Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.
Printable View
Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.
holy crap! they really do and actually have him above Hatton. how is this possible??
i don't even talk about it anymore, because boxrec's rankings are ALWAYS wayyy off.. they work on some sort of point system i believe, but it's horrible..
crystal ball ftw.
That's what I usually do too, but this was so off I actually lol'ed.Quote:
Originally Posted by RP33
I don't understand how even a computer run point system could figure that.
Thats is a insult to Hatton, Pac has never fought at 140 yet!
Quote:
Originally Posted by littlebif
not only to Hatton mate but the whole 140 division... ;D
the hell with their ratings.. they should stick to recording wins and losses..
LOL demented
Boxrtec rankings have always been known for being a joke to put it nicely
Great for 2 thngs..
1 a fighters record and upcoming scheduale
2. a good laugh now and again
PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ;D ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ;D ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.
Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerPAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ;D ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ;D ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.
You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit :lolhaha: That's why we have weight divisions... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepWhy not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerPAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records
Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ;D ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ;D ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.
At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P... ;D
.
FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerYou got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit :lolhaha: That's why we have weight divisions... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheepWhy not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P... ;D
.
That's all... Why not say something why it fails? Just like how I illustrate why Klitscho can't be #1 in all weight divisions... :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheepFAIL, EPIC FAIL.............Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerYou got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit :lolhaha: That's why we have weight divisions... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P... ;D
.
.