Thats cuz u aint playin it.
Printable View
Thats cuz u aint playin it.
I did play and when I played it was the correct way so casse-toi fils de pute ....if you willQuote:
Originally Posted by Fatboxingfan
Yeahhhhh..... good ol' Kaepernick. ;D
Absolutely no place for him in the NFL today. Not with QB giants like that punk-ass Jameis Winston of the lowly, cellar-dwelling 3-7 TB Bucs (59.6% comp. pct., 19/18 TD/Int :o , 80.5 QBR). Not with the mighty Andy Dalton of the winless, hapless Cincinnati Bengals (0-10) and a 9/8 TD/Int stat line and a 79.2 QBR.
Not with at least half a dozen or more hapless teams BADLY in need of a QB right about now.
Personally I hope they ALL finish in last place, and Kaep goes on to make more money in football than he would've made IN football, without getting his brains scrambled.
Talk about thumbing your nose at the NFL. ;D ;D ;D
Well, well, well...... MSN poll with almost 700k people voting on whether they'd like to see an NFL team sign Colin:
22% - Yes
64% - No
3% - Don't know
11% - No opinion
All the MORE reason I want to see Colin signed. :D :p
If not, he can go on the lecture tour and make some good money without getting his head bashed in. Cool. ;D
Do you not remember him self sabotaging his own career?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
#1 On June 4, 2014 Kaepernick signed a six-year contract extension with the 49ers, worth up to $126 million, including $54 million in potential guarantees, and $13 million fully guaranteed. On 3/3/2017 he opted out of his contract with the 49ers because he was no longer the starting QB. He wasn't the starter under Chip Kelly, he struggled under Jim Tomsula, and he wasn't set to be the starter under Kyle Shannahan. He assumed that the 49ers were going to release him which is why HE said he opted out :shrug03:
#2 Ray Lewis attempted to get the Ravens to sign him, and then Kaep's girlfriend posted a picture of the very same Ray Lewis as the Samuel L. Jackson character from Django Unchained and the offer was pulled due to that.
#3 He changed the location of his most recent tryout and didn't inform the teams coming to see his tryout.
Are those examples of a guy who WANTS to play the game in the NFL?
I mean I don't care if a team signs him or not, I haven't been watching the games at all since it became two hand touch football. I don't care if he's political, I don't care if he kneels during the National Anthem, I mean I personally don't appreciate the view, but he can do as he pleases obviously. Other players who have kneeled for the Anthem have been signed/haven't faced repercussions to the extent Kaepernick may have, why is that? Eric Reid for example still kneels he plays for the Panthers.
I don't necessarily trust that poll.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
What will he lecture about?
I don't know whether he's a good speaker or not... probably not. But if he is, and were so inclined, I believe he'd probably speak up about the current white cop/black man situation (was going to call it a crisis, but situation will do for now) in the United States. That's probably part of what prompted Kaepernick's protests in the first place. He's out of football anyway, so what the hell....
Actually, allow me to clear some things up for the sake of the argument.
I'm not a friend or family member of Kaepernick's. It makes zilch difference to me whether he plays again in the NFL or not. He may or may not have chosen the correct way to protest what he believes is a serious crisis in America... but he chose it, and paid the price. Others have followed, but Kaepernick bore the brunt of being the first one to do so. If his issue is with the significant incidences of unwarranted killings of black men by white police officers under dubious circumstances, and how this underscores a problem of racism and insufficient/inadequate police training in the U.S...... then I can understand his frustrations. It makes zilch difference to me whether he himself is a rich black man who plays a sport for a living. That's neither here nor there. Again... Kaepernick playing or not playing will not make a bit of difference in how much I watch (or not) the NFL.
I'm not against the guy earning whatever money he can in football, out of football, I do not care. I only notice he seems like he doesn't much want to play OR maybe he wants to play on HIS terms and I'm sorry that doesn't happen like ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
....so that's a NO on watching the Larry Elder video which covers exactly that very specific thing?
I mean there are SOME unjustified uses of force by police obviously and to which citizens that happens most frequently to and WHY exactly that is the case...there's a discussion to be had there, but the police aren't the National Anthem and so there's perhaps a disconnect (I doubt it, I think I've got a good idea of who Kaep and his lady friend are and what they believe) between his protests and a lot of Americans and some of those Americans happen to be football fans...something I no longer consider myself but it's not down to him that's more due to the rule changes and pussification of the game.
