-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
I think Fury has enough savy to make it into the last 3rd of the fight.
What Price can or can't do from there, at this point is anyone's guess.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
I thought fury looked pretty impressive at the start of the fight, he has improved since I watched him get knocked down by nevan whatever it was, I dont watch fury that much but he didn't look bad at all, best thing he managed to do v johnson was pace himself and not punch himself so out... so there are some positives for him even though it is hard to judge because johnson can be so bad sometimes..
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Fury vacated rather than face Price because of what Price did to John McDermott. Price demolished him in 1 when Fury struggled twice. Tyson is probably the more skilled of the 2 but if Price landed he'd be counting stars.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Just fight. Fuck the lollygagging.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Fury vacated rather than face Price because of what Price did to John McDermott. Price demolished him in 1 when Fury struggled twice. Tyson is probably the more skilled of the 2 but if Price landed he'd be counting stars.
Fury's Trainer Rips Maloney Over Past David Price Talks - Boxing News
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I thought fury looked pretty impressive at the start of the fight, he has improved since I watched him get knocked down by nevan whatever it was, I dont watch fury that much but he didn't look bad at all, best thing he managed to do v johnson was pace himself and not punch himself so out... so there are some positives for him even though it is hard to judge because johnson can be so bad sometimes..
Johnson was beyond bad, he never came to fight, it was one of the worst displays from a HW I've seen in a few years....shameful!
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
I dont know.... Hayes against Wladamir was pretty dire;)
Maybe hes a big Bruce Lee fan "fighting without fighting"
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I thought fury looked pretty impressive at the start of the fight, he has improved since I watched him get knocked down by nevan whatever it was, I dont watch fury that much but he didn't look bad at all, best thing he managed to do v johnson was pace himself and not punch himself so out... so there are some positives for him even though it is hard to judge because johnson can be so bad sometimes..
Johnson was beyond bad, he never came to fight, it was one of the worst displays from a HW I've seen in a few years....shameful!
Briggs vs the White poddle set the bar and then Briggs/Ibragimov but that was right up in the mix. Would like to see the punch stats from Johnsons end even though they are usually exaggerated by a factor of 10. I bet he threw about 6 right hands the entire contest.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dave1066
This would make for an interesting fight. Fury can take a punch and go 12. Price is a hard hitter but not sure he can go the distance. I'd like Price to go the distance aganst a solid hard puncher the full distance. To see how well he takes a hard punch to the chin and if he can last 12 rounds.
Until then i'm reserving judgement.
The reason Price hasn't gone the distance has a lot to do with the fact that he has great stopping power. He stopped Audley in less time than it took Haye, McDermott with none of the trouble that Fury took, those are hardly negatives. There is nothing to suggest his fitness would prevent him going 12 rounds and people going on about his chin because of one amateur fight years ago is getting a bit desperate now.
That maybe true but until he goes the distance i ain't changing my mind. There is nothing to suggest that he will go the distance aswell. It can go either way! Unless you know something we don't all know? Like your his coach?
Like Inuit said. If you ain't got the gass you ain't punching hard!
Don't get me wrong these are only criticisms. I'm not being negative. Price comes across well in interviews. I don't dislike the fighter. He does have good stopping power. I do like the guy. But i ain't no fan boy. I keep a level head when watching a fight. But Audley. That was just a pay cheque. How did that test him atall. He needs an opponent that tests him. An ideal fight prime Vs prime Mike Tyson Vs David Price. Or an Even prime Foreman. See who has the greatest power.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
David Price. I just can't get over Fury's knockdown against the limited Canadian, and I haven't seen Price hurt like that against comparable opposition.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
Fury is simply following the David Haye gameplan: only fight risky fights if he is facing a Klitschko. He won't face Price, unless he's cashing out, or the fight makes s$nse.
From what I understand, if Vitali retires, which at 41, which there is a good chance of, the title will become vacant, and Fury will go against the winner of Bermaine Stiverne and Cris Arreola. That's a fight I'm more interested in seeing.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
When fury offered price the fight, Maloney said they couldnt because he was contracted to sky then that turned out to be bullshit. Go back a page and read the link I put up.
Prices last 3 fights have hot progressively worse whereas Tyson Fury is winning new fans each time he fights because everyone can see the improvements he ks making with each fight nd is now a genuine contender whereas Price is knocking about with British level journeymen in their 40's.
