-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
Canelo is sturdy and strong but a well placed body shot by GGG will render him useless.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
Canelo is sturdy and strong but a well placed body shot by GGG will render him useless.
The same can happen the other way around because Jacobs was making GGG looking really uncomfortable with body shots. Body shots is Canelos thing and it not like he does not have the speed to land them either.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
Canelo is sturdy and strong but a well placed body shot by GGG will render him useless.
The same can happen the other way around because Jacobs was making GGG looking really uncomfortable with body shots. Body shots is Canelos thing and it not like he does not have the speed to land them either.
GGG has fought tougher fighters than Canelo and Jacobs is one example. Alvarez has never faced a power puncher like GGG and his avoidance of the match shows that he is running scared. Lets hope he agrees with you though. ;)
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
He isn't hard to hit and Golovkin will be the hardest puncher he has faced. I struggle to see Golovkin not having an effect on that head. Golovkin hurts anyone he gets in there with. Jacobs did well because he can move and is smart. I don't think Canelo is a smart fighter.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
Canelo is sturdy and strong but a well placed body shot by GGG will render him useless.
The same can happen the other way around because Jacobs was making GGG looking really uncomfortable with body shots. Body shots is Canelos thing and it not like he does not have the speed to land them either.
GGG has fought tougher fighters than Canelo and Jacobs is one example. Alvarez has never faced a power puncher like GGG and his avoidance of the match shows that he is running scared. Lets hope he agrees with you though. ;)
See this is were i disagree with you i will give you Jacobs but in my eyes he lost that fight anyway. As for Canelo he has faced Cotto, Lara and Trout that better then GGG wins out side the last fight with Jacobs. Not to mention I favor Canelo as durable then Jacobs and come fight night he going to weigh more then he did i am just saying. As for him avoiding the fight that is Oscar and if he wins against him it was good game plan waiting Canelo still pretty young.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
It is not Oscar that is avoiding GGG, it is clearly Canelo.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
He isn't hard to hit and Golovkin will be the hardest puncher he has faced. I struggle to see Golovkin not having an effect on that head. Golovkin hurts anyone he gets in there with. Jacobs did well because he can move and is smart. I don't think Canelo is a smart fighter.
I am just going off what i seen in the fights and i never seen Canelo hurt and he is going be over 180 pounds if he hydrating from 160 limit be good fight regardless. I still want to see a rematch with Jacobs though so that fine as well.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
I'm not a fan of Jacobs although I give him huge respect for his performance in that fight. I had him winning. The best I could give Golovkin would be a draw.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
He isn't hard to hit and Golovkin will be the hardest puncher he has faced. I struggle to see Golovkin not having an effect on that head. Golovkin hurts anyone he gets in there with. Jacobs did well because he can move and is smart. I don't think Canelo is a smart fighter.
I am just going off what i seen in the fights and i never seen Canelo hurt and he is going be over 180 pounds if he hydrating from 160 limit be good fight regardless. I still want to see a rematch with Jacobs though so that fine as well.
ive seen canelo wobbled when he fought cottos bro
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Depends on how serious you want to take it, but I came across this.
Witness: Golovkin Hurt Canelo Twice in Sparring - Ring Observer
In boxing time, it did happen a long time ago. So maybe you can attribute it to Cañelo being green.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Bunce: Golovkin doesn’t make my all-time top five
Boxing pundit Steve Bunce says undefeated middleweight world champion Gennady Golovkin wouldn’t make his all-time top five boxers, but would make his top 10.
Golovkin has won all 37 of his fights, with his latest victory coming against Daniel Jacobs.
“My feeling was, if he takes care of Jacobs, he makes my top 10,” said Bunce.
“He doesn’t make the top five of my top 10, he makes my top 10.
“I don’t think he climbs up that ladder from the top of the top 10, to anywhere near the top five at the moment, and irrespective of what he does in the future,” he added.
This clip is from 5 live Boxing with Costello and Bunce, first broadcast on Tuesday 21 March 2017.
