Soldier butchered in street in Woolwich

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

You invaded a country under false pretence in a war for oil, you killed a couple of hundred thousand civilians and then Iran booted you out. Every paper in the Arabic and Asian world had that photograph and a headline similar to "America's humiliation". Either from a military/foreign policy point of view or just a moral point of view that's nothing to be proud of, is it?

---

#1 Iraq knowingly AND repeatedly violated numerous UN resolutions.....how many times must I type that out before you pull your head out of your ass and read it?

#2 The civilian casualties in Iraq are minute when compared to any other war ESPECIALLY when you consider the amount of civilians the Allied Forces supposedly killed as opposed to the ones that were killed in the sectarian violence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

You invaded a country under false pretence in a war for oil, you killed a couple of hundred thousand civilians and then Iran booted you out. Every paper in the Arabic and Asian world had that photograph and a headline similar to "America's humiliation". Either from a military/foreign policy point of view or just a moral point of view that's nothing to be proud of, is it?

---

#1 Iraq knowingly AND repeatedly violated numerous UN resolutions.....how many times must I type that out before you pull your head out of your ass and read it?

#2 The civilian casualties in Iraq are minute when compared to any other war ESPECIALLY when you consider the amount of civilians the Allied Forces supposedly killed as opposed to the ones that were killed in the sectarian violence.

---

OK, they violated UN sanctions. So what? So do lots of other countries, including Middle Eastern countries that we're allied with. Iraq's violations didn't give America or anybody else the right to invade as I already pointed out. Bush invaded without UN sanction to do so, not with it.


OK, so you killed less people in this failed war for oil than in other wars. Congratulations. Maybe if you only kill a few hundred thousand people then it doesn't really count.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

OK, they violated UN sanctions. So what? So do lots of other countries, including Middle Eastern countries that we're allied with. Iraq's violations didn't give America or anybody else the right to invade as I already pointed out. Bush invaded without UN sanction to do so, not with it.


OK, so you killed less people in this failed war for oil than in other wars. Congratulations. Maybe if you only kill a few hundred thousand people then it doesn't really count.

---

Really? Really? we're going to be THAT cynical "Well everyone else violates UN resolutions".....well not everyone else was already on the shit list to begin with.

UN Security Council Resolution 1441 passed by a UNANIMOUS 15-0 vote (wider support than even was given to the Persian Gulf War)

The ambassador for the United States, John Negroponte, said:

“This resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by UNMOVIC, the IAEA or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12. The resolution makes clear that any Iraqi failure to comply is unacceptable and that Iraq must be disarmed. And, one way or another, Iraq will be disarmed. If the Security Council fails to act decisively in the event of further Iraqi violations, this resolution does not constrain any Member State from acting to defend itself against the threat posed by Iraq or to enforce relevant United Nations resolutions and protect world peace and security


"Failed war for oil"....you mean where the US took over an entire country in less than a month? And don't you a worthless self loathing Brit preach to ME about illegal wars you jackass. Your dumb fucking country got the Middle East drawn out this way and if that wasn't enough England got the US involved in the Iranian Revolution and what do we have to show for it? A bunch of effete little cocksuckers who bemoan the United States getting involved in other countries.....well I'm sorry, I guess that was only OK when you guys did it....a thousand pardons

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

I was wondering how long this would go before Kirk put up that picture. Kirk, you've got that blown poster size in your house (not your main house but the lake house in Lausanne) don't you?

---

Why Lausanne?

---

Don't all wealthy glob trotting lefties have a lake house there?

Lyle, all the crazy of Miles without the alcohol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by howlin mad missy

lyle, all the crazy of miles without the alcohol

---

Racist!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

I don't see how Brit is short for a Britain .
However Paki is short for Pakistan , but to call a Brit British isn't racist , but to call a Pakistani a Paki is racist ? Who makes up these rules , fucking stupid if u ask me , one rule for one , one rule for another.

In case you are wondering , and start to call me racist , my nephew is engaged to a girl of Punjabi stock , and we are great friends.

I just think as a country we have become to politically correct , madness.

