Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: How far does Malignaggi drop?

Voters
5. This poll is closed
  • 1 spot to 4th

    0 0%
  • 2 spots to 5th

    2 40.00%
  • 3 spots to 6th

    3 60.00%
Results 1 to 15 of 276

Thread: Old Welterweight/Light-Welterweight/Lightweight threads

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    I vote he should remain in the pool. That being said, I'm almost positive he's done as a legitimate contender.
    I'm not so sure, but its going to be hard for him to get another big fight I think... maybe him & Guzman can finally get it on at Jr. Welter
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    I vote he should remain in the pool. That being said, I'm almost positive he's done as a legitimate contender.
    I'm not so sure, but its going to be hard for him to get another big fight I think... maybe him & Guzman can finally get it on at Jr. Welter
    I'm a big fan of Campbell, but he ruined any future earnings tonight. It was obvious from Shaw's participation in the post-fight interviews that Bradley won't give him the rematch, and who else is going to give him a shot? A fight between him and Guzman would drum up almost no interest. It would be an undercard fight at best.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    I vote he should remain in the pool. That being said, I'm almost positive he's done as a legitimate contender.
    I'm not so sure, but its going to be hard for him to get another big fight I think... maybe him & Guzman can finally get it on at Jr. Welter
    I'm a big fan of Campbell, but he ruined any future earnings tonight. It was obvious from Shaw's participation in the post-fight interviews that Bradley won't give him the rematch, and who else is going to give him a shot? A fight between him and Guzman would drum up almost no interest. It would be an undercard fight at best.
    I for one would be interested in Campbell/ Guzman, it would have to be an undercard but that's a good fight for an undercard!

    Maybe someone like Lamont Peterson, Maidana or a comebacking Ortiz. Nate still has a bit of name value & 140 is stacked. Fights with Urango or Torres would be entertaining & work towards his advancement.

    But your right he's got a lot of rebuilding to do & time isn't on his side!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post

    I'm not so sure, but its going to be hard for him to get another big fight I think... maybe him & Guzman can finally get it on at Jr. Welter
    I'm a big fan of Campbell, but he ruined any future earnings tonight. It was obvious from Shaw's participation in the post-fight interviews that Bradley won't give him the rematch, and who else is going to give him a shot? A fight between him and Guzman would drum up almost no interest. It would be an undercard fight at best.

    I for one would be interested in Campbell/ Guzman,
    it would have to be an undercard but that's a good fight for an undercard!

    Maybe someone like Lamont Peterson, Maidana or a comebacking Ortiz. Nate still has a bit of name value & 140 is stacked. Fights with Urango or Torres would be entertaining & work towards his advancement.

    But your right he's got a lot of rebuilding to do & time isn't on his side!
    I'd be rather interested to see it as well, but you and I are hardly the type of "casual" fans that fights are made to appeal to. Anyways, I hope Campbell comes back strong, but even before the stoppage he looked old and slow, 140 does not seem to suit him well, and I fear it's pretty much the end of the line (or back to ESPN) for him.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    i haven't seen the fight, what happen?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    i haven't seen the fight, what happen?
    Campbell was seemed to be cut by a clash of heads, Bradley was starting to come on in the third though. Before the start of the 4th Campbell said he couldn't see & the ref awarded the fight to Bradley. Campbell argued that it should have been a no contest...
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    961
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Sure he does.. there wasn't a awful lot to suggest he would of lost that fight should it continue for the full duration, so there's not alot we can go off if we want to drop him, although this is just my opinion.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    i haven't seen the fight, what happen?
    Campbell was seemed to be cut by a clash of heads, Bradley was starting to come on in the third though. Before the start of the 4th Campbell said he couldn't see & the ref awarded the fight to Bradley. Campbell argued that it should have been a no contest...
    ok saw it, i vote no nate shouldn't remain in the pool. I dont think he belongs at 140.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1718
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    This may well get overturned considering the circumstance, so I think that he should stay in

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Nate Campbell remain in the pool at 140?

    I say remove him for now. If he fights against Bradley again, he will have to win to take the spot. If he fights anyone unranked, but worthwhile he can fight to get back in the pool. But as of now he is officially 0-1 at 140. I think he moved up to Light welter too late.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Cotto's first loss loike Tszyus first loss?
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-28-2008, 01:40 PM
  2. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 07-02-2008, 07:12 PM
  3. Should I Drop This Class?
    By CFH in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-05-2008, 12:00 AM
  4. Can Any One Help Me Drop 4 KG
    By British_Boxer in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-11-2007, 01:28 PM
  5. Is It Possible 2 Drop From 225 TO 150?
    By LIL_IRON_MIKE in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-27-2005, 09:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing