Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
Better training , better nutrition , better weight training , Better diets and supplements , better sparring partners , better trainers, They have this neat thing called film and tape to look at. Are you that fukin stupid that your ass cant figure that out. All you are is just a bully trying to compensate for the hard life that you never had and street education that you never got in the rough streets of british columbia "A".
:rotflmao:
Education "A" (LMAO @ A)? Education is clearly something which has eluded you. You're right though, I'm quite the bully, attempting to have a rational debate and all... :rolleyes:
How is training better? I acknowledged that nutrition may have improved, but like Daxx said, "You can only move around a 20X20 ring so fast regardless of training methods....muscles and supplements do not make you hit harder..." Tape existed in the 1950's as well...
I'll try to ignore how ironic it is of someone who lives in fucking Ohio trying to deride one of the internationally acknowledged best places on earth to live.
Between the two of us, I'm clearly the stupid one. ;D
Jello Biafra.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
Well go find doc flying Delorean. You are the biggest douche bag ever born. This is a comparision not a fantasy if they trained and fought today the same way. We are comparing . I feel at 160 Pavlik would own a SRR the same stlye 60 years ago. This is a dumb thread . Why would you assume if they trained and fought in modern day. i am comparing time and styles. Not a world of warcraft fantasy what if time warp thing that you are doing. Did you ever box or wrestle , play football , baseball or anything. I did all of those. I am comparing.Thats like saying how would Bill Walton do one on one with Lebron James or Babe Ruth trying to hit off of Cliff Lee. Things are better these days athletes included. If Jesse Owens had todays shoes and tracks Usian Bolt would still smoke him.
I have boxed a bit, nothing serious. As for wrestling, I have no desire to get oiled up and mount a sweaty man, but if that's your thing by all means go for it.
Again, for the fourth time, I said to explain it without using other sports as an example, they are not relevant to boxing.
How are Pavlik's SKILLS superior to those of any of the fighters you mentioned?
:lolhaha: CFH you just owned him big time.
It wasn't hard, the guy's nothing but a racist dipshit. You should see some of the stuff he PM'd me.
Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Uhhh, what? That's a hell of a first sentence by the way.
You're the one who said Pavlik would KO SRR, I would assume that they would hypothetically have to fight for that to happen. So what skills does Pavlik possess that places him above all those greats you are so sure he would beat? I love fanboys.
No. What I am saying is todays athletes are way better than 30 -70 years ago. But you have so much crap in your brains you cant wrap you little mind around it. Todays athletes are way better. Sorry I think Pavlik would beat the crap out of any middle weight of 1960 prior. SRR included.
dude i understand u like kelly, i like kelly too hes a good fighter, but too say he will ko SRR thats just wrong hes never been stopped in his life by guys who were better than pavlik.
Like who. Name me a great middle weight who if they came across a time warp would win a 160 crown. Things are better now.
Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
No. What I am saying is todays athletes are way better than 30 -70 years ago. But you have so much crap in your brains you cant wrap you little mind around it. Todays athletes are way better. Sorry I think Pavlik would beat the crap out of any middle weight of 1960 prior. SRR included.
dude i understand u like kelly, i like kelly too hes a good fighter, but too say he will ko SRR thats just wrong hes never been stopped in his life by guys who were better than pavlik.
Like who. Name me a great middle weight who if they came across a time warp would win a 160 crown. Things are better now.
i think basillio,fulmer, even rocky graciano could beat him. and pavlik aint even prime yet hes just getting started
Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kingfrnk
Quote:
Originally Posted by
southakron314
No. What I am saying is todays athletes are way better than 30 -70 years ago. But you have so much crap in your brains you cant wrap you little mind around it. Todays athletes are way better. Sorry I think Pavlik would beat the crap out of any middle weight of 1960 prior. SRR included.
dude i understand u like kelly, i like kelly too hes a good fighter, but too say he will ko SRR thats just wrong hes never been stopped in his life by guys who were better than pavlik.
Like who. Name me a great middle weight who if they came across a time warp would win a 160 crown. Things are better now.
Yea your right Kelly Pavlik, Arthur Abraham, Felix Sturm, are the best Middleweights ever. In the best Middleweight era of all time :rolleyes:
