sounds like you have already had one suggesting wlad is legitQuote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
No but probably a drink.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44do you need a happy pill?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Printable View
sounds like you have already had one suggesting wlad is legitQuote:
Originally Posted by FensterNo but probably a drink.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44do you need a happy pill?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Even if you're shit you can still be legit.
that rhymesQuote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
i wonder if you could add another line with the word rules in, or ref, or money, or corrupt
How about...Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that rhymesQuote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
i wonder if you could add another line with the word rules in, or ref, or money, or corrupt
Even if you're shit you can still be legit and you can hug a guy to death in hopes he'll play with your Klit?
i like it but you structure a poem more like thisQuote:
Originally Posted by bzkfnHow about...Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44that rhymesQuote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
i wonder if you could add another line with the word rules in, or ref, or money, or corrupt
Even if you're shit you can still be legit and you can hug a guy to death in hopes he'll play with your Klit?
Even if you're shit you can still be legit
you can hug a guy to death in hopes he'll play with your Klit
Wlad can vacate the WBO to get a bigger fight than Lepai.
Then we can have 3 heavyweight champs plus Vitali as grandad empai title holder.
is this a poem?Quote:
Originally Posted by boyla
Jennings is fighting Szpilka next that will be a good fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingedwards
Surely Wladimir Klitschkcho deserves a shot at the most prestigious belt against the WBC #1 contender, who is apparently a man from Canadia, Bermane Stiverne, 23-1, who's notable wins ARE against "the nipple" Chris Arreola.. former WBC challenger, 36-3 & former IBF challenger, Ray "Rainman"
Austin, 28-6-4.
My money's on the Ukranian.
Tyson Fury has a point, only himself, Stiverne and Arreola have fought WBC eliminators recently, so only they should be eligible to fight for the title.
does he fuckQuote:
Originally Posted by Morgan-B-Howell
who wants to watch another highly corrupt HW title hug fest?
i certainly dont
the best thing for the HW division would be to now keep the WBC title as far away from the klit as possible and all decent contenders aim for that belt
let klit hug fighters who arent really in the frame
That'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6 ;D
World Boxing Council
#1 already fought #2 about 6 months ago and beat him easily, that would be a pointless fight. The fight really didn't warrant a rematch.Quote:
Originally Posted by bzkfnThat'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6 ;D
World Boxing Council
Fury is the guy that deserves it on resume (compared to the others). Hes beaten 2 former WBC title challengers (Chisora, Kevin Johnson) afterall, whilst Wilder has fought no one and Perez has never contested a 12 rounder.
Exactly, theres some right dick heads in here;DQuote:
Originally Posted by J_C#1 already fought #2 about 6 months ago and beat him easily, that would be a pointless fight. The fight really didn't warrant a rematch.Quote:
Originally Posted by bzkfnThat'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6 ;D
World Boxing Council
Fury is the guy that deserves it on resume (compared to the others). Hes beaten 2 former WBC title challengers (Chisora, Kevin Johnson) afterall, whilst Wilder has fought no one and Perez has never contested a 12 rounder.
Fury is mentioning about the possibility of getting Stiverne over to Manchester for the title. Its getting interesting!
You misunderstand. I wasn't saying that is what I think should happen, I was saying that is what should happen as per WBC rules. I agree it would be pointless, but when there is a vacant title up for grabs, #1 fights #2.Quote:
Originally Posted by J_C#1 already fought #2 about 6 months ago and beat him easily, that would be a pointless fight. The fight really didn't warrant a rematch.Quote:
Originally Posted by bzkfnThat'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6 ;D
World Boxing Council
Fury is the guy that deserves it on resume (compared to the others). Hes beaten 2 former WBC title challengers (Chisora, Kevin Johnson) afterall, whilst Wilder has fought no one and Perez has never contested a 12 rounder.
However, saying that, you view that Fury beat 2 former WBC Title challengers can only be taken into account for Johnson, since Chisora hadn't challenged for the title when Fury beat him. Wilder beat former WBO Champion Sergey Liakovich and for WBA World Title Challenger Audley Harrison. Do they make him warrant a title shot?