Anyone else bored of 'racism' yet?

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

We have a very high profile case here being re-tried the murder of the black teenager Stephen Lawrence.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...BGlRH8tVEaoXiw

I do agree though that the race card is pulled way too frequently. I completely am with you on that one. I also agree that the double standard is ignored way too frequently. Imagine if Carl Froch took the key from Bernard and said he would never lose to a black boy. It would be endless outrage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

---

Woah now wait a damn minute...I don't like the KKK but I'm fairly certain they were more anti-black than anti-semite, now the Aryan Nation/Neo-Nazi's who mistakenly use the Battle Flag of the Confederacy to support their cause, THEY dislike the Jews.

I'll have you know, the Confederate States would have more than likely had a Jewish President as their 2nd or 3rd President. Judah P. Benjamin was the Treasurer of the C.S.A. and was well respected by all in the South.

The KKK started up POST Civil War (War of Northern Aggression) due to Reconstruction as all of the officers in the CSA's armed forces had the right to vote taken from them, and land owners got screwed too as Plantations were cut up and given away to carpet baggers and former slaves. Now eventually it degenerated into just a pure hate group, but the KKK had started out as people of wealth and class trying to reestablish political control over their land.


That said, all of the organizations I mentioned: KKK, Neo-Nazi's, Aryans, etc....they can all go rot in my opinion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

---

Actually I completely agree with you on this, and with master regarding Stephen Lawrence. I would also see use of the N word as a direct racial attack. But footballers slagging each other off and a caddy slagging of his former employee and friend has no racial subtext imo and to claim so trivialises real racism.

As to the caddy just calling him an asshole if he wasn't racist rather than a black asshole I totally disagree. All insults are preceeded by a personal slur. It's very unnatural to make an insult without it. Try it. Do you call someone a bastard, or fat bastard, ugly bastard, ginger bastard, whiny bastard etc? There is always a descriptive that prefaces the swear word, always. It's always the thing that stands out to most define that person as well. For Tiger its being black.

For the record Luis Suarez called Patrice Evra "negrito" which is NOT racist in South American/Central American/Hispanic culture....so Evra is just a whiny little bastard with a delicate constitution

Nah I'm not bored of it, I just think many of the situations are rather sad or amusing depending on the circumstances.


BTW, if I were to call Miles a whiny English cunt, am I being prejudice against the English? Or is that a descriptor?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by generalbulldog

Nah I'm not bored of it, I just think many of the situations are rather sad or amusing depending on the circumstances.


BTW, if I were to call Miles a whiny English cunt, am I being prejudice against the English? Or is that a descriptor?

---

So long as I can use this...
http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/e...gif?1293729577


I'm ok :thumb:

never EVER call anyone English my friend. Especially if you are going to follow it with a derogatory noun.

Its just not acceptable any more

And you should know that

half-cast is racist ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

I gotta call BS on the hate-crime stats. Legally speaking there is no such thing as a hate-crime when the victim is white. Kind of hard to give reasonable statistics when the largest portion of the population is omitted.

---

Crimes against whites were included in th is recent study. There were 679 anti-white incidents. US Hate Crimes Continue At Steady Pace, FBI Says - San Diego News Story - KGTV San Diego

---

Thats pretty interesting considering its not a hate crime if the victim is not a minority. The simple fact that we have "hate-crimes" is laughable. Somehow an assault is a worse crime if there is a racial bias...what a joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mark TKO

never EVER call anyone English my friend. Especially if you are going to follow it with a derogatory noun.

Its just not acceptable any more

And you should know that

---

How about Pommie Bastard?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ghost

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mark TKO

never EVER call anyone English my friend. Especially if you are going to follow it with a derogatory noun.

Its just not acceptable any more

And you should know that

---

How about Pommie Bastard?

---

when I went to Vietnam a couple of years ago most in my tour group were Australian. After getting to know each other and being on the piss most nights thats what they started to call me. Should I have been offended ??

I

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

The thing with half cast is that once again it is correct. You have a black father and a white mother and then you have a child that is a mixture of those genetic types. To be called half whatever is just a definition of how one appears. They are not James Toney black and they are not Hitler white, they are quite definitely something inbetween and I see nothing negative in being able to describe someone's appearance.

Half cast might have negative connotations because of history, but you would do just as well to have another word, perhaps 'halfcolour' or the more politically correct 'people of half colour'. Well, that just sounds stupid, just call them half casts and educate society to become more tolerant of ethnic diversity which in many ways the UK is. Certainly much more so than somewhere like Korea.

---

To be honest, you kinda Barking up the wrong tree... You have to know the origins of the term 'Half-Cast' to understand why it is offensive... Mongrel isn't even that offensive. Just stupid. We are all 'mongrel' in one way or another.

Fuck whatever Missy and Mark are talkin about, the younger generation have the right idea. Ignorance should never be accepted.

---

So show me the history of the term 'half cast'. It is a term with exactly the same meaning as 'mixed race'. Maybe 100 years later 'mixed race' will be called out as being wrong. Mongrel is crude and revolting as it suggests dog like characteristics. It suggests less than human which 'half cast' never does. In that way half cast is more endearing and in all honesty is not particularly offensive anyway.

---

The Poet John Agard in talking about his poem Half-Caste

"This imposition of half, half, half on a person's total human complexity implies that some sort of 'purity' has been subverted. A child of mixed race is a tangible, loving expression of human beings from different cultural backgrounds getting together - that should be seen not as something threatening, but as something enriching..."
John Agard

Caste comes from the latin castus meaning pure. Prefixing pure with half automatically gives it a negative as though the person being described is less than pure. The history of the term is very different depending on which country in which it is used and is coined by the imperial conquering culture. In our case as Brits, the Empire. After the subjugation of commonwealth countries it started as a term to describe anyone of mixed race, not necessarily black and white . Your belief that it is "endearing" is perhaps ill-judged as for many it will carry connotations of condescension.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

---

Actually I completely agree with you on this, and with master regarding Stephen Lawrence. I would also see use of the N word as a direct racial attack. But footballers slagging each other off and a caddy slagging of his former employee and friend has no racial subtext imo and to claim so trivialises real racism.

As to the caddy just calling him an asshole if he wasn't racist rather than a black asshole I totally disagree. All insults are preceeded by a personal slur. It's very unnatural to make an insult without it. Try it. Do you call someone a bastard, or fat bastard, ugly bastard, ginger bastard, whiny bastard etc? There is always a descriptive that prefaces the swear word, always. It's always the thing that stands out to most define that person as well. For Tiger its being black.

---

It is precisely because you think Tiger Woods (womanising Hypocrite that he is) being black, is his most defining characteristic and that you then throw black into the same territory as fat, ugly and ginger that you fail to see the inherent racism in calling someone a black asshole. White fat bastard, White ugly bastard, both racist,Ginger Bastard not racist but more offensive than bastard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by generalbulldog

Nah I'm not bored of it, I just think many of the situations are rather sad or amusing depending on the circumstances.


BTW, if I were to call Miles a whiny English cunt, am I being prejudice against the English? Or is that a descriptor?

---

Yes you are again displaying prejudice against the English by inserting English in-between whiny and the four letter c word. The construction of your sentence implies that the English are whiny and the plural version of the four letter c word. It is not a descriptor, a descriptor is a term used in Libraries,Website design in fact anywhere a database needs a way to index information for easy future retrieval. It was coined by Calvin Northrup Mooers the American computer scientist in 1948.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by generalbulldog

Nah I'm not bored of it, I just think many of the situations are rather sad or amusing depending on the circumstances.


BTW, if I were to call Miles a whiny English cunt, am I being prejudice against the English? Or is that a descriptor?

---

Yes you are again displaying prejudice against the English by inserting English in-between whiny and the four letter c word. The construction of your sentence implies that the English are whiny and the plural version of the four letter c word. It is not a descriptor, a descriptor is a term used in Libraries,Website design in fact anywhere a database needs a way to index information for easy future retrieval. It was coined by Calvin Northrup Mooers the American computer scientist in 1948.

