-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Joshua should handle Pulev very easily, should be over in a few rounds really.
Wilder-Ortiz should be a good fight, SHOULD be, but for whatever reason I am not confident it will actually happen. Should the fight happen there's a good chance (only good) that Ortiz lures Wilder in and bombs him out a la a fight Wilder's trainer should know very much about Mark Breland vs Marlon Starling.
As for Tyson Fury, he's no longer a boxer, he's a drug addict and fat ass sooooo yeah no one cares what he's saying
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Tyson Fury is a bum who got lucky one night And then ran into retirement before getting exposed.Tyson won a decision against a very flat Wladimir In one of the worst championship fights you'll ever see.At this stage he's irrelevant so he can keep talkingWhile AJ and Wilder both keep winning and making money.
Yep. Wilder WILL fight Ortiz in November, which is amazing. Makes Joshua look a lil bad, but Joshua just KO'd Wlad, which is still much better than anything Wilder has done, though I do like him as well. Joshua is #1 in my book until he's beaten.
The Wilder/ Ortiz fight is not official yet as Wilder has not signed the contract. If it happens it might get pushed to 2018.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Tyson Fury is a bum who got lucky one night And then ran into retirement before getting exposed.Tyson won a decision against a very flat Wladimir In one of the worst championship fights you'll ever see.At this stage he's irrelevant so he can keep talkingWhile AJ and Wilder both keep winning and making money.
Yep. Wilder WILL fight Ortiz in November, which is amazing. Makes Joshua look a lil bad, but Joshua just KO'd Wlad, which is still much better than anything Wilder has done, though I do like him as well. Joshua is #1 in my book until he's beaten.
The Wilder/ Ortiz fight is not official yet as Wilder has not signed the contract. If it happens it might get pushed to 2018.
I don't want to crap on that fight but I have a very strong feeling of either Wilder gets injured or Ortiz gets popped for PEDs.....no reason, no evidence, just a gut feeling. I honestly hope to hell that fight happens and it's the best thing ever, but that feeling just won't leave.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
As for Tyson Fury, he's no longer a boxer, he's a drug addict and fat ass sooooo yeah no one cares what he's saying
Turson Fury will be back and he will KO AJ, Wilder, Parker, Ortiz and any other fucker that comes near him, he won't even bother with Haye because Haye fucked around and missed his chance.
Trust me Fury will be back.
And he's not a drug addict, although he had high levels of some shit or another that was cuz he ate hedgehogs and he isn't fat he's just big boned
....is what Ross would say
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Funny to hear "Haye needs to fight a top 5 heavyweight", Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. He's going to start now? Nope
Not that I want to defend Haye, but I am sure Valuev and maybe at a stretch Ruiz were top 5 in their day.
Ruiz? GTFOOH with that nonsense. He was a bum by the time Haye fought him as evidenced by his never fighting again. Or evidenced by his 4 losses in his previous 7 fights.
Which of Valuev's losses moved him into your top 5, his loss to Chagaev or his loss to Oldyfield coming into the Haye fight? Values was a fraud, everyone knew it and that's why Haye fought him. Easy belt that Valuev shouldn't have have. He didn't beat Chagaev to get it handed back to him and he didn't beat Evan Fields.
I said I was not going to defend Haye, so I am not going to start now.
Name 5 that were rated higher at the time?
Wladimir Klitschko
Vitali Klitschko
Eddie Chambers
Ruslan Chagaev(who had already beaten Valuev)
David Haye
Alexander Povetkin
Denis Boytsov
Chris Arreola
And of course Evan Fields who had just beaten him.
Only can give you the Klit brothers and Chagaev ahead of Valuev at the time Haye fought him.
So you are suggesting Valuev was better than 2 men that beat him. I know you enjoy being different but the conversation has no sense.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Tony thompson was going well at that time and would have won pretty easily against valuev on the scorecards... well depending o the judges i guess
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Funny to hear "Haye needs to fight a top 5 heavyweight", Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. He's going to start now? Nope
Not that I want to defend Haye, but I am sure Valuev and maybe at a stretch Ruiz were top 5 in their day.
Ruiz? GTFOOH with that nonsense. He was a bum by the time Haye fought him as evidenced by his never fighting again. Or evidenced by his 4 losses in his previous 7 fights.
Which of Valuev's losses moved him into your top 5, his loss to Chagaev or his loss to Oldyfield coming into the Haye fight? Values was a fraud, everyone knew it and that's why Haye fought him. Easy belt that Valuev shouldn't have have. He didn't beat Chagaev to get it handed back to him and he didn't beat Evan Fields.
I said I was not going to defend Haye, so I am not going to start now.
Name 5 that were rated higher at the time?
Wladimir Klitschko
Vitali Klitschko
Eddie Chambers
Ruslan Chagaev(who had already beaten Valuev)
David Haye
Alexander Povetkin
Denis Boytsov
Chris Arreola
And of course Evan Fields who had just beaten him.
Only can give you the Klit brothers and Chagaev ahead of Valuev at the time Haye fought him.
So you are suggesting Valuev was better than 2 men that beat him. I know you enjoy being different but the conversation has no sense.
That was after the event, you said name top 5 fighters that Haye fought and I said Valuev was one at the time.
I know you like being a pain in the ass but keep up.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Funny to hear "Haye needs to fight a top 5 heavyweight", Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. He's going to start now? Nope
Not that I want to defend Haye, but I am sure Valuev and maybe at a stretch Ruiz were top 5 in their day.
Ruiz? GTFOOH with that nonsense. He was a bum by the time Haye fought him as evidenced by his never fighting again. Or evidenced by his 4 losses in his previous 7 fights.
Which of Valuev's losses moved him into your top 5, his loss to Chagaev or his loss to Oldyfield coming into the Haye fight? Values was a fraud, everyone knew it and that's why Haye fought him. Easy belt that Valuev shouldn't have have. He didn't beat Chagaev to get it handed back to him and he didn't beat Evan Fields.
I said I was not going to defend Haye, so I am not going to start now.
Name 5 that were rated higher at the time?
Wladimir Klitschko
Vitali Klitschko
Eddie Chambers
Ruslan Chagaev(who had already beaten Valuev)
David Haye
Alexander Povetkin
Denis Boytsov
Chris Arreola
And of course Evan Fields who had just beaten him.
Only can give you the Klit brothers and Chagaev ahead of Valuev at the time Haye fought him.
So you are suggesting Valuev was better than 2 men that beat him. I know you enjoy being different but the conversation has no sense.
That was after the event, you said name top 5 fighters that Haye fought and I said Valuev was one at the time.
I know you like being a pain in the ass but keep up.
Keep up? How exactly am I supposed to keep up with you changing what I said until after you change what I said? You are saying I said "name top 5 fighters that Haye fought" and I never said that. I said Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. But even with you changing what I said you are wrong. Did you think Valuev was better than Haye? If not you should have Haye rated higher, if so then you don't know what you are talking about. Haye was much better because Valuev wasn't top 5 good.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Funny to hear "Haye needs to fight a top 5 heavyweight", Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. He's going to start now? Nope
Not that I want to defend Haye, but I am sure Valuev and maybe at a stretch Ruiz were top 5 in their day.
Ruiz? GTFOOH with that nonsense. He was a bum by the time Haye fought him as evidenced by his never fighting again. Or evidenced by his 4 losses in his previous 7 fights.
Which of Valuev's losses moved him into your top 5, his loss to Chagaev or his loss to Oldyfield coming into the Haye fight? Values was a fraud, everyone knew it and that's why Haye fought him. Easy belt that Valuev shouldn't have have. He didn't beat Chagaev to get it handed back to him and he didn't beat Evan Fields.
I said I was not going to defend Haye, so I am not going to start now.
Name 5 that were rated higher at the time?
