False Flags: myth, conspiracy theory or reality?

[TitoFan]

Hmm... so now even the COURTS' decisions don't count? Damn... talk about stacking the deck.

[NoSavingByTheBell]

Hmm... so now even the COURTS' decisions don't count? Damn... talk about stacking the deck.

When did I say the Court's decisions didn't count?

[NoSavingByTheBell]

I've been very very clear I will accept the Court's decisions.

[NoSavingByTheBell]

The court will rule and I will accept it. But I'm saying that I believe there will be a false flag between now and then

[TitoFan]

The court will rule and I will accept it. But I'm saying that I believe there will be a false flag between now and then

Is a false flag a falsehood? (not sure)

Because if it is... there have been PLENTY of false flags raised non-stop since Election Day.

But I'm glad you're willing to accept the courts' decisions.

[NoSavingByTheBell]

The court will rule and I will accept it. But I'm saying that I believe there will be a false flag between now and then

Is a false flag a falsehood? (not sure)

Because if it is... there have been PLENTY of false flags raised non-stop since Election Day.

But I'm glad you're willing to accept the courts' decisions.

In general I think a false flag like the Gulf of Tonkin or like REMEMBER THE MAINE, or like 9-11, is an actual real life event as opposed to something no one has witnessed for example, but that it was nevertheless staged as a distraction for the general public.

[SlimTrae]

The court will rule and I will accept it. But I'm saying that I believe there will be a false flag between now and then

Is a false flag a falsehood? (not sure)

Because if it is... there have been PLENTY of false flags raised non-stop since Election Day.

But I'm glad you're willing to accept the courts' decisions.

In general I think a false flag like the Gulf of Tonkin or like REMEMBER THE MAINE, or like 9-11, is an actual real life event as opposed to something no one has witnessed for example, but that it was nevertheless staged as a distraction for the general public.

I agree on staging for distraction of the general public.

Appealing to your objective POV: Not looking at either candidate's name, nor their political party- just the final 2 who ran for POTUS. How did both become so convinced that introducing a vaccine would be best to address the virus in question?
Is the shadow/illuminati government behind the pushing of vaccinating? And do you think it will be optional or forced?

If somehow...courts overturned the win for the Dem & the Incumbent stays in, are there any sources you use to determine how the incumbent would address the false flag of the millennium?


My answer is that they both are pro vaccine. Every sentence both have stated bares witness that is the sole solution.
I disagree.
The Human Immune system is our first line of defense.
Again, One stated he would pledge to ensure there are vaccines, the other said not only would it come, but the military will administer in a "powerful" manner.

Are you for military aiding in the distribution of a vaccine?



Side question, were you in the states in 2007 & 2008? Back then there was this huge effort to claim the incoming POTUS would force people to get chip implants - it was labeled as mark of the beast & proof he was the antichrist, curious of your take & if that was a false flag thrown at us again-seeing as not only did it not happen (forced chip implants) but it may have distracted Americans from the President elect's war of nonstop drones, the cloning of meat, the over-use of eminent domain to name a few &, the abuse IMO of the executive order to name a few!