Printable View
FIGHTHYPE \\ JAMES TONEY: "BERNARD JOBBED EVERYBODY...HE WOULDN'T GO 6 ROUNDS WITH ME"
Says he think Roy was flat because of trying to make weight, and Bernard's mother must have had sex with a goat because of the way he comes with his head all the time.
That's how you talk trash, Toney may not have it in the ring anymore, but damn if he had a talk show I'd watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
Nice to hear someone speak the truth about Hopkins. Fact.
All bollocks of course
Hopkins is an ass and just about the lamest fighter around. But if you cant respect his acheivements and understand why he will be recognised as a hall of famer for generations to come then you just dont get this sport
"He wouldn't six rounds with me" No shit genius you outweigh him by probably 100 pounds now. Just shut the f**k up and take it. B-Hop has accomplished much more than Toney ever has and now he wants to talk shit. How about when B-Hop called him out in the mid nineties and Toney wanted no part of him. Toney is nothing but a mouth anymore and I hope his damn ass gets KTFO when he switches to that UFC shit.
Toney is still the undisputed king of smack, if only he could still back it up.
He will be calling out fighters in his 80's I'm sure and still fighting allcomers on some travelling roadshow.
I personally don't like B-Hop but have a great respect for his achievements. Anyway I kept my fingers crossed for RJJ in their last fight
B-Hop has achieved much more than James Toney ? in what way ? James Toney has beaten better fighters than B-Hop, and also moved all the way up to Heavyweight. Plus James Toney was a much more exciting fighter aswell, So in what way has B-Hop achieved more ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fightfan
James Toney's Best Wins.
Michael Nunn
Mike McCallum x2
Tim Littles
Evander Holyfield
Vassiliy Jirov
Reggie Johnson
Doug DeWitt
Iran Barkley
Charles Williams
Tony Thorton
Titles at Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Cruiserweight.
And he beat John Ruiz for the WBA title aswell, forgetting about the steroids. Because like they helped anyway did you see James Toney in that fight ? i know rules are rules and i agree with the decision of a NC, but come on James Toney would of whooped John Ruiz 100 out of 100.
...toney is pissed that he wasted money watching that silly fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBB-Hop has achieved much more than James Toney ? in what way ? James Toney has beaten better fighters than B-Hop, and also moved all the way up to Heavyweight. Plus James Toney was a much more exciting fighter aswell, So in what way has B-Hop achieved more ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fightfan
James Toney's Best Wins.
Michael Nunn
Mike McCallum x2
Tim Littles
Evander Holyfield
Vassiliy Jirov
Reggie Johnson
Doug DeWitt
Iran Barkley
Charles Williams
Tony Thorton
Titles at Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Cruiserweight.
And he beat John Ruiz for the WBA title aswell, forgetting about the steroids. Because like they helped anyway did you see James Toney in that fight ? i know rules are rules and i agree with the decision of a NC, but come on James Toney would of whooped John Ruiz 100 out of 100.
It's not that he didn't face good fighter's I simply stated that B-Hop's reign at middleweight mean's much more than James Toney's championship fight's against decent opposition. I mean Jirov was good but come on did anyone really think he could win? Hell no they thought Toney should have destroyed him it just turned out that Jirov was a much tougher fighter than anticipated. Do I have to mention John Ruiz's championship belt was bought by Don King? And that he certainly was not a good champion and anyone who wasn't ancient ( Holyfield ) or someone who fouled (Kirk Johnson) would have beaten him.
I hate the simple fact that James Toney always runs his mouth and 75 percent of the time doesn't do a damn thing about it. HE trashed mouth B-Hop then and now and wouldn't fight him. He trashed Tarver after he knock Roy Jones cold. Tarver said he would fight Toney and Toney had nothing to say. Here is the short list James Toney has shit on and not done a damn thing when they verbally accepted his challenge.
B-Hop
Tarver
Chris Byrd
Jameel McCline - which was all but done but Toney broke his leg and wanted to postpone and he never signed again, later I believe he fought Rydell Booker.
both Klitschko brother's
And Roy Jones.
All mouth and not enough action f**k Toney.
It is funny and sometimes true what he says.
Both are starting to make a joke of their legacies. Jones already did.Might as well make it a trifecta!
Why does Toney being more exciting mean he is the better fighter ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBB-Hop has achieved much more than James Toney ? in what way ? James Toney has beaten better fighters than B-Hop, and also moved all the way up to Heavyweight. Plus James Toney was a much more exciting fighter aswell, So in what way has B-Hop achieved more ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fightfan
James Toney's Best Wins.
Michael Nunn
Mike McCallum x2
Tim Littles
Evander Holyfield
Vassiliy Jirov
Reggie Johnson
Doug DeWitt
Iran Barkley
Charles Williams
Tony Thorton
Titles at Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Cruiserweight.
And he beat John Ruiz for the WBA title aswell, forgetting about the steroids. Because like they helped anyway did you see James Toney in that fight ? i know rules are rules and i agree with the decision of a NC, but come on James Toney would of whooped John Ruiz 100 out of 100.
I guess that means Hopkins gets 1 up on Toney for being the more disciplined fighter who came to every fight in top shape. I certainly can't say the same for Toney.
Hopkins should also get another 1 up on Toney for being a clean fighter, another thing i can't say for Toney who has tested postive for illegal substances.
Half those guys you mentioned aren't worth much either.
Giving Toney credit for a win over Tim Littles is like giving Hopkins credit for beating Joe Lipsey. Doug Dewitt and Charles Williams also shouldn't be mentioned.
Holyfield was shot in the Toney fight.
McCallum was old for the last fight. I'll give you the 2nd fight though.
Jirov was a decent win but nothing spectactular. Nunn was a nice win. Same for the Reggie Johnson and Iran Barkley wins. Two Losses to Montell Griffin don't help his resume though.
Toney is a 3 division champ which helps his achivements but his resume isn't the strongest.
Hopkins is a two division champ and defended his middleweight crown 20 times. He didn't lose his middleweight title till he was in his 40s.
His biggest wins are over Trinidad, Tarver, Pavlik. He was the underdog in all those fights and dominated them. He was 41 against Tarver and 43 against Pavlik.
Other notable wins include Wright, De La Hoya, Johnson, Elchols, Joppy, Eastman. Three of his losses came when he was in his 40's and they were close.
Hopkins resume could be better but it's better than Toneys. Hopkins also plans a heavyweight fight this year, a win against Haye would blow him past Toney in the achivements catergory.
Prime for Prime, it would be a tough fight, both guys had what it took to beat each other.
I love Toney to death but he should sit down on this one.Seriously.When it mattered and Hopkins and Jones jr fought so many years ago....of the two which can say they came in peak shape mentally and physically and applied all of their skills in that contest?Certainly not Toney...he got psyched out and went from a career best performance vs Barkley to shit preperation and came in bloated and tired.He blew it though even as a Toney fan I dont think it would have mattered vs that Jones.
He of all people cant say anything about lounging around and half efforts in the ring,he was a master at timing out rounds and his mouth over ran his effort on a few occasions.Can you ever see Hopkins dogging it and being upset by a Drake Thadzi,pumping god knows what into his body and pissing away the credibility of one of his career best wins,Ruiz.He's done now and barking from the sidelines...though making valid points expressed by some fans,rings shallow.
And you could say B-Hop has never really beaten a very good fighter, at his own weightclass. Antonio Tarver is the only one, but he was distracted making movies like Rocky 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by PugilisticWhy does Toney being more exciting mean he is the better fighter ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBB-Hop has achieved much more than James Toney ? in what way ? James Toney has beaten better fighters than B-Hop, and also moved all the way up to Heavyweight. Plus James Toney was a much more exciting fighter aswell, So in what way has B-Hop achieved more ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fightfan
James Toney's Best Wins.
Michael Nunn
Mike McCallum x2
Tim Littles
Evander Holyfield
Vassiliy Jirov
Reggie Johnson
Doug DeWitt
Iran Barkley
Charles Williams
Tony Thorton
Titles at Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Cruiserweight.
And he beat John Ruiz for the WBA title aswell, forgetting about the steroids. Because like they helped anyway did you see James Toney in that fight ? i know rules are rules and i agree with the decision of a NC, but come on James Toney would of whooped John Ruiz 100 out of 100.
I guess that means Hopkins gets 1 up on Toney for being the more disciplined fighter who came to every fight in top shape. I certainly can't say the same for Toney.
Hopkins should also get another 1 up on Toney for being a clean fighter, another thing i can't say for Toney who has tested postive for illegal substances.
Half those guys you mentioned aren't worth much either.
Giving Toney credit for a win over Tim Littles is like giving Hopkins credit for beating Joe Lipsey. Doug Dewitt and Charles Williams also shouldn't be mentioned.
Holyfield was shot in the Toney fight.
McCallum was old for the last fight. I'll give you the 2nd fight though.
Jirov was a decent win but nothing spectactular. Nunn was a nice win. Same for the Reggie Johnson and Iran Barkley wins. Two Losses to Montell Griffin don't help his resume though.
Toney is a 3 division champ which helps his achivements but his resume isn't the strongest.
Hopkins is a two division champ and defended his middleweight crown 20 times. He didn't lose his middleweight title till he was in his 40s.
His biggest wins are over Trinidad, Tarver, Pavlik. He was the underdog in all those fights and dominated them. He was 41 against Tarver and 43 against Pavlik.
Other notable wins include Wright, De La Hoya, Johnson, Elchols, Joppy, Eastman. Three of his losses came when he was in his 40's and they were close.
Hopkins resume could be better but it's better than Toneys. Hopkins also plans a heavyweight fight this year, a win against Haye would blow him past Toney in the achivements catergory.
Prime for Prime, it would be a tough fight, both guys had what it took to beat each other.
ODLH = a blown up Welterweight, looked horrible against Felix Sturm in his only other Middleweight fight.
Howard Eastman = Decent European level fighter, but always failed at the elite level.
William Joppy = William Joppy had already got destroyed by Felix Trinidad, and he was never that good anyway. He got a gift off Howard Eastman.
Winky Wright = Again a blown up Jr Middleweight, he looked flabby at Light Heavyweight. And still pretty much went dead even with B-Hop.
Felix Trinidad = I give credit to B-Hop for this win, but again Felix Trinidad still isn't no Middleweight. He's a blown up Welterweight.
Glen Johnson = A good win for B-Hop, but Glen Johnson wasn't in his prime. Still a good win though i give him credit for this win.
Kelly Pavlik = Again a blown up Middleweight who didn't belong at Light Heavyweight, yes it is a good win but its the same old story with B-Hop. He's never truly beaten a great fighter in his own weightclass.
As for James Toney i never said he was the better fighter, just because he is more exciting. Im just pointing out he is a much better fighter to watch.
Michael Nunn = P4P top 3 in the world at the time or close to that anyway.
Vssiliy Jirov = Considered the best Cruiserweight in the world at that time.
Mike McCallum = A very good win for James Toney, Mike McCallum is considered a legend amongst boxing fans. And plus he was still very capable in there 3rd fight, because he had just recently gone 12 rounds with a prime Roy Jones Jr.
Tim Littles = Was undefeated and was quite highly rated, because of his Amateur backgroud.
Evander Holyfield = Yes obviously not in his prime, but he is only the 2nd man to stop Evander Holyfield, other than 6'5 240+ Riddick Bowe. Plus it was an dominant win, and considering James Toney started off at Middleweight, that is very impressive.
Montel Griffin = Watch these fights James Toney was robbed in both fights, especially the 2nd. I had it 8-4 for James Toney.
The others i don't need to go into, because you seem to agree with most of the other names. But when James Toney was in his peak, dominating at Super Middleweight.
He was more impressive than B-Hop IMO, and considering he went through the weightclasses especially at Heavyweight. Where he was competitive against big guys, just shows he is greater IMO.
But to each to his own, im not trying to discredit B-Hop, he has had some good wins and he was exciting when he was younger. But he turned really boring when he won the title, and the fact he never really beat a very good fighter at his own weightclass. Just takes away from some of his greatness.
I look at it this way:
Bernard definitely has the most glamorous resume. But both resumes, like most, can be torn to shit. IMO there about even. James wouldn't struggle to match any W's on Bernard's resume and visa-versa. Although imo James might look a little better in the process. Plus I think JFAT stomps Nard in a fight ;D
But fuck all that... What's really important though is the probability that neither of 'em could beat Roy Jones in their prime ;)
Hopkins got nothing on Toney, no what im saying?;D
This is a bit hypocritical.Quote:
Originally Posted by PugilisticWhy does Toney being more exciting mean he is the better fighter ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBB-Hop has achieved much more than James Toney ? in what way ? James Toney has beaten better fighters than B-Hop, and also moved all the way up to Heavyweight. Plus James Toney was a much more exciting fighter aswell, So in what way has B-Hop achieved more ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fightfan
James Toney's Best Wins.
