Boxrec RULES!!!!

[XaduBoxer]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

[killersheep]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

[XaduBoxer]

Gotta love them having PAC #1 at 140 when he's never fought at that weight.

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

[killersheep]

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............

[XaduBoxer]

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............

That's all... Why not say something why it fails? Just like how I illustrate why Klitscho can't be #1 in all weight divisions...
.

[killersheep]

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.

FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............

That's all... Why not say something why it fails? Just like how I illustrate why Klitscho can't be #1 in all weight divisions...
.

Surely, you don't need me to point out the flaw in your argument, it's pretty obvious.

[XaduBoxer]

FAIL, EPIC FAIL.............

That's all... Why not say something why it fails? Just like how I illustrate why Klitscho can't be #1 in all weight divisions...
.

Surely, you don't need me to point out the flaw in your argument, it's pretty obvious.

OK here's the facts, you can eat this if you want...

PAC's present rankings:
#2 at 135 Ring Mag
#5 at 147 Ring Mag
#1 at 135 Fightnews
#1 at 140 BoxRec

You see that? PAC is ranked at 135, 140 and 147 with #1 at 135 and 140... So why all the fuzz?
.

[ono]

PAC never fought that weight but he's already scheduled to fight the recognized no. 1 man at 140 (Hatton) on May 2, 2009 in Las Vegas, USA...

link to fight schedule -> BoxRec Boxing Records

Being the no.1 P4P and scheduled to fight the no. 1 (now former ) at 140 makes PAC as the new no. 1 at 140 (according to BoxRec ). Why complain if PAC has not fought at 140? PAC already fought at even higher weight at 147 !!!
.

Why not make Klitschko # 1 at all weights then? He's fought at even higher weights too!!

You got a tiny point... BUT Klitschko needs to fight (or had fought) at minimumweight/mini-flyweight (105 lbs.) and win convincingly in order to be considered as #1 in all weight division. BUT Klitschko can't and will not ever make the 105 lbs. limit That's why we have weight divisions...

At this moment, I think PAC can make 135 and 140... He can be ranked as #1 in those divisions being the #1 overall P4P...
.