FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

[brucelee]

FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?

Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.

Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM

[ElTerribleMorales]

FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?

Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.

Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM

unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy

[brucelee]

Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.

Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM

unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy

If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.

[ElTerribleMorales]

Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM

unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy

If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.

why? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover

[brucelee]

unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy

If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.

why? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover

and your name is "el terrible morales". at least I haven't named myself after Pac.

[ElTerribleMorales]

If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.

why? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover

and your name is "el terrible morales". at least I haven't named myself after Pac.

you don't hear me turning every single thread into something based on Morales now do you?, hell wouldn't be surprised one bit if you were able to squeeze in Pacman in a thread about W. Klitschko vs David Haye

[Violent Demise]

FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?

Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.

Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM