-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
I shouldn't have said all Brits, because there are great posters here such as Skel and even Hattonthehomo along with a few others, but the excuse used by many of Hatton's countrymen are that Joe Cortez was the reason why Hatton lost and Mayweather "cheated" along with using elbows or something like that. Then the Hatton/Pacquiao fight was that Pacquiao "cheated" by weight draining Hatton, although the fight wasn't a catchweight but at the 140 pound limit where Hatton was king, then the excuse it was Pacquiao was on drugs.
Excuses, excuses, and excuses.
Well to be honest the fans of the WBA title holder already have a list of excuses when it comes to Wladimir and oddly enough if they are really that bothered by Wlad holding (which he really hasn't done all that much of since the first Sam Peter fight) then Joe Cortez would be the referee they would want in the ring as the main argument with him in the Hatton-Mayweather fight wasn't that he allowed Floyd to use his elbows (that's revisionist history from ono and furthermore it should be expected from the style Floyd uses, meaning Hatton should have trained for it) it was that Cortez broke up the clinches too quickly and Hatton never got to maul Floyd like he mauled Kostya Tszyu.
That being said who would you guys be satisfied with as ref of this fight (should it actually happen this time)?
Regardless of who the ref is I can't see it changing the outcome of a Wlad KO. I can't see there being a great deal of holding either, but if there was and Cortez were in charge than that would only be beneficial to Haye. I don't care either way, IMO Haye is still going to take a beating and get stopped, and any excuses aren't going to wash when the end result is Haye out cold on the canvas.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Well to be honest the fans of the WBA title holder already have a list of excuses when it comes to Wladimir and oddly enough if they are really that bothered by Wlad holding (which he really hasn't done all that much of since the first Sam Peter fight) then Joe Cortez would be the referee they would want in the ring as the main argument with him in the Hatton-Mayweather fight wasn't that he allowed Floyd to use his elbows (that's revisionist history from ono and furthermore it should be expected from the style Floyd uses, meaning Hatton should have trained for it) it was that Cortez broke up the clinches too quickly and Hatton never got to maul Floyd like he mauled Kostya Tszyu.
That being said who would you guys be satisfied with as ref of this fight (should it actually happen this time)?
In fairness, Wlad hasn't really been in a serious fight where he hasn't been on a different level to his opponent since he got rattled in the first Peter fight, which really shows the dominance of the Klitschko's over recent years.
The hope is that Haye can get past the ramrod jab and start to rattle Wlad a bit and make it competitive, but I don't see the fight being close enough to need excuses, it's either a Wlad points win or Haye KO.
I just hope that the penpushers on both sides get the details out of the way and get them in the ring together.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
superheavyrhun
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Well to be honest the fans of the WBA title holder already have a list of excuses when it comes to Wladimir and oddly enough if they are really that bothered by Wlad holding (which he really hasn't done all that much of since the first Sam Peter fight) then Joe Cortez would be the referee they would want in the ring as the main argument with him in the Hatton-Mayweather fight wasn't that he allowed Floyd to use his elbows (that's revisionist history from ono and furthermore it should be expected from the style Floyd uses, meaning Hatton should have trained for it) it was that Cortez broke up the clinches too quickly and Hatton never got to maul Floyd like he mauled Kostya Tszyu.
That being said who would you guys be satisfied with as ref of this fight (should it actually happen this time)?
In fairness, Wlad hasn't really been in a serious fight where he hasn't been on a different level to his opponent since he got rattled in the first Peter fight, which really shows the dominance of the Klitschko's over recent years.
The hope is that Haye can get past the ramrod jab and start to rattle Wlad a bit and make it competitive, but I don't see the fight being close enough to need excuses, it's either a Wlad points win or Haye KO.
I just hope that the penpushers on both sides get the details out of the way and get them in the ring together.
That is a bit unfair to be honest mate Haye is probably the best opponent he has faced in some time but Wlad has fought some decent fighters such as Chambers who he knocked clean out, Chambers for me would beatthe majority of the top ten.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Superheavystud
In fairness, Wlad hasn't really been in a serious fight where he hasn't been on a different level to his opponent since he got rattled in the first Peter fight, which really shows the dominance of the Klitschko's over recent years.
The hope is that Haye can get past the ramrod jab and start to rattle Wlad a bit and make it competitive, but I don't see the fight being close enough to need excuses, it's either a Wlad points win or Haye KO.
