Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
It's either my eyes or Dawson has some serious speedy combinations.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
.....i don't know but it sure as hell ain't tarver, we wore out the tape watching that shit over and over this weekend, i cried a whole lot less when the broncos lost also.....thanks chad !!!!!
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
pavlik would beat chad with easy as it stands today and for all the reasons already mentioned. pavlik will win vs b-hop, anyone trying to give the impression it will be close, is lying. if b-hop were 5 years younger it would be a close affair, but he's not and it won't.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
I like Dawson, very talented, seems to have a fighters mentality.
Still strikes me as a guy who could have a come out of nowhere type knockout happen to him though. Maybe I'll stop thinking that after a while but I still get that sense about him.
BTW this "you're the idiot, no you're the idiot" posting is just superb.
It irks me every time I see your name up in blue.
You're not a mod calibre type of poster, you're an Amat or a boozeboxer type.
I should have been the mod, I'm witty, pretty, and self important.
I think I was discriminated against on account of my paleness........
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
taeth u are stupid if u think bernard lost to taylor the first time was better than kellys victory over taylor the second time. idiot:nono:
Your the idiot, Hopkins was coutnering effectively, he hurt Taylor more near the end then Kelly ever did in their second fight. Taylor wasn't able to use the jab, Bernard put on a defensive show along with showcasing the right hand. Pavlik got hit a lot, he landed alot, but I liked what Hopkins did more. All in all they both won close fights IMO against Taylor, but
Cory Spinks and Winky Wright
beat Taylor emphatically IMO.
Yeah he really laid a smackdown on him :rolleyes:
You're postings and fight analysis are truly awful Taeth, truly truly awful :-\
My fight analysis? STFU, half of you have no fighting experience, you can't see anything worth shit, and you have no true knowledge of the sport. Of course Spinks didn't beat him silly he is a fucking featherfisted welterweight, but he did out box Taylor. He had better ring generalship, and he landed way more punches. Half the people know what they are talking about, the other half are fucking retards.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
taeth u are stupid if u think bernard lost to taylor the first time was better than kellys victory over taylor the second time. idiot:nono:
Your the idiot, Hopkins was coutnering effectively, he hurt Taylor more near the end then Kelly ever did in their second fight. Taylor wasn't able to use the jab, Bernard put on a defensive show along with showcasing the right hand. Pavlik got hit a lot, he landed alot, but I liked what Hopkins did more. All in all they both won close fights IMO against Taylor, but Cory Spinks and Winky Wright beat Taylor emphatically IMO.
your the dumbass if u think hopkins only fighting 4-5 rounds was better than kelly fighting all 12 rounds in the rematch. i think u only watch one fighter instead of both when u watch fights. :-\
Your the fucking dumbass, Hopkins had amazing defense the other round which didn't allow Taylor to get anything off. Pavlik fought all 12 rounds, but that doesn't mean he won all 12 rounds, Taylor IMO looked a lot better against Pavlik then he did against Hopkins, who made him look like an amateur, in the Pavlik-TAylor fight they looked like equals. EIther way I don't think Hopkins lookd a lot better then Pavlik, but I do think Winky did a much better job comming forwad against Taylor then Pavlik did, he nullified Taylor's jab, he blocked most of what Taylor threw his way, he landed better combinations, he landed his jab more effectively. Spinks stayed a way, landed more punches in almost every round, and made Taylor miss.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hume
pavlik would beat chad with easy as it stands today and for all the reasons already mentioned. pavlik will win vs b-hop, anyone trying to give the impression it will be close, is lying. if b-hop were 5 years younger it would be a close affair, but he's not and it won't.
When reasons were mentioned? Also how is Hopkins vs Pavlik not a close fight, Hopkins just came off an extremely close fight with Calzaghe that i felt he won, but either way was a close fight. I could see Pavlik winning, but to say Hopkins doesn't have an even or almost even chance is denying obvious facts that.
1) Hopkins makes everybody look bad
2) Hopkins has stunned Calzaghe and Tarver who both ahve better chins then Pavlik in their fights.
3) He has made a couple of the most skilled pressure boxers in boxing look bad in Winky and Calzaghe.
4) Hopkins style is a bad matchup for Pavlik
5) ITS BERNARD HOPKINS.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
I know people wont agree but pavlik hasn't fought top quality boxer with good boxing skill yet. He's a proper set boxer and he'll fight brawlers like miranda, taylor and hopkins. even though hopkins has skills he's old as hell. If he fights Dawson he'll be KO'd Dawson quicker faster and his style is made for boxing a Pavlik. Pavlik won't keep up with his foot speed and even though he's acurate he's only fight sluggers for right now Dawson counter shot would put Pavlik to bed.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
I agree with the post above regarding Dawson v. Pavlik. That is why I think Pavlik should remain at middleweight for as long as possible and establish himself as one of the better middleweights of all-time. By moving up in weight he loses his advantages his height, reach, and toughness. Other than Abraham, I don't see a middleweight out there that could hang with him.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
I agree with the post above regarding Dawson v. Pavlik. That is why I think Pavlik should remain at middleweight for as long as possible and establish himself as one of the better middleweights of all-time. By moving up in weight he loses his advantages his height, reach, and toughness. Other than Abraham, I don't see a middleweight out there that could hang with him.
i dont think kelly can establish himself as a ATG middleweight because the only 2 fights for kelly at 160 is abraham and sturm. so for kelly to be an ATG at the moment he would have to go up in weight to make a great name for himself.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
I agree with the post above regarding Dawson v. Pavlik. That is why I think Pavlik should remain at middleweight for as long as possible and establish himself as one of the better middleweights of all-time. By moving up in weight he loses his advantages his height, reach, and toughness. Other than Abraham, I don't see a middleweight out there that could hang with him.
i dont think kelly can establish himself as a ATG middleweight because the only 2 fights for kelly at 160 is abraham and sturm. so for kelly to be an ATG at the moment he would have to go up in weight to make a great name for himself.
