Chisora isn't in his mid 30's so its not as if the WBA title holder would jump at the chance to fight him
You guys bring all this stuff up (in other threads and other posts) about Chisora not being deserving (fine it doesn't bother me, its an OPTIONAL defense), about Wlad fighting 2 times in 8-9 weeks and how Wlad only fought 2 times in 2010 but a big reason for that is because he was waiting to sign a fight with the WBA title holder, same thing in 2009.
If Haye had chosen to fight Chisora PERIOD, we would never have heard the end of it. You'd have said he's fighting a 14 fight novice with no previous experience. Mock the Harrison defense all you like, but truth is the guy was a European Champion. He wasn't deserving, but he, like Sosnowski when he signed to fight Vitali, was European Champion. How is Chisora acceptable but Harrison not so much? Skel is right, you have double standards when it comes to the IBF & WBO title holder.
What does it matter? Look at the rest of his heavyweight opponents, Chisora would be an upgrade IMO. At least he's young and undefeated unlike Monte Barrett, Audley Harrison, etc.
to be honest the way the heavyweight division is at the moment fighting a young ubeaten boxer may carry a risk because most guys are in the 30's, somewhat fat and flabby flat footed with?? about there stamina, chin, and overrall tactical abillty...a young gun who may turn up to fight, throw hard shots with quicker feet then most might just land one on wlads chin and change the dynamic......lets all hope ahh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks