 |
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
BIG H the 2nd question was how great could those last 4 fighters be, i don't think Chad Dawson is great at the moment. But i think he has the potiental to be great.Originally Posted by BIG H
Change Dawson to "Good" and I'd agree with that assesmentAntonio Tarver = Good
Roy Jones Jr = Amazing
Bernard Hopkins = Great
Chad Dawson = Great
Paul Williams = Great
Mikkel Kessler = Good
Kelly Pavlik = Good
...bigger than Jesus
Array
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Yeh I know mate, I just don't think he will become "Great"BIG H the 2nd question was how great could those last 4 fighters be, i don't think Chad Dawson is great at the moment. But i think he has the potiental to be great.Change Dawson to "Good" and I'd agree with that assesment
I think Paul Williams could become "Great" and probably will!
BUCK WILD
Array
Re: how good were these guys in their prime
Tarver - Consider him a 1 hit wonder over a declining Jones.
Roy Jones - the best athlete to ever put on a pair of gloves but he could have fought a few more people here and there. He could have pressed the action more to KO some people.
Hopkins - Over acheiver, who didnt have the athleticism of a Jones but always came in in top shape and was smart. Not afraid to stink the joint out to pot shot and get a win (hence why he was relatively unpopular up until a few years ago)
Chad Dawson - I dont see Dawson being much more than a good fighter.
Paul Williams - Could be great if he stays at lower weight classes. I dont think he can be a dominant MW.
Mikkel Kessler - Good fighter. Outclassed in his big step up and now inactive
Kelly Pavlik - Good Fighter - a little one dimensional to be great.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks