should dirrell have been dq'd in his last fight?

[shza]

This is the dumbest thread in quite a while. OP - accept that no one agrees with you and quit.

noone agrees with me on what point big man?

with the suggestion that there's even a question about whether dirrell should have been dq'd for tapping on the break.

par for the course with your threads/comments. probably still buttsore from froch being humiliated in the super 6.

you are taking over as the forum egg

btw, froch wasnt humiliated in the super six, he got to the final and lost by 2 or 3 rounds by way of the score cards

pretty good performance all in all, especially considering he had 1 fight at home and the winner didnt once fight outside his home country

so take a chill pill dude

dude, i was here nearly 5 years before you arrived.

relying on those ridiculous scorecards from the froch-ward fight speaks for itself. if that's the best you can do . . . .

hilarious also to reference his one fight at home, since he would not have "won" (been gifted) that fight outside of the UK.

but anyway, the response from every single other person on the thread is that what you raise is not "an interesting question" but rather a stupid attempt at provocation (in typical fashion). i don't believe even you honestly think dirrell should have been dq'd or even had a point deducted for that.

ok, i'm chill now.