Who are the biggest Floyd nuthuggers..ooops i mean "supporters" on the forum?

[Violent Demise]

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

[JonesJrMayweather]

Agreed 100%. Mar is one of the most objective posters on here. Anyone attacking him is an idiot.

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

By that logic Castillo beat floyd. What really doesn't make is that nobody has ever gotten a decision in close fight over oscar in vegas and shane got a UD in the second fight. And a SD in the first one although everyone agrees shane clearly won the first one. But the second one isn't as clear as to who won, but the fact that Shane got a UD against oscars star power and his belt was on the line says alot about shane performance...



the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

[amat]

Very little loyalty to any fighter? You get your panties in a bunch everytime someone utters a bad word about Shane. It's his opinion leave him alone.

[Violent Demise]

"Paw paw paw..counter. Paw paw paw wide shot's counter. All night long. I know everyone wants floyd to loose so people make a case for anyone he fights, but shane has very little chance. Shane brings nothing floyd hasn't seen or beaten already. In his prime floyd would also be younger and would still beat his ass. Don't let floyd hype yall up with his 24/7 crap. Mosely is no threat to floyd, and shane most of all know it. If you can't beat vernon forrest, cotto, and have problems with mayorga and collazo, you sure as shit ain't beating the best boxer in the world. Not best fighter but he is by far the best boxer, which this sport just happens to be. I wasn't even really all that sure that he was going to beat berto really. Everyone wants too see floyd loose i get that..but shane is far from the one."


That's objectivity?

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane

Vernon Forrest is always spoke about as if he was some under schooled talent when he was on the same olympic boxing team with Oscar, not too mention a very long fighter with a hard right hand. A guy at 147 that would possibly be floyd's worst nightmare seeing as how many of the posters feel a strong jab would cause floyd major problems.

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

Shane tends to go into to knock out mode. Where he just loads up on every punch. And ignores his other skills. If he fights like that against Mayweather than he really does have little chance

[JonesJrMayweather]

Shane really only beat Oscar one time. Oscar should of took the win in there second fight. And that Mayweather SD should of been a UD. And Judah won 3 rounds. Wow. 3 whole rounds, huh?

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

Shane tends to go into to knock out mode. Where he just loads up on every punch. And ignores his other skills. If he fights like that against Mayweather than he really does have little chance

totally agree, but doesn't shane historically get up for fights that he's supposed to lose? I hear that shane "loads" up but he's very accurate with it and throws well timed bombs, it seems no one gives shane any credit for ring intelligence in using his arsenal and strength.

[JonesJrMayweather]

Very little loyalty to any fighter? You get your panties in a bunch everytime someone utters a bad word about Shane. It's his opinion leave him alone.

I agree..but its only retaliatory when the floyd blinders are pulled down and a HOF fighter like shane mosley is chalked up to "standing no chance" when Hatton went 10 rounds, JMM 12, Judah 12, and so and so on...

You;d see me do the same when PACFANs come blasting away at floyd, totally dismissing that facts that floyd is longer than pac and will exploit pac's tendency to be off balance...it just like NAZ said of shane and floyd...

"its a preference they're both luxury cars"

So I don;t get the whole PBF is a Benz while Shane is a civic....

[Violent Demise]

the point is that Judah was in the fight until his brain power showed up and his corner failed him. When floyd picked up the pace judah crumbled...Something that shane wouldn't do..but somehow shane has very little chance..

Shane tends to go into to knock out mode. Where he just loads up on every punch. And ignores his other skills. If he fights like that against Mayweather than he really does have little chance

totally agree, but doesn't shane historically get up for fights that he's supposed to lose? I hear that shane "loads" up but he's very accurate with it and throws well timed bombs, it seems no one gives shane any credit for ring intelligence in using his arsenal and strength.

Mosley loaded up bombs are accurate against the likes of Margarito, Mayorga and Vargas. Not exactly fighters who's defense can be compared to Mayweathers

[JonesJrMayweather]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

[amat]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?

[match]

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

didn't even have him (MAR) in mind until you brought him up but since you did..

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane


I refer you to this: Perfection - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

1st and last points are accurate but the 2nd and 3rd are way off. Shane's first win over Oscar was the same split decision win Floyd got, and Shane was losing and had to rally to win (he arguably lost the rematch but that's beside the point). And the 3 rounds Judah won on most people's scorecards were the ONLY rounds he won in the fight. Losing 9 rounds to 3 is not competitive at all.

[Kev]

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?

That's cos it's a totally different wording and meaning you pleb

It's like posting who is the most knowledgeble poster on the board versus who is the biggest know it all on the board, a totally different question, the first is about respect amongst peers and acknowledgment of a person's knowledge and standing and the second is a troll posting and invitation to a flame war.

[ryanman]

This thread is truly shit for a few reasons.
One of which is when I come on to 'lets get it on' I don't want to have to read the words 'Mayweather' or 'Pacquiao', or even 'Mosley' for that matter....actually not even the word 'boxing'.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?

That's cos it's a totally different wording and meaning you pleb

It's like posting who is the most knowledgeble poster on the board versus who is the biggest know it all on the board, a totally different question, the first is about respect amongst peers and acknowledgment of a person's knowledge and standing and the second is a troll posting and invitation to a flame war.

If that's not the biggest crock of shit. I understand majority of this forum discussions are cool..but at least once in mostly every thread after a big event, several posters are called out for being biased, fanboys, nutthuggers, and sometimes far worse. I'm not talking about noobs that join after their guy wins and they join up to fanatically argue everything and everyone on the board. I'm talking about members with thousands of posts. So because the thread just jumps right to the obvious instead of waiting for a big fight to happen its trolling? Get the fuck out of here with that, don't know if its saddo-pms or you guys having been inside of some sort of other "hidden forum" where you webcam group jerk each other..


That very example you listed, would just have people come in and say you're not that knowledgeable, a know it all maybe. And so forth...

[JonesJrMayweather]

This thread is truly shit for a few reasons.
One of which is when I come on to 'lets get it on' I don't want to have to read the words 'Mayweather' or 'Pacquiao', or even 'Mosley' for that matter....actually not even the word 'boxing'.

very simple remedy for that...do you know what it is?