Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
His last fight he was dominating Dimitrenko, he had his opponent down in round 1, 2 and round 3.
His opponent went down and took a knee.. His knee was clearly down then he fired a shot straight into the guys ribs.
That was the knockout blow, he should have clearly been disqualified
BUT NOOOO.. protect the prospects, doesn't matter that he was winning clearly he should have been DQd
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Are you mad?
That fight was one way traffic and the guy was looking for a way out of the fight. It would have been an in justice if they disqualified him just like Roy Jones first loss. It was wrong.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Are you mad?
That fight was one way traffic and the guy was looking for a way out of the fight. It would have been an in justice if they disqualified him just like Roy Jones first loss. It was wrong.
2 fighters with records 15-15-10 and that's a DQ.
Rules are rules and he broke the rules. He hit a guy who was down and the ref knew it because he initially waved his hands saying no KD and once he noticed the guy was staying down he started counting.
Ref protected Parkers record, he bottled it.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
The opponent was a joke and surprised he was even rated that high. He did not even try. Forget rules and use your common sense. It would have been a travesty if they disqualified Parker. The man was faking the injury and he should be a actor not a boxer.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Post a vid. I thought you were only posting in vids from now on? You're such a quitter.
@Memphis haha, I'm sitting in work. Have not gave up on the video format.
Master even if Dimitrenko wasn't injured and he was acting, it's an illegal shot.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.
If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it? ;)
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
It would send a dangerous precedent if they disqualified every time someone hit them when they are down. Every tom, dick and harry would roll around claiming injury. It was the right decision and let us move on to something more important like Chisora throwing a table at Whytes head.
Funny that if someone likes a fighter it's fine.
If you're fav fighter got beaten by that punch it'd be illegal then wouldn't it? ;)
I honestly never seen Parker fight before but I was appalled by the lack of effort by his opponent. No way that cunt deserves the fight by disqualification.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch
hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch
hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
Even eric44 is talking sense now.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch
hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
Even eric44 is talking sense now.
I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch
hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
Even eric44 is talking sense now.
I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
Probably more on how the fight is going.
Terry Norris, one of my favourite fighter was disqualified twice against the same person (also faking) and I was more annoyed at Terry for making the mistake.
Roy Jones should never have been disqualified.
Arthur Abrahams not so sure
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
Should AJ have been DQ's?
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbpNuLqXcYg
Dimitrenko wasn't winning but come on, that's a cheap one right there.......arm up, ribs exposed, that'll put anyone down