Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
I had it 7-4-1 for frampton. No say quigg should have had a decision on any score card.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
So it is about 8 hours after the fight and I'm still confused about the SD.
Now the guy I thought and wanted to win, won!
I cannot see in what world Quigg is ahead on a score card.
You have to give Frampton (and I did) the first 6 with maybe a 10-10 in there.
How do you give any of them to Quigg who barely threw a punch?
Bemused and I'd love to see the guys card and see what rounds he gave who.
Actually looking at it again. There is no way I could give 12th round to quigg
I had Frampton winning 117-116
My scorecards
Fram - Quigg
- 10-10
- 10-9
- 10-10
- 10-9
- 10-9
- 10-9
- 9-10
- 10-10
- 9-10
- 10-10
- 9-10
- 10-9
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
My line of thinking was that I wouldn't have had Frampton losing many rounds in the first 6 rounds, but I scored them 10-10's as I didn't think there was enough superiority to warrant an extra point over the opponent.
Frampton was fucked on his stool between the 11th and 12th, but his trainer then told him it was the last round and he hadn't realised. This gave him the boost he needed. He thought " I can do one more round, fuck it." So he came out in the 12th and moved really well and fought an excellent 3 minutes. Quigg couldn't pin him down , and yeah Frampton won the round.
Compare that to what Gallagher told his man after the 8th and that tells you how you should be communicating with your fighter.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
My line of thinking was that I wouldn't have had Frampton losing many rounds in the first 6 rounds, but I scored them 10-10's as I didn't think there was enough superiority to warrant an extra point over the opponent.
Frampton was fucked on his stool between the 11th and 12th, but his trainer then told him it was the last round and he hadn't realised. This gave him the boost he needed. He thought " I can do one more round, fuck it." So he came out in the 12th and moved really well and fought an excellent 3 minutes. Quigg couldn't pin him down , and yeah Frampton won the round.
Compare that to what Gallagher told his man after the 8th and that tells you how you should be communicating with your fighter.
I try and avoid 10-10 rounds unless it is action packed and no one deserves to lose the round.
But the rounds (1-6) like last night when one isn't throwing at all and the other is hitting gloves... The guy hitting gloves gets the 10-9 for me because he is attempting to make it a fight and it is not his fault the other guy is refusing to engage.
Scott Quigg made that a bad fight and deserved to lose!
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
I never like to score 10-10 rounds and Frampton did do more in the first 6 rounds than Quigg who hardly threw and landed anything. I do not know what he was playing at for a fighter who trains hard he should have let it all go from round 1.
It was a dismal fight. The yanks are going to think our fighters are crap with Fury and this Quiampton show.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
I never did a card and have not seen the final tally but I can easily see several of the first 5 being dead even. Was a punch even thrown over the first two rounds? Can one give a guy a round because he appeared to come forward? Its still a 10 point must system.
Ps-Its being reported that Quiggs jaw is broken??? It sure didn't look like it after the fight or during the interview.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
Quigg broke the jaw from an uppercut in the 4th rounds and it was swelling up in the dressing room. It does not explain the slow start from Scott though.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
Began a rewatch on a slow Sunday morning. Then stopped a few rounds in, once was more than enough :-X. When I started scoring fights I'd often end up with many 10-10 rounds but now always look for distinction no matter the bore. Even if its scoring by the minute or something. Had Frampton sweeping first seven rounds. It wasn't much but he was probing, jabbing and controlled the back foot as well as initiating whatever action there was.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
It wasn't that bad a fight with a second watch, it just didn't live up to what it should have been. The last four rounds were what the 12 were meant to be.
Quigg was genuinely shocked when told Sky have him 6-1 down. Bad tactics.
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
It wasn't that bad a fight with a second watch, it just didn't live up to what it should have been. The last four rounds were what the 12 were meant to be.
Quigg was genuinely shocked when told Sky have him 6-1 down. Bad tactics.
That is all true, but Quigg was throwing nothing but blocking punches so honestly do not know how Scott could think he was in the fight. Frampton just had to initiate the attack early and he was winning the rounds and piling easy points. How could trainer and fighter get it so wrong?
Re: Frampton Quigg scoring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I never like to score 10-10 rounds and Frampton did do more in the first 6 rounds than Quigg who hardly threw and landed anything. I do not know what he was playing at for a fighter who trains hard he should have let it all go from round 1.
It was a dismal fight. The yanks are going to think our fighters are crap with Fury and this Quiampton show.
Ha have I made Quimpton a thing? can we keep using it?