Hey Alpha. Good to see you back. I see you have some new debaters. ;D
Been there done that..... and how can I put this......
https://pics.me.me/heres-the10-foot-...h-19730167.png
Printable View
Hey Alpha. Good to see you back. I see you have some new debaters. ;D
Been there done that..... and how can I put this......
https://pics.me.me/heres-the10-foot-...h-19730167.png
No I understand that you are trying to use strawman arguments. I asked if you accept images as proof, since you brought up images from space. Images can be manipulated, I prefer to trust natural science and practical demonstration using tangible substance.
So again, how does Japan and Brazil prove a globe?
You did not answer my question.
Yes or no.
Okay since you refuse to answer it it proves you are a coward.
I shall answer it for you, coward.
If you cannot trust an image of something without seeing it with your own eyes, then you cannot trust and image of anything without seeing it with your own eyes.
I know that is tough for you.
.
What's up Alpha how you been man? Judging by the rising sun and the sphere under a starry night on their flags I'm assuming both Countries are not flat Earthers ;D.
.... That the Earth is flat???
This part of the form is turning into the LSD part.
Ad hominem attacks already? Unfortunately for you they are not proof of the claims of the globe. You did not reply to my original question to you, but want to label me a coward? Bit hypercritical. So I guess you believe in Nessy of Loch Ness, Bigfoot etc, because all you need is an image.
The only thing tough seems to be your understanding of fallacies. You admitted your question has nothing to do with the claims of the globe (Strawman), so there is no reason to continue the discussion.
Another thing you fail to understand is that travelling to Japan or Brazil is it's testable and repeatable.
An image alone is not proof of anything. But I'll be waiting for your physical practical demonstration of a standing body of water naturally conforming to the exterior of a shape.
Hello Spicoli, how are you bud? Yea just trying to understand how pictures of either country or their flags :) prove the shape of the earth
Roflmfao
That is a breathtakingly ridiculous argument you are making. hundreds of rocket launches have shown a round and circular planet Earth and the rotation of the Earth for a full 360 degrees. Of course that is testable. Satellites orbit the Earth filming the surface for 360 degrees all around and back. None of the oceans that are photographed are fake. Have you ever watched baumgartner jump out at over 100,000 ft with his GoPro on his helmet? And have you not heard of gravity? You flat-earthers just cannot be for real. Do you think there is a true-up and a true down? Gravity pulls everything on the surface of a sphere towards the center including water.
😂🤣🥰
Holyshit give me some of those magic mushrooms you are chewing on.
🍄🍄🍄🍄🍄
Don't assign labels to me, I am an individual on my own personal journey. There is no community or movement. The ground we are on is what is is.
So can you provide a physical, practical demonstration of a standing body of water naturally conforming to the exterior of a shape, like you claim it can?
Few things, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, a heliocentric priest says you wouldn't see curvature from the height of the space jump. GoPro's use wide angle lenses, that cause curved lines. And here's a nice one for you to research, outside of magnets (which we don't really understand the mechanics of) there is no such thing as a pulling force. Everything is push. Now when I say push or pull, they are just discriptors. I'm talking about the actual mechanics. When you 'push' something, it's apply pressure causing motion.
Satellites and space stations have THOUSANDS OF TIMES filmed in stationary positions as well as orbited the planet Earth for weeks and months at a time videotaping the entire thing. Down below you can see the continents slowly going by moving Eastward. you see Africa and then the world keeps turning and you see the Atlantic ocean and it keeps turning and you see North America coming to view etc etc. THE PLANET IS A PERFECT SPHERE. WHEN LOOKING AT IT FROM SPACE YOU CAN ONLY SEE PART OF THE GLOBAL LANDSCAPE. therefore clearly the other countries and continents are on the other side of the sphere. If it was all flat you could see the entire global landscape like on a map hanging on your wall.
You jump up in the air and you come back down to the ground. What do you call that? You don't believe in gravity then?
I can't believe anybody actually engages with these people.
Diversity of thought is fun. You can put him on ignore if it upsets you so much. For instance, religion is silly, the modern Labour Party is silly, and Rap music is silly, but we seem to accept they have their place. I don't mind just as long as nobody is forcing me to change my own views.
Stand on one side of your house and get a friend to stand on the otherside. You won't be able to see each other. Doesn't mean your section is curved, just that there is stuff in the way. Can you see what's going on 3 blocks away from your door step? Pathetic, you must be new to this. All your talk about images and visuals but unable to accept the physics of water in your reality. Still waiting on that practical demonstration of your belief that a standing body of water naturally conforming to the exterior of a shape.
I call jumping in the air and coming back down exactly that. Can you please define the term gravity so I know what you are referring to. You are the one that has failed to provide a practical demonstration of your belief. I feel the same way when zealots continue to push their beliefs without being able to practically demonstrate them as objective truths.
Exactly, all I'm doing is asking questions of the affirmative claim. Those claims need to be practically demonstrated physically, using tangible substance before I would accept them as true. The globe reminds me of a cult, once someone leaves, all the other members try like crazy to get you back into their fold.
I like this quote from Gandhi "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win"
To often we are too busy talking to ourselves and can’t hear anything. But alpha are you saying the earth is definitely flat or are you saying it may not be round. Granted I can’t hold a ball of water but latitude and longitude have been accurate for a long time and is based on “roundness”. I don’t believe just because I can’t see certain things they don’t exist for now the mirror is dim and we see little but a time will come when we see all. I try not to attack anyone for their beliefs. I have been attacked for some of mine it’s pointless. As long as someone isn’t delusional it’s cool. I would like the flat earth believers to provide answers. Perhaps build a model of an accurate earth. Are there people on both sides? What keeps the water from falling off of a flat surface. The people living on the bottom, if they are, do they have water. Have we met these people.
Wow. I volunteered once at a schizophrenia clinic for 8 hours as part of a 3-credit Abnormal Psychology class in Birmingham.
These flat Earth claims come very near the centre of delusions of schizophrenics.
two people standing on different sides of a house is a strawman argument. What does the house have to do with looking at the Earth from outer space? Absolutely nothing. You must be the biggest hypocrite of all time. Talking to you is like talking to a schizophrenic. You can never get anywhere.
#NeverForget @walrus
@Alpha
Why don’t you drive to the edge of the Earth and take a picture? Then post it. Drive to the edge of the Earth.
😆😆😆
I am saying that the earth is demonstrably level based on practical demonstration of tangible substance. It is definitely not a globe as the physics of water demonstrate. Longitude and Latitude were invented on a flat map by Eratosthenes https://www.ancient.eu/uploads/image...g?v=1485682718
I also try not to attack other peoples beliefs, the thing is the affirmative claim is what is being taught to everyone, when it is only a concept, and the claims can't be practically demonstrated using tangible substances. I consider myself a direct realist. There are people that put maps and models and speculations together, I however have never been supportive of maps or models, as I feel full unrestricted exploration is required before we can move forward. I always felt maps and models were a bad idea because they open the door to strawman arguments. I prefer to focus on Natural Science and tangible substance.
Are you disputing the physics of water?
If I stand on one side of my house with someone on the otherside, the house is in the way. Same with 3 blocks over. Houses are in the way. Why are you being intellectually dishonest?
No it's not. You said you would be able to see the entire global landscape if it was flat. I was pointing out an objective truth that you can't even see a few blocks away with houses, trees etc on the land.
I'll ask again, can you provide a physical, practical demonstration of a standing body of water naturally conforming to the exterior of a shape?
Oh and I see you ignored the request to define your use of the term gravity.
There's no need to talk to me, unless you have a practical demonstration.