Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Is it that Saddoboxer admitting he made a mistake?! :scratchchin:;D
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
At first I really thought it's 25" ;D It's an honest mistake but nevertheless it doesn't change Hatton's arm length of 20 inches only... PAC still enjoys a comfortable 3" advantage...
So what's the difference in their shoulder length now?? :lolhaha:
.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Is it that Saddoboxer admitting he made a mistake?! :scratchchin:;D
YES, it's an honest mistake by me... I'm really sorry my mates...
Good Day...
.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
At first I really thought it's 25" ;D It's an honest mistake but nevertheless it doesn't change Hatton's arm length of 20 inches only... PAC still enjoys a comfortable 3" advantage...
So what's the difference in their shoulder length now?? :lolhaha:
.
I notice Paulie had a 3 inch advantage too. Didnt really help him.....
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
At first I really thought it's 25" ;D It's an honest mistake but nevertheless it doesn't change Hatton's arm length of 20 inches only... PAC still enjoys a comfortable 3" advantage...
So what's the difference in their shoulder length now?? :lolhaha:
.
I notice Paulie had a 3 inch advantage too. Didnt really help him.....
A 3 inch advantage enjoyed in Paulie's caliber means nothing but if you have it in PAC's caliber and skills, it means disaster to the opponent...
BTW, sorry again for that honest mistake but anyway it doesn't change the fact that PAC enjoys a considerable reach advantage over Hatton... ;)
.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Maybe that's typographical error coz in all of other Pac fights HBO Graphic says it' 25" arms for Pac.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Maybe that's typographical error coz in all of other Pac fights HBO Graphic says it' 25" arms for Pac.
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/7932/pac25inch.jpg
Damn!... HBO makes PAC's arm length a little shorter to make it competitive to Hatton's 20" short arms...
.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Maybe that's typographical error coz in all of other Pac fights HBO Graphic says it' 25" arms for Pac.
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/7932/pac25inch.jpg
Damn!... HBO makes PAC's arm length a little shorter to make it competitive to Hatton's 20" short arms...
.
I guess they want to give a Partida(edge) for DLH & also for Hatton not to get Scared of Pac.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Maybe that's typographical error coz in all of other Pac fights HBO Graphic says it' 25" arms for Pac.
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/7932/pac25inch.jpg
Damn!... HBO makes PAC's arm length a little shorter to make it competitive to Hatton's 20" short arms...
.
I guess they want to give a Partida (edge) for DLH & also for Hatton not to get Scared of Pac.
And for Hatton supporters not to be too worried about the reach advantage... and Hatton supporters will still buy the fight...
.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Or maybe Pac's arms are actually shrinking!! You guys could be in trouble come fight night! ;D;D
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I guess they want to give a Partida (edge) for DLH & also for Hatton not to get Scared of Pac.
And for Hatton supporters not to be too worried about the reach advantage... and Hatton supporters will still buy the fight...
.
Doesn't everyone have a reach advantage on Hatton?? He is like t-rex with his little arms and big head in there.
T-rex also had feathers. Fact.
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!
Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO :)
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!
Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO :)
What the hell does the phrase "excellent punchers chance" even mean?
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!
Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO :)
What the hell does the phrase "excellent punchers chance" even mean?
A good chance of winning perhaps?
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!
Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO :)
What the hell does the phrase "excellent punchers chance" even mean?
A good chance of winning perhaps?
I tell you what it means........it means nothing. The whole idea of a punchers chance is that a person has a very slim chance of winning because of a stray punch actually connecting.
People want to surround themselves with vagueness....and it is simply not the proper way to communicate to anyone.