Quote:
Originally Posted by
SlimTrae
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
The court will rule and I will accept it. But I'm saying that I believe there will be a false flag between now and then
Is a false flag a falsehood? (not sure)
Because if it is... there have been PLENTY of false flags raised non-stop since Election Day.
But I'm glad you're willing to accept the courts' decisions.
In general I think a false flag like the Gulf of Tonkin or like REMEMBER THE MAINE, or like 9-11, is an actual real life event as opposed to something no one has witnessed for example, but that it was nevertheless staged as a distraction for the general public.
I agree on staging for distraction of the general public.
Appealing to your objective POV: Not looking at either candidate's name, nor their political party- just the final 2 who ran for POTUS.
How did both become so convinced that introducing a vaccine would be best to address the virus in question?
Is the shadow/illuminati government behind the pushing of vaccinating? And do you think it will be optional or forced?
If somehow...courts overturned the win for the Dem & the Incumbent stays in, are there any sources you use to determine how the incumbent would address the false flag of the millennium?
My answer is that they both are pro vaccine. Every sentence both have stated bares witness that is the sole solution.
I disagree.
The Human Immune system is our first line of defense.
Again, One stated he would pledge to ensure there are vaccines, the other said not only would it come, but the military will administer in a "powerful" manner.
Are you for military aiding in the distribution of a vaccine?
Side question,
were you in the states in 2007 & 2008? Back then there was this huge effort to claim the incoming POTUS would force people to get chip implants - it was labeled as mark of the beast & proof he was the antichrist, curious of your take & if that was a false flag thrown at us again-seeing as not only did it not happen (forced chip implants) but it may have distracted Americans from the President elect's war of nonstop drones, the cloning of meat, the over-use of eminent domain to name a few &, the abuse IMO of the executive order to name a few!
Great queries, Slim, here's my answers:
1. BOth became convinced of the VAXXX for diff reasons: one wants to push a likely hidden/masked substance to be introduced to the human genome for sinister, long-term purposes of fucking the human race up, as well as condition Americans to bow down and acquiesce to BIG GOVT MANDATES, because CHina is coming (well, we're doing everything we can to fight back against that Marxist Takeover--- these cunts are following the Dr Zhivago Playbook to a fucking T --- the other person was FORCED to pursue it for TWO political purposes, i.e. IF HE DIDNT, HE WOULD BE LABELED A GENOCIDAL MANIAC for not doing so. And number 2: it's a win-win for him, coming up with it before the other team does, and Im sure there was good money in it too for affiliates/allies/friends.
***MANY PEEP ARE BRAINWASHED TO TAKE THE VAXXX. In that case, it doesnt even NEED to be forced. But enough will push back, including myself, against any FORCED agenda. I cant see it becoming forced on free, sovereign creatures. Shit won't fly. Unless China takes over and a certain candidate "wins". NO I do NOT support military forcing VAXXX on peep
2. The incumbent surely will win, its not even an issue anymore, but the MSM doesnt cover it at all, total media blackout and now Youtube is censoring videos that even MENTION the words "voter fraud". The incumbent will need to use military intervention, but the other side will cry FASCISM/HITLER when he NEEDS to shoot rubber bullets at MASSIVE, MASSIVE, MASSIVE VIOLENCE OF BURNING, LOOTING, ASSAULT, that shit wont fly this time like it flew last Spring.
I favor military intervention and military tribunals to weed out these cunts, EVEN THOUGH IT IS PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE OTHER SIDE'S NARRATIVE that the incumbent is a dictator. YOu know what??? Crushing violence and criminal/treasonous acts is NOT dictatorship. It's the fucking LAW. And I would ask all delusional "other party" supporters (HA! Im sticking with NOT naming names as you requested! Pat on the back for me here!) how the fuck ELSE should a President quell MASSIVE, MASSIVE, MASSIVE VIOLENCE IN THE STREETS FROM COAST TO COAST? WITH LOLLY POPS AND CANDY CANES FFS?!?!?!?!
One side has championed defunding police, abolishing ICE, open borders, and absolute lawlessness for so long, that people literally BELIEVE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IS COOL AND OK.
They will soon find out their party time is up. So to answer your question, the incumbent will put down harshly (AS HE SHOULD) all the MASSIVE, MASSIVE, MASSIVE VIOLENCE, by using (AS HE FUCKING WELL SHOULD) the military. Time to re-establish the definition of LAW ENFORCEMENT.
As for what he will do to address the False Flag -- and before January 6th there will likely be one, or even between 1/6 and 1/20, since SCOTUS WILL CRUSH GA/WI/MI/PA, and the other side will be desperate to do anything to derail it --- it looks like it will have no choice but to be INSURRECTION ACT + MARTIAL LAW.
***NOTE: I GIVE AN EQUALLY LIKELY SPECTACULAR EVENT BEING A NUCLEAR SKIRMISH/WORLD WAR BREAKING OUT-- WHICH THEN WOULD SURELY RESULT IN MARTIAL LAW/WAR-TIME CONDITIONS.
3. Agree, and no, I had left the US in 2007 and didnt return until 2015, but DO remember that whole anti-christ thing --- I think it was a slow introduction to the public of the concept of it all..... a beta-test.... to gauge pub opinion. But they are hell-bent on carrying it out in stages, gradually conditioning the lab rats (citizens) until the Stockholm Syndrome makes them fucking BEG TO BE RAPED. These are long-range plans: you talk to the sheep, you pet the sheep, you cuddle the sheep, you put cool water on the sheep's head, you befriend the sheep, THEN YOU CUT THE MOTHERFUCKER'S THROAT. Thats how evil they are.