---

The offensive word has been offensive for years, so do not tell me you are surprised. You say that to your nephews girl and you will see.

---

I didn't say I go round calling anyone a PAKI , I was making a point , and your reaction to jump right on me shows the world has gone mad.

BRIT = BRITISH
PAKI = PAKISTANI

You can find something offensive in everything in life , people just need to fucking grow up.
it is that simple , anyone who sees it different is the racist.

Heckler Gets Owned! - YouTube

---

Watch the video of someone not even listening and playing the race card.

---

I was not jumping down on you, where did you get that from? You know the word is offensive.

american is not a race

and you've turned this thread in to a joke.

just to demonstrate the way the UK deals with armed suspects http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEk0CjMdSP8

and the USA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cAAM4TXPdw

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

You know the word is offensive.

---

OK, chalk this up to my being white and please forgive the naivety in which I state this childlike question, but......


Why?


Why is it an offensive word? What about Paki rather than Pakistani makes it offensive? Is Stani offensive? I mean there are a few countries that end in -stan, and I guess someone could lump them all together with Stani, unless that's already been done and have the same effect, but seriously what about the word makes it offensive? Is it the manner in which it's used, the tone, what it implies...please explain it the way someone would explain it to a Martian who has just set foot on Earth and yes I am absolutely serious, I would like to understand it better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

american is not a race

and you've turned this thread in to a joke.

just to demonstrate the way the UK deals with armed suspects http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEk0CjMdSP8

and the USA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cAAM4TXPdw

---

And neither is Islam or Pakistani so how about you stop with the double standards, all this PC bullshit does is create victims...you don't deal with prejudice or bullying or racism by creating victims, creating victims just keeps those institutions in place, it cements their place in society.....way to help

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

You know the word is offensive.

---

OK, chalk this up to my being white and please forgive the naivety in which I state this childlike question, but......


Why?


Why is it an offensive word? What about Paki rather than Pakistani makes it offensive? Is Stani offensive? I mean there are a few countries that end in -stan, and I guess someone could lump them all together with Stani, unless that's already been done and have the same effect, but seriously what about the word makes it offensive? Is it the manner in which it's used, the tone, what it implies...please explain it the way someone would explain it to a Martian who has just set foot on Earth and yes I am absolutely serious, I would like to understand it better.

---

You get a pass because you do not know the history and meaning of the word. It was used against any brown skinned person is a derogatory and offensive way. Naz use to get called it a lot, so did Takaloo. National Front used it a lot in the 1970's, it really is and should not be a debate, but is surprisingly is. I am not jumping either, just dismayed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

You know the word is offensive.

---

OK, chalk this up to my being white and please forgive the naivety in which I state this childlike question, but......


Why?


Why is it an offensive word? What about Paki rather than Pakistani makes it offensive? Is Stani offensive? I mean there are a few countries that end in -stan, and I guess someone could lump them all together with Stani, unless that's already been done and have the same effect, but seriously what about the word makes it offensive? Is it the manner in which it's used, the tone, what it implies...please explain it the way someone would explain it to a Martian who has just set foot on Earth and yes I am absolutely serious, I would like to understand it better.

---

Because in Britain, thankfully more in the recent past than now the word Paki often prefaced the word Bastard and then imminent violence. It was used as away to make somebody less than human. It justified in the eyes of those that used it putting a brick through the brown families window, jumping the non white guy for having the cheek to walk down the street. It is a horrible word because of what it came to symbolise not because those subjected to it saw themselves as victims but because they often were victims. Victims of harassment,bullying, assault,arson and sometimes even murder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

You get a pass because you do not know the history and meaning of the word. It was used against any brown skinned person is a derogatory and offensive way. Naz use to get called it a lot, so did Takaloo. National Front used it a lot in the 1970's, it really is and should not be a debate, but is surprisingly is. I am not jumping either, just dismayed.

---

OK, thank you for taking time to explain the history of it's use to me, it does offer insight on the topic.


