-
FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
..... http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09104/pac1at140790.jpg .....
FightNews might be anticipating the result of PAC-Hatton fight on May 2, 2009 and they already installed PAC as the man at 140 this early... ;)
.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Yeah.. obviously Nostradamus does their rankings.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
There are now 2 boxing rankings orgs that ranked PAC as the man at 140 lbs., FightNews and Boxrec...
As early as December 2008 Boxrec already installed PAC as the no. 1 boxer at 140...
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Pacman is the P4P king right now without a doubt. But to instill him as number 1 at 140 before hes got past Hatton is quite insulting to Ricky.
I hope they take him down a peg once Hattons smashed his ribcage in.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
He's number 2 for me, until Ricky is beaten 140, he remains The Man at light-welter
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
There are now 2 boxing rankings orgs that ranked PAC as the man at 140 lbs., FightNews and Boxrec...
As early as December 2008 Boxrec already installed PAC as the no. 1 boxer at 140...
Boxrec also has Manny ranked #5 P4P behind
BHOP
JMM
VIC
and BCD.
Anyway Mighty Mike is clearly the top fighter at 140, and Pac is avoiding him like the plague!
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
.. http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09104/pac1boxrec818.jpg .. http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09104/pac1at140790.jpg ..
FightNews and BoxRec ranking PAC as the no. 1 at 140 lbs. tells a lot about the upcoming PAC vs. Hatton fight...
Vegas oddsmakers are also in agreement with these rankings since they have PAC as a 2 to 1 favorite to smash Hatton...
.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ukansodoff
Pacman is the P4P king right now without a doubt. But to instill him as number 1 at 140 before hes got past Hatton is quite insulting to Ricky.
I hope they take him down a peg once Hattons smashed his ribcage in.
Those who find these rankings insulting to Ricky, maybe you can write a protest letter to FightNews and BoxRec... There's a possibility that an error was made in these rankings...
Just a suggestion tho...
.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Boxrec
P4P Rankings
Lb 4 Lb
1
Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
2
Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
3
Vic Darchinyansuper flyweight
4
Chad Dawsonlight heavyweight
5
Manny Pacquiao light welterweight
6
Shane Mosley welterweight
7
Kelly Pavlik middleweight
8
Ricky Hatton light welterweight
9
Denkaosan Kaovichit flyweight
10
Daisuke Naito flyweight
In BoxRec P4P rankings, PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder at 5th position while Hatton is only at 8th position...
.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
More bad news for the lower ranked Hatton...
link --> Hatton clearly the underdog against Pacquiao
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
then theyve either got mystic meg working for them or are complete morons who have no idea about boxing.
Pacquiaos never had a fight at 140 pounds how can he be considered as number 1 ranked??
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Yeah.. obviously Nostradamus does their rankings.
I don't think so! I just got this from Nostradamus himself 2010.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
I also like cheese, but I like dogs more.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Boxrec rankings are just generated by computer so obviously understandable if they fuck up, although I really can't understand how a computer can calculate a defeat to Calzaghe puts Hopkins ahead of Manny with a win over Marquez but I digress.
The fightnews ranking is just retarded though. How can Manny be ranked in a weight class he hasn't fought in, much less ranked as number 1? :confused:
He should be ranked either in the lightweight or welterweight category right now, either number 2 in the lightweights behind Marquez, or around number 5 at welterweight behind the belt holders and Cotto.
Rank him at light welter only AFTER he's fought there.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Its absurd to rank any fighter at a weight he has never fought. Also very disrespectful to Hatton, a guy who has the titles at that weight and fought most of his career at. Pac electively vacated his lightweight belt to fight a non title fight at welterweight with Oscar. Pac is not a champion right now and he is not the best in a particular division right now. Its not even arguable.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Imagine how excited Saddoboxer will be when he sees this :o
Anyway, this kind of stuff, it just doesn't annoy me anymore, I am out of outrage, I find it absolutely hilarious when people compain about the WBO or IBF or whoever's rankings, they've rated dead people before, come on now, how is there any outrage left.
I guess fightnews should be better, I get that, still wake me up later.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
BTW I burned my finger horribly the other day. Here's a tip for you people since I'm looking out for you, if you cook in a pan on the stove you can touch the handle cause its not hot, if you put the pan in the oven for 30 minutes at 400 degrees and then grab the handle you will burn the shit out of your finger.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
Its absurd to rank any fighter at a weight he has never fought. Also very disrespectful to Hatton, a guy who has the titles at that weight and fought most of his career at. Pac electively vacated his lightweight belt to fight a non title fight at welterweight with Oscar. Pac is not a champion right now and he is not the best in a particular division right now. Its not even arguable.
come on' now BoomBoom don't get out there too far.... Pacquiao paid $30K! for that fight.;D
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
that's pretty ridiculous, and all they do is prove they can't do rankings worth shit lol they have 2 men who've never fought at 140 in the top 10 in Nate Campbell and Joan Guzman, and Urango deserves to be #3 or 4, Torres should be higher up and Arnaoutis isn't even on there??? and yet only SaddoBoxer would think this makes sense
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
Its absurd to rank any fighter at a weight he has never fought. Also very disrespectful to Hatton, a guy who has the titles at that weight and fought most of his career at. Pac electively vacated his lightweight belt to fight a non title fight at welterweight with Oscar. Pac is not a champion right now and he is not the best in a particular division right now. Its not even arguable.
come on' now BoomBoom don't get out there too far.... Pacquiao paid $30K! for that fight.;D
Maybe he bought his fightnews ranking too :-X;D
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
BTW I burned my finger horribly the other day. Here's a tip for you people since I'm looking out for you, if you cook in a pan on the stove you can touch the handle cause its not hot, if you put the pan in the oven for 30 minutes at 400 degrees and then grab the handle you will burn the shit out of your finger.
Solid advice. Hopefully all the kids out there are taking notes.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
that article loses my respect when he refers to kostya as russian. Prehaps background but no doubt in my eyes he was a pure ozzy
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Joan Guzman at light welter? He weighed 135 for his last fight and his next fight is at lightweight too. That lst is garbage.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Boxrec has Manny at p4p #5 too. I dont get it. I know its computer rankings but compters are not to be trusted :mad:
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
What an absurd ranking, and Campbell ranked No.3 on one of them, do me a favour. You couldn't buy that crap. Neither of them have fought at 140, especially Campbell, he'll get blown away by a top 140 fighter.
Pacman certainly won't be number one ranked come may 3rd anyhow.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
that's pretty ridiculous, and all they do is prove they can't do rankings worth shit lol they have 2 men who've never fought at 140 in the top 10 in Nate Campbell and Joan Guzman, and Urango deserves to be #3 or 4, Torres should be higher up and Arnaoutis isn't even on there??? and yet
only SaddoBoxer would think this makes sense
The 50 or so boxing writers/experts that comprises the FightNews rankings committee think their ranking is sensible enough to be published in their website and shown to the whole world... :p
.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
I also like cheese, but I like dogs more.
I knew some flip broad who use to throw all that in a burrito along with egg. Wasn't bad at all
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
BTW I burned my finger horribly the other day. Here's a tip for you people since I'm looking out for you, if you cook in a pan on the stove you can touch the handle cause its not hot, if you put the pan in the oven for 30 minutes at 400 degrees and then grab the handle you will burn the shit out of your finger.
:LOLATYOU:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
oakleyno1
that article loses my respect when he refers to kostya as russian. Prehaps background but no doubt in my eyes he was a pure ozzy
I consider Kostya Russian. Always will
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Boxrec
P4P Rankings
Lb 4 Lb
1
Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
2
Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
3
Vic Darchinyansuper flyweight
4
Chad Dawsonlight heavyweight
5
Manny Pacquiao light welterweight
6
Shane Mosley welterweight
7
Kelly Pavlik middleweight
8
Ricky Hatton light welterweight
9
Denkaosan Kaovichit flyweight
10
Daisuke Naito flyweight
In BoxRec P4P rankings, PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder at 5th position while Hatton is only at 8th position...
.
So u agree that Manny is P4P #5?
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Boxrec
P4P Rankings
Lb 4 Lb
1
Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
2
Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
3
Vic Darchinyansuper flyweight
4
Chad Dawsonlight heavyweight
5
Manny Pacquiao light welterweight
6
Shane Mosley welterweight
7
Kelly Pavlik middleweight
8
Ricky Hatton light welterweight
9
Denkaosan Kaovichit flyweight
10
Daisuke Naito flyweight
In BoxRec P4P rankings, PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder at 5th position while Hatton is only at 8th position...
.
So u agree that Manny is P4P #5?
I agree that PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder in that P4P list... PAC ranked much higher than Hatton which make sense ... ;)
.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Boxrec
P4P Rankings
Lb 4 Lb
1
Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
2
Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
3
Vic Darchinyansuper flyweight
4
Chad Dawsonlight heavyweight
5
Manny Pacquiao light welterweight
6
Shane Mosley welterweight
7
Kelly Pavlik middleweight
8
Ricky Hatton light welterweight
9
Denkaosan Kaovichit flyweight
10
Daisuke Naito flyweight
In BoxRec P4P rankings, PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder at 5th position while Hatton is only at 8th position...
.
So u agree that Manny is P4P #5?
I agree that PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder in that P4P list... PAC ranked much higher than Hatton which make sense ... ;)
.
U did not answer the question. I'll ask again, do u agree Manny is P4P #5?
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
I also like cheese, but I like dogs more.
I knew some flip broad who use to throw all that in a burrito along with egg. Wasn't bad at all
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
BTW I burned my finger horribly the other day. Here's a tip for you people since I'm looking out for you, if you cook in a pan on the stove you can touch the handle cause its not hot, if you put the pan in the oven for 30 minutes at 400 degrees and then grab the handle you will burn the shit out of your finger.
:LOLATYOU:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
oakleyno1
that article loses my respect when he refers to kostya as russian. Prehaps background but no doubt in my eyes he was a pure ozzy
I consider Kostya Russian. Always will
Hmmmm... cheese, canine, and egg you say?
I must admit, while the dog-lover in me is repulsed, the carnivore in me is very intrigued.
What kind of cheese did she use?
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Boxrec
P4P Rankings
Lb 4 Lb
1
Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
2
Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
3
Vic Darchinyansuper flyweight
4
Chad Dawsonlight heavyweight
5
Manny Pacquiao light welterweight
6
Shane Mosley welterweight
7
Kelly Pavlik middleweight
8
Ricky Hatton light welterweight
9
Denkaosan Kaovichit flyweight
10
Daisuke Naito flyweight
In BoxRec P4P rankings, PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder at 5th position while Hatton is only at 8th position...
.
So u agree that Manny is P4P #5?
I agree that PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder in that P4P list... PAC ranked much higher than Hatton which make sense ... ;)
.
how is Pac higher than Hatton, in a weight division he's never fought at?, hell i guess Cotto should be considered the #1 154 pounder in the world just for kicks, and hell why not make B-Hop the #1 Cruiserweight in the world just for the hell of it and since he wants to fight Adamek, well B-Hop's the bigger name so he should most definately most definately be ranked higher than Adamek.....
SaddoBoxer you are officially the Rain Man of this Forum, only besides the genius part
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
I also like cheese, but I like dogs more.
I knew some flip broad who use to throw all that in a burrito along with egg. Wasn't bad at all
:LOLATYOU:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
oakleyno1
that article loses my respect when he refers to kostya as russian. Prehaps background but no doubt in my eyes he was a pure ozzy
I consider Kostya Russian. Always will
Hmmmm... cheese, canine, and egg you say?
I must admit, while the dog-lover in me is repulsed, the carnivore in me is very intrigued.
What kind of cheese did she use?
Cheddar.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
I knew some flip broad who use to throw all that in a burrito along with egg. Wasn't bad at all
:LOLATYOU:
I consider Kostya Russian. Always will
Hmmmm... cheese, canine, and egg you say?
I must admit, while the dog-lover in me is repulsed, the carnivore in me is very intrigued.
What kind of cheese did she use?
Cheddar.
Interesting, I could see throwing a bit of feta into the mix as well. Maybe some mushrooms too.
Now I want an omlette, sans dog of course.
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
So u agree that Manny is P4P #5?
I agree that PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder in that P4P list... PAC ranked much higher than Hatton which make sense ... ;)
.
how is Pac higher than Hatton, in a weight division he's never fought at?, hell i guess Cotto should be considered the #1 154 pounder in the world just for kicks, and hell why not make B-Hop the #1 Cruiserweight in the world just for the hell of it and since he wants to fight Adamek, well B-Hop's the bigger name so he should most definately most definately be ranked higher than Adamek.....
SaddoBoxer you are officially the Rain Man of this Forum, only besides the genius part
You know what, I'm a member of FightNews and BoxRec rankings committee... Me and my colleagues concluded that PAC is the man right now at 140...
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Hmmmm... cheese, canine, and egg you say?
I must admit, while the dog-lover in me is repulsed, the carnivore in me is very intrigued.
What kind of cheese did she use?
Cheddar.
Interesting, I could see throwing a bit of feta into the mix as well. Maybe some mushrooms too.
Now I want an omlette, sans dog of course.
According to the flip it's the doberman that really makes the flavor
-
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I agree that PAC is the highest ranked 140 pounder in that P4P list... PAC ranked much higher than Hatton which make sense ... ;)
.
how is Pac higher than Hatton, in a weight division he's never fought at?, hell i guess Cotto should be considered the #1 154 pounder in the world just for kicks, and hell why not make B-Hop the #1 Cruiserweight in the world just for the hell of it and since he wants to fight Adamek, well B-Hop's the bigger name so he should most definately most definately be ranked higher than Adamek.....
SaddoBoxer you are officially the Rain Man of this Forum, only besides the genius part
You know what, I'm a member of FightNews and BoxRec rankings committee... Me and my colleagues concluded that PAC is the man right now at 140...
I'm sure you are. :LOLATYOU: