Who are the biggest Floyd nuthuggers..ooops i mean "supporters" on the forum?

Just wondering because there have been some ridiculous statements made in regards to Floyd. I mean I feel like Manny Steward hit it right on the head when he said Floyd is a very good boxer, but not and all time great. He doesn't and hasn't dominated like the greats have, and probably is the only fighter that was ranked p4p #1 that most people feel like could be beaten easiest...(relatively speaking)

JT ROCK and Majesty. By a country mile. ;)

Majesty is the worst.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by skel1983

JT ROCK and Majesty. By a country mile. ;)

---

Grandfather used that term all time and just like then its always funny as hell when I hear someone use it in regards to a great distance...;D;D;D;D;D

Im a big fan of Floyd Mayweather Jr, but i can still admit he does act like an ass outside the ring at times. But inside the ring he is pretty much flawless, one of my favorite modern fighters.

I don't know if i would be called a nuthugger but i like the guy, as much as anybody else i guess. This is boxing and he's by far the best boxer in the sport. Best fighter maybe not. But boxing wise there is really no one better. I don't look at anything except for what i see in ring from any boxer and those that dislike the guy generally generate thier dislike of the guy from that. If we are looking at these guys from that kind of standpoint then i dunno i probably wouldn't like any of them....Some even say the guy isn't exciting or boring. But neither of those opinions get judged on the scorecards so i don't care about that either. I put as much blame on his opponets for not making the guy fight and or not cutting off the ring etc.. everyone knows before hand what floyd is going to do yet they'd rahter complain about it after instead of stopping it in the ring. Any man can be beat anyone...but for the forseeable future i just don't see anyone out there outside of maybe paul williams at 154 (cause i doubt he'll ever make 147 again) beating him. If you want to find his biggest nuthuggers you really have to look to the people who claim to hate the guy. They are the one's keeping dude's name out there. Think about it ..how many threads are started by fans of his to say something nice about the guy, it's always his haters filling his pockets and giving him press. Take away the negetive press he gets and he would probably get none, which would be fine by me. I say it all the time. Floyd is not all there is to boxing, there are tons of great fights that happen without him or anyone even mentioning his name. I actually look forward to the day he's gone and all this foolishness in generall stops. Finally fighters will have to make a name for themselves without saying i can beat floyd to try and get popular.

Kinda bizarre you starting this thread with your name and all ;D

Every fighter has their huggers, I can't remember who, but someone even supported Valuev for a while.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by killersheep

Kinda bizarre you starting this thread with your name and all ;D

Every fighter has their huggers, I can't remember who, but someone even supported Valuev for a while.

---

That was Landmine wasn't it ? a real fruitcake he was, what happened to him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mar

I don't know if i would be called a nuthugger but i like the guy, as much as anybody else i guess. This is boxing and he's by far the best boxer in the sport. Best fighter maybe not. But boxing wise there is really no one better. I don't look at anything except for what i see in ring from any boxer and those that dislike the guy generally generate thier dislike of the guy from that. If we are looking at these guys from that kind of standpoint then i dunno i probably wouldn't like any of them....Some even say the guy isn't exciting or boring. But neither of those opinions get judged on the scorecards so i don't care about that either. I put as much blame on his opponets for not making the guy fight and or not cutting off the ring etc.. everyone knows before hand what floyd is going to do yet they'd rahter complain about it after instead of stopping it in the ring. Any man can be beat anyone...but for the forseeable future i just don't see anyone out there outside of maybe paul williams at 154 (cause i doubt he'll ever make 147 again) beating him. If you want to find his biggest nuthuggers you really have to look to the people who claim to hate the guy. They are the one's keeping dude's name out there. Think about it ..how many threads are started by fans of his to say something nice about the guy, it's always his haters filling his pockets and giving him press.

---

Rep

People have only called Mayweather boring in the Baldomir fight when he didn't engage. It is funny how people call him a boring fighter since he'd been engaging with a more aggressive style lately. His fights with Gatti, Mitchell and Judah weren't boring, Baldomir was boring I admit, but he followed it vs Oscar and Hatton both fights weren't boring either.