The point I'm trying to get at is in the end it is just a word and people should not allow a word to upset them, to make them angry, and evoke the reaction that the people yelling that word want. They want people angry, frustrated, emotional, stirred up, they want them to lash out but also to be victims, they want people to feel helpless.....no different than what Ali did to Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier, or George Foreman. No different than when Roberto Duran spit at Ray Leonard's wife. There comes a time when a word should mean nothing because it meaning something gives that word power over a population.

The NAACP gave the word 'nigger' a symbolic burial complete with coffin and all, but I don't think they have followed through in destroying the emotions that word conjures up. Saying "n-word" is just ridiculous, it makes people seem like they're in kindergarten.

I guess that takes a unified and unanimous effort to rid those words of their emotional values, but maybe it's time that happened. But hey, I'm just a white dude and I get irked at being called a name here and there so I guess I won't ever understand the true feeling of being called a racist name as being white has always been kind of a popular thing though there are plenty of ethnic slurs but again my people came from the British Isles so not much to bitch about there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Because in Britain, thankfully more in the recent past than now the word Paki often prefaced the word Bastard and then imminent violence. It was used as away to make somebody less than human. It justified in the eyes of those that used it putting a brick through the brown families window, jumping the non white guy for having the cheek to walk down the street. It is a horrible word because of what it came to symbolise not because those subjected to it saw themselves as victims but because they often were victims. Victims of harassment,bullying, assault,arson and sometimes even murder.

---

Thank you as well Beanz

Again, one cannot just hand over power to a word, it's just some letters which are LEARNED to be painful.

Rhubarb....that mean anything to anyone? Well if I yelled that every time I punched you or did something bad to you eventually you'd grow to despise the word and the people who use it because of the actions which you learned follow after it. It is basic Behavioral Psychology and I believe the only way to truly rid a word of its power is to just use it until it looses all meaning....granted that would be a very emotional purge to let all that go, but it COULD be done....then again, white dude here so maybe I'm just talkin out my ass here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Because in Britain, thankfully more in the recent past than now the word Paki often prefaced the word Bastard and then imminent violence. It was used as away to make somebody less than human. It justified in the eyes of those that used it putting a brick through the brown families window, jumping the non white guy for having the cheek to walk down the street. It is a horrible word because of what it came to symbolise not because those subjected to it saw themselves as victims but because they often were victims. Victims of harassment,bullying, assault,arson and sometimes even murder.

---

Thank you as well Beanz

Again, one cannot just hand over power to a word, it's just some letters which are LEARNED to be painful.

Rhubarb....that mean anything to anyone? Well if I yelled that every time I punched you or did something bad to you eventually you'd grow to despise the word and the people who use it because of the actions which you learned follow after it. It is basic Behavioral Psychology and I believe the only way to truly rid a word of its power is to just use it until it looses all meaning....granted that would be a very emotional purge to let all that go, but it COULD be done....then again, white dude here so maybe I'm just talkin out my ass here.

---

Holy shit Lyle. Seriously, how dare you. Can someone ban Lyle for being racist please? As highlighted above, he just said the 'R' word.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bzkfn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Because in Britain, thankfully more in the recent past than now the word Paki often prefaced the word Bastard and then imminent violence. It was used as away to make somebody less than human. It justified in the eyes of those that used it putting a brick through the brown families window, jumping the non white guy for having the cheek to walk down the street. It is a horrible word because of what it came to symbolise not because those subjected to it saw themselves as victims but because they often were victims. Victims of harassment,bullying, assault,arson and sometimes even murder.

---

Thank you as well Beanz

Again, one cannot just hand over power to a word, it's just some letters which are LEARNED to be painful.

Rhubarb....that mean anything to anyone? Well if I yelled that every time I punched you or did something bad to you eventually you'd grow to despise the word and the people who use it because of the actions which you learned follow after it. It is basic Behavioral Psychology and I believe the only way to truly rid a word of its power is to just use it until it looses all meaning....granted that would be a very emotional purge to let all that go, but it COULD be done....then again, white dude here so maybe I'm just talkin out my ass here.