BBC Radio 5 live - In Short, Bunce: Golovkin doesn’t make my all-time top five
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
He isn't hard to hit and Golovkin will be the hardest puncher he has faced. I struggle to see Golovkin not having an effect on that head. Golovkin hurts anyone he gets in there with. Jacobs did well because he can move and is smart. I don't think Canelo is a smart fighter.
I am just going off what i seen in the fights and i never seen Canelo hurt and he is going be over 180 pounds if he hydrating from 160 limit be good fight regardless. I still want to see a rematch with Jacobs though so that fine as well.
ive seen canelo wobbled when he fought cottos bro
I do not recall that if you remember a clip were he was clearly hurt and have it i be down to watch it. Do you remember what round he was wobbled in because i do not at all and it must of been pretty quick.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
I still see Golovkin beating Canelo. I do feel however that it is a much more competitive battle than we originally anticipated. 160 might just be getting a little life in it now. GGG, Jacobs, BJS, Lee, Lemieux, Charlo, Derevyanchenko, the N'Jikam/ Murata winner, Sulecki, CEJ floating around.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Yeah it's safe to say the Middleweight division has gone full circle and is coming good again, it's always produced brilliant and exciting fighters because you get that perfect mix of KO power and speed and it makes people watch because the guys fighting are your average sized human male and easy to relate to.
Shame Golovkin is nearly 35 really.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
GGG just had an off night, how much of that is due to age, weight difference or just Jacobs ability we will never know. I had GGG winning narrowly and he was frustrated.
If they are going to persist with weigh ins the day before then why isn't the weigh in exactly 24 hours before the fight? What is this midday or 1pm bullshit?
Is this not enough time to give the athlete a chance to put all the water weight back on? Or is it just so promoters get a chance to deal with fighters that miss weight?
Why can't they have the weigh in at 9 or 10pm the previous night approximately 24 hours before fight time? Instead they get 34 or 35 hours? IMO that is too much time between weigh in and fight time.
That was not a Middleweight contest we witnessed.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
The only problem with that is i can see even more fights getting cancelled which is not a option i think they will take. IF you can make the cut then you are in division i really do not care how much the re hydrate to. If a person is cutting weight and not having a problem or getting caught cheating then i do not see the problem with it. Some guys are not good at cutting and can not take the strain but others just can like anything just a advantage they try to gain.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
palmerq
I honestly think canelo will beat golovkin now.. golovkin has a lot of good stuff going for him... he really doesnt like body shots and canelo is great at those, golovkin cuts of the ring well, canelo doesnt but will he need to when fighting someone like golovkin ? I think canelo stops golovkin
I think this was the right decision by the judges btw
I'm hoping Canelo sees it the same way as you. ;)
So do I because GGG wrecks Canelo if they get in the ring. Style wise Canelo offers very little resistance against GGG.
I think so too. Canelo fights in spurts and has slow feet. Golovkin should be able to bust him up and maybe stop him with his power. People are dissing GGG, but seem to underappreciate that Jacobs might be one of the best fighters in the world.
Has Canelo ever even been hurt in a fight really and i do not think he has been dropped either. I am starting to think he going to have 15 pounds on GGG as well and if he can not hurt him he is going to be deep shit.
He isn't hard to hit and Golovkin will be the hardest puncher he has faced. I struggle to see Golovkin not having an effect on that head. Golovkin hurts anyone he gets in there with. Jacobs did well because he can move and is smart. I don't think Canelo is a smart fighter.
I am just going off what i seen in the fights and i never seen Canelo hurt and he is going be over 180 pounds if he hydrating from 160 limit be good fight regardless. I still want to see a rematch with Jacobs though so that fine as well.
Defending against the likes of Matthew Hatton and Ryan Rhodes helps.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
The only problem with that is i can see even more fights getting cancelled which is not a option i think they will take. IF you can make the cut then you are in division i really do not care how much the re hydrate to. If a person is cutting weight and not having a problem or getting caught cheating then i do not see the problem with it. Some guys are not good at cutting and can not take the strain but others just can like anything just a advantage they try to gain.
If fights get cancelled then promoters and networks will be weary of working with those fighters that miss weight. Sure some guys can do it but it doesn't make it right. It is also unhealthy. Not to mention the potential risks involved when one guy out weighs the other by a large margin. If everyone involved took a stand they would have no choice but to follow suit.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
All that matters is that both fighters are on board so it's a level playing field. You can't have one guy making sure he doesn't blow up too much and the other saying fuck it I won't bother. There's a lot to like about Jacobs but what he did was dirty, there's no two ways about it as far as I'm concerned. Still staggers me that given all we know, people will still try and cripple their opponent on the scales and the endorsement that practice receives from the boxing fraternity at large.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
The only problem with that is i can see even more fights getting cancelled which is not a option i think they will take. IF you can make the cut then you are in division i really do not care how much the re hydrate to. If a person is cutting weight and not having a problem or getting caught cheating then i do not see the problem with it. Some guys are not good at cutting and can not take the strain but others just can like anything just a advantage they try to gain.
If fights get cancelled then promoters and networks will be weary of working with those fighters that miss weight. Sure some guys can do it but it doesn't make it right. It is also unhealthy. Not to mention the potential risks involved when one guy out weighs the other by a large margin. If everyone involved took a stand they would have no choice but to follow suit.
To be honest there is a lot more things in boxing i would want to tackle before I would go against that. As long as you cut the weight and you can do it with out your kidneys going out then fight at that weight. If that is problem we can go back to having same day way ins i think it is weird to tell a guy how much hey can hydrate after he makes weight that is just unhealthy for fighter. So either keep this or make back to same day so they know exactly what they can do.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
The only problem with that is i can see even more fights getting cancelled which is not a option i think they will take. IF you can make the cut then you are in division i really do not care how much the re hydrate to. If a person is cutting weight and not having a problem or getting caught cheating then i do not see the problem with it. Some guys are not good at cutting and can not take the strain but others just can like anything just a advantage they try to gain.
If fights get cancelled then promoters and networks will be weary of working with those fighters that miss weight. Sure some guys can do it but it doesn't make it right. It is also unhealthy. Not to mention the potential risks involved when one guy out weighs the other by a large margin. If everyone involved took a stand they would have no choice but to follow suit.
To be honest there is a lot more things in boxing i would want to tackle before I would go against that. As long as you cut the weight and you can do it with out your kidneys going out then fight at that weight. If that is problem we can go back to having same day way ins i think it is weird to tell a guy how much hey can hydrate after he makes weight that is just unhealthy for fighter. So either keep this or make back to same day so they know exactly what they can do.
Let us be honest as well think all the networks are going to not work with Canelo and not have the biggest draw at the moment fight and he not only guy who popular that cuts a lot. I am just saying this sport about money and i doubt there going to change to something that would end up hurting there bank account. Not to mention as the weigh ins are now there still way less deaths then there was in old way in method of doing things.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Like I said just because it's legal doesn't make it right. Slavery was legal at one stage. Changes for the better need to start somewhere.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Gatti vs Gamache Facts & Stats
- Arturo Gatti (30-4) vs Joey Gamache (55-3)
- The popular Arturo Gatti was very unpopular on this night. He'd gained a mind-blowing 19 lbs since the weigh-in a day prior which resulted in a sizable weight disparity between him and his opponent, Joey Gamache.
- On fight night, HBO recorded Gamache at 145 lbs while Gatti was 160; A welterweight versus a middleweight.
- The weigh-in, itself, was also controversial as some believe the scales may have been tweaked for Gatti, enabling him to weigh-in a pound or two above the contracted catchweight of 141 lbs
- Looking much larger and stronger than his foe, Gatti brutally knocked out Gamache in less than two rounds, sending him crashing to the canvas in an unconscious state
- Not only did Gamache's boxing career come to an abrupt halt, his life would be forever changed
- Gamache, who almost died in the hospital that night, received permanent brain damage
- As of 2009 (nine years after the bout) according to NY Daily News, Gamache suffered from intense migraines and depression, had difficulty staying employed and took numerous medications to quell the pain and depression.
- A mismatch? On paper, this was a solid match-up. Gamache was also a former world champion and entered the bout having won 55 of 58 pro bouts, registering 38 knockouts along the way. He was on a 10-fight win streak and was clearly not a weak opponent.
The Controversy
Official weigh-ins occur the day before a bout, enabling fighters to rehydrate to their actual weight in the 28-32 hours leading up to the bout.
Some fighters, like Julio Cesar Chavez Jr, have the process down to a science. While campaigning at middleweight (160 lb limit), Chavez would usually tip the scales at roughly 159 lbs at the weigh-in only to enter the ring the next day at a blistering 181 lbs. Most of his opponents hovered around 164-167 lbs.
Point: Obviously, size factors into the competitiveness of a bout. Size and strength do matter. Gamache was being hit by a naturally bigger, stronger man and that may have been the prime factor in causing this near-tragedy.
Counterpoint: Boxing is a brutal sport and serious injury is part of the game. Serious injury and, sadly, ring deaths, occur when fighters enter the ring within only a pound or several ounces apart from each other.
Moreover, some heavyweights, like Evander Holyfield, routinely gave up 30-40 lbs in the ring and suffered no apparent, serious ill-effects. As a matter of fact, Holyfield was often very successful against much larger opponents. (Are the circumstances different when a 205 lb fighter faces a 240 lb opponent?)
------
Solution 1: Weigh-ins should take place the morning of the bout, thereby greatly limiting a fighter's ability to rehydrate. (Keep in mind, some would argue this would be even more dangerous because a fighter may enter the ring already dehydrated from having to cut weight for the weigh-in)
Solution 2: Perhaps there should be a rehydration limit? For example, a middleweight (160 lb limit) shouldn't be allowed to rehydrate more than 10 pounds (170 lbs).
Solution 3: This is much ado about nothing. Keep things as they are.
Solution 4: Share your thoughts.
[SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000][FONT="]- See more at: [url=http://www.fightsaga.com/tidbits/item/3566-Arturo-Gatti-nearly-killed-Joey-Gamache-in-the-ring-Should-weigh-ins-happen-on-fight-day-(Video)#sthash.laVcPkpY.dpuf]Arturo Gatti nearly killed Joey Gamache in the ring: Should weigh-ins happen on fight day? (Vid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPAl0WAhg6Q
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Solution 2 is the most sensible but Jacobs avoided that to relinquish the IBF title which was premeditated and bordering on cheating.
GGG camp should never agree to that in the future including against Canelo.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
MR140 where are you from? just wondering
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
MR140 where are you from? just wondering
He is from 135 but just rehydrated back up to Jr Welter since he last posted :p
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Solution 2 is the most sensible but Jacobs avoided that to relinquish the IBF title which was premeditated and bordering on cheating.
GGG camp should never agree to that in the future including against Canelo.
The only thing that you should be required to make is the weight cut which is what all the other belts wanted but IBF. If people are gaining to much weight make it same day it really does not need more regulation on it.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
MR140 where are you from? just wondering
He is from 135 but just rehydrated back up to Jr Welter since he last posted :p
That is pretty funny but on real note i would die if i ever tried to make 135 that is 45 pounds and do not have fat to lose lol. As for were i am from is Oceanside California take it most of people here are from the UK.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
The only problem with that is i can see even more fights getting cancelled which is not a option i think they will take. IF you can make the cut then you are in division i really do not care how much the re hydrate to. If a person is cutting weight and not having a problem or getting caught cheating then i do not see the problem with it. Some guys are not good at cutting and can not take the strain but others just can like anything just a advantage they try to gain.
If fights get cancelled then promoters and networks will be weary of working with those fighters that miss weight. Sure some guys can do it but it doesn't make it right. It is also unhealthy. Not to mention the potential risks involved when one guy out weighs the other by a large margin. If everyone involved took a stand they would have no choice but to follow suit.
I totally agree with your position on this. Weight divisions exist basically to ensure that fighters of the same size and weight fight. But we all know that rules are meant to be, if not broken, at least bent a little. ;) Why are there so many weight divisions nowadays? The difference between divisions is anywhere from 5 to 8 pounds. The system isn't meant so that So-and-So can re-hydrate by 25 pounds so he totally outweighs his opponent at fight night. The intent was to have guys fight at the same weight. Some of these re-hydrating experts, who rely on this process to win their fights, look visibly bigger than their opponent in the ring. This basically unfair and IMO takes away from the match. I see no good reason why boxing can't implement re-hydrating clauses, other than it would hurt one or two fighters who happen to be big draws at the moment. It illustrates how in boxing, money trumps safety and common sense.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
All that matters is that both fighters are on board so it's a level playing field. You can't have one guy making sure he doesn't blow up too much and the other saying fuck it I won't bother. There's a lot to like about Jacobs but what he did was dirty, there's no two ways about it as far as I'm concerned. Still staggers me that given all we know, people will still try and cripple their opponent on the scales and the endorsement that practice receives from the boxing fraternity at large.
The weigh in was stupidly early and Jacobs made the weight. There was no reason to have the weigh in as early as they did.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
I don't really think this is as big a deal as people make out. Both fighters weigh in at the same time, and have exactly the same amount of time to re hydrate. Some guys can shift weight more easily than others, I just see that as one of many possible genetic advantages that come into play. It's like saying it's unfair some guys recover from hard training faster than others. Pretty well everything about boxing as a whole is extremely bad for you, if your main concern is the health of the fighters, the only reasonable solution would be to ban the sport entirely.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
I think all commissions and sanctioning bodies should implement re-hydration stipulations like the IBF does. It will force more fighters to fight closer to their natural divisions.
The only problem with that is i can see even more fights getting cancelled which is not a option i think they will take. IF you can make the cut then you are in division i really do not care how much the re hydrate to. If a person is cutting weight and not having a problem or getting caught cheating then i do not see the problem with it. Some guys are not good at cutting and can not take the strain but others just can like anything just a advantage they try to gain.
If fights get cancelled then promoters and networks will be weary of working with those fighters that miss weight. Sure some guys can do it but it doesn't make it right. It is also unhealthy. Not to mention the potential risks involved when one guy out weighs the other by a large margin. If everyone involved took a stand they would have no choice but to follow suit.
I totally agree with your position on this. Weight divisions exist basically to ensure that fighters of the same size and weight fight. But we all know that rules are meant to be, if not broken, at least bent a little. ;) Why are there so many weight divisions nowadays? The difference between divisions is anywhere from 5 to 8 pounds. The system isn't meant so that So-and-So can re-hydrate by 25 pounds so he totally outweighs his opponent at fight night. The intent was to have guys fight at the same weight. Some of these re-hydrating experts, who rely on this process to win their fights, look visibly bigger than their opponent in the ring. This basically unfair and IMO takes away from the match. I see no good reason why boxing can't implement re-hydrating clauses, other than it would hurt one or two fighters who happen to be big draws at the moment. It illustrates how in boxing, money trumps safety and common sense.
I would rather they do same day weigh ins if it is huge problem. All fighters have the same days to re hydrate and cut down on the weight. If they feel that it is giving others to much advantage would rather go back to old days.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
In the end what are we looking for? Even matchups. I have no desire to watch a fighter outweigh the other one by 25 pounds on fight night just because he's better at re-hydrating. They've both trained long and hard, and no one should be punished because of genetics. I've seen too many fights where difference in abilities is canceled by ridiculous size differences. If I want to see that, I'll switch to WWF or just watch heavyweight fights, where it's open-ended. A guy should win because the other guy can't hurt him because he's just too small? Ridiculous. Give me two evenly sized fighters any day.
-
Re: Gennady Golovkin v Daniel Jacobs - 18/3/17 MSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
I don't really think this is as big a deal as people make out. Both fighters weigh in at the same time, and have exactly the same amount of time to re hydrate. Some guys can shift weight more easily than others, I just see that as one of many possible genetic advantages that come into play. It's like saying it's unfair some guys recover from hard training faster than others. Pretty well everything about boxing as a whole is extremely bad for you, if your main concern is the health of the fighters, the only reasonable solution would be to ban the sport entirely.
Pretty much this i think it is nuts that they are putting a limit to how much you can re hydrate to when you made the cut for the weight. If people do not like the weight gain they do now should go back to the same day weigh ins.