I just hope that the penpushers on both sides get the details out of the way and get them in the ring together.
That is a bit unfair to be honest mate Haye is probably the best opponent he has faced in some time but Wlad has fought some decent fighters such as Chambers who he knocked clean out, Chambers for me would beatthe majority of the top ten.
Well he's not faced Haye yet, and what I was getting at was that Wlad has pretty much dominated everyone in front of him since Peter #1. Chambers may beat the majority of the top ten, but he didn't come close to Wlad.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
superheavyrhun
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Superheavystud
In fairness, Wlad hasn't really been in a serious fight where he hasn't been on a different level to his opponent since he got rattled in the first Peter fight, which really shows the dominance of the Klitschko's over recent years.
The hope is that Haye can get past the ramrod jab and start to rattle Wlad a bit and make it competitive, but I don't see the fight being close enough to need excuses, it's either a Wlad points win or Haye KO.
I just hope that the penpushers on both sides get the details out of the way and get them in the ring together.
That is a bit unfair to be honest mate Haye is probably the best opponent he has faced in some time but Wlad has fought some decent fighters such as Chambers who he knocked clean out, Chambers for me would beatthe majority of the top ten.
Well he's not faced Haye yet, and what I was getting at was that Wlad has pretty much dominated everyone in front of him since Peter #1. Chambers may beat the majority of the top ten, but he didn't come close to Wlad.
For me that shows ho much he has improved with Steward, I don't think Haye has a chance to be honest and I see ths fight as one sided as the hambers fight.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
superbevvyrhun
Well he's not faced Haye yet, and what I was getting at was that Wlad has pretty much dominated everyone in front of him since Peter #1. Chambers may beat the majority of the top ten, but he didn't come close to Wlad.
For me that shows ho much he has improved with Steward, I don't think Haye has a chance to be honest and I see ths fight as one sided as the hambers fight.
So, if we disregard Haye as a Klitschko-beater, surely the heavyweights are just waiting for Wlad and Vitali to retire so it gets competitive again?
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mattyhitman
Have you ever seen the K taking excuses not to fight Haye? I'Ve seen this the opposite direction 2 times back to back.
it was never clear who was making the excuses, haye made himself look a dick by the way he kept going on about it and everyone seemed to blame him
adam booths offer to negotiate everything on the TV kind of makes me think haye may not have been blowing all the hot air
the klits get everything their own way in all other fight negotiations, why is it hard to believe that they wanted it all their own way when talking to hayemaker?
THe K offered him 2 times, he signed 2 times and backed off under shady excuses, he even refused a 50-50 offer for a long time stating he was the one bringing the dough on the table and now he comes im trumpeting that the K have no excuses to refuse the 50-50 when HE was the one refusing it the first time? A bit hard to believe the guy one second, really.
Haye never signed to fight 2 times thats incorrect. Only once has a fight been signed by port parties and that was the original Wlad vs Haye fight.
Haye walked away from negotiations with Vitali after getting a much fairer deal from Valuev and Don King.
I agree with you on the 50/50 stuff. At the moment it looks like we just need Wlad to say Yes and I hope he does.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
I think the hang up that people are getting confused by is that Vitali offered the exact same contract Wlad offered that the WBA title holder signed and then backed out of and instead of signing to fight Vitali he signed to fight Valuev.
But I must say I do love this whole "I'm taking a £2 million pay cut to make this fight happen" line....it's like he's been listening to the President of the United States. He's not taking any pay cut he's hashing up hypothetical numbers...total bullshit
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Balboa
A valid and as yet unthought of question was posted on page 1.
Why ARENT Wlad and Vitali each other's mandatories? I've never even thought of that.
Because the alphabet gangs don't rank other alphabet champions. Both Wlad and Vitali are alphabet champions, so they can never be ranked by their brother's alphabet gang, unless one of them give up their alphabet titles.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Balboa
A valid and as yet unthought of question was posted on page 1.
Why ARENT Wlad and Vitali each other's mandatories? I've never even thought of that.
Because (all due respect) its a dumb fucking idea. They won't fight each other and everyone that wants that fight is a complete fucking moron. Never has this been asked of ANY other boxing family....its fucking stupid, stop bringing it up.
"With all due respect" my ass. I find your response wholly unnecessary in both it's hostility and presumptuousness. If that's even a word.
I had never considered it.
I had never heard it talked about.
I do not believe people imagining a fight between the two brothers to be "fucking morons."
I did not realize, at the request of the athlete's involved, that the laws of the sanctioning bodies as it pertains to mandatory fights could be completely discarded based on relationships between fighters.
Yknow Lyle, lots of folks give you a mountain of shit for your unwavering support of the Klitschkos. Sometimes rightfully so. Im a pretty big fan myself, so Ive always tended to quietly support at least the spirit of your arguments.
But now you pissed me off.
-
Did people want the Baer's to fight each other? The Mayweather's? The Gatti's? The Judah's? The Marquez's? Etc.
I didn't mean for you personally to be offended, and I apologize but seriously I'm tired of people even suggesting that Wlad and Vitali fight because its never been asked of any other boxing family. And yes it is for that reason I believe the people suggesting they fight are "fucking morons".
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mattyhitman
Have you ever seen the K taking excuses not to fight Haye? I'Ve seen this the opposite direction 2 times back to back.
it was never clear who was making the excuses, haye made himself look a dick by the way he kept going on about it and everyone seemed to blame him
adam booths offer to negotiate everything on the TV kind of makes me think haye may not have been blowing all the hot air
the klits get everything their own way in all other fight negotiations, why is it hard to believe that they wanted it all their own way when talking to hayemaker?
THe K offered him 2 times, he signed 2 times and backed off under shady excuses, he even refused a 50-50 offer for a long time stating he was the one bringing the dough on the table and now he comes im trumpeting that the K have no excuses to refuse the 50-50 when HE was the one refusing it the first time? A bit hard to believe the guy one second, really.
thats what you think happened, im not sure it did
and it doesnt sound like many people actually know what has happened
it sounds like you dislike haye and that is clouding your judgement
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Balboa
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Balboa
A valid and as yet unthought of question was posted on page 1.
Why ARENT Wlad and Vitali each other's mandatories? I've never even thought of that.
Because (all due respect) its a dumb fucking idea. They won't fight each other and everyone that wants that fight is a complete fucking moron. Never has this been asked of ANY other boxing family....its fucking stupid, stop bringing it up.
"With all due respect" my ass. I find your response wholly unnecessary in both it's hostility and presumptuousness. If that's even a word.
I had never considered it.
I had never heard it talked about.
I do not believe people imagining a fight between the two brothers to be "fucking morons."
I did not realize, at the request of the athlete's involved, that the laws of the sanctioning bodies as it pertains to mandatory fights could be completely discarded based on relationships between fighters.
Yknow Lyle, lots of folks give you a mountain of shit for your unwavering support of the Klitschkos. Sometimes rightfully so. Im a pretty big fan myself, so Ive always tended to quietly support at least the spirit of your arguments.
But now you pissed me off.
To answer your first question mate, they have never been made each others mandatories because none of the major 4 governing bodies rank any of the other champions. So they cannot become each others mandatory defence, if that makes sense.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
plus they will not fight each other, there mother said.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
the idea of having two brothers fight each other is ridiculous, the point of boxing is to inflict physical damage on your opponent, sometimes have fatal consequences
and you're telling me you'd wanna see two brothers kill each other?
it's ridiculous, you actually think if they did end up fighting each other it would be entertaining?!? hell no, you know they're not going to go at it, especially as close as they are, they're gonna have it in the back of their head that that's their blood across the ring and all they'd do is look at each other and maybe paw away
Haye needs to stop talking so much and just fucking fight
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
I know the Klits would never fight and don't expect it or want to see it, but does anyone know if there's any footage of them sparring anywhere? It'd be interesting to see, that's assuming they do spar together.
Not getting my hopes up too much on the Haye fight, but I think the most solid sign that it'll happen is here
"We are now perfectly positioned to get together and make this fight with Wladimir Klitschko. "Despite the fact we know we bring more UK television money to the table, David and I are happy to split the entire pot 50-50 and grant Wladimir the deal he has wanted since day one.
"We have offered them 50-50 on everything - just as they requested - and now see no reason why this tremendous fight can't happen. The path is clear." from Adam Booth.
In that quote too it clearly says it's been the Haye camp holding up over the TV money, as we suspected.
Seems promising, as long as the extra money that's been mentioned doesn't become a factor. This clearly should be complete 50/50, and Booth and Haye should know it.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Let's pretend that the Klits were not brothers. I reckon Vitali starches Wlad personally. As I've said many times (in my opinion) Haye has a punchers chance against Wlad. If Sanders and Brewster can KO him it's stupid to suggest that Haye cannot. However I still think Wlad KOs Haye within 9 minutes and possibly within 3. As far as Vitali goes (again in my opinion) Haye's only chnace is if Vitali has a heart attack and dies in the ring. Haye cannot KO Vitali and that is his only chance of winning. Again I don't see it going past 3 rounds
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
koppas
Love how people are now believing everything David Haye and Adam Booth say...
well said mate, isnt that the same haye who's signed then pulled out of fights with the klit bro's in the pasted
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
He signed for one fight, not two and he didn't pull out, he was not allowed to postpone until another date.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
He signed for one fight, not two and he didn't pull out, he was not allowed to postpone until another date.
Whether or not he was "allowed to postpone until another date" is erroneous because he wasn't hurt he had financial troubles with the contract due to the collapse of Setanta.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
The fact remains that he didn't withdraw entirely from the bout.
If people want to talk about the facts then they can talk about the facts... If you want to speculate then speculate.
I also lean toward the opinion that he wasn't going to get paid because Setanta when bust but I'll never say that as if it's more than speculation.
Unless you heard it from the horses mouth it's speculation, it might be pretty good speculation but it is still just speculation.
Also I think that irrelevant' or 'a moot point' would have been better words to use?
-
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
If Wlad can catch a prime Chris Byrd he won't have trouble finding the WBA title holder.
But act surprised when it happens ;D
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
If Wlad can catch a prime Chris Byrd he won't have trouble finding the WBA title holder.
But act surprised when it happens ;D
Byrd was also a southpaw counterpuncher with no power that waited on the shots coming and rarely lead.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
If Wlad can catch a prime Chris Byrd he won't have trouble finding the WBA title holder.
But act surprised when it happens ;D
Byrd was also a southpaw counterpuncher with no power that waited on the shots coming and rarely lead.
Point noted but Byrd was one of the slickest heavyweights of recent memory ergo if you can catch him you shouldn't have an issue catching someone with little to no defensive prowess.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
If Wlad can catch a prime Chris Byrd he won't have trouble finding the WBA title holder.
But act surprised when it happens ;D
Lyle you will have to help get me back on the straight path mate. God knows I want to hate the Hayemaker but watching him sitting ringside for the Khan fight in his cowboy hat and then getting to his feet and cheering, I couldn't help but find him a tiny bit cool and almost liked him.
I beat those thoughts down but part of me is starting to become a fan in spite of myself :(
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
If Wlad can catch a prime Chris Byrd he won't have trouble finding the WBA title holder.
But act surprised when it happens ;D
Lyle you will have to help get me back on the straight path mate. God knows I want to hate the Hayemaker but watching him sitting ringside for the Khan fight in his cowboy hat and then getting to his feet and cheering, I couldn't help but find him a tiny bit cool and almost liked him.
I beat those thoughts down but part of me is starting to become a fan in spite of myself :(
I saw that...that fucking cowboy hat :vd: ....you Brits when its not food you're ruining its clothes.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Do you guys bother to use reading comprehension? Yes Manny said the fight needs to get signed but he also said "50-50 all the way around"....and what is being offered is a different deal dressed up like its 50-50...its Sauerland wanting the fight to be shown on their network ARD and not RTL whether or not its of any benefit to Wlad or his opponent. And the opposition says ARD will offer ___ and RTL will offer less and if you take RTL's deal you have to pay the difference out of pocket when ARD can make up some imaginary figure that they "offer" but not in hopes of actually getting the fight. Its a bad deal and I think if Sauerland (who has made more fights fall apart than any other promoter I can think of) wasn't involved I think this fight would have been signed long ago.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Do you guys bother to use reading comprehension? Yes Manny said the fight needs to get signed but he also said "50-50 all the way around"....and what is being offered is a different deal dressed up like its 50-50...its Sauerland wanting the fight to be shown on their network ARD and not RTL whether or not its of any benefit to Wlad or his opponent. And the opposition says ARD will offer ___ and RTL will offer less and if you take RTL's deal you have to pay the difference out of pocket when ARD can make up some imaginary figure that they "offer" but not in hopes of actually getting the fight. Its a bad deal and I think if Sauerland (who has made more fights fall apart than any other promoter I can think of) wasn't involved I think this fight would have been signed long ago.