---

Holy shit Lyle. Seriously, how dare you. Can someone ban Lyle for being racist please? As highlighted above, he just said the 'R' word.

---

So says the Puerto Rican ginger....fuckin hell, you grabbed hold of the shit end of the stick with both hands didn't you. If anyone should be offended its you Rhubarb ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

Oh now I know what muzzies are :-X!
Had me stumped there for bit.

Oil is all about controlling the world price not supply. It is about barrels released and produced on demand as much as stockpiles.

The Middle east consortium via a few global companies (It had a real name,which I forget, but it was a number of countries who sought to join up to be in the controlling position of the world price).
They nearly got control at one point and were a mere vote away from a monopoly on it, its only that they fell apart in disagreement and lost some voters over our Israeli friends doing something or another at the time, that they fucked themselves up.
Usa saw this and have worked very nicely on a number of levels to halt them ever going up the same path and forming into another. A foothold over there is very useful.

---

It was mainly American companies who were controlling the oil market up till the mid seventies when the Atrabs started taking control/Iranian revolution happened and US control started to slip. Here's a brief history:

OPEC and Crude Oil

---

Thanks Ill read it later, but reply otherwise Ill forget later and have no point of reference. Top day here,have to go surf while the tides right or ride while the suns out cant make mind up :-\.

Memory, says something about a sisters company or something, they were about to all join together and then the shit hit the fan over something and they didnt,there was a split and it has served America well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

I don't see how Brit is short for a Britain .
However Paki is short for Pakistan , but to call a Brit British isn't racist , but to call a Pakistani a Paki is racist ? Who makes up these rules , fucking stupid if u ask me , one rule for one , one rule for another.

In case you are wondering , and start to call me racist , my nephew is engaged to a girl of Punjabi stock , and we are great friends.

I just think as a country we have become to politically correct , madness.

---

The offensive word has been offensive for years, so do not tell me you are surprised. You say that to your nephews girl and you will see.

---

I didn't say I go round calling anyone a PAKI , I was making a point , and your reaction to jump right on me shows the world has gone mad.

BRIT = BRITISH
PAKI = PAKISTANI

You can find something offensive in everything in life , people just need to fucking grow up.
it is that simple , anyone who sees it different is the racist.

Heckler Gets Owned! - YouTube

---

Watch the video of someone not even listening and playing the race card.

---

I was not jumping down on you, where did you get that from? You know the word is offensive.

---

There is a big difference hounding someone for no reason , whatever you say to them ,
the word PAKI is no difference than the word BRIT .
Yes you would be offended if you are Indian and someone ignorantly called you PAKI , of course , I didn't say that there are no idiots who are ignorant to facts.
I've always found the race thing puzzling , EDL , UKIP , etc . protest they are all racists , saying things like close our borders , yet muslims like Chowdrey , Captain HOOK etc preach death to ignorant sheep in the street , and continue to take handouts from the state.
Yes there are racist people but it does work both ways.

The thing that subsequently struck me was that this event exposed all the glaring holes, corruptions, hypocrisies and contradictions in all facets of our society - to the point where I just had to turn my back on it all.

But anyway... Poor lad, if it was an actual soldier, I probably wouldn't mind as much - it's a soldiers job to kill or be killed (sounds terrible) but killing a drummer boy somehow highlights the feeble nature of it all. I mean I doubt this does much to bolster the extremists position. This was a supposed act of terror but we're hardly terrified by it ay?

The only lingering thing is the trial and media coverage. The attackers should have been disposed of quickly and unceremoniously - not have his bloody hands put on national newspapers and television sets for millions of little eyes to see ('terrorism' eh?).

If I change religions Ill be a Mussie Aussie :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

If I change religions Ill be a Mussie Aussie :D

---

@Andre

Ever thought of growing an Aussie Muzzie?

DAL seriously :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

If I change religions Ill be a Mussie Aussie :D

---

Racist! Wait.....Missy he's racist for saying that right?

Lets not all stray to far from the thread title , last week 2 black muslims butchered an innocent man in the streets of London , and however you look at it , that is a terrible thing.

My thoughts go out to his family. r,i,p.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

If I change religions Ill be a Mussie Aussie :D

---

Racist! Wait.....Missy he's racist for saying that right?

---

Was he?

Fuzzy :-\

This is not normaln and not true i hope

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

OK, they violated UN sanctions. So what? So do lots of other countries, including Middle Eastern countries that we're allied with. Iraq's violations didn't give America or anybody else the right to invade as I already pointed out. Bush invaded without UN sanction to do so, not with it.


OK, so you killed less people in this failed war for oil than in other wars. Congratulations. Maybe if you only kill a few hundred thousand people then it doesn't really count.

---

Really? Really? we're going to be THAT cynical "Well everyone else violates UN resolutions".....well not everyone else was already on the shit list to begin with.

UN Security Council Resolution 1441 passed by a UNANIMOUS 15-0 vote (wider support than even was given to the Persian Gulf War)

The ambassador for the United States, John Negroponte, said:

“This resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by UNMOVIC, the IAEA or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12. The resolution makes clear that any Iraqi failure to comply is unacceptable and that Iraq must be disarmed. And, one way or another, Iraq will be disarmed. If the Security Council fails to act decisively in the event of further Iraqi violations, this resolution does not constrain any Member State from acting to defend itself against the threat posed by Iraq or to enforce relevant United Nations resolutions and protect world peace and security


"Failed war for oil"....you mean where the US took over an entire country in less than a month? And don't you a worthless self loathing Brit preach to ME about illegal wars you jackass. Your dumb fucking country got the Middle East drawn out this way and if that wasn't enough England got the US involved in the Iranian Revolution and what do we have to show for it? A bunch of effete little cocksuckers who bemoan the United States getting involved in other countries.....well I'm sorry, I guess that was only OK when you guys did it....a thousand pardons

---

I already showed you Bush tried and failed to get a UN resolution authorising an invasion. If you manage to post something coherent/factual I'll reply to it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

I was wondering how long this would go before Kirk put up that picture. Kirk, you've got that blown poster size in your house (not your main house but the lake house in Lausanne) don't you?

---

Why Lausanne?

---

Don't all wealthy glob trotting lefties have a lake house there?

---

I've never understood the attraction. I think the view is rubbish :

http://www.macgraph.com/images/stori.../lac_leman.jpg

What Geneva council need to do is hire a couple of JCBs and clear all those mountains out of the way. If you took the mountains out of the way you'd have a fantastic view.


Lefties and liberals seem to like Como but it's like fucking sardines everywhere with millions of eurotrash trying to gewt into the same bar as George Clooney. Lugano is where it's at. The best scenery, the best bars and restaurants and you can actually get to and from places with minimal tourist issues.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Larryboy

I think it speaks volumes about how people have been raised in this country over the last few decades. A British soldier is killed by 2 vile pieces of shit in broad daylight who shout about how it's a repsonse to wars abroad, eye for an eye etc, and all the little white lapdogs run to the internet with the usual limp wristed "oh, you can't blame all foreigners, oh, white people kill people too, oh, what about the west bank and gaza strip?" excuses and grovelling. We've got a nation of bitches now, people who'd get on their knees and lick a muslims balls rather than risk offending them.

---

I thought I was the only one that thought like this, when did the white British men loose their balls and their brains? Because we sure as hell wernt like this a few generations ago. Its like most white British people are pro everyone but themselves. I find it very odd. I wonder if its the media "brainwashing" us in the hope we all get along and the "brainwashing" is having unexpected negative effects.

Is like are you from Africa? Do you want to come on in and sell drugs to us, rape some white women, spead AIDS, cut some white men up, mung off the benifits system, and get free food and shelter in prison instead of being shipped back to Africa, ok well come on in then, if anyone says anything they will be branded a racist (I will probably be banned from this forum after saying this) I mean its just common sense but everyone seems to be intent on allowing people that hate us to continue to do us harm while sympathising with them and comming down harshly/cutting out those that stand up for white people. F this country, im out. Im going to Australia they still have their balls attatched.

