Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

Based on this thread

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...rquez-3-a.html

I pick up all posters that gave their their detailed scores. ALL of them had it for Marquez.


Miles - 116 -112 JMM gave rounds 1, 6, 7 and 10 for Pac

Elterrible - 117-113 JMM gave rounds 4, 9 and 12 for Pac

Armyash - 116-112 JMM gave rounds 6, 9, 10 and 11 for Pac

Pugilistic - 116-112 JMM gave rounds 1, 6, 9, 10 for Pac

Cutemick - 115-113 JMM gave rounds 1, 4,5,9 and 12 for pac



What does this show us ?????

THERE's ABSOLUTELY NO ROBBERY HERE


here's why


These 5 posters gave Pac rounds 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12

From their eyes it is Justifiable to give Pac a 118-110 Victory :o



Its a close fight that went to Agressor/Belt holder/More popular fighter but no robberies here. The reason for the ruckus is the HUGE Expectation from Pacquiao from both side.




*Pls dont hurt me ;D

I have to admire your persistence and creativity in collecting this data and molding it to further your point. Your grasp on reality (if you really believe Pac won the fight) - I don't admire as much.

I must admit that in rewatching the fight, I gave a couple of close rounds to Pac. On the paper I have beside me I actually wrote down 'even' for a few but decided on reflection to give them to Pac based on his slightly higher activity and on knowing that rounds are usually not scored as even. I was being more than generous to Manny and more so than might perhaps be expected of me.

Maybe I'm being a bit too harsh, weighing in on miles' comment ^ it wasn't the very worst robbery I've ever seen, but at this level of the sport it shouldn't be condoned by the fans.

Cmon guys.


You can see how these 5 unbiased posters have their tally. its their score. Its justifiable to give those to Pac. It means that the fight is that close and your preference is different compare d to the official judges. as what Bilbo wrote here

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...onsistent.html


Only rounds 2 and 3 were clear for Marquez and that is not a robbery.

I agree that it wasn't a complete robbery, but to actually have Pacquiao winning more rounds you have to really want to give him any that were even close or put unreasonable emphasis on "agression". Of course considering who made this thread that is a given here. I also don't see how people had Pacquiao winning rounds 5 or 7 for the life of me. 6 MAYBE, but I felt MArquez really swept a good 3 or 4 of the mid rounds. Looking at the fight as a whole, although of course it isn't scored that way, Marquez was absolutely the better fighter last night.

Cmon man.. what happened last night was criminal. It was like an oceans eleven heist job, bobfather edition.

Miron lang, u are filipino so of course u watched the fight through a different goggle but it was a classic robjob in vegas.. It happens often at mgm..

p4p, Finito


Those scores arent my scores. and what i am saying is not an opinion, since these 5 posters gave those rounds to Pacquiao not me.


Professional bouts arent scored on emotion. but technically round by round.


Marquez's beautiful connections weighs the same with Pac's harder awkward looking connects.

miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.

Impossible to argue against.

How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?

Great stuff.

OMG!!!

LMFAO!!!

:appl::appl::appl:

This thread/post should be compulsory viewing for anyone that ever calls "robbery"

Even if we agree on the outcome, the very fact we see individual rounds different makes a mockery of the cry "robbery"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miron_lang

Cmon guys.


You can see how these 5 unbiased posters have their tally. its their score. Its justifiable to give those to Pac. It means that the fight is that close and your preference is different compare d to the official judges. as what Bilbo wrote here

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...onsistent.html


Only rounds 2 and 3 were clear for Marquez and that is not a robbery.

---

If you think rounds 2 and 3 were clear for Marquez then the judges screwed him. 2 judges had round 2 for Pac. All 3 judges gave Pac round 3.

Dougie Fisher of ring (who had it a draw) said in his mailbag, it wasn't a robbery as there was alot of close rounds. He did point out that in close fights like this it is not likely for the judging to go against the biggest PPV draw in the sport. That is just being honest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.

Impossible to argue against.

How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?

Great stuff.

---

I for once 100% agree with Fenster. It's difficult to argue that it was a robbery when 5 Saddo Posters scored so many rounds differently. It's clear as day the fight was close.

I started watching the fight last night again, this time scoring it.

I had rounds 1 & 2 both level.

Unfortunatley I fell asleep after that! Got woke up on the sofa by the mrs, asking what I was doing with my laptop in my lap with squiggles on a bit of paper next to me! ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.

Impossible to argue against.

How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?

Great stuff.

---

I for once 100% agree with Fenster. It's difficult to argue that it was a robbery when 5 Saddo Posters scored so many rounds differently. It's clear as day the fight was close.

---

I hope this thread is an eye opener for Miles and anyone who thinks the fight was robbery.

Bilbo made a great point too on his recent thread. It seems like the official judges are more consistent than the average viewers.