Wladimir Klitschko
Vitali Klitschko
Eddie Chambers
Ruslan Chagaev(who had already beaten Valuev)
David Haye
Alexander Povetkin
Denis Boytsov
Chris Arreola
And of course Evan Fields who had just beaten him.
Only can give you the Klit brothers and Chagaev ahead of Valuev at the time Haye fought him.
So you are suggesting Valuev was better than 2 men that beat him. I know you enjoy being different but the conversation has no sense.
That was after the event, you said name top 5 fighters that Haye fought and I said Valuev was one at the time.
I know you like being a pain in the ass but keep up.
Keep up? How exactly am I supposed to keep up with you changing what I said until after you change what I said? You are saying I said "name top 5 fighters that Haye fought" and I never said that. I said Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. But even with you changing what I said you are wrong. Did you think Valuev was better than Haye? If not you should have Haye rated higher, if so then you don't know what you are talking about. Haye was much better because Valuev wasn't top 5 good.
You really like to make a tangle of this.
Obviously Haye was better than Valuev because he beat him but before he beat him valuev must have been a top 5 fighter at the time, not in retrospect.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Funny to hear "Haye needs to fight a top 5 heavyweight", Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. He's going to start now? Nope
Not that I want to defend Haye, but I am sure Valuev and maybe at a stretch Ruiz were top 5 in their day.
Ruiz? GTFOOH with that nonsense. He was a bum by the time Haye fought him as evidenced by his never fighting again. Or evidenced by his 4 losses in his previous 7 fights.
Which of Valuev's losses moved him into your top 5, his loss to Chagaev or his loss to Oldyfield coming into the Haye fight? Values was a fraud, everyone knew it and that's why Haye fought him. Easy belt that Valuev shouldn't have have. He didn't beat Chagaev to get it handed back to him and he didn't beat Evan Fields.
I said I was not going to defend Haye, so I am not going to start now.
Name 5 that were rated higher at the time?
Wladimir Klitschko
Vitali Klitschko
Eddie Chambers
Ruslan Chagaev(who had already beaten Valuev)
David Haye
Alexander Povetkin
Denis Boytsov
Chris Arreola
And of course Evan Fields who had just beaten him.
Only can give you the Klit brothers and Chagaev ahead of Valuev at the time Haye fought him.
So you are suggesting Valuev was better than 2 men that beat him. I know you enjoy being different but the conversation has no sense.
That was after the event, you said name top 5 fighters that Haye fought and I said Valuev was one at the time.
I know you like being a pain in the ass but keep up.
Keep up? How exactly am I supposed to keep up with you changing what I said until after you change what I said? You are saying I said "name top 5 fighters that Haye fought" and I never said that. I said Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. But even with you changing what I said you are wrong. Did you think Valuev was better than Haye? If not you should have Haye rated higher, if so then you don't know what you are talking about. Haye was much better because Valuev wasn't top 5 good.
You really like to make a tangle of this.
Obviously Haye was better than Valuev because he beat him but before he beat him valuev must have been a top 5 fighter
at the time, not in retrospect.
I don't think that Valuev would have been ranked higher than Haye at the time, wasn't Haye expected to win that fight quite easily, Valuev just gained a lot of publicity because of the freak show aspect of the fight, it was a while back now so I could be wrong.
I think that at the point of that point I actually quite liked David Haye, you know before he turned into an absolute freak show himself and became quite possibly the biggest cunt in the game
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Funny to hear "Haye needs to fight a top 5 heavyweight", Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. He's going to start now? Nope
Not that I want to defend Haye, but I am sure Valuev and maybe at a stretch Ruiz were top 5 in their day.
Ruiz? GTFOOH with that nonsense. He was a bum by the time Haye fought him as evidenced by his never fighting again. Or evidenced by his 4 losses in his previous 7 fights.
Which of Valuev's losses moved him into your top 5, his loss to Chagaev or his loss to Oldyfield coming into the Haye fight? Values was a fraud, everyone knew it and that's why Haye fought him. Easy belt that Valuev shouldn't have have. He didn't beat Chagaev to get it handed back to him and he didn't beat Evan Fields.
I said I was not going to defend Haye, so I am not going to start now.
Name 5 that were rated higher at the time?
Wladimir Klitschko
Vitali Klitschko
Eddie Chambers
Ruslan Chagaev(who had already beaten Valuev)
David Haye
Alexander Povetkin
Denis Boytsov
Chris Arreola
And of course Evan Fields who had just beaten him.
Only can give you the Klit brothers and Chagaev ahead of Valuev at the time Haye fought him.
So you are suggesting Valuev was better than 2 men that beat him. I know you enjoy being different but the conversation has no sense.
That was after the event, you said name top 5 fighters that Haye fought and I said Valuev was one at the time.
I know you like being a pain in the ass but keep up.
Keep up? How exactly am I supposed to keep up with you changing what I said until after you change what I said? You are saying I said "name top 5 fighters that Haye fought" and I never said that. I said Wlad was the only top 5 heavyweight he ever fought. But even with you changing what I said you are wrong. Did you think Valuev was better than Haye? If not you should have Haye rated higher, if so then you don't know what you are talking about. Haye was much better because Valuev wasn't top 5 good.
You really like to make a tangle of this.
Obviously Haye was better than Valuev because he beat him but before he beat him valuev must have been a top 5 fighter
at the time, not in retrospect.
You're the one making a tangle. Changing words. Not answering simple questions.
It isn't about retrospective if you knew beforehand. I knew Haye would win. Everyone I know knew Haye would win. Did you or did you not know Haye would win?
I'm trying to type very slow so you can get it. If you knew Haye would win as everyone else did you should rate Haye higher as everyone else did
At that time and before
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Knowing and doing are 2 totally different things. Everyone knew Tyson would beat Douglas.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Not sure but I think most knew Haye would beat Bellew.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Not sure but I think most knew Haye would beat Bellew.
Fine, let's forget that Haye was clearly better than Valuev.
You still have the obvious 2 of Wlad and Vitali. You still have Povetkin, you still have Chambers, you still have Chagaev who already beat him and Evan Fields who already beat him.
That's still 6 to have above Valuev, and that's not even considering other better fighters. Valuev never did anything because he wasn't any good. His biggest accomplishment is beating Ruiz twice in the middle of a stretch where Ruiz won 3 of 8 fights. And he couldn't even do that convincingly.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
I'm not arguing that Value was top 5. I'm just saying that's why they fight the fights.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I'm not arguing that Value was top 5. I'm just saying that's why they fight the fights.
This is how messed up it is trying to get the simplest point across to Master, nobody is saying Valuev is any good. He won't even say it but he wants to at the same time use it as evidence that Haye did fight good heavyweights. He and John Ruiz who had won 3 out 7 fights coming into the Haye fight. None of it makes any sense.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I'm not arguing that Value was top 5. I'm just saying that's why they fight the fights.
This is how messed up it is trying to get the simplest point across to Master, nobody is saying Valuev is any good. He won't even say it but he wants to at the same time use it as evidence that Haye did fight good heavyweights. He and John Ruiz who had won 3 out 7 fights coming into the Haye fight. None of it makes any sense.
I do not want to labour this point Ronnie. All I am saying is that Valuev as a champion would automatically rated and have been ranked in the top 5 at the time. Yes he was very poor and protected by Don King which is why he kept getting shots at that particular trinket.
When Haye fought Valuev it was not in the UK and Holyfield did not get the decision. The same could have easily happened for Haye.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
So Pulev is going to give his earnings from the fight to charity "if he wins"
Just goes to show a complete lack of confidence, Chisora gave 20k to charity when Haye beat him.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I'm not arguing that Value was top 5. I'm just saying that's why they fight the fights.
This is how messed up it is trying to get the simplest point across to Master, nobody is saying Valuev is any good. He won't even say it but he wants to at the same time use it as evidence that Haye did fight good heavyweights. He and John Ruiz who had won 3 out 7 fights coming into the Haye fight. None of it makes any sense.
I do not want to labour this point Ronnie. All I am saying is that Valuev as a champion would automatically rated and have been ranked in the top 5 at the time. Yes he was very poor and protected by Don King which is why he kept getting shots at that particular trinket.
When Haye fought Valuev it was not in the UK and Holyfield did not get the decision. The same could have easily happened for Haye.
So you admit he's crap but give him a faulty rating and then judge him by that faulty rating rather than judging him by his actual quality.
The things you say make absolutely no sense man. You should judge him in real terms. Reality is a very simple thing. If you would stay in it these conversations wouldn't be so complicated.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I'm not arguing that Value was top 5. I'm just saying that's why they fight the fights.
This is how messed up it is trying to get the simplest point across to Master, nobody is saying Valuev is any good. He won't even say it but he wants to at the same time use it as evidence that Haye did fight good heavyweights. He and John Ruiz who had won 3 out 7 fights coming into the Haye fight. None of it makes any sense.
I do not want to labour this point Ronnie. All I am saying is that Valuev as a champion would automatically rated and have been ranked in the top 5 at the time. Yes he was very poor and protected by Don King which is why he kept getting shots at that particular trinket.
When Haye fought Valuev it was not in the UK and Holyfield did not get the decision. The same could have easily happened for Haye.
So you admit he's crap but give him a faulty rating and then judge him by that faulty rating rather than judging him by his actual quality.
The things you say make absolutely no sense man. You should judge him in real terms. Reality is a very simple thing. If you would stay in it these conversations wouldn't be so complicated.
It is not too complicated. An example could be Parker who happens to hold WBO title. I believe he is worse than Pulev or Stiverne but because he has a title is rated higher.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
I'd have Pulev ahead of Parker at this stage, but Stiverne should not even be rated top 10 right now. Not saying Valuev was top 5 but some guys on here had him rated from #4 to #7 so Masters claim of top 5 is not totally out of left field:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
HEAVYWEIGHT:
1.Wladimir Klitschko
2.Vitali Klitschko
3.Ruslan Chagaev
4.Alexander Povetkin
5.Sultan Ibragimov
6.Nicoly Valuev
7.Juan Carlos Gomez
8.Sam Peter
9.Alexander Dimitrenko
10.David Haye
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
Heavyweight
1. Wlad Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Ruslan Chagaev
4. Nicolay Valuev
5. Alexander Povetkin
6. Juan Carlos Gomez
7. Sam Peter
8. David Haye
9. Alexander Dimitrenko
10. Chris Arreola
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
Heavyweight
1. Wlad Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Ruslan Chagaev
4. Alexander Povetkin
5. Sultan Ibragimov
6. Sam Peter
7. Nicolay Valuev
8. Juan Carlos Gomez
9. Chris Arreola
10. David Haye
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hitmanhatton
Heavyweight
1. Wlad
2. Vitali
3. Chagaev
4. Gomez
5. Valuev
6. Haye
7. Povetkin
8. Peter
9. Ibragimov
10. Dimitrenko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Heavyweight
1. Wlad
2. Vitali
3. Chagaev
4. Valuev
5. Povetkin
6. Gomez
7. Ibragimov
8. Peter
9. Haye
10.Arreola
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scott22
Heavyweight
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Ruslan Chagaev
4. Nikolai Valuev
5. Alexander Povetkin
6. Juan Carlos Gomez
7. Alexander Dimitrenko
8. Chris Arreola
9. Samuel Peter
10. David Haye
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Just seen that AJ is now doing adverts for Lynx deodorant...that means that he is now walking around with the aroma of a teenage boys guilty masturbation session at christmas
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Is anyone interested in this fight? We all know AJ will win easily and early.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Is anyone interested in this fight? We all know AJ will win easily and early.
Now people might stop criticising Wlad for some shit fights. When you hold multiple belts, you're always gonna have some crappy mandatories to deal with. I think it could've been way worse than Pulev though I have to say. He's not that terrible.
I thought that Was one of Wlad's best performances of the last 5 years.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Is anyone interested in this fight? We all know AJ will win easily and early.
Now people might stop criticising Wlad for some shit fights. When you hold multiple belts, you're always gonna have some crappy mandatories to deal with. I think it could've been way worse than Pulev though I have to say. He's not that terrible.
I thought that Was one of Wlad's best performances of the last 5 years.
Yeah, that and the Byrd return were probably his best performances. The Chagev one was a special night too and the Peter rematch... he had a number of great nights. I’m not blaming Joshua but I’m just not excited for this fight
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
This is not a crap defence at all... Pulev is pretty handy, he fought stupid against wladimir and paid for it, apart from that he beat ustinov and Thompson pretty easily, Thompson was well past it though. He handled chisora very easily too and whilst chisora is not that great he is still a good fighter.. I think pulev will be kod though as he doesn't have the power but it's not Joshua's fault he is so much stronger than his opponents.... Pulev knows how to fight rough /semi dirty too if he survives an early assault he could cause Joshua some issues.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Deontay Wilder slams Anthony Joshua ahead of potential heavyweight showdown next year
Deontay Wilder has launched another scathing attack on heavyweight rival Anthony Joshua after the Brit indicated that a unification showdown in 2018 was inevitable.
The WBC champion, who defends his title against Bermane Stiverne next month, had previously posted a video on Twitter last week claiming that Joshua wasn't 'physically, mentally or emotionally ready' to face him despite the 2012 Olympic gold medallist defeating legendary heavyweight Wladimir Klitschko in a classic fight at Wembley in April.
Joshua responded to Wilder's claims by suggesting the pair could share a ring next year after his own title defence against Kubrat Pulev later this month, which the American has taken offence to.
He took to Twitter again and wrote: "Bro what the f*** Anthony Joshua? You going to soon be ramming your jab down my throat?! To be honest that don't sound too good unless it's some next level ish.
"I guess I'll have to son you and teach you how a champion supposed to talk - so when they hear you, they shall also feel you.
"Next time I'd rather hear how you gonna knock my a** out."
His latest tirade came just days after he called out Joshua, saying "make the m***********g fight".
The 31-year-old had been scheduled to fight Luis Ortiz next month, only for the Cuban to withdraw from the fight after failing a drugs test.
Joshua's comments that prompted Wilder's reponse came when asked about his next potential bout after he takes on Pulev in Cardiff on October 28, and he sounded out the American and fellow Brit David Haye as possible opponents.
He told Sky: "All these guys talk about me and it's always negative, but sooner or later I'll be ramming my jab down their throats.
"It's not a matter of if, it's just a matter of when when it comes to the likes of David Haye and Deontay Wilder because there has been no era of boxing where heavyweights haven't come together.
"We have to fight each other and that's just the way it's going to go."
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/boxi...cid=spartanntp
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
I read this morning that AJ is getting £20,000,000 For this fight, that's fucking crazy money, if that's true then fair play to him, I'd guess that 20 mill for fighting Pulev makes him the official money man of the sport now, is there anyone else who would get that sort of wedge?
Again only if that figure is true
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
I read this morning that AJ is getting £20,000,000 For this fight, that's fucking crazy money, if that's true then fair play to him, I'd guess that 20 mill for fighting Pulev makes him the official money man of the sport now, is there anyone else who would get that sort of wedge?