Africans had black slaves before we did and if they could inslave the white man they would and they would be alot more cruel than we were. Dont believe me then check out what they do to each other in Africa.

As for the terrorists at least we are fighting them, standing up so to speak.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OMGWTF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Larryboy

I think it speaks volumes about how people have been raised in this country over the last few decades. A British soldier is killed by 2 vile pieces of shit in broad daylight who shout about how it's a repsonse to wars abroad, eye for an eye etc, and all the little white lapdogs run to the internet with the usual limp wristed "oh, you can't blame all foreigners, oh, white people kill people too, oh, what about the west bank and gaza strip?" excuses and grovelling. We've got a nation of bitches now, people who'd get on their knees and lick a muslims balls rather than risk offending them.

---

I thought I was the only one that thought like this, when did the white British men loose their balls and their brains? Because we sure as hell wernt like this a few generations ago. Its like most white British people are pro everyone but themselves. I find it very odd. I wonder if its the media "brainwashing" us in the hope we all get along and the "brainwashing" is having unexpected negative effects.

Is like are you from Africa? Do you want to come on in and sell drugs to us, rape some white women, spead AIDS, cut some white men up, mung off the benifits system, and get free food and shelter in prison instead of being shipped back to Africa, ok well come on in then, if anyone says anything they will be branded a racist (I will probably be banned from this forum after saying this) I mean its just common sense but everyone seems to be intent on allowing people that hate us to continue to do us harm while sympathising with them and comming down harshly/cutting out those that stand up for white people. F this country, im out. Im going to Australia they still have their balls attatched.

Africans had black slaves before we did and if they could inslave the white man they would and they would be alot more cruel than we were. Dont believe me then check out what they do to each other in Africa.

As for the terrorists at least we are fighting them, standing up so to speak.

---

Now THAT is racist. Hateful shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OMGWTF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Larryboy

I think it speaks volumes about how people have been raised in this country over the last few decades. A British soldier is killed by 2 vile pieces of shit in broad daylight who shout about how it's a repsonse to wars abroad, eye for an eye etc, and all the little white lapdogs run to the internet with the usual limp wristed "oh, you can't blame all foreigners, oh, white people kill people too, oh, what about the west bank and gaza strip?" excuses and grovelling. We've got a nation of bitches now, people who'd get on their knees and lick a muslims balls rather than risk offending them.

---

I thought I was the only one that thought like this, when did the white British men loose their balls and their brains? Because we sure as hell wernt like this a few generations ago. Its like most white British people are pro everyone but themselves. I find it very odd. I wonder if its the media "brainwashing" us in the hope we all get along and the "brainwashing" is having unexpected negative effects.

Is like are you from Africa? Do you want to come on in and sell drugs to us, rape some white women, spead AIDS, cut some white men up, mung off the benifits system, and get free food and shelter in prison instead of being shipped back to Africa, ok well come on in then, if anyone says anything they will be branded a racist (I will probably be banned from this forum after saying this) I mean its just common sense but everyone seems to be intent on allowing people that hate us to continue to do us harm while sympathising with them and comming down harshly/cutting out those that stand up for white people. F this country, im out. Im going to Australia they still have their balls attatched.

Africans had black slaves before we did and if they could inslave the white man they would and they would be alot more cruel than we were. Dont believe me then check out what they do to each other in Africa.

As for the terrorists at least we are fighting them, standing up so to speak.

---

What gives you the right to go over there and contaminate australia.
You werent born in australia, and they dont want you going over there takin their women, spreading your diseases, fighting an claiming chav style

We can all stereotype.

But not everyone is stupid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OMGWTF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Larryboy

I think it speaks volumes about how people have been raised in this country over the last few decades. A British soldier is killed by 2 vile pieces of shit in broad daylight who shout about how it's a repsonse to wars abroad, eye for an eye etc, and all the little white lapdogs run to the internet with the usual limp wristed "oh, you can't blame all foreigners, oh, white people kill people too, oh, what about the west bank and gaza strip?" excuses and grovelling. We've got a nation of bitches now, people who'd get on their knees and lick a muslims balls rather than risk offending them.

