Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,315
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,315
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    I reckon dimitrenko wanted a way out and the body shot wasn't a KO punch

    hed been battered about for a few rounds, there was only one winner
    Even eric44 is talking sense now.
    I don't dispute that there was only one winner.. it just find it funny how fans bend their opinions based on the fighter and how a fights going.
    Probably more on how the fight is going.

    Terry Norris, one of my favourite fighter was disqualified twice against the same person (also faking) and I was more annoyed at Terry for making the mistake.

    Roy Jones should never have been disqualified.

    Arthur Abrahams not so sure
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    650
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch



    Dimitrenko wasn't winning but come on, that's a cheap one right there.......arm up, ribs exposed, that'll put anyone down

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,315
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
    To box again
    Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    650
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?

    Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
    Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?

    You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.

    P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    I've seen AJ throw a cheeky shot after the bell several times, he did it against Whyte as well who kicked off massive.
    Should AJ have been DQ's?
    @Batman
    If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
    So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?

    Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
    Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?

    You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.

    P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
    I'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.

    So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Good one punch Ko from Joseph Parker
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 01:11 AM
  2. Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  3. I know the answer sounds obvious but.........
    By leftylee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 07:30 PM
  5. Isn't obvious why hatton's workrate dropped....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing