Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as good ?
people keep saying "HBO don't like this HBO want that" is larry the lapley guy and whom else are talking? what 'HBO' is saying/doing something that screams HBO hate mosley? coz from watching, and reading about merchant and lampley, them seem to be to guys who really don't give to fucks for HBO and will speak thier mind, hell mayweather is a HBO fighter fight? makes HBO a shit load of money? but merchant slates him any god given chance he gets...
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by Preme
people keep saying "HBO don't like this HBO want that" is larry the lapley guy and whom else are talking? what 'HBO' is saying/doing something that screams HBO hate mosley? coz from watching, and reading about merchant and lampley, them seem to be to guys who really don't give to fucks for HBO and will speak thier mind, hell mayweather is a HBO fighter fight? makes HBO a S*** load of money? but merchant slates him any god given chance he gets...
It's a bit different though.. They rag on Mayweather because a) they've already got him under contract, and b) they need him to be entertaining for them to get their moneys worth, or at least from their standpoint. No matter how much they slate him they are always careful to make sure they include that he is the no.1 p4p, so it still generates interest either way.. People just getting in to boxing may then want to see him lose. You watch some De La Hoya fights and tell me Lampley speaks his mind. Better yet watch Jermain Taylors fights with Hopkins or Wright. Lampley rides their nutsacks so hard it's disgusting. "The best punch of the fight!", or "look at that combination", and nothing will have landed. Not a damn thing.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
CC to both of you, Bilbo and Mayorga hater. Mosley looked damn good last night. And yes, HBO is trying to sell Hatton pretty badly, they made a big investment on his a**, and he's been a bit of a disapointment so far.
Wouldn't it be an incredible irony if HBO decided to 'vacate' their contract with Hatton on the grounds that they were only interested in getting the big fights :P
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as go
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.
HBO stole the title from Bernard? I thought Taylor stole it by winning 7 rounds...
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as good ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.
;D
So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as good ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.
;D
So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?
They misewell have been, they along with former HBO boxing head honcho, Lou Dibella and his judges SCREWED Bernard over, and tried to make it seem like Taylor had actually won the fight. It was a disgrace. HBO is bias, very bias. To deny that is to be either totally ignorant or totally stupid.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as good ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.
;D
So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?
They misewell have been, they along with former HBO boxing head honcho, Lou Dibella and his judges SCREWED Bernard over, and tried to make it seem like Taylor had actually won the fight. It was a disgrace. HBO is bias, very bias. To deny that is to be either totally ignorant or totally stupid.
Well there must be a lot of really ignorant and stupid people out there, because lots of people agree that Taylor won the fight.
Re: if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as good ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.
I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.
HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.
Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.
I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?
The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.
You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?
And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.
;D
So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?
They misewell have been, they along with former HBO boxing head honcho, Lou Dibella and his judges SCREWED Bernard over, and tried to make it seem like Taylor had actually won the fight. It was a disgrace. HBO is bias, very bias. To deny that is to be either totally ignorant or totally stupid.
Well there must be a lot of really ignorant and stupid people out there, because lots of people agree that Taylor won the fight.
Yes there are. There damn sure are.
