Re: Calzaghe says he can beat Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mattboxingfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PRIDE OF BOSTON
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mattboxingfan
In 46 fights he only got knocked down 3 times so i would say his chin is pritty solid i dont think wlad could KO him.
Are you high? Wlad would have Calzaghe on queer street inside of 2 minutes. We're talking about a guy who is naturally almost 70lbs heavier that has been KOing the best HWs the world has to offer for years. I'm not a big Kitschko fan but the fact that you even entertain the idea of Joe's chin even holding up to the battering ram jab that Wlad packs for a round is idiocy...
Obviously you dont know what a joke is :p, and lets be fair the 'best' heavyweights at the mo arent so great!
Yeah, whatever, guy.:rolleyes:
Re: Calzaghe says he can beat Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mar
funny thing is, he probably could if he waited as long to fight them as he did the current old guys he's taking so much credit for beating.
He deserves credit for beating B-Hop. B-Hop's performance against Pavlik, was the best performance I have seen from Hopkins. Infact his best performances both came in his forties imo (Tarver & Pavlik) Jones was shot to pieces agreed on that!
P.S Not to go over old ground, but Joe Calzaghe's SMW resume is better than B-Hops MW resume and equal to RJJ's LHW resume imo
His performances against Felix Trinidad, Glen Johnson, Sergundo Mercado 2, were better performances IMO. The problem is even though Bernard Hopkins looked impressive in those fights with Antonio Tarver, Kelly Pavlik. He still lacked workrate in those fights. Which is why he lost to Joe Calzaghe and Jermain Taylor.
As for comparing Bernard Hopkins resume to Joe Calzaghe's, well some of Joe Calzaghe's best wins over Charles Brewer, Richie Woodhall, ETC. lost to fighters Bernard Hopkins beat. Which may not be much of an argument, but it is still an interesting point to bring up IMO. I really don't think there resume's are much different.
Most of Joe Calzaghe's best wins were against fighters, who were on the downslide. And most of Bernard Hopkins wins were against undersized opponents. So it really comes down to what you think is more relevant, but even though both mens resume's at the one weightclass they dominated at are nothing special.
They still never ducked anyone in there weightclass, which is a good point to bring up. And really and truthfully which fighters, who have dominated one weightclass, really has alot of special names anyway ? because i don't think theres many.
Re: Calzaghe says he can beat Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Anyone who is taking this seriously is an idiot.
There seems to be a lot about on this thread ;D
Re: Calzaghe says he can beat Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Saddo
Hahahaha that song is utter shite !! Funny though.
