Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
i haven't seen the fight, what happen? ;D
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
I'm not so sure, but its going to be hard for him to get another big fight I think... maybe him & Guzman can finally get it on at Jr. Welter
I'm a big fan of Campbell, but he ruined any future earnings tonight. It was obvious from Shaw's participation in the post-fight interviews that Bradley won't give him the rematch, and who else is going to give him a shot? A fight between him and Guzman would drum up almost no interest. It would be an undercard fight at best.
I for one would be interested in Campbell/ Guzman, it would have to be an undercard but that's a good fight for an undercard!
Maybe someone like Lamont Peterson, Maidana or a comebacking Ortiz. Nate still has a bit of name value & 140 is stacked. Fights with Urango or Torres would be entertaining & work towards his advancement.
But your right he's got a lot of rebuilding to do & time isn't on his side!
I'd be rather interested to see it as well, but you and I are hardly the type of "casual" fans that fights are made to appeal to. Anyways, I hope Campbell comes back strong, but even before the stoppage he looked old and slow, 140 does not seem to suit him well, and I fear it's pretty much the end of the line (or back to ESPN) for him.
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Julius Rain
i haven't seen the fight, what happen? ;D
Campbell was seemed to be cut by a clash of heads, Bradley was starting to come on in the third though. Before the start of the 4th Campbell said he couldn't see & the ref awarded the fight to Bradley. Campbell argued that it should have been a no contest...
Should Delvin Rodriguez remain in the pool at 147?
After fighting to a split decision loss to 7th ranked Isaac Hlatswayo, should Rodriguez remain in the pool at Welter?
I think he should
Re: How far does Junior Witter drop?
Damn.. I voted wrong. I meant to vote him into the pool... my bad. :(
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
Sure he does.. there wasn't a awful lot to suggest he would of lost that fight should it continue for the full duration, so there's not alot we can go off if we want to drop him, although this is just my opinion.
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Julius Rain
i haven't seen the fight, what happen? ;D
Campbell was seemed to be cut by a clash of heads, Bradley was starting to come on in the third though. Before the start of the 4th Campbell said he couldn't see & the ref awarded the fight to Bradley. Campbell argued that it should have been a no contest...
ok saw it, i vote no nate shouldn't remain in the pool. I dont think he belongs at 140.
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
This may well get overturned considering the circumstance, so I think that he should stay in
Re: How far does Junior Witter drop?
He's done & regardless of what he says in the dressing room, I think this was his last fight
Re: How far does Junior Witter drop?
Into the pool i think at 35 year old he carnt compete with the younger fresher fighters no more.
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
I say remove him for now. If he fights against Bradley again, he will have to win to take the spot. If he fights anyone unranked, but worthwhile he can fight to get back in the pool. But as of now he is officially 0-1 at 140. I think he moved up to Light welter too late.
Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?
I say yes the fight was called incorrectly it should be a NC...an NC against a title holder should not deter the ranking
Re: How far does Junior Witter drop?
Put him in the pool...he quit for no valid reason for christ sake other then he was getting embaressed....
Re: Should Delvin Rodriguez remain in the pool at 147?
This poll is now closed. The results are as follows:
Delvin Rodriguez remains in the poll on a vote of 4 points to 1 point to be removed & 1 point that he should enter in the vacant #10 position
Should Ricardo Torres remain rated
Ricardo Torres (#10 at 140) hasn’t fought at that weight since July 5th ’08. That was the 1st round KO loss to Kendall Holt. Should he remain rated or be removed to the pool?
I think he should move down to the pool