Re: Amir Khan v Edwin Valero...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
How the hell have we ended up talking about bloody Margarito again??!
I'll bet Cotto doesn't talk about that goat looking fool as much as we do here :-X
Anyway, back to the topic, Valero has got a hell of a punch, but to see people comparing him to Pacquiao is mad. Oh wait I don't want to talk about him either, it will only bring SaddoBoxer & brucelee in here like vultures.
So, Khan... well... no that's only gonna end up talking about Barrera's bloody cut again :-\
I'll just say I think if Khan could stay out of Valero's way for the first 6 rounds he could take the fight well, maybe even KOing him
i agree that the whole subject of Pac is getting annoying, but it's not completely absurd to compar Valero to Pacquiao, if you look at the old Manny the one who only knew how to throw 2 punches which were the lunging jab followed by the straight left, Valero does look a lot like him, the only difference is Manny has evolved and added no aspects to his style, only time will tell if Valero is for real and will be able to do that as well
Re: Amir Khan v Edwin Valero...
Valero mite miss Khan's chin but the force he misses with still mite hurt khan:D.
Re: Amir Khan v Edwin Valero...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mark TKO
..lasts how long ??
hahaha
Okay... hmmm ... let me think. We are only able to predict in seconds right?
Re: Amir Khan v Edwin Valero...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
i'm no Cotto nuthugger, but he beat Malignaggi plenty convincingly and i'd dare say he beat him up a hell of a lot worse than Hatton did, i mean look at his face after both fights and it speaks for itself, second of all Malignaggi is a good decent fighter and should be counted as a good win on both fighter's records, but Hatton did NOT knock him out, the fight was stopped, but Hatton did NOT knock him out, corner stoppage doesn't equal KO, and on that note, look at both fighters records, who has the bigger names?
Woah woah woah woah woah!!! there's no need for you to suddenly run to Cotto's defence, I didn't in no way insinuate Cotto is a bad fighter or that Hatton is better than him. I infact agree with you in saying Paulie is a very good fighter and therefore Hatton should be given credit for his win over him, as should Cotto. Unfortunately Danny doesn't agree, hence why I said what I said.
Re: Amir Khan v Edwin Valero...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
Kahn could actually beat Valero even stop him imo. Valero hasnt fought anyone that big with that kind of speed. Of course Valero cuold KO him if he lands a big punch, but I do think Kahn is smarter and aware that he needs to keep a tight D. If it went past 3, id favor Kahn.
I'm with you on that. I also wanna add that Valero never fought an A level elite fighter (Mosquera was only B+, so as Khan).
I'd say imo, Valero-Khan is 50/50.
How the fukk is Con B+ when he's not even C+? He's C- at best. All this overrating of crap fighters is ridiculous. Valero destroys Con. Vincente Mosquera was a fine fighter. And I did consider him to be elite.
Re: Amir Khan v Edwin Valero...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JoeyUK
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
i'm no Cotto nuthugger, but he beat Malignaggi plenty convincingly and i'd dare say he beat him up a hell of a lot worse than Hatton did, i mean look at his face after both fights and it speaks for itself, second of all Malignaggi is a good decent fighter and should be counted as a good win on both fighter's records, but Hatton did NOT knock him out, the fight was stopped, but Hatton did NOT knock him out, corner stoppage doesn't equal KO, and on that note, look at both fighters records, who has the bigger names?
Woah woah woah woah woah!!! there's no need for you to suddenly run to Cotto's defence, I didn't in no way insinuate Cotto is a bad fighter or that Hatton is better than him. I infact agree with you in saying Paulie is a very good fighter and therefore Hatton should be given credit for his win over him, as should Cotto. Unfortunately Danny doesn't agree, hence why I said what I said.
ok no problem, and agree both should be given full credit of their wins, Malignaggi is a lot better than most think, only thing is he's already in a division that from there on up you have to at least have a decent amount of power, and well even if he's got speed and good boxing ability he doesn't have enough pop in his punches to hurt anyone