Should we abolish the Royal family?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

get rid of the royals
abolish the class divide
=
shariah law throughout the country within 50years!!

---

You dip stick nothing to do with Shariah law but about having a republic.

---

Because of course republics have a much better reputation.....

It's not often me and Kirklaind Laing agree but I'm 100 percent with him, in that the Queen is the best head of state we can possibly have.

@ Miles

I just don't understand your logic really. First off, yes the queen gets money to upkeep her homes, but come on these stately buildings are part of the nation's heritage a bit different from your gran's house.

Think of all the fantastic royal buildings we have, Buckingham Palace, The Tower of London, Westminster, they are amazing, some of the finest and most famous buildings on earth with hundreds, even thousands of years of history.

They are the Queen's property but in a sense belong to the whole nation. They are all open to the public, we can all go and visit most days of the year so what is the problem with public funds going towards their upkeep?

If you abolished the Royal Family it would still be public funds paying for the repairs and upkeep anyway.

And your gran probably can get help with essential repairs anyway, there are plenty of benefits out there for those in need.

As for your, 'inherited wealth should be taxed to death', well firstly it already is, we have inheritance tax after all, which I personally think sucks, but you seem to want to go even further and forceably take money from the rich to give to the government.

So are you a communist?

It's a fucking horrible philosophy and just ends up with nobody having anything.

Anybody who has worked for something is entitled to it. When they pass on their children are entitled to it. If they still have their wealth into the next generation they are entitled to it, and so forth.

Wanting to force them to hand over their money for some egalitarian plan is just theft imo. What would be the incentive to work hard and be succesful if all of your reward is taken from you in taxes and given to others?

It's a ridiculous, evil idea imo.

As for the queen, she does a tremendous job for this country as a faithful and loyal ambassador.

You never responded to this before but I put it to you again, has her life been one of a rich socialite living the highlife, indulging in excess and aristocratic vices? I really don't think it has, her life has been one of tireless service to this country. Think of all the diplomatic functions and visits she has to carry out, all the engagements, the rituals etc.

It's not a role I'd want in a million years, her wealth is nothing like that of a rock star, a footballer or an actor. Her wealth comes with immense responsibility and she has had to live a life of service and devotion to her country.

I am proud to say I love my queen and country and would oppose to the fullest any attempts at turning this nation into a republic with a Brown or Blairesque figure looming large as out head of state.

---

Once again completely bang on the mark

I happen to think some of the architecture is quite wonderful too, but if they are her homes then surely she is responsible for the upkeep. As it is, these homes are open to the public and at a cost. Surely this money would suffice for the upkeep of the properties. I don't understand why she should have any claim over taxpayers money. It was estimated that the Royal family cost the tax payer over 40 milllion pounds last year. Now look at the following article to see where this money went....

BBC NEWS | UK | Cost of Royal Family rises £1.5m

I see no way to justify it. I much prefer the idea of Graham Smith who suggested a cap on the Queens income at 200, 000 pounds a year. That's a mighty fine yearly salary for anyone! Surely, no one could have any complaints about that being better than what we currently have?

As for me possibly being a communist. Well, I wouldn't quite go that far. I am pretty left wing though in quite a bit of my thinking. Personally, I think the systems that we have in place today are becoming ever more evil and twisted too. The room for opportunity has seldom been this bad. The rich at the top are sucking it all dry and the banks are being handed over billions of pounds of hard working tax payers money just to keep the bubble afloat. The entire system is criminal. But at least we have the right to say what we want and be ignored by everyone!

I don't think keeping most of the wealth in society in the hands of a limited number of families who are free to manipulate the system through cronyism is a very good idea. It's best to funnel that wealth away from them and to stimulate the areas of society which suffer most. The 'have not's' deserve the opportunity to try and make something of themselves too. But I am digressing here away from talking specifically about the Royal family and going into a bit of a diatribe at what is taking place right now before our very eyes. But, no I'm not a communist. I'm more a humanist with strong socialist leanings.

In response to your final point, the Queen has a standard of living far beyond the reach of most ordinary people. If anybody was able to command millions of pounds for performing her duties, I'm sure they would jump at the chance too! But as it is, unless you are in the bloodline then you haven't a chance. It doesn't matter to me that she hasn't been galivanting and living it up in expensive clubs and collecting airplanes as a hobby. She does though have private cooks who cook her the finest food she desires all paid for by the humble old taxpayer. Why can't she cook her own tin of soup like I am most other people have to?

I'm not really into the salaries of top football players either, but they are paid by the people who are willing to pay money to watch games. Nobody is forcing people to buy tickets or watch football. There is a demand and the market stipulates that top players earn a lot more than the lowly minnions in the lesser leagues. I don't like that, but the taxpayers are not funding it so it doesn't matter so much. I can choose not to watch a game, but I am unable to stipulate who the head of state should be. The market does not respond to the Royal family in quite the same way.

The country is pretty much a republic anyway. Gordon Brown is the leader and what he wants generally gets passed as long as the house agrees. The Queen is head of state in name only.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

I happen to think some of the architecture is quite wonderful too, but if they are her homes then surely she is responsible for the upkeep. As it is, these homes are open to the public and at a cost. Surely this money would suffice for the upkeep of the properties. I don't understand why she should have any claim over taxpayers money. It was estimated that the Royal family cost the tax payer over 40 milllion pounds last year. Now look at the following article to see where this money went....

BBC NEWS | UK | Cost of Royal Family rises �1.5m

I see no way to justify it. I much prefer the idea of Graham Smith who suggested a cap on the Queens income at 200, 000 pounds a year. That's a mighty fine yearly salary for anyone! Surely, no one could have any complaints about that being better than what we currently have?

As for me possibly being a communist. Well, I wouldn't quite go that far. I am pretty left wing though in quite a bit of my thinking. Personally, I think the systems that we have in place today are becoming ever more evil and twisted too. The room for opportunity has seldom been this bad. The rich at the top are sucking it all dry and the banks are being handed over billions of pounds of hard working tax payers money just to keep the bubble afloat. The entire system is criminal. But at least we have the right to say what we want and be ignored by everyone!

I don't think keeping most of the wealth in society in the hands of a limited number of families who are free to manipulate the system through cronyism is a very good idea. It's best to funnel that wealth away from them and to stimulate the areas of society which suffer most. The 'have not's' deserve the opportunity to try and make something of themselves too. But I am digressing here away from talking specifically about the Royal family and going into a bit of a diatribe at what is taking place right now before our very eyes. But, no I'm not a communist. I'm more a humanist with strong socialist leanings.

In response to your final point, the Queen has a standard of living far beyond the reach of most ordinary people. If anybody was able to command millions of pounds for performing her duties, I'm sure they would jump at the chance too! But as it is, unless you are in the bloodline then you haven't a chance. It doesn't matter to me that she hasn't been galivanting and living it up in expensive clubs and collecting airplanes as a hobby. She does though have private cooks who cook her the finest food she desires all paid for by the humble old taxpayer. Why can't she cook her own tin of soup like I am most other people have to?

I'm not really into the salaries of top football players either, but they are paid by the people who are willing to pay money to watch games. Nobody is forcing people to buy tickets or watch football. There is a demand and the market stipulates that top players earn a lot more than the lowly minnions in the lesser leagues. I don't like that, but the taxpayers are not funding it so it doesn't matter so much. I can choose not to watch a game, but I am unable to stipulate who the head of state should be. The market does not respond to the Royal family in quite the same way.

The country is pretty much a republic anyway. Gordon Brown is the leader and what he wants generally gets passed as long as the house agrees. The Queen is head of state in name only.

---

worth every penny!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

I happen to think some of the architecture is quite wonderful too, but if they are her homes then surely she is responsible for the upkeep. As it is, these homes are open to the public and at a cost. Surely this money would suffice for the upkeep of the properties. I don't understand why she should have any claim over taxpayers money. It was estimated that the Royal family cost the tax payer over 40 milllion pounds last year. Now look at the following article to see where this money went....

BBC NEWS | UK | Cost of Royal Family rises �1.5m

I see no way to justify it. I much prefer the idea of Graham Smith who suggested a cap on the Queens income at 200, 000 pounds a year. That's a mighty fine yearly salary for anyone! Surely, no one could have any complaints about that being better than what we currently have?

As for me possibly being a communist. Well, I wouldn't quite go that far. I am pretty left wing though in quite a bit of my thinking. Personally, I think the systems that we have in place today are becoming ever more evil and twisted too. The room for opportunity has seldom been this bad. The rich at the top are sucking it all dry and the banks are being handed over billions of pounds of hard working tax payers money just to keep the bubble afloat. The entire system is criminal. But at least we have the right to say what we want and be ignored by everyone!

I don't think keeping most of the wealth in society in the hands of a limited number of families who are free to manipulate the system through cronyism is a very good idea. It's best to funnel that wealth away from them and to stimulate the areas of society which suffer most. The 'have not's' deserve the opportunity to try and make something of themselves too. But I am digressing here away from talking specifically about the Royal family and going into a bit of a diatribe at what is taking place right now before our very eyes. But, no I'm not a communist. I'm more a humanist with strong socialist leanings.

In response to your final point, the Queen has a standard of living far beyond the reach of most ordinary people. If anybody was able to command millions of pounds for performing her duties, I'm sure they would jump at the chance too! But as it is, unless you are in the bloodline then you haven't a chance. It doesn't matter to me that she hasn't been galivanting and living it up in expensive clubs and collecting airplanes as a hobby. She does though have private cooks who cook her the finest food she desires all paid for by the humble old taxpayer. Why can't she cook her own tin of soup like I am most other people have to?

I'm not really into the salaries of top football players either, but they are paid by the people who are willing to pay money to watch games. Nobody is forcing people to buy tickets or watch football. There is a demand and the market stipulates that top players earn a lot more than the lowly minnions in the lesser leagues. I don't like that, but the taxpayers are not funding it so it doesn't matter so much. I can choose not to watch a game, but I am unable to stipulate who the head of state should be. The market does not respond to the Royal family in quite the same way.

The country is pretty much a republic anyway. Gordon Brown is the leader and what he wants generally gets passed as long as the house agrees. The Queen is head of state in name only.

---

Out of interest Miles how far does your desire to see the 'have nots' empowered extend?

You seem to have no problem with the Royal family and other rich families having their inherited wealth taken from them but what about yours?

Are you not, purely by virtue of birth a beneficiary of being born into glorious first world country, which in comparison with most of the most is fabulously wealthy beyond compare?

As you, I and all the rest of us inherited this land purely by birthright is it really fair that we get to enjoy it rather than those in struggling third world countries?

I presume you support not only uncontrolled immigration but also a compulsary repatriation process whereby British citizens are selected to trade places with those from Africa, Indian and the Arab countries so as to redisperse the wealth in as fair a way as possible?

Do you feel this way? Does our great wealth as a first world country also rightly belong to our cousins in the second and third worlds?

Or do you think Britain's wealth, in which we partake soley as a result of heredity birthright is for the people of Britain only?

lol fucken crazies ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Out of interest Miles how far does your desire to see the 'have nots' empowered extend?

You seem to have no problem with the Royal family and other rich families having their inherited wealth taken from them but what about yours?

Are you not, purely by virtue of birth a beneficiary of being born into glorious first world country, which in comparison with most of the most is fabulously wealthy beyond compare?

As you, I and all the rest of us inherited this land purely by birthright is it really fair that we get to enjoy it rather than those in struggling third world countries?

I presume you support not only uncontrolled immigration but also a compulsary repatriation process whereby British citizens are selected to trade places with those from Africa, Indian and the Arab countries so as to redisperse the wealth in as fair a way as possible?

Do you feel this way? Does our great wealth as a first world country also rightly belong to our cousins in the second and third worlds?

Or do you think Britain's wealth, in which we partake soley as a result of heredity birthright is for the people of Britain only?

---

Typically changing the subject going on about compulsary repatriation. :rolleyes: In which case sod Philip off to Corfu and Liz to sausage land.

Bilbo both you and the Queen take from the system so I can see why you'd support her robbing me of my money, I won't get a pension but if I want one it means paying twice, once for a private pension and what I'm paying now for all the people claiming pension and for the next 30/40 years. I get nothing. So why should the Queen - and if we're talking about heritage - they got where there positions by actively raping and pillaging the people of this country and round the world. We as subjects don't get a look in.

Their 'heritage' is OUR heritage and as such why don't we have free access to it if it's ours and we're paying for it twice, in taxes to that go to the Queen and to view them.

Eat the rich.

CEWAP
CEWAP - Conditionally Exempt Works Appreciation Party

I'm not a communist - I'm politically anarchist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

You dip stick nothing to do with Shariah law but about having a republic.

---

Because of course republics have a much better reputation.....

It's not often me and Kirklaind Laing agree but I'm 100 percent with him, in that the Queen is the best head of state we can possibly have.

@ Miles

I just don't understand your logic really. First off, yes the queen gets money to upkeep her homes, but come on these stately buildings are part of the nation's heritage a bit different from your gran's house.

Think of all the fantastic royal buildings we have, Buckingham Palace, The Tower of London, Westminster, they are amazing, some of the finest and most famous buildings on earth with hundreds, even thousands of years of history.

They are the Queen's property but in a sense belong to the whole nation. They are all open to the public, we can all go and visit most days of the year so what is the problem with public funds going towards their upkeep?

If you abolished the Royal Family it would still be public funds paying for the repairs and upkeep anyway.

And your gran probably can get help with essential repairs anyway, there are plenty of benefits out there for those in need.

As for your, 'inherited wealth should be taxed to death', well firstly it already is, we have inheritance tax after all, which I personally think sucks, but you seem to want to go even further and forceably take money from the rich to give to the government.

So are you a communist?

It's a fucking horrible philosophy and just ends up with nobody having anything.

Anybody who has worked for something is entitled to it. When they pass on their children are entitled to it. If they still have their wealth into the next generation they are entitled to it, and so forth.

Wanting to force them to hand over their money for some egalitarian plan is just theft imo. What would be the incentive to work hard and be succesful if all of your reward is taken from you in taxes and given to others?

It's a ridiculous, evil idea imo.

As for the queen, she does a tremendous job for this country as a faithful and loyal ambassador.

You never responded to this before but I put it to you again, has her life been one of a rich socialite living the highlife, indulging in excess and aristocratic vices? I really don't think it has, her life has been one of tireless service to this country. Think of all the diplomatic functions and visits she has to carry out, all the engagements, the rituals etc.

It's not a role I'd want in a million years, her wealth is nothing like that of a rock star, a footballer or an actor. Her wealth comes with immense responsibility and she has had to live a life of service and devotion to her country.

I am proud to say I love my queen and country and would oppose to the fullest any attempts at turning this nation into a republic with a Brown or Blairesque figure looming large as out head of state.

---

Once again completely bang on the mark

---

:vd:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BIG H

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JazMerkin

Isn't that basically the same thing?

---

Queue HMH

---

get rid of the royals
abolish the class divide
=
shariah law throughout the country within 50years!!

---

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BIG H

Queue HMH

---

get rid of the royals
abolish the class divide
=
shariah law throughout the country within 50years!!

---

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

---

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

get rid of the royals
abolish the class divide
=
shariah law throughout the country within 50years!!

---

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

---

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

Sorry but you lost all credibility and that point and anything subsquent is just void ;D


Only joking HMH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

I happen to think some of the architecture is quite wonderful too, but if they are her homes then surely she is responsible for the upkeep. As it is, these homes are open to the public and at a cost. Surely this money would suffice for the upkeep of the properties. I don't understand why she should have any claim over taxpayers money. It was estimated that the Royal family cost the tax payer over 40 milllion pounds last year. Now look at the following article to see where this money went....

BBC NEWS | UK | Cost of Royal Family rises �1.5m

I see no way to justify it. I much prefer the idea of Graham Smith who suggested a cap on the Queens income at 200, 000 pounds a year. That's a mighty fine yearly salary for anyone! Surely, no one could have any complaints about that being better than what we currently have?

As for me possibly being a communist. Well, I wouldn't quite go that far. I am pretty left wing though in quite a bit of my thinking. Personally, I think the systems that we have in place today are becoming ever more evil and twisted too. The room for opportunity has seldom been this bad. The rich at the top are sucking it all dry and the banks are being handed over billions of pounds of hard working tax payers money just to keep the bubble afloat. The entire system is criminal. But at least we have the right to say what we want and be ignored by everyone!

I don't think keeping most of the wealth in society in the hands of a limited number of families who are free to manipulate the system through cronyism is a very good idea. It's best to funnel that wealth away from them and to stimulate the areas of society which suffer most. The 'have not's' deserve the opportunity to try and make something of themselves too. But I am digressing here away from talking specifically about the Royal family and going into a bit of a diatribe at what is taking place right now before our very eyes. But, no I'm not a communist. I'm more a humanist with strong socialist leanings.

In response to your final point, the Queen has a standard of living far beyond the reach of most ordinary people. If anybody was able to command millions of pounds for performing her duties, I'm sure they would jump at the chance too! But as it is, unless you are in the bloodline then you haven't a chance. It doesn't matter to me that she hasn't been galivanting and living it up in expensive clubs and collecting airplanes as a hobby. She does though have private cooks who cook her the finest food she desires all paid for by the humble old taxpayer. Why can't she cook her own tin of soup like I am most other people have to?

I'm not really into the salaries of top football players either, but they are paid by the people who are willing to pay money to watch games. Nobody is forcing people to buy tickets or watch football. There is a demand and the market stipulates that top players earn a lot more than the lowly minnions in the lesser leagues. I don't like that, but the taxpayers are not funding it so it doesn't matter so much. I can choose not to watch a game, but I am unable to stipulate who the head of state should be. The market does not respond to the Royal family in quite the same way.

The country is pretty much a republic anyway. Gordon Brown is the leader and what he wants generally gets passed as long as the house agrees. The Queen is head of state in name only.

---

Out of interest Miles how far does your desire to see the 'have nots' empowered extend?

You seem to have no problem with the Royal family and other rich families having their inherited wealth taken from them but what about yours?

Are you not, purely by virtue of birth a beneficiary of being born into glorious first world country, which in comparison with most of the most is fabulously wealthy beyond compare?

As you, I and all the rest of us inherited this land purely by birthright is it really fair that we get to enjoy it rather than those in struggling third world countries?

I presume you support not only uncontrolled immigration but also a compulsary repatriation process whereby British citizens are selected to trade places with those from Africa, Indian and the Arab countries so as to redisperse the wealth in as fair a way as possible?

Do you feel this way? Does our great wealth as a first world country also rightly belong to our cousins in the second and third worlds?

Or do you think Britain's wealth, in which we partake soley as a result of heredity birthright is for the people of Britain only?

---

Let's not forget that when we talk about inherited wealth I am talking about extremely wealthy families. I am not talking about taking away everything they have either. Taken at an individual level and in terms of my own possible future, I don't really have a lot of wealth to give away. I have lived away from home too long to ever think about claiming a pension there and the pension here covers nothing. My entire working life is simply to try and support me when I am too old to work. It won't be a life of luxury, but I hope it will be in comfort. I also hope I don't live too long just in case there isn't enough! It would be awful to get to 82 and the pot runs dry...I might be from a wealthy country, but I really won't ever see any of that wealth myself. When it comes to inherited wealth, I don't imagine there will be all that much left over when I die. Hopefully, I will have paid for the education of my kids and given them a decent sense of right and wrong and that will have been my job done. And of course, I would help out when I can but thats pretty much it.

As to how far my support of the 'have nots' goes, well we have been talking about Britain and I have no qualms with this being about the wealth of the rich being filtered down to support the poor. I'm not talking about just handing over cash to lazy bums, but investing it in education, creating jobs and other things like improving rough estates. Governments of all developed nations should contribute to supporting the least well off internationally too. I would have loved it if we had spent a fraction of the money we spent in Iraq on building water supplies for those in parts of Africa that most need it. We could have actually helped people rather than invading illegally, killing thousands.

I don't believe in unrestricted imigration though. I think it is unhealthy and with opportunities being as meagre as they are, it is unfair on those already looking for jobs. You could say, "well that isn't so considerate of the poor who are wanting to come to the UK to escape poverty". And I would understand that, but you are extending the question somewhat by asking me that and getting beyond the position of the monarchy and inherited wealth. But as I said before, I do believe it is the responsibility of our governments and our taxes to try and improve the lot of others overseas as well. It doesn't help things to have the rich getting richer and then having mass immigration allowing standards of living to fall for the vast majority of the population....and for the rich to continue to be unnaffected. That's not particularly fair.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BIG H

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

---

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

Sorry but you lost all credibility and that point and anything subsquent is just void ;D


Only joking HMH

---

I'll get my burqa :-X

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

get rid of the royals
abolish the class divide
=
shariah law throughout the country within 50years!!

---

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

---

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

This I agree on too. Sharia law is not something I would like for Britain.

Edit: Though on reading HTH's original post, I find what he says to be somewhat ludicrous. The Royal family is what it is, I don't really equate abolishing it with accepting Islam with open arms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

get rid of the royals
abolish the class divide
=
shariah law throughout the country within 50years!!

---

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

---

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

But they're not deciding the fates of anybody who doesn't want to be tried under that law. First and foremost both parties have to agree to be tried under the Sharia Court or the Jewish Courts. Secondly, it's only marital and domestic cases and the like. Criminal cases still have to be dealt with by English Law, and thirdly it doesn't over-rule English Law and it never will.

The fact that Jewish Courts have been in action for centuries, whilst still being over-ridden by English law suggests that it's work-able and has zero effect on non-Jewish people.

I don't even understand the paranoia that England will become an Islamic nation, given that only roughly 5% of the population are infact Muslims. Even then you're looking at a very miniscule percentage of that population who would be in favour of a full Sharia Law.

In fact i find it more worrying that we have a much greater population who would gladly enforce the death penalty, support the supposed War on Terror and get rid of all the foreigners.