---

I thought I was the only one that thought like this, when did the white British men loose their balls and their brains? Because we sure as hell wernt like this a few generations ago. Its like most white British people are pro everyone but themselves. I find it very odd. I wonder if its the media "brainwashing" us in the hope we all get along and the "brainwashing" is having unexpected negative effects.

Is like are you from Africa? Do you want to come on in and sell drugs to us, rape some white women, spead AIDS, cut some white men up, mung off the benifits system, and get free food and shelter in prison instead of being shipped back to Africa, ok well come on in then, if anyone says anything they will be branded a racist (I will probably be banned from this forum after saying this) I mean its just common sense but everyone seems to be intent on allowing people that hate us to continue to do us harm while sympathising with them and comming down harshly/cutting out those that stand up for white people. F this country, im out. Im going to Australia they still have their balls attatched.

Africans had black slaves before we did and if they could inslave the white man they would and they would be alot more cruel than we were. Dont believe me then check out what they do to each other in Africa.

As for the terrorists at least we are fighting them, standing up so to speak.

---

I want to know something: what do you think of the people from other countries including many Africans who actually get off their ass do something for others incomunity service or professional or labor work?

BTW in Australia the further north you go the better Darwin would suit you well as would some large in land rural towns; as you have a hope of finding others (in a pub)with the same attitudes. But they have it towards the local original indigenous blacks because they are now trapped in towns and trapped into the white mans world with all the habits and addictions, the two are a very sad mixture.

Other places out here are so multicultural,the whole of Australia is built on multiculturalism so much so you may hate it.There are areas that are mostly Viet and areas that are Chinese and so on because people tend to move in close to their own social groups, but you can go there with no problem and each goes into each others areas for different reasons.

But like anywhere in the world its only the young immature men who cant handle their testosterone levels or the mentally challenged others who choose group mentality who usually drink alot, dont work much, take whatever drug they can get a hold of types of people (whites and other ethnicity included) that get all racial and storm around in groups in the early hours looking to hurt others to make themselves feel better about nothing.
They dont show their true colors out in the light of day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

OK, they violated UN sanctions. So what? So do lots of other countries, including Middle Eastern countries that we're allied with. Iraq's violations didn't give America or anybody else the right to invade as I already pointed out. Bush invaded without UN sanction to do so, not with it.


OK, so you killed less people in this failed war for oil than in other wars. Congratulations. Maybe if you only kill a few hundred thousand people then it doesn't really count.

---

Really? Really? we're going to be THAT cynical "Well everyone else violates UN resolutions".....well not everyone else was already on the shit list to begin with.

UN Security Council Resolution 1441 passed by a UNANIMOUS 15-0 vote (wider support than even was given to the Persian Gulf War)

The ambassador for the United States, John Negroponte, said:

“This resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by UNMOVIC, the IAEA or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12. The resolution makes clear that any Iraqi failure to comply is unacceptable and that Iraq must be disarmed. And, one way or another, Iraq will be disarmed. If the Security Council fails to act decisively in the event of further Iraqi violations, this resolution does not constrain any Member State from acting to defend itself against the threat posed by Iraq or to enforce relevant United Nations resolutions and protect world peace and security


"Failed war for oil"....you mean where the US took over an entire country in less than a month? And don't you a worthless self loathing Brit preach to ME about illegal wars you jackass. Your dumb fucking country got the Middle East drawn out this way and if that wasn't enough England got the US involved in the Iranian Revolution and what do we have to show for it? A bunch of effete little cocksuckers who bemoan the United States getting involved in other countries.....well I'm sorry, I guess that was only OK when you guys did it....a thousand pardons

---

I already showed you Bush tried and failed to get a UN resolution authorising an invasion. If you manage to post something coherent/factual I'll reply to it.

---

OK continue to be a whiny cunt I won't get in your way. Saddam was given every opportunity to come clean....BUT he violated UN resolutions and well you can't say he wasn't warned could you?