So people calling Floyd boring are basically basing it off one fight and ignoring the fact he'd been exciting before that fight and was exciting after it.

And i bolded the last part because you make a great point, Haters make more threads about Floyd then the "nuthuggers". Haters seem to care more about drawing attention to him then his nuthuggers do, which is funny to me.

JT would eat floyds ass cheese given the opportunity

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by killersheep

Kinda bizarre you starting this thread with your name and all ;D

Every fighter has their huggers, I can't remember who, but someone even supported Valuev for a while.

---

I remember a floyd fanatic back in 2005 was highly offended that mayweather's name was part of my username esp because I've always stated shane would beat him. I mean this was right after the PBF-Gatti fight..

I guess I have to say PBF is the GOd of GODs on every topic or I'm not worthy using his name on a boxing forum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by skel1983

JT ROCK and Majesty. By a country mile. ;)

---

Nah i say Mar is.

JT ROCK; Floyd wins cause his the best and i dont like his opponent.

Majesty; Floyd great boxer hard to hit, wins points, etc.

MAR; Floyd is above all nobody can beat him, theres nothing anyone can do to beat him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mar

I don't know if i would be called a nuthugger but i like the guy, as much as anybody else i guess. This is boxing and he's by far the best boxer in the sport. Best fighter maybe not. But boxing wise there is really no one better. I don't look at anything except for what i see in ring from any boxer and those that dislike the guy generally generate thier dislike of the guy from that. If we are looking at these guys from that kind of standpoint then i dunno i probably wouldn't like any of them....Some even say the guy isn't exciting or boring. But neither of those opinions get judged on the scorecards so i don't care about that either. I put as much blame on his opponets for not making the guy fight and or not cutting off the ring etc.. everyone knows before hand what floyd is going to do yet they'd rahter complain about it after instead of stopping it in the ring. Any man can be beat anyone...but for the forseeable future i just don't see anyone out there outside of maybe paul williams at 154 (cause i doubt he'll ever make 147 again) beating him. If you want to find his biggest nuthuggers you really have to look to the people who claim to hate the guy. They are the one's keeping dude's name out there. Think about it ..how many threads are started by fans of his to say something nice about the guy, it's always his haters filling his pockets and giving him press. Take away the negetive press he gets and he would probably get none, which would be fine by me. I say it all the time. Floyd is not all there is to boxing, there are tons of great fights that happen without him or anyone even mentioning his name. I actually look forward to the day he's gone and all this foolishness in generall stops. Finally fighters will have to make a name for themselves without saying i can beat floyd to try and get popular.

---

I actually think the nutthuggers are the ones that crowd every topic from a subjective standpoint on Floyd. They ridiculous things like

"Shane Mosley a first ballot HOF fighter doesn't stand a chance" or "that no one can land flush on him when Chop Chop wobbled him" you know, things like.

they completely make Floyd above reproach.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Julius Rain

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by skel1983

JT ROCK and Majesty. By a country mile. ;)

---

Nah i say Mar is.

JT ROCK; Floyd wins cause his the best and i dont like his opponent.

Majesty; Floyd great boxer hard to hit, wins points, etc.

MAR; Floyd is above all nobody can beat him, theres nothing anyone can do to beat him.