David Haye didnt want to fight Johnson a few years ago when he moved to heavy. Beating Johnson convincingly over 12 is far more impressive than stopping Skelton in 2. Price had some jittery moments when Skelton came forward. There is a reason Maloney wont move him up in class, hes shit scared of that jaw. Its like having a Ferrari with glass tyres.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
Fury is simply following the David Haye gameplan: only fight risky fights if he is facing a Klitschko. He won't face Price, unless he's cashing out, or the fight makes s$nse.
From what I understand, if Vitali retires, which at 41, which there is a good chance of, the title will become vacant, and Fury will go against the winner of Bermaine Stiverne and Cris Arreola. That's a fight I'm more interested in seeing.
A little harsh there on Haye. Who else should he have fought? He took on Ruiz and Valuev and won a strap. Both are a cut above the usual dross and have been world champions.
I hope Vitali does retire, and I think Arreola against Fury is a cracking matchup.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Price has done well for himself and I am impressed with his power. Price also comes across well I interviews whereas Fury does not at times. I still prefer Fury but think Price should take on the Klit brothers first in 2013. Fury has got time on his side and needs to get more confidence. Fury was in shape but he fought within himself and needs to be tested against someone who is trying to win against him.
Fury or Price would beat Adamek.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
I dont know.... Hayes against Wladamir was pretty dire;)
Maybe hes a big Bruce Lee fan "fighting without fighting"
I dunno, Haye came to fight against Wlad, he just quickly found that he couldnt get past the jab and he had no Plan B...Johnson on the other hand did nothing even when it was clear he was a number of rounds down, so I suppose you could be right, he could quite possibly be a student of Master Lee :cool:
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I thought fury looked pretty impressive at the start of the fight, he has improved since I watched him get knocked down by nevan whatever it was, I dont watch fury that much but he didn't look bad at all, best thing he managed to do v johnson was pace himself and not punch himself so out... so there are some positives for him even though it is hard to judge because johnson can be so bad sometimes..
Johnson was beyond bad, he never came to fight, it was one of the worst displays from a HW I've seen in a few years....shameful!
Briggs vs the White poddle set the bar and then Briggs/Ibragimov but that was right up in the mix. Would like to see the punch stats from Johnsons end even though they are usually exaggerated by a factor of 10. I bet he threw about 6 right hands the entire contest.
6 half hearted right hands ;D why bother turning up if that's all you are going to offer, I wonder wether he could be sparring with Fraudley Harrison and has picked up some bad habits :cool:
-
Fury does not need the price fight right now.
He is on the verge of fighting for a world title, why would he go back and fight price who is fighting total losers. Fury has time on his side, he will become a world champion. I think price will become one also. When one of them is champion that's when the fight should be made.
I like both fighters, but both are on different paths and don't need to fight right now.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
Fury is simply following the David Haye gameplan: only fight risky fights if he is facing a Klitschko. He won't face Price, unless he's cashing out, or the fight makes s$nse.
From what I understand, if Vitali retires, which at 41, which there is a good chance of, the title will become vacant, and Fury will go against the winner of Bermaine Stiverne and Cris Arreola. That's a fight I'm more interested in seeing.
Fury has fought stronger opposition than Price, and is 5 years younger. If he's taking a "non-risk" path then what is Price doing?
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
Fury is going towards a world title shot.
Price, while more popular has not fought the quality of opponents Fury has.
What is the biggest name Price has beaten?
To be fair Fury's only really beaten Chisora and Kingpin.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
Fury is going towards a world title shot.
Price, while more popular has not fought the quality of opponents Fury has.
What is the biggest name Price has beaten?
To be fair Fury's only really beaten Chisora and Kingpin.
But Price wants to fight Chisora next year?
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
When fury offered price the fight, Maloney said they couldnt because he was contracted to sky then that turned out to be bullshit. Go back a page and read the link I put up.
David Haye didnt want to fight Johnson a few years ago when he moved to heavy. Beating Johnson convincingly over 12 is far more impressive than stopping Skelton in 2. Price had some jittery moments when Skelton came forward. There is a reason Maloney wont move him up in class, hes shit scared of that jaw. Its like having a Ferrari with glass tyres.
There are links all over the internet that contradict what both camps have said. If you believe any one of them, then you'll love these magic beans I'm selling...
Price didn't have jittery moments when Skelton came forward, apart from in the eyes of the uninitiated and the poisonously biased. Still, at least Skelton came forward, unlike Johnson.
I don't want to criticise Fury for the Johnson fight, because last minute opponents are hard to find, but I'm confused how anybody can be impressed by a landslide victory over an opponent who doesn't fight back and whose sole claim to fame is he went 12 rounds with the champ years ago and didn't get knocked out whilst throwing no punches then either.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
Fury is simply following the David Haye gameplan: only fight risky fights if he is facing a Klitschko. He won't face Price, unless he's cashing out, or the fight makes s$nse.
From what I understand, if Vitali retires, which at 41, which there is a good chance of, the title will become vacant, and Fury will go against the winner of Bermaine Stiverne and Cris Arreola. That's a fight I'm more interested in seeing.
A little harsh there on Haye. Who else should he have fought? He took on Ruiz and Valuev and won a strap. Both are a cut above the usual dross and have been world champions.
I hope Vitali does retire, and I think Arreola against Fury is a cracking matchup.
I think there are many top ten heavyweights that Haye could fight, and he would be favored over most. Adamek, Chambers, Arreola all come to mind.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bobthepen
The issue that concerns me the most about team Fury is their reluctance to entertain a fight with Price. Forget the discussions about who they have fought, because history has shown that is no barometer for a future encounter.
I like Fury, and he's taken some good, testing fights thus far, but if he is serious about facing Vitali or Wlad next year he needs to step up in class in a huge way in the future. Whilst people carp on about the likes of Chisora and Johnson as decent opponents, they are missing the point that however good they are in their own right, their fighting style is about as far removed from a brother K as it is possible to get.
Fury has made a name fighting smaller, lethargic heavies who are not too heavy handed. In Vitali he has a busy power puncher of comparable size.
What could Fury do to prepare? Find a technically adept, tall, rangy, power punching boxer who will be busy enough to push him. I can't think of any current heavyweight that would be better preparation than Price, which is why it baffles me that team Fury aren't chasing this to the ends of the earth.
Fury needs Price.
Fury is simply following the David Haye gameplan: only fight risky fights if he is facing a Klitschko. He won't face Price, unless he's cashing out, or the fight makes s$nse.
From what I understand, if Vitali retires, which at 41, which there is a good chance of, the title will become vacant, and Fury will go against the winner of Bermaine Stiverne and Cris Arreola. That's a fight I'm more interested in seeing.
Fury has fought stronger opposition than Price, and is 5 years younger. If he's taking a "non-risk" path then what is Price doing?
Price is moving equally slowly. He's still fighting at the British domestic level.
It's my primary criticism of the heavyweight division. There are just a lot of good fights to be made that do not include the KBros, but aren't made because it makes more financial sense for a top fighter to lie in wait until a title challenge with the Kbros opens up. By the way, it makes perfect sense for careers; I'm just a boxing fan, and I would love to see guys like Fury and Arreola mix it up.
Recently, Pulev beat Dimitrenko, Adamek beat Chambers and Arreola is set to face Stiverne, but who else of the top ten/fifteen is facing each other?
I recall that Fury wanted a fight with Boystov, which is the exact kind of fight I would be excited to see.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Whytie
Fury does not need the price fight right now.
He is on the verge of fighting for a world title, why would he go back and fight price who is fighting total losers. Fury has time on his side, he will become a world champion. I think price will become one also. When one of them is champion that's when the fight should be made.
I like both fighters, but both are on different paths and don't need to fight right now.
So turning down a mandatory title defence with Price and vacating his titles to Duck him, because he was planning to take this so called different path, vindicates Tyson from running??
Price is actually fighting the level of opponent he should be at this point of his progression, taking on domestic opponents and at the time he was made the mandatory for the British title that was also his next progressive step....but Fury simply bottled it....you can say what you like but the real facts are that Fury refused to take the fight with Price because he didn't fancy it, he lacked confidence!
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
I don't think Fury is the sort of man that lacks confidence.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
doesnt matter if fury is confident or not , he doesnt last 2 rounds with price.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jimanuel Boogustus
I don't think Fury is the sort of man that lacks confidence.
Ranting and raving are sure fire signs of confidence issues, Tyson protests too much :cool:
-
Price is cleaning up the UK division, he's not clambering for titles just for the sake of it, Irish belts or random EU ones.
Not many UK heavies for him to fight now, Haye would never do it, He'll beat Chisora next year.
I think Price hits too hard for Fury, some of these guys he's knocking out are durable fighters, he's making it look too easy.
You can see Fury has more experience, just by the way he fights now compared to before. He's getting better technically and his journey has been paced well, including that weird fight against Rogan he fought southpaw.
I think his experience might get him through 3 rounds and land a few, but based on only about 3 shots I've seen Price take flush, I think he will take Furys punches and land bigger ones.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
I would much rather Price vacated the British title, and not fought dross like a 45 year old Skelton, and a gun shy Fraudley.
So much talk of meaningless titles, if they are you mandatory defenses.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
I would much rather Price vacated the British title, and not fought dross like a 45 year old Skelton, and a gun shy Fraudley.
So much talk of meaningless titles, if they are you mandatory defenses.
The British title is hardly meaningless just because Fury did not value it is no reason to criticise Price for giving it the respect it is due. In many ways the belt and title is the most meaningful a British fighter can hold. To win the most beautiful belt out there outright is a perfectly valid and respectable thing to do.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
I would much rather Price vacated the British title, and not fought dross like a 45 year old Skelton, and a gun shy Fraudley.
So much talk of meaningless titles, if they are you mandatory defenses.
The British title is hardly meaningless just because Fury did not value it is no reason to criticise Price for giving it the respect it is due. In many ways the belt and title is the most meaningful a British fighter can hold. To win the most beautiful belt out there outright is a perfectly valid and respectable thing to do.
Hear hear!
Ross you're not at it again are you? Did Price have some 'jittery moments' in the same way that his legs went against Sexton just before sparking him? ;D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
Fury is going towards a world title shot.
Price, while more popular has not fought the quality of opponents Fury has.
What is the biggest name Price has beaten?
To be fair Fury's only really beaten Chisora and Kingpin.
But Price wants to fight Chisora next year?
Only because Chisora has somehow become somewhat of a name after losing to both Haye and Klitschko. Let's face it, there isn't a massive difference in terms of the quality of their respective opposition.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
Fury is going towards a world title shot.
Price, while more popular has not fought the quality of opponents Fury has.
What is the biggest name Price has beaten?
To be fair Fury's only really beaten Chisora and Kingpin.
But Price wants to fight Chisora next year?
Only because Chisora has somehow become somewhat of a name after losing to both Haye and Klitschko. Let's face it, there isn't a massive difference in terms of the quality of their respective opposition.
Price-Chisora makes sense though. Chisora has a pretty decent chin so you'll find out if
a) Price's power is for real
or
b) If Price has a stamina issue.
I also believe Chisora is Fury's toughest opponent thus far (other than McDermott who he made hard work of)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
Fury is going towards a world title shot.
Price, while more popular has not fought the quality of opponents Fury has.
What is the biggest name Price has beaten?
To be fair Fury's only really beaten Chisora and Kingpin.
But Price wants to fight Chisora next year?
Only because Chisora has somehow become somewhat of a name after losing to both Haye and Klitschko. Let's face it, there isn't a massive difference in terms of the quality of their respective opposition.
Price-Chisora makes sense though. Chisora has a pretty decent chin so you'll find out if
a) Price's power is for real
or
b) If Price has a stamina issue.
I also believe Chisora is Fury's toughest opponent thus far (other than McDermott who he made hard work of)
I agree with this and another thing I reckon Chisora will be able to test Prices chin too.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Chisora is not a puncher, if he did have one he would have hurt Vitali, Fury and Haye.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Chisora is not a puncher, if he did have one he would have hurt Vitali, Fury and Haye.
Correction his punches would have bounced off Vitali , stung Haye and KOED Fury.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Chisora is not a puncher, if he did have one he would have hurt Vitali, Fury and Haye.
Correction his punches would have bounced off Vitali , stung Haye and KOED Fury.
Fury has a better chin than Haye. He wouldnt have been dropped by super middle weight Lolenga Mock, Mormeck or got knocked out by Carl Thompson;D
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Chisora is not a puncher, if he did have one he would have hurt Vitali, Fury and Haye.
Correction his punches would have bounced off Vitali , stung Haye and KOED Fury.
Fury has a better chin than Haye. He wouldnt have been dropped by super middle weight Lolenga Mock, Mormeck or got knocked out by Carl Thompson;D
Even with the size difference The Cat would have bust him up.
-
Re: Who do you think is better: David Price or Tyson Fury?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boyla
Fury is going towards a world title shot.
Price, while more popular has not fought the quality of opponents Fury has.
What is the biggest name Price has beaten?
To be fair Fury's only really beaten Chisora and Kingpin.
But Price wants to fight Chisora next year?
Only because Chisora has somehow become somewhat of a name after losing to both Haye and Klitschko. Let's face it, there isn't a massive difference in terms of the quality of their respective opposition.
Price-Chisora makes sense though. Chisora has a pretty decent chin so you'll find out if
a) Price's power is for real
or
b) If Price has a stamina issue.
I also believe Chisora is Fury's toughest opponent thus far (other than McDermott who he made hard work of)
For 'made hard work of' see: Lost to.