If the guy can still play he should be in the league, but having played football myself I know for a fact coaches don't like distractions. They don't like opera singers, you know the "Me, Me, Me" guys because they destroy and distract teams. You've got a guy who says he wants to play and he plans this headfake of a tryout in advance....yyyyyyeah I can't see too many teams going "OOOOOH I like that guy! He's 32 had a few surgeries and been out of the league since 2016 and he just jerked the chain of all the teams who wanted to scout him. Let's sign HIM!" ......it's a bad move and in this case he's again got nobody to blame but himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongI'm not against the guy earning whatever money he can in football, out of football, I do not care. I only notice he seems like he doesn't much want to play OR maybe he wants to play on HIS terms and I'm sorry that doesn't happen like ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
....so that's a NO on watching the Larry Elder video which covers exactly that very specific thing?
I mean there are SOME unjustified uses of force by police obviously and to which citizens that happens most frequently to and WHY exactly that is the case...there's a discussion to be had there, but the police aren't the National Anthem and so there's perhaps a disconnect (I doubt it, I think I've got a good idea of who Kaep and his lady friend are and what they believe) between his protests and a lot of Americans and some of those Americans happen to be football fans...something I no longer consider myself but it's not down to him that's more due to the rule changes and pussification of the game.
If the guy can still play he should be in the league, but having played football myself I know for a fact coaches don't like distractions. They don't like opera singers, you know the "Me, Me, Me" guys because they destroy and distract teams. You've got a guy who says he wants to play and he plans this headfake of a tryout in advance....yyyyyyeah I can't see too many teams going "OOOOOH I like that guy! He's 32 had a few surgeries and been out of the league since 2016 and he just jerked the chain of all the teams who wanted to scout him. Let's sign HIM!" ......it's a bad move and in this case he's again got nobody to blame but himself.
One thing for sure is that the more time passes, the less likely it is he'll get another crack at the NFL. If he's not actually serious about wanting back in, it'll never happen. The distraction thing is a real point. But not so much for the "me, me, me" aspect of it, as for the annoying press coverage that would make it 99% about Colin Kaepernick and 1% about the rest of the team. Chemistry would go right out the window.
So yeah... I wouldn't bet money on Kaep ever returning to the league. As for his cause, it may not be him, but hopefully somewhere down the line someone else will pick up the ball and run with it. The good thing about someone like Kaep doing it is that people tend to listen more to high-profile figures, like athletes, celebrities, etc. The average Joe gets up and starts to pontificate about the evils of today's white cop society.... and precious few will even bother to listen.
Oh ESPN is DYING for him to get in the league regardless of if he's good, bad, indifferent, starting, on the bench, whatever they just want to ring the Colin Kaepernick bell until the clapper falls out! Him just trying out has them in a state of worshipful focus. Yes chemistry would be right out the window, the "Me, Me, Me" guys are a distraction and that goes for egomaniacs like Terrell Owens just the same as political figures like Kaepernick and religious figures like Tim Tebow....they all drew the eyes of the media and that ruffles feathers especially when they fuck up and dont' want the spotlight shining on them OR they take spotlight off of a top performer who is earning it....although in some cases that's a good thing and can be used by a smart coach.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Is that the GOOD thing about it though? I mean look at the NBA and China and the Hong Kong situation....is it GOOD that Lebron James is out there making a damned fool of himself to cover for China's tyranny? That ain't good.
White cop society? Wut?
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongOh ESPN is DYING for him to get in the league regardless of if he's good, bad, indifferent, starting, on the bench, whatever they just want to ring the Colin Kaepernick bell until the clapper falls out! Him just trying out has them in a state of worshipful focus. Yes chemistry would be right out the window, the "Me, Me, Me" guys are a distraction and that goes for egomaniacs like Terrell Owens just the same as political figures like Kaepernick and religious figures like Tim Tebow....they all drew the eyes of the media and that ruffles feathers especially when they fuck up and dont' want the spotlight shining on them OR they take spotlight off of a top performer who is earning it....although in some cases that's a good thing and can be used by a smart coach.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Is that the GOOD thing about it though? I mean look at the NBA and China and the Hong Kong situation....is it GOOD that Lebron James is out there making a damned fool of himself to cover for China's tyranny? That ain't good.
White cop society? Wut?
The white cop/black man shooting problem. The problem that, although it doesn't affect US (you and me), is still a problem. Your dislike for Kaepernick and others like him (Lebron, etc) is apparent. I personally don't hold Kaepernick's outspoken-ness against him. In Lebron's case, he's mouthing off about a global issue that is really none of his concern, regardless of NBA's ties or derived benefits from China. It's not his case to plead.
Terrell Owens was all about Terrell Owens. Now THAT'S a "me, me, me" guy now that you mention it. I don't group those three together.
Many people (not saying you) don't like Kaepernick because he brings to the public eye something they don't want to see. Out of sight... out of mind. People will happily put on blinders to something that doesn't affect them personally, and resent it when someone interrupts their happy consciousness to talk about a problem that's real and must be addressed. That's why I have nothing against Kaepernick and hopes he does even better outside of football than he did in it.
Yes because it's apparently 1960's Alabama all of a sudden again :dontknow: Has Bull Connor come back from the dead and I missed it? Did I fall asleep near a wormhole and wake up in Apartheid South Africa? Unwarranted and extreme violence from the police is something that can be discussed, and it should be, but #1. All cops aren't white #2 All citizens impacted by wrongful use of force from cops aren't necessarily black ...and if we can't start out on that then what will we start on? Should we form a line going most oppressed to least oppressed?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
There have been literal riots due to these shootings, justified or unjustified, good shot/bad shot, doesn't matter fucking RIOT because someone got shot by the police regardless of the color of the officer too! the news media is all over these events as well....who isn't talking about them? :dontknow:Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Seems like a lose lose situation for me to even attempt to discuss the "issue" what with my skin color and all :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongYes because it's apparently 1960's Alabama all of a sudden again :dontknow: Has Bull Connor come back from the dead and I missed it? Did I fall asleep near a wormhole and wake up in Apartheid South Africa? Unwarranted and extreme violence from the police is something that can be discussed, and it should be, but #1. All cops aren't white #2 All citizens impacted by wrongful use of force from cops aren't necessarily black ...and if we can't start out on that then what will we start on? Should we form a line going most oppressed to least oppressed?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
There have been literal riots due to these shootings, justified or unjustified, good shot/bad shot, doesn't matter fucking RIOT because someone got shot by the police regardless of the color of the officer too! the news media is all over these events as well....who isn't talking about them? :dontknow:Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Seems like a lose lose situation for me to even attempt to discuss the "issue" what with my skin color and all :rolleyes:
You leave precious little wiggle room for debate, Lyle. So it's "let's not even talk about it, 'cause it's not a worthy cause or a real problem?" I'd hate to think that's how you really feel. No it's not 1960's Alabama all over again, and your mention of it unfortunately trashes whatever argument one may have that things are not well and could definitely improve. Why the perceived backlash, Lyle? It's an issue that isn't going to go away by itself. No... all cops aren't white. No... all citizens impacted by wrongful use of force aren't all black.
The thing about is, you know how I think about this. You know I know about the victim card played by a lot of blacks looking to ride the coattails of these incidents and cry "racism" to just about anything. Yet you agree when I talk like that... but you immediately disagree when I touch on some of the worthy points on the OTHER side. Why? We can't only agree when I'm totally on your side. Or maybe that's how these topics should be handled. I see both sides, and you know it. But I'm not going to excuse or sweep under the rug the many incidents where racist white cops have shot black men (and even women) in a blatant abuse of power because of their racist views. I don't care if the media covers this more than the "other" incidents, where I guess black racist cops shoot and kill white guys. If any of those came up, I'd be just as critical of those also.
It's not either/or for me. It's whatever is right and wrong. Racist cops shooting black guys is a bad thing (using Trump's vernacular). Why can't we just leave it at that?
Riots? I don't care about riots. Riots don't bring back young black men who have been executed by trigger-happy, unfit-for-the-job white cops. It's a problem whether anyone else sees it as a problem or not.
In some other thread, I'm all over the situation in Minneapolis where videos show merciless beatings of white guys by young black hoods over a damn cell phone. Those black guys are totally racist (they wouldn't thrash a fellow black guy that badly)... and I gladly call it like it is, regardless of what anybody else thinks. If they have been black cops instead, we'd have just the opposite of what I mentioned in the previous post. And I'd be calling the black cops racist and insisting that it's a problem that must be dealt with. To hell with what color is doing the abusing of power and what color is the victim.
It’s not that issues don’t exist but Colin should just STFU and play ball. Let him start an activist group do address the countries issues. He does a poor job carrying the message is is actually creating more divide with his antics. Just use your star power to do good elsewhere Colin taking a knee looks foolish when you live a life of privilege
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
Colin's black, and he feels there is very much systemic racism in America, as evidenced by the many black men shootings by white cops. Seriously, why should he STFU? If he wasn't an (ex) NFL quarterback, would he then be allowed to speak? Yeah, maybe he should start an activist group but some of us just aren't built that way. Easy to say... not always easy to do. He "lives a life of privilege." Would it be better for him to just enjoy his good fortune and forget the trials and tribulations being suffered by many in his own race?
Nah. The guy's doing what he feels he can do, whether people like it or not. He got his punishment, so it's not like he got off easy. He's out of football... but he decided to throw that to the wayside in order to get his message across. Why should it matter that he's (was) a rich QB in the National Football League? I've heard this narrative a million times, and still have not heard a good answer to those questions.
I'm not saying "let's not even talk about it" I'm 100% FOR talking about it...what I'm NOT for is a deliberate malicious skewing of the FACTS be it by law enforcement or by protesters and BLM activists. If we can't have an HONEST discussion then yeah no discussion at all suits me fine because what are we actually achieving? When Freddie Gray dies in police custody in Baltimore an investigation is definitely warranted but you know what isn't? RIOTS! And what really isn't warranted are local politicians saying they need to give "protesters" :rolleyes: "room to destroy" words I use because they are the direct quotes of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake. Now when a police shooting happens, justified or unjustified and it's reported on I guess we all had best just batten down the hatches and let folks loot and riot and burn the city down because lord help us all if we just discuss what actually happened and why.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Why the backlash? Well let's start with what Black Lives Matter actually wants, what they themselves have as their agenda:
Demands
End the war on black people - seeks to resolve:
"the criminalization and dehumanization of Black youth across all areas of society";
capital punishment;
money bail and court surcharges in court proceedings;
"use of past criminal history to determine eligibility for housing, education, licenses, voting, loans, employment, and other services";
"the war on Black immigrants including the repeal of the 1996 crime and immigration bills";
"the war on Black trans, queer and gender nonconforming people";
"the mass surveillance of Black communities";
"the militarization of law enforcement";
"the privatization of police, prisons, jails, probation, parole, food, phone and all other criminal justice related services"; and
"public jails, detention centers, youth facilities and prisons" in their present conditions.
Reparations for the:
"systemic denial of access to high quality educational opportunities in the form of full and free access for all Black people";
"continued divestment from, discrimination toward and exploitation of our communities in the form of a guaranteed minimum livable income for all Black people";
"wealth extracted from" the black communities "through environmental racism, slavery, food apartheid, housing discrimination and racialized capitalism in the form of corporate and government reparations";
"cultural and educational exploitation, erasure, and extraction" in the form of, among other things, "public school curriculums that critically examine the political, economic, and social impacts of colonialism and slavery"; and
the demand the state and federal levels require "the United States to acknowledge the lasting impacts of slavery, establish and execute a plan to address those impacts".
Invest-Divest:
Reallocation of federal, state, and local government funds from "policing and incarceration to long-term strategies for education, restorative justice services, and employment programs."
The decriminalization, immediate release, record expungement, and reparations for the disparaging effects of both the "war on drugs" and "the criminalization of prostitution" on black communities.
"Real, meaningful, and equitable universal healthcare"
A constitutionally protected right to a "fully-funded education"
Divestment from the "use of fossil fuels and investment in community-based sustainable energy solutions."
Cuts to military expenditures and a reallocation of those funds to "infrastructure and community well-being"
Economic Justice:
Redistribution of wealth through a "progressive restructuring of tax codes at the local, state, and federal levels."
Employment programs that specifically target the "most marginalized Black people" in order to promote economic equality.
"A right to restored land, clean air, clean water and housing and an end to the exploitative privatizaiton of natural resources."
Right for workers to organize in both the public and private sector.
Restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act.
"An end to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and a renegotiation of all trade agreements" with an increased focus on the interests of workers and communities.
Increased support for "the development of cooperative or social economy networks."
"Financial support of Black alternative institutions."
Increased protection for workers in poorly regulated industries.
Community Control:
Implementation of "democratic community control of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies."
"End to the privatization of education."
Communal participation in "budgeting at the local state and federal level."
Political Power:
"End to the criminalization of Black political activity."
Termination of super PACs and the implementation of "public financing of elections."
Establishment of "full-access guarantees, and protections of the right to vote for all people."
"Full-access to technology" through the implementation of "net-neutrality and universal access to internet."
"Protection and increased funding for Black institutions."
"the criminalization and dehumanization of Black youth across all areas of society"; - Is that actually a thing?
capital punishment; - Why?
money bail and court surcharges in court proceedings; - the courts don't pay for themselves
"use of past criminal history to determine eligibility for housing, education, licenses, voting, loans, employment, and other services"; - I could come up with several hypotheticals for why that's a horrible idea
"the war on Black immigrants including the repeal of the 1996 crime and immigration bills"; - Why would black people willingly come to such a racist nation? Also President Trump just did Criminal Justice Reform and yet the praise for him from BLM :tumbleweed:
"the war on Black trans, queer and gender nonconforming people"; - there's a war on them? From who?
"the mass surveillance of Black communities";
"the militarization of law enforcement";
"the privatization of police, prisons, jails, probation, parole, food, phone and all other criminal justice related services"; and
"public jails, detention centers, youth facilities and prisons" in their present conditions. .....I can get behind THESE specifically, in general, for society as a whole...but if there's illegal immigration and there are cartels ALLOWED to do their business in the US then the police need all the weapons at their disposal, but shut the border and maybe we don't have such an issue.
Reparations for the:
"systemic denial of access to high quality educational opportunities in the form of full and free access for all Black people"; - how is that quantified? I mean did it happen? Sure. How is it quantified and where does the money come from?
"continued divestment from, discrimination toward and exploitation of our communities in the form of a guaranteed minimum livable income for all Black people"; - So Communism? No thank you.
"wealth extracted from" the black communities "through environmental racism, slavery, food apartheid, housing discrimination and racialized capitalism in the form of corporate and government reparations"; - So again Communism no thanks AND food apartheid? environmental racism? What are those?
"cultural and educational exploitation, erasure, and extraction" in the form of, among other things, "public school curriculums that critically examine the political, economic, and social impacts of colonialism and slavery"; and
the demand the state and federal levels require "the United States to acknowledge the lasting impacts of slavery, establish and execute a plan to address those impacts". - OK so teach everyone white people bad...sorry gonna have to disagree with that just on the whole Content of Character > Skin Color. Slavery which was abolished 154 years ago is still an issue today? Is there a 175 year old out there I missed?
Invest-Divest:
Reallocation of federal, state, and local government funds from "policing and incarceration to long-term strategies for education, restorative justice services, and employment programs." - What is "restorative justice services"?
The decriminalization, immediate release, record expungement, and reparations for the disparaging effects of both the "war on drugs" and "the criminalization of prostitution" on black communities. - I agree on war on drugs expungment, but sorry prostitution encourages human and child trafficking so that's a no from me.
"Real, meaningful, and equitable universal healthcare" - Yes because only white people have healthcare?
A constitutionally protected right to a "fully-funded education" - Then pass an Amendment to the Constitution, that's the ONLY way it's "Constitutionally protected"...also public schools (and I graduated from them) used to be a great thing a great source of pride, but now? They are absolute GARBAGE and that's either on purpose or just a happy coincidence due to who is going to the schools or who is running the schools.
Divestment from the "use of fossil fuels and investment in community-based sustainable energy solutions." - No thank you
Cuts to military expenditures and a reallocation of those funds to "infrastructure and community well-being" - Yeah that's a state and local issue not a federal one
Economic Justice:
Redistribution of wealth through a "progressive restructuring of tax codes at the local, state, and federal levels." - So Communism....we getting a clear picture of this group yet?
Employment programs that specifically target the "most marginalized Black people" in order to promote economic equality. - So Affirmative Action then???
"A right to restored land, clean air, clean water and housing and an end to the exploitative privatization of natural resources." - Those aren't rights, again Amend the Constitution if that's what you want. What about the Federalization of public land? The Government owns more than anyone else.
Right for workers to organize in both the public and private sector. - We have a Department of Labor, why are Unions necessary?
Restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act. - Yes because everything became racist after that was repealed :dontknow:
"An end to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and a renegotiation of all trade agreements" with an increased focus on the interests of workers and communities. - Donald Trump has actually done this and again :tumbleweed:
Increased support for "the development of cooperative or social economy networks." - So Communism
"Financial support of Black alternative institutions." - What does that even mean?
Increased protection for workers in poorly regulated industries. - Industries like ______?
Community Control:
Implementation of "democratic community control of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies." - So Police Academy 4 Citizens on Patrol?
"End to the privatization of education." - If the state is so racist why wouldn't you want a chance to escape indoctrination from it?
Communal participation in "budgeting at the local state and federal level." - Communism again?
Political Power:
"End to the criminalization of Black political activity." - I see nobody stopping BLM even when they riot
Termination of super PACs and the implementation of "public financing of elections." - I might could agree with that
Establishment of "full-access guarantees, and protections of the right to vote for all people." - No thank you legal citizens over age of 18 no felons only
"Full-access to technology" through the implementation of "net-neutrality and universal access to internet." - That's not what net neutrality does
"Protection and increased funding for Black institutions." - Race based funding? Ooooh sounds like fun.
And those are the things Colin Kaepernick has aligned himself with, so I'm sorry if I don't buy into this idea that he wants to actually solve a damn thing and as you can see there's precious little on their demands list I agree with and a great deal of what is on this list is outright Communism. I don't think there's anything positive that will ever come from Communism.
I don't wish to steer this thread into the political quagmire many other threads go to, I merely wished to explain to you @TitoFan why Kaepernick draws my ire. I find him and the BLM disingenuous and I believe they have ulterior motives namely COMMUNISM of which I am wholeheartedly against you know due to it's tendency to cause for the deaths of multiple millions of people during peacetime with no famine, pestilence, or plague.
Yes there's a discussion to be had in regards to the excessive use of force by police, but Kaepernick and BLM aren't the folks to hold that conversation with. Salute them for drawing attention to a cause, but their "solutions" would only exacerbate things.
That sounds like socialism to me.
You've obviously gone to great lengths to research (I'm assuming) and express here the entire agenda of the BLM movement. Assuming you're accurate about that (and I'm not implying you're not), that's pretty commendable on your part.
Needless to say, you KNOW I've been against reparations from the very beginning. I like to focus forward, not backwards. If anything, I've been consistent in my opinions.
THAT, in a nutshell, would summarize how I feel about the whole black-white issue and anything the BLM movement would have to say.
I'm all for justice across the board. Not just lip service to the whole racist cop issue..... but actual, concrete, measurable actions.
I see you've commented on each individual BLM "demand" and I can see myself agreeing with many of your comments.
In short, I don't condone nor support any demand that seeks to go above and beyond merely trying to establish an even playing field for the average black citizen, without talk of retribution/reparations for things of the past.
Let's move forward... and quit trampling all over the past. In Spanish we say quit stirring the shit, lest it begin to stink.
A lot of items on that list are "pie-in-the-sky" types of things like someone sat down to make a list and at some point added things while shrugging and saying... "why not?".
But let me pick out one specifically related to the shooting problem I've been talking about.... along with your response.
"the criminalization and dehumanization of Black youth across all areas of society"; - Is that actually a thing?
To answer your question... yes.
Maybe not across ALL areas of society.... but certainly in enough big city police departments to the point where they not only abuse their power, but also protect each other from any accountability for blatantly racist actions against black males.
You know it's a problem... I know it's a problem... everybody knows it's a problem. But no one does a damn thing about it. I've yet to see mandatory body cams across all police forces.
Dashcams have already captured extremely disturbing videos of some of these tragedies. If cops continue doing this knowing there are dashcams..... imagine what goes on when they know no one's watching and there are no witnesses.
How do you eliminate or at least reduce the "criminalization and dehumanization of black youth"?
You weed out the bad cops and throw them the hell off the force. You beef up entrance requirements to the police force. You redouble your training on confrontational situations and the use of deadly force. You enforce mandatory body cams on EVERY SINGLE COP. You combat this fucking fraternity where they all cover each other's asses. You put excellent leadership on these police forces, not some hateful bastard with racism oozing out of his pores. You redouble the use of non-lethal, disabling methods, which exist but are ignored by some of these assholes. You amp up the punishment for these needless shootings and allow the full weight of the law to come down on these murderers.
THAT'S how you attack a problem if you really want to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Again, I'll have to claim to be uninformed about what Colin actually says. I thought he was clear from the very beginning why he was protesting, and it all had to do with the white cop/black man shooting crisis in the streets. I haven't seen Colin attaching himself to BLM, but maybe the other way around. That's a fine line, but important nonetheless.
I DON'T believe Colin himself has ulterior motives of any type, most certainly not communism. I frankly don't know where you got that. I DO praise him for drawing attention to a cause, as you said.... but haven't exactly heard of him suggesting any solutions. It's important to me to keep to what's in front of me. I'm not going to simply lump Colin and BLM extremists together because they all happen to be black and indignant over the crisis I've already mentioned.
I know enough to understand the issue of excessive use of force from police against young black men is not something that happens in a vacuum. There's no easy fix, there's no simple solution, and there's no 1 root cause either. Oftentimes the police have not covered themselves in glory, but likewise, there are policemen out there who just want to make it through the day and they put up with major bullshit on the regular.
I believe fatherlessness and lack of a positive male role model is a huge issue in several communities which show a disproportionate level of criminal activity. And hell we can discuss the WHY's and HOW's of fatherlessness and lack of positive male role models for eons! Could be the 'War on Drugs' has seen many nonviolent people locked up, could be the 'War on Poverty' incentivized not getting married and just pumping out babies, could be the Sexual Revolution made premarital sex less of a taboo, could be that certain public schools are absolute shitholes where nobody is able to learn anything they're just trying to survive.
All those things can and should be discussed, as should militarization of the police force but the agenda put forth by Colin Kaepernick and BLM is a lot more than just "end police killings".....also SOME uses of force and even uses of lethal force are absolutely justified. A fellow I went to high school with was killed by the police and I've got to say the guy EARNED it...you cannot bodyslam a policewoman, show no effects of being tazered by that officer and then expect to not receive live rounds. The guy was always a nice person to me, I never had issue 1 with him or he with me and yeah it's sad he left the world with so much life left to live. I wonder had a MALE officer been first on the scene would the guy still be alive? That's also an issue to discuss.....women I'm sure will perceive life threatening events differently than men.
There is an idea among certain people that officers can "shoot to wound/maim" and that's just wrong a gun is a deadly weapon and when it is drawn the holder of that weapon should be thinking "once I pull this trigger someone WILL die" not COULD die, not MIGHT die, WILL die. So education in what law enforcement officers face is also something to think about.
It frustrates me so much that there's a wholehearted push for Communism under the guise of "these cops are evil and they are murdering young black men" .....it's infuriating to me because it glosses over the real issue to promote the worst bullshit possible which is Communism and if you're really worried about police violence, Communism ain't the route you want to go.
My fixes
1. 2 parent households & more unified communities who watch after youthful members of their community regardless of color
2. education (of civilians and police)
3. jobs, people with good jobs don't typically commit violent crimes or commit to a life of crime
4. more controlled interactions between police and civilians. more situations in day to day life where police aren't seen as the enemy and don't negatively impact the groups they're supposed to 'protect & serve'
Po-tay-to po-tah-toQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
When you're talking about systems of GOVERNMENT/ECONOMY there's no difference and they are both tyrannical and oppressive.
That said, I'm all about charity and being willing to support your community of your own free will and not under threat of violence, I think that is a virtuous thing and we certainly need more of that.
Single mothers in predominantly black neighborhoods doing an awful job of raising male children and leaving the problem to the cops.
Yeah... I hear you. I know enough to understand the issue of the harm this causes on society and the burden it puts on cops. Some of these young women just keep pumping out kids without any regard for society when these kids grow up to be less than stellar individuals.
All that does is underscore the need to adjust the police force accordingly. Like I said before... more training... better screening... more accountability... more use of non-lethal, incapacitating weapons... mandatory body cams for every cop. Like you said... education (on both sides).... more controlled interactions between police and civilians.... etc. All good and worthy ideas.
By the way, I saw the Larry Elder video on Kaepernick and Nike. Interesting fellow, this Elder guy. Obviously it all depends where we get our information/videos from, doesn't it. Elder obviously has a VERY big bone to pick with Kaepernick, for whatever reason. I care not that he's black. He can be just as biased as any white guy. But again.... I saw ONE video of Kaepernick speaking and all he said was what I've seen written over and over again. He's protesting the tragic incidents between white cops and black young men. Oh... and the studies cited. Well... I don't need to see a study to tell me that shooting a black guy 16 times, most of them while he's lying on the pavement..... (and then LYING about the whole damn incident).... is MURDER. Oh wait... the guy had a knife in his hand. I guess that changes everything. :rolleyes: The cop shot from about 10 feet away (imminent danger from a guy NOT walking towards him with a knife in his hand). The first shot dropped him... so I guess the other 15 were just to make sure.
I don't know all the other incidents by heart, so I'll just stop there. I do remember the guy who got shot in the back while RUNNING AWAY from the cop, who then shot him several times, killing him. Thank God for the bystander with the phone camera, huh?
Before you list the "other" incidents where the cop was probably justified in using lethal force, I really don't want to go there. ONE incident is more than enough to show there is a problem within some of the police forces in the U.S.
But back to Kaepernick. Excuse my ignorance, please. But until I see a video of Kaepernick HIMSELF calling for communism or any of the other "demands" you listed as BLM demands..... I guess I'll just have to go by what I myself hear and see. Until I see or hear a video of Kaepernick asking Nike to remove the Betsy Ross flag from its tennis shoe, I guess I'll keep on believing that Colin Kaepernick is just a young black guy fed up with all the same stories I'm fed up with.
That sounds like a socialist to me. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongPo-tay-to po-tah-toQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
When you're talking about systems of GOVERNMENT/ECONOMY there's no difference and they are both tyrannical and oppressive.
That said, I'm all about charity and being willing to support your community of your own free will and not under threat of violence, I think that is a virtuous thing and we certainly need more of that.
Which part?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterThat sounds like a socialist to me. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongPo-tay-to po-tah-toQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
When you're talking about systems of GOVERNMENT/ECONOMY there's no difference and they are both tyrannical and oppressive.
That said, I'm all about charity and being willing to support your community of your own free will and not under threat of violence, I think that is a virtuous thing and we certainly need more of that.
