Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
deadlypete
Nope Joe Calzaghe Is A Class On His Own And He Well And Truly Defeated Kessler In A Beautiul Fight....which He Won Easily... Joes Undeafted Status Will Go Down In History And That Is Wat Makes Him Greater Then Any Of These Wannabe Greats.....joe Was A Absolutely Brilliant Fighter And His Resume Will Remain Unmatched 50 Years From Now
Well, Marciano already has a better resume than Joe... so you should say that Marciano will remain with an unmatched resume for 50 years;)
Also, if we talk in matter of quality of opponent, Jermaine has the edge over Joe big time. Not saying he's better, but just like the violent one stated, quality of opponent for quality of opponent, Jermaine has a better one to this day and it is quite likely to think that he'll continue to face dangerous guys, no matter win or lose.
No he doesn't. If it's just about names faced then Calzaghe faced Roy Jones. Roy pisses over every name on Taylors record barring Hopkins. Calzaghe faced Hopkins too.
So Calzaghe wins this easy. ;D
I would agree with you if he would have beaten a.. let's say, 33-34-35 years old Roy Jones and not a way pass its prime and fading 40 years old Jones. ;)
Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Well, Marciano already has a better resume than Joe... so you should say that Marciano will remain with an unmatched resume for 50 years;) Also, if we talk in matter of quality of opponent, Jermaine has the edge over Joe big time. Not saying he's better, but just like the violent one stated, quality of opponent for quality of opponent, Jermaine has a better one to this day and it is quite likely to think that he'll continue to face dangerous guys, no matter win or lose.
No he doesn't. If it's just about names faced then Calzaghe faced Roy Jones. Roy pisses over every name on Taylors record barring Hopkins. Calzaghe faced Hopkins too.
So Calzaghe wins this easy. ;D
I would agree with you if he would have beaten a.. let's say, 33-34-35 years old Roy Jones and not a way pass its prime and fading 40 years old Jones. ;)
So you think it's better to lose than to win?
Taylor getting knocked out by Carl Froch is better for his resume than Calzaghe beating Roy Jones?
Fucks sake ;D
Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
Only Kessler and Jermain have resumes worth comparing even with winning the whole tournament.
I'll say this if Jermain wins this whole tournament with wins over Kessler, Abraham, and Froch in a rematch, it's worth discussing. Right now Calzaghe has a better resume hands down if simply because he has never lost and faced better opposition at his natural weight. Yes, an undefeated Jeff Lacy, Eubanks, Reid, Bika, Kessler, Bhop (step up in weight to 175), Jones (step up in weight to 175) are better wins than Taylor most significant wins. Taylor FACED good opposition, but other than his Hopkins wins (which for comparison's sake were only three years before Calzaghe beat Hopkins and Hopkins only fought twice in that time), he never won the big fights. He lost to Kelly Pavlik (and in my opinion the jury is still out on how good legacy-wise Kelly Pavlik is), drew with Winky Wright, and lost to Carl Froch. Jermain wins the whole thing and beats Bute and his resume compares favorably to Calzaghe's.
Abraham's biggest wins are over Miranda at 160.
Froch's biggest wins are over Jermain and Pascal at 168 - better than Abraham's resume.
Ward and Dirrell don't have any significant wins yet.
Kessler has wins over Andrade, Beyer, and Mundine, but he lost to Calzaghe. Kesslers wins the whole thing and beats Bute and his resume can compare favorably with Calzaghe's.
Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Well, Marciano already has a better resume than Joe... so you should say that Marciano will remain with an unmatched resume for 50 years;) Also, if we talk in matter of quality of opponent, Jermaine has the edge over Joe big time. Not saying he's better, but just like the violent one stated, quality of opponent for quality of opponent, Jermaine has a better one to this day and it is quite likely to think that he'll continue to face dangerous guys, no matter win or lose.
No he doesn't. If it's just about names faced then Calzaghe faced Roy Jones. Roy pisses over every name on Taylors record barring Hopkins. Calzaghe faced Hopkins too.
So Calzaghe wins this easy. ;D
I would agree with you if he would have beaten a.. let's say, 33-34-35 years old Roy Jones and not a way pass its prime and fading 40 years old Jones. ;)
Right, but Calzaghe was 37 at the time of the fight. It goes both ways.
Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
lmao at woodhall schooling froch.
the funniest shit i've ever heard.
Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
RJJ has actually looked prity good lately.. and yeh JC was no spring chicken when he fought B-Hop and RJJ
Re: does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??
[quote=Darth_Simasu;795969]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Jermain Taylor already has a better resume than Calzaghe
NONSENSE - you're speaking out of your rear end there pal.[/q
Id love to hear you explain how Taylor hasnt. And please dont go by JC wins over an over-the-hill Jones and a 86yr old B-hop.
