should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?

[shza]

This is the dumbest thread in quite a while. OP - accept that no one agrees with you and quit.

noone agrees with me on what point big man?

with the suggestion that there's even a question about whether dirrell should have been dq'd for tapping on the break.

par for the course with your threads/comments. probably still buttsore from froch being humiliated in the super 6.

you are taking over as the forum egg

btw, froch wasnt humiliated in the super six, he got to the final and lost by 2 or 3 rounds by way of the score cards

pretty good performance all in all, especially considering he had 1 fight at home and the winner didnt once fight outside his home country

so take a chill pill dude

dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.

relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .

hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.

but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.

ok, i'm chill now.

[erics44]

dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.

relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .

hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.

but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.

ok, i'm chill now.

im not sure you are that chilled, you seem a bit up tight

the score cards for the final are only ridiculous acording to you, and it is your opinion that Froch wouldn't have won agaist Dirrell in any other town

you must have just emerged as the number one egg recently since skel and boxingbantz stopped posting, perhaps you were a little overshaddowed before and thats maybe why i didnt notice you

they are both in their early teens mind, whats your excuse?

[shza]

dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.

relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .

hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.

but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.

ok, i'm chill now.

im not sure you are that chilled, you seem a bit up tight

the score cards for the final are only ridiculous acording to you, and it is your opinion that Froch wouldn't have won agaist Dirrell in any other town

you must have just emerged as the number one egg recently since skel and boxingbantz stopped posting, perhaps you were a little overshaddowed before and thats maybe why i didnt notice you

they are both in their early teens mind, whats your excuse?

Read around a bit on what every single boxing writer (and everyone except you and dropanuke on this forum) thinks about those scores. Actually, you already have and you're just playing your role as provocateur.

Chill as can be.

[erics44]

I thought it was 8-4 to ward, i thought ward won the first 4 and then it was an even fight

Froch definately wasnt humiliated