Recognising that there is such a thing as a community for one and contributing to it the other. Maggie Thatcher did not believe in such a thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongWhich part?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterThat sounds like a socialist to me. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongPo-tay-to po-tah-toQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
When you're talking about systems of GOVERNMENT/ECONOMY there's no difference and they are both tyrannical and oppressive.
That said, I'm all about charity and being willing to support your community of your own free will and not under threat of violence, I think that is a virtuous thing and we certainly need more of that.
So long as contributing isn't under threat of force I'm all for it, I do it myself when I'm able, everyone should. It brings us all together.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Government FORCING charitable giving via draconian taxation and handing out meager benefits, that creates resentment, laziness, and a sense of entitlement.
I'm quite well pleased if you notice and acknowledge the difference :bow:
I recognise the difference so long as you also recognise that socialism does not force you to help others and is not communism.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongSo long as contributing isn't under threat of force I'm all for it, I do it myself when I'm able, everyone should. It brings us all together.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Government FORCING charitable giving via draconian taxation and handing out meager benefits, that creates resentment, laziness, and a sense of entitlement.
I'm quite well pleased if you notice and acknowledge the difference :bow:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...id=mailsignout
Myles Garrett on Mason Rudolph: “I know what I heard”
Classic. :rolleyes:
To recap..... so defensive lineman Myles Garrett of the Cleveland Browns gets into a tussle with Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph... and in the process rips off Rudolph's helmet and bashes him over the head with it.
As a result, Garrett gets suspended by the NFL for the remainder of the season.
Now..... a week later..... Garrett says, oh by the way... did I mention Rudolph said a racial slur to me? :D :-X
Riiiiiight. I guess that little detail just slipped your mind and only now it becomes important, huh?
Oh.... oh.... he also says he understood that anything he said in appealing his suspension would remain private.... and I guess is appalled that it became public. :rolleyes:
Any stand-up comedian not immediately leaping on this new material isn't doing his job. :D
Seriously though... it's sad when someone has to resort to the old "go to" defense to justify his actions.
Mason Rudolph did try to take Garrett's helmet off first.
A lot of shit gets said during games, I was never one to waste my time with that. You talk trash you put a target on your back.
It's true, trash talking is part of the game. But racial slur claims are an all-too-convenient "go to" when you have no other defense. The fact he brought it up a week later makes his case flimsier than a house of cards.
You're right, Rudolph tried (stupidly) to rip off Garrett's helmet first. He didn't succeed... and Garrett did. IMO, to bash him over the head with it crossed a line clearly drawn by the NFL.
Regardless of whether the league has become "pussified", a helmet swung full force at someone else's head by a 270-pound lineman is assault.
I guess I just scrolled past this earlier...Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
What specific incident are you speaking of about the shooting 16 times? What studies are you talking about?
Yeah I remember the Walter Scott shooting I was the very first to post about it here and I called it MURDER...I think justice was eventually carried out as the officer is in jail for life.
"ONE incident is more than enough" oh so the police must maintain perfection then? Well that's easy enough to do....and no I'm serious, it's quite easy for the police to be PERFECT in not shooting anyone at all. The easiest way to do it is just no longer police areas with any violent crime at all. Done and done....everyone is safe from the scourge of the crooked police then.
former NFL player Marcellus Wiley on Colin Kaepernick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfVFHsoSM5A
....gets interesting around the 4:30 mark....but hey what does Marcellus Wiley know? :shrug03:
Flaked on a meeting with all the police chiefs in the area? :scratchchin: $1 million from Jed York to Kaep's organization AND a meeting with the chiefs of police and you don't show? Local churches who wanted Kaepernick to say his piece....he flakes?
Whatever....I give up. He plays he doesn't play he flies a rocketship to the moon, I don't care. I care about the issues with police but at the end of the day it doesn't matter
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Colin Kaepernick means nothing to me. Let's get that out in the open. I just applaud his wanting to bring the white cop/black man shooting problem out in the open. Anything else regarding Colin Kaepernick is quickly becoming superfluous in my book. I'm actually beginning to be sorry I ever mentioned him.
There are bad cops, there are cops that make bad decisions, and sometimes those folks end lives unjustly....that happens and it happens to people of all races. Nuance is important and looking at each individual event is warranted.
That said, I'll let you get it back to football
Wahey playoffs have started, now these I find fun... Lost track of the normal season so no idea who's good or not... Wildcards on now, I don't see the dolphins so I assume they got a bye... Otherwise @Masters prediction for superbowl winner would look pretty silly :S.....
Tenesee titans v new England just now, new England have won enough and I always like Tenesee since eddie George was one yard from the superbowl(which is a fair bit ::S)... Brady bunch up by three at start of the second quarter.