Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Not sure why people are having a pop at Golovkin. He didn't chase Brook, he was waiting for Eubank Jr to sign. Jr bottled it so Golovkin was offered the Brook fight. It's not like he has a long list of opponents willing to face him.
O2 arena, 20,000 punters, Sky PPV, HBO. That equals millions of reasons for Golovkin to fight Brook.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Eubank Jr ?
http://ih1.redbubble.net/image.15831...x800,070,f.jpg
Within 2 days, Eddie Hearn offered Brook the EXACT same contract that Eubank turned down and he signed right away.
The butcher don't care what's on the table he's chopping it up.
Even though I think Triple G should be fighting that bitch ass Cameltoe (the ginger headed donkey rider is not gonna man up and face his mandatory) you have to give kudos to Brook for grabbing the chance of his life when the Eubank's were playing possum. From a technical point of view Brook is probably the best pro fighter GGG has come up against.
Brook's victory over Porter is looking an outstanding piece of form when you see how well Porter has performed since. But I've been reading the 4 pages of GGG fanboys trying to say Brook will get destroyed.
Duran moved up 2 divisions and beat SRL. SRL moved up 2 divisions and beat Hagler.
But Britain's two best 147lbers head two divisions north to engage in fights against much bigger men ?
But then again Vargas pulled out, Arum has said he's not looking to match his guys against Brook which rules out Bradley, Khan is terrified, it's too early for Spence, Porter isn't interested in a rematch, Garcia is looking to avoid any of the top guys at 147 and Thurman wants Garcia or a Porter rematch.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Brook is not in the class of Hagler or Leonard.
Stop making excuses for why Brook is taking the fight. He will be slaughtered inside 6 rounds like Khan was. No way is Brook the best technical fighter, it does not matter how good Brook is, he is just too small.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Brook is not in the class of Hagler or Leonard.
Stop making excuses for why Brook is taking the fight. He will be slaughtered inside 6 rounds like Khan was. No way is Brook the best technical fighter, it does not matter how good Brook is, he is just too small.
I dont agree with that. Brook would beat a lot of the top Middleweights. GGG is just a step too far.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Canelo is a pussy for not fighting GGG.
GGG is a pussy for fighting a blown up welterweight in Brook.
WARD is still the ultimate £4£ fighter who is stepping up by fighting the best and can never be accused of taking any easy step in boxing.
Eubank jr would have beat GGG...probably.
I cant wait til Kov smashes Wards face in :D
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Canelo is a pussy for not fighting GGG.
GGG is a pussy for fighting a blown up welterweight in Brook.
WARD is still the ultimate £4£ fighter who is stepping up by fighting the best and can never be accused of taking any easy step in boxing.
Eubank jr would have beat GGG...probably.
I cant wait til Kov smashes Wards face in :D
Happen. Not. Gonna
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
denilson200
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Canelo is a pussy for not fighting GGG.
GGG is a pussy for fighting a blown up welterweight in Brook.
WARD is still the ultimate £4£ fighter who is stepping up by fighting the best and can never be accused of taking any easy step in boxing.
Eubank jr would have beat GGG...probably.
I cant wait til Kov smashes Wards face in :D
Happen. Not. Gonna
Happy have a bet with you if your interested. I think its close but think Kov will stop him in the 2nd half of the fight.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Canelo is a pussy for not fighting GGG.
GGG is a pussy for fighting a blown up welterweight in Brook.
WARD is still the ultimate £4£ fighter who is stepping up by fighting the best and can never be accused of taking any easy step in boxing.
Eubank jr would have beat GGG...probably.
;D Really? How do you think Eubank Jr would fare against Ward ?
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Brook is not in the class of Hagler or Leonard.
Stop making excuses for why Brook is taking the fight. He will be slaughtered inside 6 rounds like Khan was. No way is Brook the best technical fighter, it does not matter how good Brook is, he is just too small.
I dont agree with that. Brook would beat a lot of the top Middleweights. GGG is just a step too far.
Brook would not be able to beat Eubank Jnr never mind a top middleweight. What an absurd thing to write.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Brook is not in the class of Hagler or Leonard.
Stop making excuses for why Brook is taking the fight. He will be slaughtered inside 6 rounds like Khan was. No way is Brook the best technical fighter, it does not matter how good Brook is, he is just too small.
I dont agree with that. Brook would beat a lot of the top Middleweights. GGG is just a step too far.
Brook would not be able to beat Eubank Jnr
never mind a top middleweight. What an absurd thing to write.
You see Master, your wording there sums it up perfectly. Eubank is nowhere near a top MW. you've just put that yourself.
So going back to your cryptic post earlier about "Eubank deserves more.", more than who or what?
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Who is a top middleweight if not Eubank then? Aside from GGG, I don't think there's much separating the rest of the division. No idea how Brook would do against those guys either, he may be big enough to fight there but it doesn't negate the fact that he's fought nothing but guys who aren't.
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Brook is not in the class of Hagler or Leonard.
Stop making excuses for why Brook is taking the fight. He will be slaughtered inside 6 rounds like Khan was. No way is Brook the best technical fighter, it does not matter how good Brook is, he is just too small.
I dont agree with that. Brook would beat a lot of the top Middleweights. GGG is just a step too far.
Brook would not be able to beat Eubank Jnr
never mind a top middleweight. What an absurd thing to write.
You see Master, your wording there sums it up perfectly. Eubank is nowhere near a top MW. you've just put that yourself.
So going back to your cryptic post earlier about "Eubank deserves more.", more than who or what?
Even thou hes the only man to have won on points over BJS?;D
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Canelo is a pussy for not fighting GGG.
GGG is a pussy for fighting a blown up welterweight in Brook.
WARD is still the ultimate £4£ fighter who is stepping up by fighting the best and can never be accused of taking any easy step in boxing.
Eubank jr would have beat GGG...probably.
I cant wait til Kov smashes Wards face in :D
You guys highlighted how much GGG is a pussy by acknowledging Ward stepping up to fight Kov
Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Brook is not in the class of Hagler or Leonard.
Stop making excuses for why Brook is taking the fight. He will be slaughtered inside 6 rounds like Khan was. No way is Brook the best technical fighter, it does not matter how good Brook is, he is just too small.
I dont agree with that. Brook would beat a lot of the top Middleweights. GGG is just a step too far.
Brook would not be able to beat Eubank Jnr
never mind a top middleweight. What an absurd thing to write.
You see Master, your wording there sums it up perfectly. Eubank is nowhere near a top MW. you've just put that yourself.
So going back to your cryptic post earlier about "Eubank deserves more.", more than who or what?
Even thou hes the only man to have
won on points over BJS?;D
Ha ha Ross, you're so desperate you have to rewrite history! Look at their records, and even you who professes to know a little bit about the sport will see that against BJS's name is a big fat "W", and against Eubank Jr's is an equally big "L".
Yes Ross that stands for LOSER! It doesn't stand for "well one judge didn't think so":rolleyes:
See I'm even putting your next line down before you get the chance.
BJS is currently a paper champion until he fights and beats someone relevant, and Eubank Jr. Is currently British level until he steps up. These , my pedigree chum are what you call FACTS !!! I know you have trouble spelling that, you get mixed up and spell it FANTASY! ;D;D;D;D