---

Shut up you green fucker. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by generalbulldog

Nah I'm not bored of it, I just think many of the situations are rather sad or amusing depending on the circumstances.


BTW, if I were to call Miles a whiny English cunt, am I being prejudice against the English? Or is that a descriptor?

---

You'd be bang on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

---

Actually I completely agree with you on this, and with master regarding Stephen Lawrence. I would also see use of the N word as a direct racial attack. But footballers slagging each other off and a caddy slagging of his former employee and friend has no racial subtext imo and to claim so trivialises real racism.

As to the caddy just calling him an asshole if he wasn't racist rather than a black asshole I totally disagree. All insults are preceeded by a personal slur. It's very unnatural to make an insult without it. Try it. Do you call someone a bastard, or fat bastard, ugly bastard, ginger bastard, whiny bastard etc? There is always a descriptive that prefaces the swear word, always. It's always the thing that stands out to most define that person as well. For Tiger its being black.

---

It is precisely because you think Tiger Woods (womanising Hypocrite that he is) being black, is his most defining characteristic and that you then throw black into the same territory as fat, ugly and ginger that you fail to see the inherent racism in calling someone a black asshole. White fat bastard, White ugly bastard, both racist,Ginger Bastard not racist but more offensive than bastard.

---

How many other elite level golfers are black? Being black IS Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers. If he was a basketball player or boxer it wouldn't be, but his colour is what stands out in the golfing world and in my opinion its a weird reverse positive racism that people like you try to adopt, pretending everyone is the same colour.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

---

Actually I completely agree with you on this, and with master regarding Stephen Lawrence. I would also see use of the N word as a direct racial attack. But footballers slagging each other off and a caddy slagging of his former employee and friend has no racial subtext imo and to claim so trivialises real racism.

As to the caddy just calling him an asshole if he wasn't racist rather than a black asshole I totally disagree. All insults are preceeded by a personal slur. It's very unnatural to make an insult without it. Try it. Do you call someone a bastard, or fat bastard, ugly bastard, ginger bastard, whiny bastard etc? There is always a descriptive that prefaces the swear word, always. It's always the thing that stands out to most define that person as well. For Tiger its being black.

---

It is precisely because you think Tiger Woods (womanising Hypocrite that he is) being black, is his most defining characteristic and that you then throw black into the same territory as fat, ugly and ginger that you fail to see the inherent racism in calling someone a black asshole. White fat bastard, White ugly bastard, both racist,Ginger Bastard not racist but more offensive than bastard.

---

How many other elite level golfers are black? Being black IS Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers. If he was a basketball player or boxer it wouldn't be, but his colour is what stands out in the golfing world and in my opinion its a weird reverse positive racism that people like you try to adopt, pretending everyone is the same colour.

---

Trudat....as a black man once said.

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

The caddy is Australian....he obviously doesn't know better, they still think blackface is a laugh riot :vd:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

The caddy is Australian....he obviously doesn't know better, they still think blackface is a laugh riot :vd:

---

Australian history is as bad on racism as England and US.

whats blackface ??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.

---

Actually I completely agree with you on this, and with master regarding Stephen Lawrence. I would also see use of the N word as a direct racial attack. But footballers slagging each other off and a caddy slagging of his former employee and friend has no racial subtext imo and to claim so trivialises real racism.

As to the caddy just calling him an asshole if he wasn't racist rather than a black asshole I totally disagree. All insults are preceeded by a personal slur. It's very unnatural to make an insult without it. Try it. Do you call someone a bastard, or fat bastard, ugly bastard, ginger bastard, whiny bastard etc? There is always a descriptive that prefaces the swear word, always. It's always the thing that stands out to most define that person as well. For Tiger its being black.

---

It is precisely because you think Tiger Woods (womanising Hypocrite that he is) being black, is his most defining characteristic and that you then throw black into the same territory as fat, ugly and ginger that you fail to see the inherent racism in calling someone a black asshole. White fat bastard, White ugly bastard, both racist,Ginger Bastard not racist but more offensive than bastard.

---

How many other elite level golfers are black? Being black IS Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers. If he was a basketball player or boxer it wouldn't be, but his colour is what stands out in the golfing world and in my opinion its a weird reverse positive racism that people like you try to adopt, pretending everyone is the same colour.

---

Trudat....as a black man once said.

---

:rolleyes: never let the truth get in the way of some good ol' ownage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

---

For sure he's a great player, but how many other leading golfers are black?

I guess Obama is famous for being the first American President with big ears right?

He's black. His asshole is black. By all accounts he is an asshole. Thus calling him a black asshole is entirely factually correct right?

So why the objection? The people objecting are being racist, as they assume that to mention a person being black is a negative.

Greenbeanz went even further and showed that he felt being ginger, overweight or wearing glasses were also 'bad things' and thus sae them in a negative light, as if it would be wrong to draw attention to them.

I'm sick of these racist, judgemental people.

If you can cite examples of white people calling other white people "white arsehole" then i'll agree.

However, I don't believe Steve Williams would have called his current employer a "white arsehole" (had they fallen out), he'd have just said "arsehole," so the "black" bit seems pretty unnecessary to me unless there's some other meaning... Apart from him stating a FACT, of course, because the whole world needed telling Tiger Woods is black (well asian/black (is that racist?).. shit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

If you can cite examples of white people calling other white people "white arsehole" then i'll agree.

However, I don't believe Steve Williams would have called his current employer a "white arsehole" (had they fallen out), he'd have just said "arsehole," so the "black" bit seems pretty unnecessary to me unless there's some other meaning... Apart from him stating a FACT, of course, because the whole world needed telling Tiger Woods is black (well asian/black (is that racist?).. shit

---

Well watch any film and you will know that black always precedes ass when talking a black person's bottom. "My black ass", "Your black ass", "His black ass" etc. It's just a common phrasing that black people themselves use all the time.

I guess a white equivilant would be "white trash". How often do you hear the term "black trash"? Black ass, and white trash are just common sayings well known to all.

If Tiger had called his caddy white trash would their be a big hullaballo? I'm guessing not.

Incidently if you think the caddy was being racist, what was his intention? How was he planning to subjugate his multi millionare former employer? See, racism is the act of discriminating against somebody on the basis of their colour, either through deprivation of rights, property, dignity, threats to their safety, enslavement, persecution etc. How does calling Tiger Woods a black asshole put Tiger at risk of such things?

It can't be racism. It's just name calling.

Fuck me you are all still going on about this thread? going to have to make another post "Is anyone else bored of the "Anyone else bored of 'racism' yet? thread yet?"

You all need to get out more.

But thanks for coming.

I never said he was racist.

He brought race into it by saying "black," so was called on the meaning of it. Like you said he was probably just making a factual statement in case people didn't realise Tiger was black.

I have no doubt in future he will call Adam Scott (his current employer) "white - asshole, trash, cunt"

A bunch of white people bitching about being hard done by because of racism?

Oh the fucking irony.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

---

For sure he's a great player, but how many other leading golfers are black?

I guess Obama is famous for being the first American President with big ears right?

He's black. His asshole is black. By all accounts he is an asshole. Thus calling him a black asshole is entirely factually correct right?

So why the objection? The people objecting are being racist, as they assume that to mention a person being black is a negative.

Greenbeanz went even further and showed that he felt being ginger, overweight or wearing glasses were also 'bad things' and thus sae them in a negative light, as if it would be wrong to draw attention to them.

I'm sick of these racist, judgemental people.

---

The blackest thing about Obama is his wife ;D

Seriously though Bil, neither Tiger or Obama are black.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

---

For sure he's a great player, but how many other leading golfers are black?

I guess Obama is famous for being the first American President with big ears right?

He's black. His asshole is black. By all accounts he is an asshole. Thus calling him a black asshole is entirely factually correct right?

So why the objection? The people objecting are being racist, as they assume that to mention a person being black is a negative.

Greenbeanz went even further and showed that he felt being ginger, overweight or wearing glasses were also 'bad things' and thus sae them in a negative light, as if it would be wrong to draw attention to them.

I'm sick of these racist, judgemental people.

---

The blackest thing about Obama is his wife ;D

Seriously though Bil, neither Tiger or Obama are black.

---

But they ain't white, maybe coco or coffee and cream, but ain't white.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

A bunch of white people bitching about being hard done by because of racism?

Oh the fucking irony.

---

Only this, as Roberto Mancini would say.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ghost

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

---

For sure he's a great player, but how many other leading golfers are black?

I guess Obama is famous for being the first American President with big ears right?

He's black. His asshole is black. By all accounts he is an asshole. Thus calling him a black asshole is entirely factually correct right?

So why the objection? The people objecting are being racist, as they assume that to mention a person being black is a negative.

Greenbeanz went even further and showed that he felt being ginger, overweight or wearing glasses were also 'bad things' and thus sae them in a negative light, as if it would be wrong to draw attention to them.

I'm sick of these racist, judgemental people.

---

The blackest thing about Obama is his wife ;D

Seriously though Bil, neither Tiger or Obama are black.

---

But they ain't white, maybe coco or coffee and cream, but ain't white.

---

Aaah I see!

So they are famous for what they are not moreso than what they are. To the effect that they are regarded as something that they are not, almost as conformation of what they will never be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

---

For sure he's a great player, but how many other leading golfers are black?

I guess Obama is famous for being the first American President with big ears right?

He's black. His asshole is black. By all accounts he is an asshole. Thus calling him a black asshole is entirely factually correct right?

So why the objection? The people objecting are being racist, as they assume that to mention a person being black is a negative.

Greenbeanz went even further and showed that he felt being ginger, overweight or wearing glasses were also 'bad things' and thus sae them in a negative light, as if it would be wrong to draw attention to them.

I'm sick of these racist, judgemental people.

---

The blackest thing about Obama is his wife ;D

Seriously though Bil, neither Tiger or Obama are black.

---

Really? What constitutes black then? Do you say this b/c neither of them have two black parents? I've never met a black man that didn't claim both of them.

The term Black in this sense is not in the colour of the skin, but politically i.e. anything non-white is classed as Black including Chinese, Asian, African and Caribbean.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

The term Black in this sense is not in the colour of the skin, but politically i.e. anything non-white is classed as Black including Chinese, Asian, African and Caribbean.

---

You forgot Mexican :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ghost

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

The term Black in this sense is not in the colour of the skin, but politically i.e. anything non-white is classed as Black including Chinese, Asian, African and Caribbean.

---

You forgot Mexican :rolleyes:

---

I was talking and UK, you can tell me the Blacks (capital B to synonyms the political meaning) in the US.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers is that he's one of the greatest ever players.

Child prodigy, unbeliveable amateur, 14 majors, over 100 tournament wins, successfully represented America am/pro.

It's not being black that makes him stand out. It's being an utter golfing genius. (well, was).

---

For sure he's a great player, but how many other leading golfers are black?

I guess Obama is famous for being the first American President with big ears right?

He's black. His asshole is black. By all accounts he is an asshole. Thus calling him a black asshole is entirely factually correct right?

So why the objection? The people objecting are being racist, as they assume that to mention a person being black is a negative.

Greenbeanz went even further and showed that he felt being ginger, overweight or wearing glasses were also 'bad things' and thus sae them in a negative light, as if it would be wrong to draw attention to them.

I'm sick of these racist, judgemental people.

---

I didn't mention wearing glasses, although i often do wear them, and must be in your opinion, Ugly then.Ginger, fat and ugly are not compliments and it is not the mentioning of someone being black or white that is a negative. It is using Black as a prefix to words like asshole, and bastard. If you can't see what's offensive about saying something that people are offended by, then perhaps you are looking for an excuse to continue in your prejudice. To merely mention that the Golfer Tiger Woods is Black, is not racist, and does not assume a racial slur from the person describing him as such. It is not just semantics, you are revealing your own subconscious prejudice by having to mention that someone is black before slagging them off with a negative description. I used to have a work colleague who used to say "I'm not racist, some of my best friends are black" and then he would crack a racist joke. By having to differentiate between his black and other friends he was revealing his own prejudice, confirmed by his stupid jokes. Sorry if i seem racist or judgemental.