It would be nice to see him continue to fight top opposition, unfortunately he ain't beating Ward!
Printable View
It would be nice to see him continue to fight top opposition, unfortunately he ain't beating Ward!
How you work that out?? To me froch lost a close decsion on away turf! Hardley showed how to fight bigtime?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillips
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy
IMO the froch kessler fight was a bigger robbery than any of the pc jmm fights :)
(ps.s i still havent seen III)
can't see Froch losing ...his will is too strong to lose..be cool to see Kel brook fight in the US.. Should be a top night all round and a 7am finish here in Malta ;D
Problem is he let the Kessler fight slip away. If he had been more active at certain points in the middle and end of the fight, he would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by smashup
In reality froch won 3 out of 4 rounds quite clearlyQuote:
Originally Posted by RantcatratProblem is he let the Kessler fight slip away. If he had been more active at certain points in the middle and end of the fight, he would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by smashup
If the fight had have been anywhere other than denmark froch would have won
Fixed that for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
That was the fist time froch has ever been hurt. Kessler outclassed him bigtime!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by TaffturnerHow you work that out?? To me froch lost a close decsion on away turf! Hardley showed how to fight bigtime?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillips
Ha, i admit i can see the argument for dirrell beating frochQuote:
Originally Posted by shzaFixed that for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
He didnt win tho, noone in the history of boxing has been that negative and won a fight
In the froch kessler fight kessler hardly lands any sort of meaningful punch till the sixth
I dont see any case for kes winning that fight
I fucking love Carl Froch. That guy would fight a laser-wielding polar bear using nothing but an old newspaper and a box of crayons if you could get 20 people to come and watch.
Disagree on Dirrell, he clearly won the fight, but I totally agree about Kesler. Froch should have gotten the nod there.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Ha, i admit i can see the argument for dirrell beating frochQuote:
Originally Posted by shzaFixed that for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
He didnt win tho, noone in the history of boxing has been that negative and won a fight
In the froch kessler fight kessler hardly lands any sort of meaningful punch till the sixth
I dont see any case for kes winning that fight
I thought it was a VERY winnable fight for Froch. I remember thinking there were times where Froch took too long a rest in between getting his shots off and that hurt him. I'll rewatch it and see if I still feel the same way. I disagree about it not being a close fight. It was close either way. I thought Froch won too though.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44In reality froch won 3 out of 4 rounds quite clearlyQuote:
Originally Posted by RantcatratProblem is he let the Kessler fight slip away. If he had been more active at certain points in the middle and end of the fight, he would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by smashup
If the fight had have been anywhere other than denmark froch would have won
It was close. Froch and Kessler looked equally bad. Honestly, that was the sloppiest, most amateurish-looking fight between two supposedly elite fighters that I've ever seen. It hurt my eyes to watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by RantcatratI thought it was a VERY winnable fight for Froch. I remember thinking there were times where Froch took too long a rest in between getting his shots off and that hurt him. I'll rewatch it and see if I still feel the same way. I disagree about it not being a close fight. It was close either way. I thought Froch won too though.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44In reality froch won 3 out of 4 rounds quite clearlyQuote:
Originally Posted by RantcatratProblem is he let the Kessler fight slip away. If he had been more active at certain points in the middle and end of the fight, he would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by smashup
If the fight had have been anywhere other than denmark froch would have won
I don't disagree. I have seen Froch box beautifully off his back foot (Johnson fight), with his jab (Abraham fight) and slugging it out (Pascal). He boxed badly in the Kessler fight no doubt about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by shzaIt was close. Froch and Kessler looked equally bad. Honestly, that was the sloppiest, most amateurish-looking fight between two supposedly elite fighters that I've ever seen. It hurt my eyes to watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by RantcatratI thought it was a VERY winnable fight for Froch. I remember thinking there were times where Froch took too long a rest in between getting his shots off and that hurt him. I'll rewatch it and see if I still feel the same way. I disagree about it not being a close fight. It was close either way. I thought Froch won too though.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44In reality froch won 3 out of 4 rounds quite clearlyQuote:
Originally Posted by RantcatratProblem is he let the Kessler fight slip away. If he had been more active at certain points in the middle and end of the fight, he would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by smashup
If the fight had have been anywhere other than denmark froch would have won
Froch rips the pampered Bute..
Froch Rips Lucian Bute: He's Not Up There With The Best! - Boxing News