FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Answer the question. Do u agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings that have Pac at #5? Yes or no?

---

If you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)
Or you need more clues?? ;D

---

Why dont u just tell me genius...

---

Ohh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

If you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)
Or you need more clues?? ;D

---

Why dont u just tell me genius...

---

Ohh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??
.

---

No i accept that u dont think like a normal person so i have to ask u what your opinion is cos its not obvious. Why not answer? Scared. Fool

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

If you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)
Or you need more clues?? ;D

---

Why dont u just tell me genius...

---

Ohh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??
.

---

Saddoboxer, that is a lame answer. Do you actually have a direct answer to a rather straightforward question? Or is it that you don't actually know?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

miles are you referring to eagle? he's been repeating asking me this same question on this thread many times already... maybe 20 times already... :lolhaha:
.

---

And yet still no answer from the numb nuts i ask. He must be brain dead.Yes or no?

---

I predict he will just say something elusive and cryptic. ;)

---

Your prediction is correct...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brucelee

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brucelee

FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.;)


After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?

---

Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.

---

Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.;D

If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM;D

---

:LOLATYOU:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by killersheep

Saddoboxer, do you agree with boxrec having PAC #5 p4p?

---

Unlike eagle, I think you're intelligent enough to locate the answer killersheep...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Why dont u just tell me genius...

---

Ohh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??
.

---

Saddoboxer, that is a lame answer. Do you actually have a direct answer to a rather straightforward question? Or is it that you don't actually know?

---

Unlike eagle, I think you're smart enough to locate where to find the answer miles...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer

Ohh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??
.

---

Saddoboxer, that is a lame answer. Do you actually have a direct answer to a rather straightforward question? Or is it that you don't actually know?

---

Unlike eagle, I think you're smart enough to locate where to find the answer miles...

---

Look i clearly dont know where to look. So tell me.