Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

[Pacdbest2]

That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.

Maybe that's typographical error coz in all of other Pac fights HBO Graphic says it' 25" arms for Pac.

Damn!... HBO makes PAC's arm length a little shorter to make it competitive to Hatton's 20" short arms...
.

I guess they want to give a Partida(edge) for DLH & also for Hatton not to get Scared of Pac.

[XaduBoxer]

Maybe that's typographical error coz in all of other Pac fights HBO Graphic says it' 25" arms for Pac.

Damn!... HBO makes PAC's arm length a little shorter to make it competitive to Hatton's 20" short arms...
.

I guess they want to give a Partida (edge) for DLH & also for Hatton not to get Scared of Pac.

And for Hatton supporters not to be too worried about the reach advantage... and Hatton supporters will still buy the fight...
.

[Gandalf]

Or maybe Pac's arms are actually shrinking!! You guys could be in trouble come fight night!

[boozeboxer]

Damn!... HBO makes PAC's arm length a little shorter to make it competitive to Hatton's 20" short arms...
.

I guess they want to give a Partida (edge) for DLH & also for Hatton not to get Scared of Pac.

And for Hatton supporters not to be too worried about the reach advantage... and Hatton supporters will still buy the fight...
.

Doesn't everyone have a reach advantage on Hatton?? He is like t-rex with his little arms and big head in there.










T-rex also had feathers. Fact.

[KananKrus]

With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!

Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO

[boozeboxer]

With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!

Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO

What the hell does the phrase "excellent punchers chance" even mean?

[Gandalf]

With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!

Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO

What the hell does the phrase "excellent punchers chance" even mean?

A good chance of winning perhaps?

[boozeboxer]

With the facts laid down like that by SaddoBoxer (a commendable job I might add), overwhelmingly in favor of Pacquiao and on black and white, it sure makes it hard to disagree without sounding logically challenged. Logic one ups nuthugging here!

Pacquiao will highly likely inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton. Outside of an excellent punchers chance, as the "Hitman" has that on a vast reserve, Hatton's chance of winning is marginally slim to none. IMHO

What the hell does the phrase "excellent punchers chance" even mean?

A good chance of winning perhaps?

I tell you what it means........it means nothing. The whole idea of a punchers chance is that a person has a very slim chance of winning because of a stray punch actually connecting.

People want to surround themselves with vagueness....and it is simply not the proper way to communicate to anyone.