No Lyle Haye has said it can be shown on whichever German station they want. That is a FACT.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
At least they got his nationality right this time, last time the Klits were Russian :D
It looks like a lot of the obstacles that were stopping this fight being made before have been removed, so hopefully they'll get it signed soon. I'll still remain skeptical until its a done deal and they're in the ring, but its looking promising at least.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Do you guys bother to use reading comprehension? Yes Manny said the fight needs to get signed but he also said "50-50 all the way around"....and what is being offered is a different deal dressed up like its 50-50...its Sauerland wanting the fight to be shown on their network ARD and not RTL whether or not its of any benefit to Wlad or his opponent. And the opposition says ARD will offer ___ and RTL will offer less and if you take RTL's deal you have to pay the difference out of pocket when ARD can make up some imaginary figure that they "offer" but not in hopes of actually getting the fight. Its a bad deal and I think if Sauerland (who has made more fights fall apart than any other promoter I can think of) wasn't involved I think this fight would have been signed long ago.
No Lyle Haye has said it can be shown on whichever German station they want. That is a FACT.
That's another half truth rjjtszyu because you left out the stipulation where they tell Wlad to pay the difference of any other offers out of his portion of the purse......that's a FACT
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Do you guys bother to use reading comprehension? Yes Manny said the fight needs to get signed but he also said "50-50 all the way around"....and what is being offered is a different deal dressed up like its 50-50...its Sauerland wanting the fight to be shown on their network ARD and not RTL whether or not its of any benefit to Wlad or his opponent. And the opposition says ARD will offer ___ and RTL will offer less and if you take RTL's deal you have to pay the difference out of pocket when ARD can make up some imaginary figure that they "offer" but not in hopes of actually getting the fight. Its a bad deal and I think if Sauerland (who has made more fights fall apart than any other promoter I can think of) wasn't involved I think this fight would have been signed long ago.
No Lyle Haye has said it can be shown on whichever German station they want. That is a FACT.
That's another half truth rjjtszyu because you left out the stipulation where they tell Wlad to pay the difference of any other offers out of his portion of the purse......that's a FACT
Where?? I've never seen anything of the sorts in these NEW negotiations. That was an old stipulation but nothing has been mentioned that I have seen since.
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Spin it however you like, the guy didn't want to fight Wlad then. And he might not want to fight him now.
He never had the style to trouble Wlad.
Well he is slim enough to move around the ring, so straight away it poses more problems that 90% of the rest of the competition.
If Wlad can catch a prime Chris Byrd he won't have trouble finding the WBA title holder.
But act surprised when it happens ;D
Lyle you will have to help get me back on the straight path mate. God knows I want to hate the Hayemaker but watching him sitting ringside for the Khan fight in his cowboy hat and then getting to his feet and cheering, I couldn't help but find him a tiny bit cool and almost liked him.
I beat those thoughts down but part of me is starting to become a fan in spite of myself :(
I saw that...that fucking cowboy hat :vd: ....you Brits when its not food you're ruining its clothes.
anyone told lyle yet that wlad & vitali are not american;D
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Haha, what a thread! ;D
I loved reading through that, thanks chaps!
Sign the fight you fuckers it's 2011 out here.
where is that mate?
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Haha, what a thread! ;D
I loved reading through that, thanks chaps!
Sign the fight you fuckers it's 2011 out here.
where is that mate?
He is in Soth Korea
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
This thread really has derailed and became pretty stupid. Every nation has people that you could pin down to what's been mentioned above, it's ridiculous to stereotype so much.
Guess after years of talks between the two camps people have ran out of things to talk about. :rolleyes:
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ukboxingwatcher
This thread really has derailed and became pretty stupid. Every nation has people that you could pin down to what's been mentioned above, it's ridiculous to stereotype so much.
Guess after years of talks between the two camps people have ran out of things to talk about. :rolleyes:
Amen brother! Next person who mentions dodgy British teeth or American lardasses....or Brits with dodgy teeth and lardasses (me) will get a slap.
Looks like both sets of negotiators have been off for Christmas, as no new leaks, people moaning about unreasonable demands or one fighter dissing the other has appeared in a few days. Hopefully 2011 proves more succesful!
-
Re: Adam Booth Says Wlad is refusing to sign a 50/50 split fight with Haye.
I think 2011 will be a tremendous year for boxing. I just have a gut feeling this fight and the Pac-Mayweather fight will happen and quite possibly Khan/winner of bradley-Alexander also.
