why the hate

Printable View

11-09-2009, 08:40 PM
paddy448

why the hate

why the hate for david haye, especially the few british lads on here givin him stick. i thought he fought the perfect fight, yeah it was boring, but he did what he had too do, those on here that say valuev won it are absolutely crazy. a boxing fight first and foremost is scored on shots landed, that is the primary scoring system(check the rules) and aggresion and all that shit is secondary.but first and foremost its shots landed. haye outland valuev easily, and scored the most eye catching punches, yeah haye was on the back foot, but how else did u expect haye too beat valuev, ive sat silently for a while just wathing peoples posts about the fight, and people who i thought knew boxing that are sayin valuev won the fight must not no shit, not naming names. haye won that fight with ease, he made valuev look so ordinary its unreal(which we no he is,many have tried and most have failed). i no now that im gonna get some mixed replies from this thread, but im more than happy too answer, WELL DONE DAVID HAYE, WE NEED A FIGHTER LIKE U FOR THE SAKE OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, GOD BLESS U
11-09-2009, 08:55 PM
armin

Re: why the hate

I've not even seen the fight so I can't comment on that. People are hating on haye tho because he made it his business to talk shit about wladimir for doing "what he has to" and not fighting in wild exciting fights, difference is even with that style wladimir still knocks his foes out. Haye is simply a shit talker and hypocrite, and people often times do not admire those qualities, simple as, even if it's just an act to sell tickets.
11-09-2009, 09:40 PM
Kev

Re: why the hate

I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

Valuev is a garbage fighter.

John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.
11-09-2009, 09:52 PM
paddy448

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

Valuev is a garbage fighter.

John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why
11-09-2009, 10:12 PM
rjj tszyu

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

Valuev is a garbage fighter.

John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

Haye won quite comfortably. The art (or science) of boxing is to hit your opponent and not be hit yourself. That is exactly what Haye did to Valuev!
11-09-2009, 10:18 PM
Kev

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

Valuev is a garbage fighter.

John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.
11-09-2009, 10:31 PM
Kev

Re: why the hate

I should also say as well that many commentators, ringside observers and the crowd also believe Larry Donald clearly beat Valuev, although I have not seen that fight to confirm.
11-09-2009, 10:32 PM
rjj tszyu

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

Valuev is a garbage fighter.

John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.
11-09-2009, 10:38 PM
Kev

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.

Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related

Let's make that 5 fights he's lost. :rolleyes:
11-09-2009, 10:42 PM
rjj tszyu

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.

Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related

Let's make that 5 fights he's lost. :rolleyes:

What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World. ;D
11-09-2009, 10:51 PM
Kev

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.

Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related
Let's make that 5 fights he's lost. :rolleyes:

What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World. ;D

I'm not even sure he gets past John Ruiz.
11-09-2009, 10:52 PM
paddy448

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I don't see how anyone can say he won that fight easily. Aside from rocking him in the 12th round neither fighter did anything!

It was the most pants fight I've ever seen.

And he didn't fight a perfect fight. He performed no better than John Ruiz or Evander Holyfield did, in fact I think they both beat Valuev better than he did, but neither was an attractive proposition for the heavyweight division so they both got robbed on the scorecards.

Valuev has only fought 4 fighters who wern't complete bums and all four of them beat him, but only Haye and Chagaev got the decisions because Holyfield and Ruiz are unpopular champions for the image of heavyweight boxing.

Valuev was a manufactured champ like Primo Carnera, who got the belt because he's a freakshow and people wanted to see him.

Now Haye has come along and is more marketable so he gets the win over Valuev despite doing a worse job than Ruiz and Holyfield against him.

I don't object to Haye winning, Valuev should have 4 losses on his record at least I just don't think Haye should get much credit for it.

It is less impressive than Amir Khan beating Andreas Kotelnik or Barrera imo.

Valuev is a garbage fighter.

John Ruiz will be a tougher test for Haye.

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate
11-09-2009, 10:54 PM
rjj tszyu

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related
Let's make that 5 fights he's lost. :rolleyes:

What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World. ;D

I'm not even sure he gets past John Ruiz.

Ok then Dildo.... erm i mean Bilbo, I'll have you a sig bet on the Haye Ruiz fight. I'm having Haye by the way.
11-09-2009, 10:56 PM
Kev

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

once again bilbo u make me believe my own thoughts are bullshit cause u make so much senese,lol, too be honest with u i didnt see the ruiz fight i only saw the holyfield fight, and yeah hoyfield made it look a better fight than haye but he didnt make valuev miss like like haye did. can i ask u who u thought won the fight haye vs valuev and why

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate

We will see, the 'reality' is that Haye pulled out of a fight with Wlad, thne Vitali. He made his name calling them out and then smartly cancelled on them and went after the division's David Diaz to get his belt.

When he fights Wlad he will be dismantled and chopped down as one sidedly and predictably as any of Wlad's last 8 or 9 opponents.
11-09-2009, 11:00 PM
rjj tszyu

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate

We will see, the 'reality' is that Haye pulled out of a fight with Wlad, thne Vitali. He made his name calling them out and then smartly cancelled on them and went after the division's David Diaz to get his belt.

When he fights Wlad he will be dismantled and chopped down as one sidedly and predictably as any of Wlad's last 8 or 9 opponents.

Personally I think he will be dismantled and chopped down in the same manner as Brewster was in their first fight.
11-09-2009, 11:38 PM
paddy448

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

I think Haye just about deserved to win. But I think both John Ruiz in their first fight and Evander Holyfield beat him more impressively. Oh and Chagaev of course.

When a fighter loses to John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev and an almost 50 old Holyfield you know he ain't up to much.

Haye performed about as well as a nearly 50 Evander and John Ruiz, one of the maligned and mediocre champs in recent years.

All Haye proved was that he's not even close to being one of the top players in the division.

If he fights a Klitschko he loses as uneventfully and routinely as Rahman, Brock, Arreola, Chagaev etc did before him.

He brings nothing new to the table apart from a big mouth.

Odlanier Solis will be a bigger threat to the top guys than Haye. Even Thomas Adamek has as much chance of making an impression imo.

im sorry bilbo but ur talking nonsense, fights a klitschko and he loses as routinley as rahman, i can safely say ur losing touch with reality mate

We will see, the 'reality' is that Haye pulled out of a fight with Wlad, thne Vitali. He made his name calling them out and then smartly cancelled on them and went after the division's David Diaz to get his belt.

When he fights Wlad he will be dismantled and chopped down as one sidedly and predictably as any of Wlad's last 8 or 9 opponents.

seriously bilbo why the hate for haye, what is ur nationality
11-09-2009, 11:39 PM
Nameless

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Haye is faster, punches harder and has more skill than everyone you have mentioned. FACT.

Ruiz and Evander are jokes in the heavyweight divison. So is Larry Donald. Ruslan Chagaev is, as we saw against Wlad lightyears away from being the best at heavyweight.

Haye being faster, a bigger puncher (none of those guys are punchers) and having more skill is no big deal at all, for the supposed saviour of the heavyweight division.

Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitresko are all more promising prospects than Haye.

By the way, watch this clip fast forward to around the 4.30 mark and listen to the GERMAN crowd when Valuev gets the decision over Larry Donald. Even his OWN fans boo the crap out of the decision......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-MwR...eature=related
Let's make that 5 fights he's lost. :rolleyes:

What the fuck has that video got to do with Haye? And as for Povetkin, Chambers, Solis and Dimitrenko, if Haye fights them i'd be willing to bet he beats all 4, they are all shite.

Oh yeah and Haye is no longer just a prospect, he is THE Heavyweight Champion of the World. ;D

... till he fights one of the Monsterbrothers, Chambers, Arreola or one of the top guys here.
11-10-2009, 12:11 AM
CFH

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

why the hate for david haye, especially the few british lads on here givin him stick. i thought he fought the perfect fight, yeah it was boring, but he did what he had too do, those on here that say valuev won it are absolutely crazy. a boxing fight first and foremost is scored on shots landed, that is the primary scoring system(check the rules) and aggresion and all that shit is secondary.but first and foremost its shots landed. haye outland valuev easily, and scored the most eye catching punches, yeah haye was on the back foot, but how else did u expect haye too beat valuev, ive sat silently for a while just wathing peoples posts about the fight, and people who i thought knew boxing that are sayin valuev won the fight must not no shit, not naming names. haye won that fight with ease, he made valuev look so ordinary its unreal(which we no he is,many have tried and most have failed). i no now that im gonna get some mixed replies from this thread, but im more than happy too answer, WELL DONE DAVID HAYE, WE NEED A FIGHTER LIKE U FOR THE SAKE OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, GOD BLESS U

Unless it's a Carl Froch fight. :p
11-10-2009, 04:24 AM
armin

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Personally I think he will be dismantled and chopped down in the same manner as Brewster was in their first fight.

You do realize that brewster pretty much had an iron chin in his prime, there is no way haye could take half of what brewster had to take in that fight to down wlad in the fifth round. Wlad used to gas, isn't really the same fighter anymore...if haye does decide to sign to fight one of the two brothers in the next 18 months or so and actually goes thru with it this time, he's getting hammered.
11-11-2009, 09:08 PM
JazMerkin

Re: why the hate

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

why the hate for david haye, especially the few british lads on here givin him stick. i thought he fought the perfect fight, yeah it was boring, but he did what he had too do, those on here that say valuev won it are absolutely crazy. a boxing fight first and foremost is scored on shots landed, that is the primary scoring system(check the rules) and aggresion and all that shit is secondary.but first and foremost its shots landed. haye outland valuev easily, and scored the most eye catching punches, yeah haye was on the back foot, but how else did u expect haye too beat valuev, ive sat silently for a while just wathing peoples posts about the fight, and people who i thought knew boxing that are sayin valuev won the fight must not no shit, not naming names. haye won that fight with ease, he made valuev look so ordinary its unreal(which we no he is,many have tried and most have failed). i no now that im gonna get some mixed replies from this thread, but im more than happy too answer, WELL DONE DAVID HAYE, WE NEED A FIGHTER LIKE U FOR THE SAKE OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, GOD BLESS U

See Paddy here's the problem I have, I remembered you writing a similar thread about a month back after the Froch fight where you argued the opposite. Do you feel a need to do this every time someone doesn't score with patriotism as you appear to suggest to Bilbo here?

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy448

seriously bilbo why the hate for haye, what is ur nationality

I've said it a number of times, but I can't see how someone could be saying that Froch won based on Dirrell's negativity & then not give Valuev rounds when Haye was being negative. I thought both Haye & Dirrell won based on how we score rounds in boxing, but I simply can't see the justification in one & not the other. Granted the rounds were not the same exact rounds, but there were similar patterns & if you scored a round for Froch for being aggressive, the same should of been done for Valuev.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 AM.