Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LobowolfXXX
Kessler would get beaten more decisively in a second fight with Ward than he did in the first.
Opinion and nothing else.
Hilarious, coming from you. In this thread.
Miles, you are taking this way too personally and exaggerating to an extreme to compensate.
Hopkins "turned out to be an easy win" for Calzaghe? Ward is not really very good? You don't need to jump to this kind of out-and-out hyperbole to make your point. It comes off as (and is, really) pure provocation and not even an attempt to persuade anyone to agree with you. Just like in the Manny/JMM threads.
Personally, I thought the old, Jermain Taylor-losing version of Hopkins still shaded a decision against Calzaghe. Plenty of others agree. But I'm not going to claim it was "decisive" or "easy" or pretend I can't conceive of how anyone could possibly see it any other way. Or call it a "robbery." If you score workrate above absolutely everything else, even if it's ineffective pitter-pat, you have to score the fight for Calzaghe (though still close on the cards -- not "easy").
Same with the Calzaghe-Ward point. Here, I'm generally inclined to agree that, at this point, Ward is just too young and unproven to pick in this mythical matchup. But 5 years from now? We'll see. Not out of the question. No need to completely denigrate the guy and basically say he's a completely average fighter except that he's good at clinching in order to conclude or argue that the bout favors Calzaghe at this point.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?
ha
nah he isnt that great
least i like some fighters tho eh?
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?
ha
nah he isnt that great
least i like some fighters tho eh?
Tommy Hearns is my all time favorite , so it was just a simple question , sorry if the question offended you.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?
ha
nah he isnt that great
least i like some fighters tho eh?
Tommy Hearns is my all time favorite , so it was just a simple question , sorry if the question offended you.
dont be sorry its a sign of weakness
and no offence taken, i thought you had turned a serious conversation into a bit of fun, so i joined in
im dissapointed in you tho, you are British right? you dont support Manchester United do you?
if you want a serious answer then I am English, Calzaghe is welsh so no he isnt my favourite fighter
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
[QUOTE=erics44;1038940]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?
ha
nah he isnt that great
least i like some fighters tho eh?
Tommy Hearns is my all time favorite , so it was just a simple question , sorry if the question offended you.
dont be sorry its a sign of weakness
and no offence taken, i thought you had turned a serious conversation into a bit of fun, so i joined in
im dissapointed in you tho, you are British right? you dont support Manchester United do you?
if you want a serious answer then I am English, Calzaghe is welsh so no he isnt my favourite fighter[/QUOT]
Im English , so who is your favorite fighter ?
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe
He didnt win the fight
he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward
sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument
if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words
Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?
ha
nah he isnt that great
least i like some fighters tho eh?
Tommy Hearns is my all time favorite , so it was just a simple question , sorry if the question offended you.
dont be sorry its a sign of weakness
and no offence taken, i thought you had turned a serious conversation into a bit of fun, so i joined in
im dissapointed in you tho, you are British right? you dont support Manchester United do you?
if you want a serious answer then I am English, Calzaghe is welsh so no he isnt my favourite fighter
Glad you are being honest about your irrational pro-British bias. It's obvious from all of your posts (your previous one included) but good that you at least admit it.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Hey, good old fashioned debate on this topic. Bit difficult for me to decide who would win this fight but Calzaghe is a hrad man to beat on points, and I cant see Ward knocking him out,
On the other hand if Ward were to fight and beat say Bute and Hopkins/Dawkins in the next year or 2 he'd have a resume in less than 30 fights that may have surpassed Calzaghes much longer career.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LobowolfXXX
Kessler would get beaten more decisively in a second fight with Ward than he did in the first.
Opinion and nothing else.
Hilarious, coming from you. In this thread.
Miles, you are taking this way too personally and exaggerating to an extreme to compensate.
Hopkins "turned out to be an easy win" for Calzaghe? Ward is not really very good? You don't need to jump to this kind of out-and-out hyperbole to make your point. It comes off as (and is, really) pure provocation and not even an attempt to persuade anyone to agree with you. Just like in the Manny/JMM threads.
Personally, I thought the old, Jermain Taylor-losing version of Hopkins still shaded a decision against Calzaghe. Plenty of others agree. But I'm not going to claim it was "decisive" or "easy" or pretend I can't conceive of how anyone could possibly see it any other way. Or call it a "robbery." If you score workrate above absolutely everything else, even if it's ineffective pitter-pat, you have to score the fight for Calzaghe (though still close on the cards -- not "easy").
Same with the Calzaghe-Ward point. Here, I'm generally inclined to agree that, at this point, Ward is just too young and unproven to pick in this mythical matchup. But 5 years from now? We'll see. Not out of the question. No need to completely denigrate the guy and basically say he's a completely average fighter except that he's good at clinching in order to conclude or argue that the bout favors Calzaghe at this point.
All boxing debate is just opinion at the end of the day and I happen to believe Calzaghe is much better than Ward and that the only person to really prove a challenge would have been a prime Jones Jr. Just because you don't agree doesn't make it hyperbole. You just disagree.
I don't think Ward is terribly good, I think his style involves blatant cheating and his resume isn't all that hot either. All of those points can be backed up. I don't need hyperbole, the facts to support the opinions are there. Froch has a better resume than Andre Ward.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Ward and hopkins are from a similiar cloth.
They are savy fighters.. They are good, but not great.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
The older, heavier, latter day Hopkins is good. The Hopkins that went more than a decade without losing a fight and defending the 160-pound title a bazillion times was great.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LobowolfXXX
The older, heavier, latter day Hopkins is good. The Hopkins that went more than a decade without losing a fight and defending the 160-pound title a bazillion times was great.
hopkins defended his mw titles against too many part time construction workers until he caught a former ww in Tito.
Based on your theory, Chris John is great too.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
Who did Hopkins beat at MW to prove his greatness?
His biggest wins were small men moving up. DLH who had really already lost to Sturm and Trinidad who spent most of his career at WW.
Then after Hopkins moves up you have loads more men being called up way beyond their optimum fighting weights.
Hopkins wins over Trinidad and Tarver were significant, but no more significant than Calzaghe beating Lacy, Kessler and Hopkins himself.
Re: Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable
That's a little harsh...he defeated several top-10s, and destroyed Glen Johnson and Trinidad when they were undefeated. He also took 4 rounds off of a prime Roy Jones, and did MUCH better against him than Toney did in a fight that was more hyped and totally one-sided. He was on the P4P list for a number of years, and deservedly in the top 3 for a few of them.
