Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
The Chisora fight is, was, and always has been a TUNE UP. Arreola is finished, he's fat, he's slow, and he's no longer a hot commodity. Chisora is fresh and new albeit still green to this level of fighting but no one knows how he'll handle the bright spotlight, he could take to it like a duck to water....I doubt it but the "fight or flight" response in the brain is a hell of a thing.
Duck to water lol If Haye was fighting Chisora after being offered the Wlad fight but he said no I need a tune up against Chisora we would never here the fucking end of it from you, you have shocking double standards when it comes to Wlad.
Hell of alot of truth in that Lyle.
Chisora isn't in his mid 30's so its not as if the WBA title holder would jump at the chance to fight him ;D
You guys bring all this stuff up (in other threads and other posts) about Chisora not being deserving (fine it doesn't bother me, its an OPTIONAL defense), about Wlad fighting 2 times in 8-9 weeks and how Wlad only fought 2 times in 2010 but a big reason for that is because he was waiting to sign a fight with the WBA title holder, same thing in 2009.
If Haye had chosen to fight Chisora PERIOD, we would never have heard the end of it. You'd have said he's fighting a 14 fight novice with no previous experience. Mock the Harrison defense all you like, but truth is the guy was a European Champion. He wasn't deserving, but he, like Sosnowski when he signed to fight Vitali, was European Champion. How is Chisora acceptable but Harrison not so much? Skel is right, you have double standards when it comes to the IBF & WBO title holder.
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
What does it matter? Look at the rest of his heavyweight opponents, Chisora would be an upgrade IMO. At least he's young and undefeated unlike Monte Barrett, Audley Harrison, etc.
Gotta agree with you on that one....I mean WTF man who is lewft for the brothers to beat up?.......Don't hate the players hate the game:cool:
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
to be honest the way the heavyweight division is at the moment fighting a young ubeaten boxer may carry a risk because most guys are in the 30's, somewhat fat and flabby flat footed with ???????? about there stamina, chin, and overrall tactical abillty...a young gun who may turn up to fight, throw hard shots with quicker feet then most might just land one on wlads chin and change the dynamic......lets all hope ahh
Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?
Because they are the kings of negotiating to suit themselves and if they don't get exactly what they want, when they want it, fights just don't happen.
I agree that champions should have more of a say than any contender when contracts are written but the Klits just take the piss. Could you really imagine Muhammad Ali for example saying to Joe Frazier, "right if you beat me you have to fight George Foreman straight after, otherwise you are in breach of our contract"??
What a load of Bollocks!!
