I see Eric is in a pickle again lol.
You gotta love the guy, he has surely got to be related to Hornfinger.
Printable View
I see Eric is in a pickle again lol.
You gotta love the guy, he has surely got to be related to Hornfinger.
ha good one, see you do have a sense of humour when youre not all seriousQuote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkin
i meant that it has put a question mark over a lot of big fights that margs has been involved in and the progression he has made from those fights, cintron cant be too happy about it
and a win for margs might put some of those doubts to rest, if he can beat pac perhaps he didnt have the wraps in other fights, perhaps cintron wouldnt have been the super champ he could have been if margs' gloves hadnt have been loaded
p.s. i dont actually think cintron could have been a super champ i was just using that as a possible example
I thought you were a boxing fan when Bruno was in his prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
is that the dude who owns that restaurant?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
ha, dude im just messing with youQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepI thought you were a boxing fan when Bruno was in his prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
is that the dude who owns that restaurant?
Yeah that's the thing, it's one thing when it's funny. But you're not funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44ha, dude im just messing with youQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepI thought you were a boxing fan when Bruno was in his prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
is that the dude who owns that restaurant?
i dunno dude what did i sayQuote:
Originally Posted by The Boogie ManI know what you said.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44you seem to think that i did say that the hand wraps were single-handedly bringing down boxingQuote:
Originally Posted by The Boogie Man:vd::lol::vd::lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkinYou didn't say that? (see highlighted)Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkinBoxing is in a hole because of the wraps? Yep, those handwraps are single-handedly destroying boxing :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44no it intQuote:
Originally Posted by :::PSL:::No.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfan
I want it like this...
How about, Manny destroys Margo. And let Cotto destroy him more in rematch?
No matter how you look at it, a Margarito win, is bad for boxing.
at the minute people are doubting his whole carear, boxing is in a hole because of the wraps
if he wins then that can go some ways to legitamising history
a win for margs would be good a bad defeat would raise all those questions again
I can't see anyway boxing wins with anything other than a Pacquiao win. Even if you don't like Pacquiao, you have to admit that. Win this & there's really no other money-making options out there for Arum to stick him in with. Khan won't be viable for Mayweather till he's proved definitivelly to be the best at 140, which will take him 2-3 fights. So a Pacquiao win here will mean that the two of them will almost certainly have to get it on.
It will be a new tax year & the weekend of May 7th is arguably the biggest of the year in Vegas. It will make more sense for the pair of them then it has at either point of the last 2 'negotiations'.
i didnt say that (see highlighted)
if margs wins pacs carear wont be over unless he chooses it to be, he will still be a big draw
Hahahahahahaha!!!!! ;D
i'll have to read back through
I think the whole forum knows what you said. What exactly did you say? Say it again. Just so we're all clear.
And who dug this whole that you keep referring to? Margarito, Richardson, Pacquiao, Jaz Merkin?
i thought we were talking about margs v pac
In your own little world Yes I agree In the real world I have to disagree mate. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheepYeah that's the thing, it's one thing when it's funny. But you're not funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44ha, dude im just messing with youQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepI thought you were a boxing fan when Bruno was in his prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
is that the dude who owns that restaurant?
you tried to be funny dude with the luis resto thing
i just though you had tried to start some banter, we can go back to serious if you like?
just to recap skel, the debate started because someone said a win for margs would be nothing but bad for boxingQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983In your own little world Yes I agree In the real world I have to disagree mate. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
i disagreed because of the points I have made
do you not think my points are valid?
No, the point you've made show why a Margarito win would be good for Margarito. None of them are good for boxing as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44just to recap skel, the debate started because someone said a win for margs would be nothing but bad for boxingQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983In your own little world Yes I agree In the real world I have to disagree mate. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
i disagreed because of the points I have made
do you not think my points are valid?
Whether you like one, both or neither, Mayweather & Pacquiao are the best thing to happen to boxing in the past decade. Two small ATGs who've gone through numerous weight-classes beating around half a dozen future hall of famers each. A possible fight between the two would be the biggest the sport has seen since Leonard-Hearns.
Sorry, I'm being all serious again. Let's talk about something funny like the cost of cheese in brothels.
your wrong dude, check out posts 5 and 6 where the debate startedQuote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkinNo, the point you've made show why a Margarito win would be good for Margarito. None of them are good for boxing as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44just to recap skel, the debate started because someone said a win for margs would be nothing but bad for boxingQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983In your own little world Yes I agree In the real world I have to disagree mate. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
i disagreed because of the points I have made
do you not think my points are valid?
Whether you like one, both or neither, Mayweather & Pacquiao are the best thing to happen to boxing in the past decade. Two small ATGs who've gone through numerous weight-classes beating around half a dozen future hall of famers each. A possible fight between the two would be the biggest the sport has seen since Leonard-Hearns.
Sorry, I'm being all serious again. Let's talk about something funny like the cost of cheese in brothels.
you are right when you say a between pac and may would be big
Except then you ARE saying that Margarito's wraps have boxing in a hole??Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44your wrong dude, check out posts 5 and 6 where the debate startedQuote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkinNo, the point you've made show why a Margarito win would be good for Margarito. None of them are good for boxing as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44just to recap skel, the debate started because someone said a win for margs would be nothing but bad for boxingQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983In your own little world Yes I agree In the real world I have to disagree mate. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
i disagreed because of the points I have made
do you not think my points are valid?
Whether you like one, both or neither, Mayweather & Pacquiao are the best thing to happen to boxing in the past decade. Two small ATGs who've gone through numerous weight-classes beating around half a dozen future hall of famers each. A possible fight between the two would be the biggest the sport has seen since Leonard-Hearns.
Sorry, I'm being all serious again. Let's talk about something funny like the cost of cheese in brothels.
you are right when you say a between pac and may would be big
But that can't be saying that, because you've said it isn't. So what are you saying?
what has that got to do with the last 2 posts?Quote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkinExcept then you ARE saying that Margarito's wraps have boxing in a hole??Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44your wrong dude, check out posts 5 and 6 where the debate startedQuote:
Originally Posted by JazMerkinNo, the point you've made show why a Margarito win would be good for Margarito. None of them are good for boxing as a whole.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44just to recap skel, the debate started because someone said a win for margs would be nothing but bad for boxingQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983In your own little world Yes I agree In the real world I have to disagree mate. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
what are you on about skell, im in no pickle, im winning the argument by a clear margin
have a read through :)
i disagreed because of the points I have made
do you not think my points are valid?
Whether you like one, both or neither, Mayweather & Pacquiao are the best thing to happen to boxing in the past decade. Two small ATGs who've gone through numerous weight-classes beating around half a dozen future hall of famers each. A possible fight between the two would be the biggest the sport has seen since Leonard-Hearns.
Sorry, I'm being all serious again. Let's talk about something funny like the cost of cheese in brothels.
you are right when you say a between pac and may would be big
But that can't be saying that, because you've said it isn't. So what are you saying?
and your last sentence is daft man because we have already cleared those points up, do i really need to go back through the thread and show you up again?
I was gonna say the same thing! lolQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983