Don't forget Paul Williams. Also, Bernard didn't fight greats in every fight as middleweight champ. Pavlik could sit on top of the thrown once he beats Abraham and Sturm.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
I like Dawson, very talented, seems to have a fighters mentality.
Still strikes me as a guy who could have a come out of nowhere type knockout happen to him though. Maybe I'll stop thinking that after a while but I still get that sense about him.
BTW this "you're the idiot, no you're the idiot" posting is just superb.
It irks me every time I see your name up in blue.
You're not a mod calibre type of poster, you're an Amat or a boozeboxer type.
I should have been the mod, I'm witty, pretty, and self important.
I think I was discriminated against on account of my paleness........, creepy fish eyes, constant whining, cartoonish self-absorption, look at me look at me look at me oh please look at me!, etc., etc.
Amat has a far greater chance of ever being a mod than you Bilbo ;D Off the charts, its hard to even quantify how much greater the chance is. Just saying.
I enjoy your whining as I've said before, but in all seriousness, if you were made a mod now you'd just spend all your time whining about how long it took you to become a mod. You wouldn't even enjoy it.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
What about Kessler?
that would require Kessler actually fighting someone whose not German and obscure.
seriously, when is that guy going to take a real fight again... i like him too; just want to see a real fight.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
I like Dawson, very talented, seems to have a fighters mentality.
Still strikes me as a guy who could have a come out of nowhere type knockout happen to him though. Maybe I'll stop thinking that after a while but I still get that sense about him.
BTW this "you're the idiot, no you're the idiot" posting is just superb.
It irks me every time I see your name up in blue.
You're not a mod calibre type of poster, you're an Amat or a boozeboxer type.
I should have been the mod, I'm witty, pretty, and self important.
I think I was discriminated against on account of my paleness........, creepy fish eyes, constant whining, cartoonish self-absorption, look at me look at me look at me oh please look at me!, etc., etc.
Amat has a far greater chance of ever being a mod than you Bilbo ;D Off the charts, its hard to even quantify how much greater the chance is. Just saying.
I enjoy your whining as I've said before, but in all seriousness, if you were made a mod now you'd just spend all your time whining about how long it took you to become a mod. You wouldn't even enjoy it.
Biblo, why would you talk shit on Amat and I? I think we are pretty good posters in all honesty. Esp. on the hidden boards. We are active and we don't get in pissing matches too often.
All you do is whine and cater to pac fans.
Bilbo what you haven't learned......is that the your best posts are often the ones you don't make.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
anyone of the klitschko bros i think ;D
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Eddie Mustafa seems to be the perfect trainer for Chad.
Combine that with the experience of fighting Glen Johnson and the confidence of dominating Tarver. And what you get is a superbly talented fighter that is actually getting better. He could reign for a long time.
I agree with the post stating that he wouldn't have as tough a time beating Glen Johnson in a rematch.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
I like Dawson, very talented, seems to have a fighters mentality.
Still strikes me as a guy who could have a come out of nowhere type knockout happen to him though. Maybe I'll stop thinking that after a while but I still get that sense about him.
BTW this "you're the idiot, no you're the idiot" posting is just superb.
It irks me every time I see your name up in blue.
You're not a mod calibre type of poster, you're an Amat or a boozeboxer type.
I should have been the mod, I'm witty, pretty, and self important.
I think I was discriminated against on account of my paleness........, creepy fish eyes, constant whining, cartoonish self-absorption, look at me look at me look at me oh please look at me!, etc., etc.
Amat has a far greater chance of ever being a mod than you Bilbo ;D Off the charts, its hard to even quantify how much greater the chance is. Just saying.
I enjoy your whining as I've said before, but in all seriousness, if you were made a mod now you'd just spend all your time whining about how long it took you to become a mod. You wouldn't even enjoy it.
haha creepy fish eyes, I think they are more bug like myself, mantisesque :cool:
Amat being a mod I can actually imagine, he's the type Saddo would go for I think. I'd hate that, I just know that for fun he would end up banning me from my own threads. Booze would be ok,but he's a melancholoy, depressive type. He'd probably quit the job in all honesty, too much of a drain on his resources.
I'd be the best mod, I'd create my own board where only I could I post.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
maybe and its a big maybe.... kelly pavlik.
We'll see how he fights somewhere near the weight tonight.
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hfahrenheit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
What about Kessler?
that would require Kessler actually fighting someone whose not German and obscure.
seriously, when is that guy going to take a real fight again... i like him too; just want to see a real fight.
He fights Haussler because Haussler was bypassed when Kessler fought Sartison for the WBA belt. Kessler was no1, Haussler no.2 and Sartison no.3. When the Sartison fight was arranged WBA dictated that a defense against Haussler was mandated within 90 days.
Kessler wanted a championship belt. Now he has to make this silly defense
But i also hope his next fight will be against a big name and by the way,i read in the Danish newspapper today,Kessler
Christmas-wish was a fight against these fighter
1. Joe Calzaghe, 36 år (45-0-0, 32 KO)
2. Kelly Pavlik, 26 år (34-0-0, 30 KO)
3. Roy Jones Jr., 39 år (52-4-0, 38 KO)
4. Bernard Hopkins, 43 år (48-5-1, 32 KO)
5. Jermain Taylor, 30 år (27-2-1, 17 KO)
Re: Who beats Chad Dawson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
maybe and its a big maybe.... kelly pavlik.
We'll see how he fights somewhere near the weight tonight.
I guess you can cross Pavlik off your list now...