Frampton Quigg scoring.

[Batman]

I had it 7-4-1 for frampton.

That was how I had it, shit fight though and a disappointing undercard

[Hulk]

I had it 7-4-1 for frampton.

That was how I had it, shit fight though and a disappointing undercard

Exactly. Shit fight with neither man taking much risk or daring to be great as Ali would say.

Frampton won and the Leo Santa Cruz Martinez fight as well as their undercard fight made this one look even more dull.

[Spicoli]

Began a rewatch on a slow Sunday morning. Then stopped a few rounds in, once was more than enough . When I started scoring fights I'd often end up with many 10-10 rounds but now always look for distinction no matter the bore. Even if its scoring by the minute or something. Had Frampton sweeping first seven rounds. It wasn't much but he was probing, jabbing and controlled the back foot as well as initiating whatever action there was.

[Fenster]

It wasn't that bad a fight with a second watch, it just didn't live up to what it should have been. The last four rounds were what the 12 were meant to be.

Quigg was genuinely shocked when told Sky have him 6-1 down. Bad tactics.

[Master]

It wasn't that bad a fight with a second watch, it just didn't live up to what it should have been. The last four rounds were what the 12 were meant to be.

Quigg was genuinely shocked when told Sky have him 6-1 down. Bad tactics.

That is all true, but Quigg was throwing nothing but blocking punches so honestly do not know how Scott could think he was in the fight. Frampton just had to initiate the attack early and he was winning the rounds and piling easy points. How could trainer and fighter get it so wrong?