Re: should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
yep the ref made the only decision he could, the question is tho should dirrell have been DQ'd
And the answer is "NO"
you raise some interesting points
It was the first warning, the punch was a glancing shot, the fighter was asked if he was ready & able to continue, and the shot from Abraham was flush and KO'd Dirrell....thoughI thought Dirrell's acting was embellished and a bit over the top if you ask me, but hey the ref took it and that's all that needs to happen for a fight to end in a DQ.
The very harshest punishment for Dirrell would have been to take a point, but hell it's erroneous he KO'd the dude with his next punch
the dude messed up really, he should have had a hissy fit
would have been a big win for him
Re: should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
This is the dumbest thread in quite a while. OP - accept that no one agrees with you and quit.
noone agrees with me on what point big man?
with the suggestion that there's even a question about whether dirrell should have been dq'd for tapping on the break.
par for the course with your threads/comments. probably still buttsore from froch being humiliated in the super 6.
you are taking over as the forum egg
btw, froch wasnt humiliated in the super six, he got to the final and lost by 2 or 3 rounds by way of the score cards
pretty good performance all in all, especially considering he had 1 fight at home and the winner didnt once fight outside his home country
so take a chill pill dude ;D
dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.
relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .
hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.
but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.
ok, i'm chill now.
Re: should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.
relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .
hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.
but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.
ok, i'm chill now.
im not sure you are that chilled, you seem a bit up tight
the score cards for the final are only ridiculous acording to you, and it is your opinion that Froch wouldn't have won agaist Dirrell in any other town
you must have just emerged as the number one egg recently since skel and boxingbantz stopped posting, perhaps you were a little overshaddowed before and thats maybe why i didnt notice you
they are both in their early teens mind, whats your excuse?
Re: should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.
relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .
hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.
but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.
ok, i'm chill now.
im not sure you are that chilled, you seem a bit up tight
the score cards for the final are only ridiculous acording to you, and it is your opinion that Froch wouldn't have won agaist Dirrell in any other town
you must have just emerged as the number one egg recently since skel and boxingbantz stopped posting, perhaps you were a little overshaddowed before and thats maybe why i didnt notice you
they are both in their early teens mind, whats your excuse?
Read around a bit on what every single boxing writer (and everyone except you and dropanuke on this forum) thinks about those scores. Actually, you already have and you're just playing your role as provocateur.
Chill as can be.
Re: should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?
I thought it was 8-4 to ward, i thought ward won the first 4 and then it was an even fight
Froch definately wasnt humiliated
