WBC heavyweight title now vacant

[Kingedwards]

Lets see haye back!!

Wilder vs Arreola golden boy WBC ranking match

Stiverne vs Jennings or Perez I mean look at WBC rankings thts the top 5

[IamInuit]

Wlad would not like a shot at the undisputed crown? Of course he would.

[ross]

Lets see haye back!!

Wilder vs Arreola golden boy WBC ranking match

Stiverne vs Jennings or Perez I mean look at WBC rankings thts the top 5

What the fuck!

Have you been in a coma for the past year?

The only excitment Haye would bring is all the dunces who have shelled out on tickets, hotels and travel taking that gamble again.

The only reason Haye ever went up to heavy is because of Corrie Sanders. He thought the Klitchskos were vulnerable to speed but he forgot, hes vulnerable to anyone who can punch back.

[Tam Seddon]

Lets see haye back!!

Wilder vs Arreola golden boy WBC ranking match

Stiverne vs Jennings or Perez I mean look at WBC rankings thts the top 5

Jennings is fighting Szpilka next that will be a good fight.

[Morgan-B-Howell]

Surely Wladimir Klitschkcho deserves a shot at the most prestigious belt against the WBC #1 contender, who is apparently a man from Canadia, Bermane Stiverne, 23-1, who's notable wins ARE against "the nipple" Chris Arreola.. former WBC challenger, 36-3 & former IBF challenger, Ray "Rainman"
Austin, 28-6-4.

My money's on the Ukranian.

[ross]

Tyson Fury has a point, only himself, Stiverne and Arreola have fought WBC eliminators recently, so only they should be eligible to fight for the title.

[bzkfn]

Tyson Fury has a point, only himself, Stiverne and Arreola have fought WBC eliminators recently, so only they should be eligible to fight for the title.

That'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!

#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6

World Boxing Council

[J_C]

Tyson Fury has a point, only himself, Stiverne and Arreola have fought WBC eliminators recently, so only they should be eligible to fight for the title.

That'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!

#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6

World Boxing Council

#1 already fought #2 about 6 months ago and beat him easily, that would be a pointless fight. The fight really didn't warrant a rematch.

Fury is the guy that deserves it on resume (compared to the others). Hes beaten 2 former WBC title challengers (Chisora, Kevin Johnson) afterall, whilst Wilder has fought no one and Perez has never contested a 12 rounder.

[ross]

Tyson Fury has a point, only himself, Stiverne and Arreola have fought WBC eliminators recently, so only they should be eligible to fight for the title.

That'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!

#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6

World Boxing Council

#1 already fought #2 about 6 months ago and beat him easily, that would be a pointless fight. The fight really didn't warrant a rematch.

Fury is the guy that deserves it on resume (compared to the others). Hes beaten 2 former WBC title challengers (Chisora, Kevin Johnson) afterall, whilst Wilder has fought no one and Perez has never contested a 12 rounder.

Exactly, theres some right dick heads in here

Fury is mentioning about the possibility of getting Stiverne over to Manchester for the title. Its getting interesting!

[bzkfn]

Tyson Fury has a point, only himself, Stiverne and Arreola have fought WBC eliminators recently, so only they should be eligible to fight for the title.

That'll go down as forum shocker. You think Fury has a point? I didn't see that coming!

#1 should fight #2 for the belt unless one of them is unavailable and in this case it goes to #3 to replace the one that is unavailable. Right now, Stiverne is #1, Arreola is #2 and Wilder is #3. Fury is ranked #8, behind Chisora who is #6

World Boxing Council

#1 already fought #2 about 6 months ago and beat him easily, that would be a pointless fight. The fight really didn't warrant a rematch.

Fury is the guy that deserves it on resume (compared to the others). Hes beaten 2 former WBC title challengers (Chisora, Kevin Johnson) afterall, whilst Wilder has fought no one and Perez has never contested a 12 rounder.

You misunderstand. I wasn't saying that is what I think should happen, I was saying that is what should happen as per WBC rules. I agree it would be pointless, but when there is a vacant title up for grabs, #1 fights #2.

However, saying that, you view that Fury beat 2 former WBC Title challengers can only be taken into account for Johnson, since Chisora hadn't challenged for the title when Fury beat him. Wilder beat former WBO Champion Sergey Liakovich and for WBA World Title Challenger Audley Harrison. Do they make him warrant a title shot?

[erics44]

Surely Wladimir Klitschkcho deserves a shot at the most prestigious belt against the WBC #1 contender, who is apparently a man from Canadia, Bermane Stiverne, 23-1, who's notable wins ARE against "the nipple" Chris Arreola.. former WBC challenger, 36-3 & former IBF challenger, Ray "Rainman"
Austin, 28-6-4.

My money's on the Ukranian.

does he fuck

who wants to watch another highly corrupt HW title hug fest?

i certainly dont

the best thing for the HW division would be to now keep the WBC title as far away from the klit as possible and all decent contenders aim for that belt

let klit hug fighters who arent really in the frame