It worries me even further that you partially agree with HTH. A self confessed homphobic, BNP voter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

I can't figure out if this is stupid or genuis. It's a belter of a post that only Jaz has picked up on.

Sharia already exists in Britain is Muslim communities. I'm assuming your not a Muslim so i see no reason why this bothers you.

Jewish courts are also widely used in Jewish communities within the UK and have been for centuries.

I don't understand your problem.

---

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

But they're not deciding the fates of anybody who doesn't want to be tried under that law. First and foremost both parties have to agree to be tried under the Sharia Court or the Jewish Courts. Secondly, it's only marital and domestic cases and the like. Criminal cases still have to be dealt with by English Law, and thirdly it doesn't over-rule English Law and it never will.

The fact that Jewish Courts have been in action for centuries, whilst still being over-ridden by English law suggests that it's work-able and has zero effect on non-Jewish people.

I don't even understand the paranoia that England will become an Islamic nation, given that only roughly 5% of the population are infact Muslims. Even then you're looking at a very miniscule percentage of that population who would be in favour of a full Sharia Law.

In fact i find it more worrying that we have a much greater population who would gladly enforce the death penalty, support the supposed War on Terror and get rid of all the foreigners.

It worries me even further that you partially agree with HTH. A self confessed homphobic, BNP voter.

---

A few things to address, we have a strong BNP presence in our city and I somewhat vomit everytime they start up. BUT the reasons people vote for them are a little more complex than labelling everyone as a goose-stepping nazi. A good portion are, a good chunk have allowed themselves to be manipulated but the more sensible ones have concerns that need to be dealt with rather than just saying you're wrong.

Regarding sharia/jewish law. Your point makes no sense. BRITISH law deals with marital and domestic cases. Religion should keep it's nose out. I apply the standards here as if I lived abroad, I wouldn't expect to invoke english law if I lived in spain.
How vocal have the jewish lobbies been in expressing the extension of jewish religious law? Not very. This is what is concerning people - the appearance of forced social change by a minority coupled with the fact that anyone who wants to openly discuss it is labelled racist.

I know this is difficult to discuss without sounding like HMH;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

But they're not deciding the fates of anybody who doesn't want to be tried under that law. First and foremost both parties have to agree to be tried under the Sharia Court or the Jewish Courts. Secondly, it's only marital and domestic cases and the like. Criminal cases still have to be dealt with by English Law, and thirdly it doesn't over-rule English Law and it never will.

The fact that Jewish Courts have been in action for centuries, whilst still being over-ridden by English law suggests that it's work-able and has zero effect on non-Jewish people.

I don't even understand the paranoia that England will become an Islamic nation, given that only roughly 5% of the population are infact Muslims. Even then you're looking at a very miniscule percentage of that population who would be in favour of a full Sharia Law.

In fact i find it more worrying that we have a much greater population who would gladly enforce the death penalty, support the supposed War on Terror and get rid of all the foreigners.

It worries me even further that you partially agree with HTH. A self confessed homphobic, BNP voter.

---

A few things to address, we have a strong BNP presence in our city and I somewhat vomit everytime they start up. BUT the reasons people vote for them are a little more complex than labelling everyone as a goose-stepping nazi. A good portion are, a good chunk have allowed themselves to be manipulated but the more sensible ones have concerns that need to be dealt with rather than just saying you're wrong.

Regarding sharia/jewish law. Your point makse no sense. BRITISH law deals with marital and domestic cases. Religion should keep it's nose out. I apply the standards here as if I lived abroad, I wouldn't expect to invoke english law if I lived in spain.
How vocal have the jewish lobbies been in expressing the extension of jewish religious law? Not very. This is what is concerning people - the appearance of forced social change by a minority coupled with the fact that anyone who wants to openly discuss it is labelled racist.

I know this is difficult to discuss without sounding like HMH;D

---

I agree that Religion in general should keep it's nose out. With all the scientific evidence of Evolution, i find it quite odd that people are prepared to dismiss it, and live this life as a precursor to a supposed afterlife.

Nobody is forcing social change. Sharia Law will have zero effect on everyone, except those who choose to use Sharia courts. The laws that stand under Sharia are governed by English Law. There will be a British legal authority present to advise and to make sure that court decisions do not conflict with British legal rules and precedent. So while we can debate the requirement of Sub-Legal systems, there is little point as it has no effect on the people opposing it.

Hadd punishments won't be an occurence in the UK, so don't worry. ;D

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

But they're not deciding the fates of anybody who doesn't want to be tried under that law. First and foremost both parties have to agree to be tried under the Sharia Court or the Jewish Courts. Secondly, it's only marital and domestic cases and the like. Criminal cases still have to be dealt with by English Law, and thirdly it doesn't over-rule English Law and it never will.

The fact that Jewish Courts have been in action for centuries, whilst still being over-ridden by English law suggests that it's work-able and has zero effect on non-Jewish people.

I don't even understand the paranoia that England will become an Islamic nation, given that only roughly 5% of the population are infact Muslims. Even then you're looking at a very miniscule percentage of that population who would be in favour of a full Sharia Law.

In fact i find it more worrying that we have a much greater population who would gladly enforce the death penalty, support the supposed War on Terror and get rid of all the foreigners.

It worries me even further that you partially agree with HTH. A self confessed homphobic, BNP voter.

---

A few things to address, we have a strong BNP presence in our city and I somewhat vomit everytime they start up. BUT the reasons people vote for them are a little more complex than labelling everyone as a goose-stepping nazi. A good portion are, a good chunk have allowed themselves to be manipulated but the more sensible ones have concerns that need to be dealt with rather than just saying you're wrong.

Regarding sharia/jewish law. Your point makse no sense. BRITISH law deals with marital and domestic cases. Religion should keep it's nose out. I apply the standards here as if I lived abroad, I wouldn't expect to invoke english law if I lived in spain.
How vocal have the jewish lobbies been in expressing the extension of jewish religious law? Not very. This is what is concerning people - the appearance of forced social change by a minority coupled with the fact that anyone who wants to openly discuss it is labelled racist.

I know this is difficult to discuss without sounding like HMH;D

---

I agree that Religion in general should keep it's nose out. With all the scientific evidence of Evolution, i find it quite odd that people are prepared to dismiss it, and live this life as a precursor to a supposed afterlife.

Nobody is forcing social change. Sharia Law will have zero effect on everyone, except those who choose to use Sharia courts. The laws that stand under Sharia are governed by English Law. There will be a British legal authority present to advise and to make sure that court decisions do not conflict with British legal rules and precedent. So while we can debate the requirement of Sub-Legal systems, there is little point as it has no effect on the people opposing it.

Hadd punishments won't be an occurence in the UK, so don't worry. ;D

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

;D let's call some of them 'disaffected'. There are many people who protest voted BNP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BIG H

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Because, I can't believe I'm about to say this, I agree - sort of with HMH. There should NOT be a separate body deciding the fate of British subjects. I don't care if it's jewish or islamic. The issue that concerns many and I presume this is what HMH is getting his knickers in a knot is that there is a vocal minority who see Islam as a progressive religion who do want to see sharia law throughout the UK and for the UK to become an Islamic nation.

---

Sorry but you lost all credibility and that point and anything subsquent is just void ;D


Only joking HMH

---

I'll get my burqa :-X

---

To be fair a lot of what i say including the above statement was aimed at getting a rise out of merkin ;D;D;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

A few things to address, we have a strong BNP presence in our city and I somewhat vomit everytime they start up. BUT the reasons people vote for them are a little more complex than labelling everyone as a goose-stepping nazi. A good portion are, a good chunk have allowed themselves to be manipulated but the more sensible ones have concerns that need to be dealt with rather than just saying you're wrong.

Regarding sharia/jewish law. Your point makse no sense. BRITISH law deals with marital and domestic cases. Religion should keep it's nose out. I apply the standards here as if I lived abroad, I wouldn't expect to invoke english law if I lived in spain.
How vocal have the jewish lobbies been in expressing the extension of jewish religious law? Not very. This is what is concerning people - the appearance of forced social change by a minority coupled with the fact that anyone who wants to openly discuss it is labelled racist.

I know this is difficult to discuss without sounding like HMH;D

---

I agree that Religion in general should keep it's nose out. With all the scientific evidence of Evolution, i find it quite odd that people are prepared to dismiss it, and live this life as a precursor to a supposed afterlife.

Nobody is forcing social change. Sharia Law will have zero effect on everyone, except those who choose to use Sharia courts. The laws that stand under Sharia are governed by English Law. There will be a British legal authority present to advise and to make sure that court decisions do not conflict with British legal rules and precedent. So while we can debate the requirement of Sub-Legal systems, there is little point as it has no effect on the people opposing it.

Hadd punishments won't be an occurence in the UK, so don't worry. ;D

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

;D let's call some of them 'disaffected'. There are many people who protest voted BNP.

---

;D

That's true. I think HTH's was a protest vote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BIG H

Sorry but you lost all credibility and that point and anything subsquent is just void ;D


Only joking HMH

---

I'll get my burqa :-X

---

To be fair a lot of what i say including the above statement was aimed at getting a rise out of merkin ;D;D;D

---

That's all well and good, but are you here to just get a rise out of people or would you like to actually debate something?

I have given a number of substantial replies in this thread and instead of responding with anything of substance you have simply brushed it off by saying that I am not talking sense or "they are worth every penny" (regarding the Royals) or such ilk. I have no problems with you HTH, but if you would like to debate things instead of trolling, I might respect you a little more. I might not agree with Bilbo all the time, but I respect that he takes the time to post and actually try and give some kind of indication as to why he might diasgree with me.

Miles has got the decorators in ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

I'll get my burqa :-X

---

To be fair a lot of what i say including the above statement was aimed at getting a rise out of merkin ;D;D;D

---

That's all well and good, but are you here to just get a rise out of people or would you like to actually debate something?

I have given a number of substantial replies in this thread and instead of responding with anything of substance you have simply brushed it off by saying that I am not talking sense or "they are worth every penny" (regarding the Royals) or such ilk. I have no problems with you HTH, but if you would like to debate things instead of trolling, I might respect you a little more. I might not agree with Bilbo all the time, but I respect that he takes the time to post and actually try and give some kind of indication as to why he might diasgree with me.

---

Bit harsh if your suggesting im not actually against most of the things i claim to actually be

That particular post was a one off, someone laid it off for me and i stuck in the back of the net.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

To be fair a lot of what i say including the above statement was aimed at getting a rise out of merkin ;D;D;D

---

That's all well and good, but are you here to just get a rise out of people or would you like to actually debate something?

I have given a number of substantial replies in this thread and instead of responding with anything of substance you have simply brushed it off by saying that I am not talking sense or "they are worth every penny" (regarding the Royals) or such ilk. I have no problems with you HTH, but if you would like to debate things instead of trolling, I might respect you a little more. I might not agree with Bilbo all the time, but I respect that he takes the time to post and actually try and give some kind of indication as to why he might diasgree with me.

---

Bit harsh if your suggesting im not actually against most of the things i claim to actually be

That particular post was a one off, someone laid it off for me and i stuck in the back of the net.

---

Maybe I was a bit harsh. It has been suggested that I am menstruating, but I hope that this is not the case.

I suppose I just get annoyed when people give my thoughtful comments the once over with a frivolous one liner. It annoys me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

That's all well and good, but are you here to just get a rise out of people or would you like to actually debate something?

I have given a number of substantial replies in this thread and instead of responding with anything of substance you have simply brushed it off by saying that I am not talking sense or "they are worth every penny" (regarding the Royals) or such ilk. I have no problems with you HTH, but if you would like to debate things instead of trolling, I might respect you a little more. I might not agree with Bilbo all the time, but I respect that he takes the time to post and actually try and give some kind of indication as to why he might diasgree with me.

---

Bit harsh if your suggesting im not actually against most of the things i claim to actually be

That particular post was a one off, someone laid it off for me and i stuck in the back of the net.

---

Maybe I was a bit harsh. It has been suggested that I am menstruating, but I hope that this is not the case.

I suppose I just get annoyed when people give my thoughtful comments the once over with a frivolous one liner. It annoys me.

---

Its one thing to disagree over something, but if merkin wants to constantly throw mud im more than willing to throw him a line for him to bite on

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

That's all well and good, but are you here to just get a rise out of people or would you like to actually debate something?

I have given a number of substantial replies in this thread and instead of responding with anything of substance you have simply brushed it off by saying that I am not talking sense or "they are worth every penny" (regarding the Royals) or such ilk. I have no problems with you HTH, but if you would like to debate things instead of trolling, I might respect you a little more. I might not agree with Bilbo all the time, but I respect that he takes the time to post and actually try and give some kind of indication as to why he might diasgree with me.

---

Bit harsh if your suggesting im not actually against most of the things i claim to actually be

That particular post was a one off, someone laid it off for me and i stuck in the back of the net.

---

Maybe I was a bit harsh. It has been suggested that I am menstruating, but I hope that this is not the case.

I suppose I just get annoyed when people give my thoughtful comments the once over with a frivolous one liner. It annoys me.

---

Takes one to know one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Bit harsh if your suggesting im not actually against most of the things i claim to actually be

That particular post was a one off, someone laid it off for me and i stuck in the back of the net.

---

Maybe I was a bit harsh. It has been suggested that I am menstruating, but I hope that this is not the case.

I suppose I just get annoyed when people give my thoughtful comments the once over with a frivolous one liner. It annoys me.

---

Its one thing to disagree over something, but if merkin wants to constantly throw mud im more than willing to throw him a line for him to bite on

---

But you do have a history as a homophobe and a BNP voter, which is pretty monumental. Those are the issues Jaz is not so into. You chose to acknowledge those things, it looks like you had the mud already there smeared over your face.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Maybe I was a bit harsh. It has been suggested that I am menstruating, but I hope that this is not the case.

I suppose I just get annoyed when people give my thoughtful comments the once over with a frivolous one liner. It annoys me.

---

Its one thing to disagree over something, but if merkin wants to constantly throw mud im more than willing to throw him a line for him to bite on

---

But you do have a history as a homophobe and a BNP voter, which is pretty monumental. Those are the issues Jaz is not so into. You chose to acknowledge those things, it looks like you had the mud already there smeared over your face.

---

Yeah that's true. Unless he's on one top quality wind up.

Now now girls.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_FaKchR2WlP...w/s320/ph7.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

Strongly disagree.

Labour hasn't had a clue how to deal with the immigration problems in the U.K.
The only party even talking about these problems are the BNP and that unfortunately has an affect on the people who have lost faith in Lab/ Con/ Lib Dem with regards to Immigration.

And as for your 5% minority statistic, well you can stick that up your harris mate cause i as well as anyone who lives in a urban are of a major city knows that statistic counts for shit :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Its one thing to disagree over something, but if merkin wants to constantly throw mud im more than willing to throw him a line for him to bite on

---

But you do have a history as a homophobe and a BNP voter, which is pretty monumental. Those are the issues Jaz is not so into. You chose to acknowledge those things, it looks like you had the mud already there smeared over your face.

---

Yeah that's true. Unless he's on one top quality wind up.

---

If he is it would be one enormous waste of life. You think of all the good you can do and that is what it comes down to? Quite tragic...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimboogie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

Strongly disagree.

Labour hasn't had a clue how to deal with the immigration problems in the U.K.
The only party even talking about these problems are the BNP and that unfortunately has an affect on the people who have lost faith in Lab/ Con/ Lib Dem with regards to Immigration.

And as for your 5% minority statistic, well you can stick that up your harris mate cause i as well as anyone who lives in a urban are of a major city knows that statistic counts for shit :D

---

exactly

I was a naive voter like many who heard a lot of people finally bringing this subject to our attention and chose to vote them on the basis of the issue that troubled me the most.

I admit i ballsed that up, having actually looked into their policys they are indeed a vile hate mob who want a racially pure nation. But the point i keep trying to explain to merkin is that while they may be neo-nazi thugs the large majority of people that vote for them arent. He wont have that, 8% of the british public are vile racist scum!

Yes i probably am a bit of a homophobe i`ll hold my hands up there, but merkin clearly has issues with "the man" and chooses to voice those on here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimboogie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

Strongly disagree.

Labour hasn't had a clue how to deal with the immigration problems in the U.K.
The only party even talking about these problems are the BNP and that unfortunately has an affect on the people who have lost faith in Lab/ Con/ Lib Dem with regards to Immigration.

And as for your 5% minority statistic, well you can stick that up your harris mate cause i as well as anyone who lives in a urban are of a major city knows that statistic counts for shit :D

---

Sorry but if you vote for a party who has a manifesto full of blatantly unworkable policies fronted by a man who has a previous conviction for insighting racial hatred, aswell as denying the holocaust, then you are clearly an idiot or a racist. Taking out the racial elements (if you can), you're left with a manifesto of sound bites that are designed to manipulate the average idiot into believing the BNP are the answer to the countries problems.

I'm pretty sure i'd take government/independant party statistics over your anecdotal evidence. Unless of course you've canvassed the religious beliefs of all of the 'brown people' in your Urban area.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimboogie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

Strongly disagree.

Labour hasn't had a clue how to deal with the immigration problems in the U.K.
The only party even talking about these problems are the BNP and that unfortunately has an affect on the people who have lost faith in Lab/ Con/ Lib Dem with regards to Immigration.

And as for your 5% minority statistic, well you can stick that up your harris mate cause i as well as anyone who lives in a urban are of a major city knows that statistic counts for shit :D

---

exactly

I was a naive voter like many who heard a lot of people finally bringing this subject to our attention and chose to vote them on the basis of the issue that troubled me the most.

I admit i ballsed that up, having actually looked into their policys they are indeed a vile hate mob who want a racially pure nation. But the point i keep trying to explain to merkin is that while they may be neo-nazi thugs the large majority of people that vote for them arent. He wont have that, 8% of the british public are vile racist scum!

Yes i probably am a bit of a homophobe i`ll hold my hands up there, but merkin clearly has issues with "the man" and chooses to voice those on here

---

Actually, I'd say it was much higher since on average only about 30% of people vote ;D

The other 70% have the right idea :rolleyes:

P.S Apparently, I have to spread it around a little before giving it back to Missy :-X

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimboogie

Strongly disagree.

Labour hasn't had a clue how to deal with the immigration problems in the U.K.
The only party even talking about these problems are the BNP and that unfortunately has an affect on the people who have lost faith in Lab/ Con/ Lib Dem with regards to Immigration.

And as for your 5% minority statistic, well you can stick that up your harris mate cause i as well as anyone who lives in a urban are of a major city knows that statistic counts for shit :D

---

exactly

I was a naive voter like many who heard a lot of people finally bringing this subject to our attention and chose to vote them on the basis of the issue that troubled me the most.

I admit i ballsed that up, having actually looked into their policys they are indeed a vile hate mob who want a racially pure nation. But the point i keep trying to explain to merkin is that while they may be neo-nazi thugs the large majority of people that vote for them arent. He wont have that, 8% of the british public are vile racist scum!

Yes i probably am a bit of a homophobe i`ll hold my hands up there, but merkin clearly has issues with "the man" and chooses to voice those on here

---

Actually, I'd say it was much higher since on average only about 30% of people vote ;D

---

Since merkin isnt on till later on...do you fancy a nibble of my rod missy??....


go`on...just touch it ;D;D;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimboogie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

In relation to your point on the BNP, you almost lost me when you said 'the more sensible ones.' Only the stupid or the racist would vote for them.

---

Strongly disagree.

Labour hasn't had a clue how to deal with the immigration problems in the U.K.
The only party even talking about these problems are the BNP and that unfortunately has an affect on the people who have lost faith in Lab/ Con/ Lib Dem with regards to Immigration.

And as for your 5% minority statistic, well you can stick that up your harris mate cause i as well as anyone who lives in a urban are of a major city knows that statistic counts for shit :D

---

Sorry but if you vote for a party who has a manifesto full of blatantly unworkable policies fronted by a man who has a previous conviction for insighting racial hatred, aswell as denying the holocaust, then you are clearly an idiot or a racist. Taking out the racial elements (if you can), you're left with a manifesto of sound bites that are designed to manipulate the average idiot into believing the BNP are the answer to the countries problems.

I'm pretty sure i'd take government/independant party statistics over your anecdotal evidence. Unless of course you've canvassed the religious beliefs of all of the 'brown people' in your Urban area.

---

Im beige, not brown ;)

Anyway... The moment The BNP attain a Manifesto of workable policies then they won't be any different to The rest of em.

Scary thought ay? :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

exactly

I was a naive voter like many who heard a lot of people finally bringing this subject to our attention and chose to vote them on the basis of the issue that troubled me the most.

I admit i ballsed that up, having actually looked into their policys they are indeed a vile hate mob who want a racially pure nation. But the point i keep trying to explain to merkin is that while they may be neo-nazi thugs the large majority of people that vote for them arent. He wont have that, 8% of the british public are vile racist scum!

Yes i probably am a bit of a homophobe i`ll hold my hands up there, but merkin clearly has issues with "the man" and chooses to voice those on here

---

Actually, I'd say it was much higher since on average only about 30% of people vote ;D

---

Since merkin isnt on till later on...do you fancy a nibble of my rod missy??....


go`on...just touch it ;D;D;D

---

:magnify:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqNqcoLhWv0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Actually, I'd say it was much higher since on average only about 30% of people vote ;D

---

Since merkin isnt on till later on...do you fancy a nibble of my rod missy??....


go`on...just touch it ;D;D;D

---

:magnify:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqNqcoLhWv0

---

more like...

http://www.biosphere-expeditions.org...nduras/big.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Since merkin isnt on till later on...do you fancy a nibble of my rod missy??....


go`on...just touch it ;D;D;D

---

:magnify:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqNqcoLhWv0

---

more like...

http://www.biosphere-expeditions.org...nduras/big.jpg

---

you're lucky (or not) that I'm unable to view that right now or I would (or not) have to kick your ass. :) or :mad:

Funny how religion views the very same thing in a completely different way :confused:

http://www.truthdig.com/images/earto...ad_snarly3.jpg