Again only if that figure is true
Which may mean he can kick Eddie Hearn to the kerb as he does not need him any longer.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev : IBF World Heavyweight Title
Dillian Whyte v TBC : 12 Rounds Heavyweight
Anahi Sanchez v Katie Taylor : WBA Lightweight Title
Kal Yafai v Sho Ishida : WBA Super-Flyweight title
Frank Buglioni v Callum Johnson : British and Commonwealth Light-Heavyweight Titles
Joe Cordina v TBC : 10 Rounds Super-Featherweight
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev : IBF World Heavyweight Title
Dillian Whyte v TBC : 12 Rounds Heavyweight
Anahi Sanchez v Katie Taylor : WBA Lightweight Title
Kal Yafai v Sho Ishida : WBA Super-Flyweight title
Frank Buglioni v Callum Johnson : British and Commonwealth Light-Heavyweight Titles
Joe Cordina v TBC : 10 Rounds Super-Featherweight
That card is a piece of shit. I was thinking of watching this at my local cinema for the experience but I’m not sure I’ll bother as none of those fights interests me in the slightest.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev : IBF World Heavyweight Title
Dillian Whyte v TBC : 12 Rounds Heavyweight
Anahi Sanchez v Katie Taylor : WBA Lightweight Title
Kal Yafai v Sho Ishida : WBA Super-Flyweight title
Frank Buglioni v Callum Johnson : British and Commonwealth Light-Heavyweight Titles
Joe Cordina v TBC : 10 Rounds Super-Featherweight
That card is a piece of shit. I was thinking of watching this at my local cinema for the experience but I’m not sure I’ll bother as none of those fights interests me in the slightest.
A lot of tbc. How much would they have charged you at the cinema?
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev : IBF World Heavyweight Title
Dillian Whyte v TBC : 12 Rounds Heavyweight
Anahi Sanchez v Katie Taylor : WBA Lightweight Title
Kal Yafai v Sho Ishida : WBA Super-Flyweight title
Frank Buglioni v Callum Johnson : British and Commonwealth Light-Heavyweight Titles
Joe Cordina v TBC : 10 Rounds Super-Featherweight
That card is a piece of shit. I was thinking of watching this at my local cinema for the experience but I’m not sure I’ll bother as none of those fights interests me in the slightest.
A lot of tbc. How much would they have charged you at the cinema?
Whyte is shit and unless he’s fighting somebody in the top ten then I’m not interested. They’re charging £17 to see it in the cinema which isn’t bad.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev : IBF World Heavyweight Title
Dillian Whyte v TBC : 12 Rounds Heavyweight
Anahi Sanchez v Katie Taylor : WBA Lightweight Title
Kal Yafai v Sho Ishida : WBA Super-Flyweight title
Frank Buglioni v Callum Johnson : British and Commonwealth Light-Heavyweight Titles
Joe Cordina v TBC : 10 Rounds Super-Featherweight
That card is a piece of shit. I was thinking of watching this at my local cinema for the experience but I’m not sure I’ll bother as none of those fights interests me in the slightest.
A lot of tbc. How much would they have charged you at the cinema?
Whyte is shit and unless he’s fighting somebody in the top ten then I’m not interested. They’re charging £17 to see it in the cinema which isn’t bad.
Robbery.
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev : IBF World Heavyweight Title
Dillian Whyte v TBC : 12 Rounds Heavyweight
Anahi Sanchez v Katie Taylor : WBA Lightweight Title
Kal Yafai v Sho Ishida : WBA Super-Flyweight title
Frank Buglioni v Callum Johnson : British and Commonwealth Light-Heavyweight Titles
Joe Cordina v TBC : 10 Rounds Super-Featherweight
That card is a piece of shit. I was thinking of watching this at my local cinema for the experience but I’m not sure I’ll bother as none of those fights interests me in the slightest.
A lot of tbc. How much would they have charged you at the cinema?
Whyte is shit and unless he’s fighting somebody in the top ten then I’m not interested. They’re charging £17 to see it in the cinema which isn’t bad.
Robbery.
It’s about the same to watch it at home
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
This rumor is gaining traction
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NjOlzRkELL0
I just want to see Joshua v Wilder FFS
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
As soon as Wilder lands... it’s over
-
Re: Anthony Joshua v Kubrat Pulev 28 October 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
As soon as Wilder lands... it’s over
Same goes when AJ lands.