---

:lol::lol::lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mar

I don't know if i would be called a nuthugger but i like the guy, as much as anybody else i guess. This is boxing and he's by far the best boxer in the sport. Best fighter maybe not. But boxing wise there is really no one better. I don't look at anything except for what i see in ring from any boxer and those that dislike the guy generally generate thier dislike of the guy from that. If we are looking at these guys from that kind of standpoint then i dunno i probably wouldn't like any of them....Some even say the guy isn't exciting or boring. But neither of those opinions get judged on the scorecards so i don't care about that either. I put as much blame on his opponets for not making the guy fight and or not cutting off the ring etc.. everyone knows before hand what floyd is going to do yet they'd rahter complain about it after instead of stopping it in the ring. Any man can be beat anyone...but for the forseeable future i just don't see anyone out there outside of maybe paul williams at 154 (cause i doubt he'll ever make 147 again) beating him. If you want to find his biggest nuthuggers you really have to look to the people who claim to hate the guy. They are the one's keeping dude's name out there. Think about it ..how many threads are started by fans of his to say something nice about the guy, it's always his haters filling his pockets and giving him press. Take away the negetive press he gets and he would probably get none, which would be fine by me. I say it all the time. Floyd is not all there is to boxing, there are tons of great fights that happen without him or anyone even mentioning his name. I actually look forward to the day he's gone and all this foolishness in generall stops. Finally fighters will have to make a name for themselves without saying i can beat floyd to try and get popular.

---

Oh I forgot about you, again.

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Julius Rain

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by skel1983

JT ROCK and Majesty. By a country mile. ;)

---

Nah i say Mar is.

JT ROCK; Floyd wins cause his the best and i dont like his opponent.

Majesty; Floyd great boxer hard to hit, wins points, etc.

MAR; Floyd is above all nobody can beat him, theres nothing anyone can do to beat him.

---

Mar is pretty much always on point with his posts. He pretty much says shiit the way it is. I'm sure he's a fan of Mayweather. But he'll point out the mans cons along with his pros. There is a difference between him and groupies. Mar backs up Mayweather. While..lets use you. You don't back Pacquiao. You straight deep throat and swallow Pacquiao. While Mar can praise and point out negatives others (you again) only praise and lust. See the difference?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

I agree. Floyd has far more haters than huggers on this forum. What a stupid thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

I agree. Floyd has far more haters than huggers on this forum. What a stupid thread.

---

Agreed

lets not turn this place into the sherdog or eastside forums with threads like this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

Are you serious? I suppose the nutthugging comments are to be left inside of threads not specifically about "nutthugging". Had the thread been titled "Floyd forum fan appreciation day", you probably wouldn't have shit to say. Numerous times people constantly accuse one of being biased and nutthugging on this forum, now all of sudden its frowned upon? Get the fuck out here. The thread wasn't that serious in the first place. I just read a thread where a member went on and on about how people use the wrong arguments when speaking about ranking measuring a fighter, and one of the arguments was "nutthugging and fanboyism". There were also mods in there that positively repped him. And I haven't called anyone out, I simply asked a question.


So therefore :fyou:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Just wondering because there have been some ridiculous statements made in regards to Floyd. I mean I feel like Manny Steward hit it right on the head when he said Floyd is a very good boxer, but not and all time great. He doesn't and hasn't dominated like the greats have, and probably is the only fighter that was ranked p4p #1 that most people feel like could be beaten easiest...(relatively speaking)

---

That's just a ridiculous statement, he's undefeated, has never even been knocked down or hurt (apart from when he broke his hand) and aside from the first fight with Castillo which he avenged has never even come close to losing.

Who are all the other p4p greats that look so much better than him and have proven to be harder to beat than that?

This seems like the right thread to freepost in. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Just wondering because there have been some ridiculous statements made in regards to Floyd. I mean I feel like Manny Steward hit it right on the head when he said Floyd is a very good boxer, but not and all time great. He doesn't and hasn't dominated like the greats have, and probably is the only fighter that was ranked p4p #1 that most people feel like could be beaten easiest...(relatively speaking)

---

That's just a ridiculous statement, he's undefeated, has never even been knocked down or hurt (apart from when he broke his hand) and aside from the first fight with Castillo which he avenged has never even come close to losing.

Who are all the other p4p greats that look so much better than him and have proven to be harder to beat than that?

---

Don't ask me, Steward made that comment...but he did say that he found it ridiculous that floyd was putting himself up there with the robinsons and leonards...he was also speaking about how they would get lesser opponents out the ring when they knew they could hit them at will. As far as being dominant and looking better? Don't know who Steward had in mind, but to me RJJ clearly was more dominant. And so was Sweet pea...speaking about sum total not just the work floyd put in at the smaller weights...

For me I always thought floyd would be next after roy jones, but when Jones moved up the LHW he dominated it. He didn't move up then invite all the guys smaller than him up there beat them, then claim he's the best in the division.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

---

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

---

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

---

I'm not going to argue Mar's opinions for him. However, I will say that everyone has their own perspectives on fights and fighters and that even if I don't agree with all of what Mar says, his opinions are at least legitimate and in my experience he is an excellent poster.

I will also say that I don't think Mosley has much of a shot against Mayweather either, as much as I'd love to see him win.

You're one of the sillier posters on this board, many times I've rolled my eyes at your posts, if you're going to go through post trackers why not just pick apart your own? Much easier.

This is a stupid thread, it's specific intent is to call out specific posters, asking for names of people perceived to be nuthuggers. Dumb thread, you would be a better poster if you just watched the fights tonight an post about those.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

You're one of the sillier posters on this board, many times I've rolled my eyes at your posts, if you're going to go through post trackers why not just pick apart your own? Much easier.

This is a stupid thread, it's specific intent is to call out specific posters, asking for names of people perceived to be nuthuggers. Dumb thread, you would be a better poster if you just watched the fights tonight an post about those.

---

If you mean consistent with very little loyalty to any fighter in making judgements then yeah I am...thanks for the advice on being a better poster..:rolleyes:

What's funny is that you say it's a dumb thread yet you're in it..twice I might add...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

didn't even have him (MAR) in mind until you brought him up but since you did..

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane


I refer you to this: Perfection - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

---

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

---

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

---

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

---

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

---

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

---

By that logic Castillo beat floyd. What really doesn't make is that nobody has ever gotten a decision in close fight over oscar in vegas and shane got a UD in the second fight. And a SD in the first one although everyone agrees shane clearly won the first one. But the second one isn't as clear as to who won, but the fact that Shane got a UD against oscars star power and his belt was on the line says alot about shane performance...

;D;D;D;D

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

Very little loyalty to any fighter? You get your panties in a bunch everytime someone utters a bad word about Shane. It's his opinion leave him alone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

---

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

---

;D;D;D;D

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

---

Shane tends to go into to knock out mode. Where he just loads up on every punch. And ignores his other skills. If he fights like that against Mayweather than he really does have little chance

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

---

;D;D;D;D

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

---

Shane tends to go into to knock out mode. Where he just loads up on every punch. And ignores his other skills. If he fights like that against Mayweather than he really does have little chance

---

totally agree, but doesn't shane historically get up for fights that he's supposed to lose? I hear that shane "loads" up but he's very accurate with it and throws well timed bombs, it seems no one gives shane any credit for ring intelligence in using his arsenal and strength.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Very little loyalty to any fighter? You get your panties in a bunch everytime someone utters a bad word about Shane. It's his opinion leave him alone.

---

I agree..but its only retaliatory when the floyd blinders are pulled down and a HOF fighter like shane mosley is chalked up to "standing no chance" when Hatton went 10 rounds, JMM 12, Judah 12, and so and so on...

You;d see me do the same when PACFANs come blasting away at floyd, totally dismissing that facts that floyd is longer than pac and will exploit pac's tendency to be off balance...it just like NAZ said of shane and floyd...

"its a preference they're both luxury cars"

So I don;t get the whole PBF is a Benz while Shane is a civic....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

;D;D;D;D

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

---

Shane tends to go into to knock out mode. Where he just loads up on every punch. And ignores his other skills. If he fights like that against Mayweather than he really does have little chance

---

totally agree, but doesn't shane historically get up for fights that he's supposed to lose? I hear that shane "loads" up but he's very accurate with it and throws well timed bombs, it seems no one gives shane any credit for ring intelligence in using his arsenal and strength.

---

Mosley loaded up bombs are accurate against the likes of Margarito, Mayorga and Vargas. Not exactly fighters who's defense can be compared to Mayweathers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

---

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

---

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

---

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

---

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

---

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

---

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?