how good were these guys in their prime
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Mid 90's Roy Jones was friggin unbelievable. He could walk on water in his prime.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IcemanKO
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
ICB sums it up pretty well. Except I dont consider Dawson to be great, not yet. Not really better than prime Tarver imo. Roy was the most amazing in his prime but Hopkins was brilliant in his prime too.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Jones was obviously absolutely unbelievable..
paul williams probably has the most potential on that list..
Kessler is a great technical fighter and has a lot to offer but needs some bigger fights..
Pavlik is a great puncher and has been getting a bit more technical but has shown that he can be beaten by good foot movement and accuracy.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Hopkins-Great.Think he's the better skilled fighter of the lot
Williams,Kessler and Pavlik solid effort-desire...nice skills but see only goodness at the end.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IcemanKO
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
I agree with that perfectly.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
ICB sums it up pretty well. Except I dont consider Dawson to be great, not yet. Not really better than prime Tarver imo. Roy was the most amazing in his prime but Hopkins was brilliant in his prime too.
You don't consider Dawson great? How??? He beat Tarver twice easily. Tarver was no superb fighter ever. Good, nothing more. He has 2 names on his winning record. Dawson already has more. Johnson, Tarver, and Adamek. In those fights he is 4-0. The two names Tarver has RJJ, who was not prime, and Johnson. His record in those fights is 3-2. The names he has on his total record is 4, RJJ Johnson B-Hop Dawson, with a record against them as 3-5. And remember Dawson just started his prime. Tarver is really close to a one trick pony.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IcemanKO
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
Change Dawson to "Good" and I'd agree with that assesment
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IcemanKO
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
I agree mostly but until BCD and PW fight a few more elite names I will not consider them great, both have the potential to be great but neither has really hit their primes yet so we must reserve the GREAT moniker until the book is written
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IcemanKO
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
Agreed.
Id like to think that Kess can become great but we'll have to wait and see.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
I think we have seen the best of Pavlik. It's all downhill from here! :deadnew:
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IcemanKO
Antonio Tarver
Roy Jones Jr
B-Hop
and how great could these guys be
Chad Dawson
Paul Williams
Mikkel Kessler
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
Change Dawson to "Good" and I'd agree with that assesment
BIG H the 2nd question was how great could those last 4 fighters be, i don't think Chad Dawson is great at the moment. But i think he has the potiental to be great.
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
holmcall
I think we have seen the best of Pavlik. It's all downhill from here! :deadnew:
i doubt it he hasnt even hit his prime yet and works like crazy to get better he just needs to learn more skills
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Antonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
Change Dawson to "Good" and I'd agree with that assesment
BIG H the 2nd question was how great could those last 4 fighters be, i don't think Chad Dawson is great at the moment. But i think he has the potiental to be great.
Yeh I know mate, I just don't think he will become "Great"
I think Paul Williams could become "Great" and probably will!
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Tarver - Consider him a 1 hit wonder over a declining Jones.
Roy Jones - the best athlete to ever put on a pair of gloves but he could have fought a few more people here and there. He could have pressed the action more to KO some people.
Hopkins - Over acheiver, who didnt have the athleticism of a Jones but always came in in top shape and was smart. Not afraid to stink the joint out to pot shot and get a win (hence why he was relatively unpopular up until a few years ago)
Chad Dawson - I dont see Dawson being much more than a good fighter.
Paul Williams - Could be great if he stays at lower weight classes. I dont think he can be a dominant MW.
Mikkel Kessler - Good fighter. Outclassed in his big step up and now inactive
Kelly Pavlik - Good Fighter - a little one dimensional to be great.