Michael Nunn
Mike McCallum x2
Tim Littles
Evander Holyfield
Vassiliy Jirov
Reggie Johnson
Doug DeWitt
Iran Barkley
Charles Williams
Tony Thorton
Titles at Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Cruiserweight.
And he beat John Ruiz for the WBA title aswell, forgetting about the steroids. Because like they helped anyway did you see James Toney in that fight ? i know rules are rules and i agree with the decision of a NC, but come on James Toney would of whooped John Ruiz 100 out of 100.
I guess that means Hopkins gets 1 up on Toney for being the more disciplined fighter who came to every fight in top shape. I certainly can't say the same for Toney.
Hopkins should also get another 1 up on Toney for being a clean fighter, another thing i can't say for Toney who has tested postive for illegal substances.
Half those guys you mentioned aren't worth much either.
Giving Toney credit for a win over Tim Littles is like giving Hopkins credit for beating Joe Lipsey. Doug Dewitt and Charles Williams also shouldn't be mentioned.
Holyfield was shot in the Toney fight.
McCallum was old for the last fight. I'll give you the 2nd fight though.
Jirov was a decent win but nothing spectactular. Nunn was a nice win. Same for the Reggie Johnson and Iran Barkley wins. Two Losses to Montell Griffin don't help his resume though.
Toney is a 3 division champ which helps his achivements but his resume isn't the strongest.
Hopkins is a two division champ and defended his middleweight crown 20 times. He didn't lose his middleweight title till he was in his 40s.
His biggest wins are over Trinidad, Tarver, Pavlik. He was the underdog in all those fights and dominated them. He was 41 against Tarver and 43 against Pavlik.
Other notable wins include Wright, De La Hoya, Johnson, Elchols, Joppy, Eastman. Three of his losses came when he was in his 40's and they were close.
Hopkins resume could be better but it's better than Toneys. Hopkins also plans a heavyweight fight this year, a win against Haye would blow him past Toney in the achivements catergory.
Prime for Prime, it would be a tough fight, both guys had what it took to beat each other.
He's had his best wins past 40 yet his losses are excused by his old age?
That makes his middleweight reign look very weak.
No, I don't think it's being hypocritical. Most people view it as a win-win situation. There comes a point in a fighter's career that if he lost, it doesn't hurt his legacy and if he won it only enhances it.Quote:
Originally Posted by FensterThis is a bit hypocritical.Quote:
Originally Posted by PugilisticWhy does Toney being more exciting mean he is the better fighter ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ICB
I guess that means Hopkins gets 1 up on Toney for being the more disciplined fighter who came to every fight in top shape. I certainly can't say the same for Toney.
Hopkins should also get another 1 up on Toney for being a clean fighter, another thing i can't say for Toney who has tested postive for illegal substances.
Half those guys you mentioned aren't worth much either.
Giving Toney credit for a win over Tim Littles is like giving Hopkins credit for beating Joe Lipsey. Doug Dewitt and Charles Williams also shouldn't be mentioned.
Holyfield was shot in the Toney fight.
McCallum was old for the last fight. I'll give you the 2nd fight though.
Jirov was a decent win but nothing spectactular. Nunn was a nice win. Same for the Reggie Johnson and Iran Barkley wins. Two Losses to Montell Griffin don't help his resume though.
Toney is a 3 division champ which helps his achivements but his resume isn't the strongest.
Hopkins is a two division champ and defended his middleweight crown 20 times. He didn't lose his middleweight title till he was in his 40s.
His biggest wins are over Trinidad, Tarver, Pavlik. He was the underdog in all those fights and dominated them. He was 41 against Tarver and 43 against Pavlik.
Other notable wins include Wright, De La Hoya, Johnson, Elchols, Joppy, Eastman. Three of his losses came when he was in his 40's and they were close.
Hopkins resume could be better but it's better than Toneys. Hopkins also plans a heavyweight fight this year, a win against Haye would blow him past Toney in the achivements catergory.
Prime for Prime, it would be a tough fight, both guys had what it took to beat each other.
He's had his best wins past 40yet his losses are excused by his old age?
That makes his middleweight reign look very weak.
Take George Foreman for example, if he had lost to Michael Moorer, it would have been said he was old and past his prime, but since he did win, it only significantly enhance his resume and standing because he ko the reigning undefeated lineal HW champ at an very advance age.
Or let's say Hopkins decides to fight Dawson next, if he loses it's because he's past it, which is true, but if he wins just think how his resume would look and how it would advance his legacy.
BTW, his best wins are still in his 30s. Trinidad, De La Hoya, Joppy, Johnson, Holmes.
It is the truth. Hopkins is a horrible fighter to watch and let's face it all of his wins since the losses to Taylor have their question marks (except for Tarver though it can be argued that Tarver was old and showed it in Jones/Tarver 3). What do we have, Winky Wright at LHW? That deserves no credit. Pavlik fighting at LHW? Same thing. Ornelas who? And then the joke fight with Jones? Lame. Hopkins doesn't have many skills and wins by trying to outhustle and butt his opponents into submission. He tried the same with Calzaghe who thankfully kept his cool and worked out the win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Hopkins deserves so many points to be deducted from his tally in fights and yet refs turn a blind eye. There is being a crafty veteran and their is being a dirty cheat. For me James Toney is bang on the money about Hopkins. Well said.
Wright didn't belong at 170 but no one would fight him. Hopkins agreed to lose 5 pounds at 42 where Wright had to move up 10 pounds. Wright was the favourite to beat Hopkins also.Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBAnd you could say B-Hop has never really beaten a very good fighter, at his own weightclass. Antonio Tarver is the only one, but he was distracted making movies like Rocky 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by PugilisticWhy does Toney being more exciting mean he is the better fighter ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ICB
I guess that means Hopkins gets 1 up on Toney for being the more disciplined fighter who came to every fight in top shape. I certainly can't say the same for Toney.
Hopkins should also get another 1 up on Toney for being a clean fighter, another thing i can't say for Toney who has tested postive for illegal substances.
Half those guys you mentioned aren't worth much either.
Giving Toney credit for a win over Tim Littles is like giving Hopkins credit for beating Joe Lipsey. Doug Dewitt and Charles Williams also shouldn't be mentioned.
Holyfield was shot in the Toney fight.
McCallum was old for the last fight. I'll give you the 2nd fight though.
Jirov was a decent win but nothing spectactular. Nunn was a nice win. Same for the Reggie Johnson and Iran Barkley wins. Two Losses to Montell Griffin don't help his resume though.
Toney is a 3 division champ which helps his achivements but his resume isn't the strongest.
Hopkins is a two division champ and defended his middleweight crown 20 times. He didn't lose his middleweight title till he was in his 40s.
His biggest wins are over Trinidad, Tarver, Pavlik. He was the underdog in all those fights and dominated them. He was 41 against Tarver and 43 against Pavlik.
Other notable wins include Wright, De La Hoya, Johnson, Elchols, Joppy, Eastman. Three of his losses came when he was in his 40's and they were close.
Hopkins resume could be better but it's better than Toneys. Hopkins also plans a heavyweight fight this year, a win against Haye would blow him past Toney in the achivements catergory.
Prime for Prime, it would be a tough fight, both guys had what it took to beat each other.
ODLH = a blown up Welterweight, looked horrible against Felix Sturm in his only other Middleweight fight.
Howard Eastman = Decent European level fighter, but always failed at the elite level.
William Joppy = William Joppy had already got destroyed by Felix Trinidad, and he was never that good anyway. He got a gift off Howard Eastman.
Winky Wright = Again a blown up Jr Middleweight, he looked flabby at Light Heavyweight. And still pretty much went dead even with B-Hop.
Felix Trinidad = I give credit to B-Hop for this win, but again Felix Trinidad still isn't no Middleweight. He's a blown up Welterweight.
Glen Johnson = A good win for B-Hop, but Glen Johnson wasn't in his prime. Still a good win though i give him credit for this win.
Kelly Pavlik = Again a blown up Middleweight who didn't belong at Light Heavyweight, yes it is a good win but its the same old story with B-Hop. He's never truly beaten a great fighter in his own weightclass.
As for James Toney i never said he was the better fighter, just because he is more exciting. Im just pointing out he is a much better fighter to watch.
Michael Nunn = P4P top 3 in the world at the time or close to that anyway.
Vssiliy Jirov = Considered the best Cruiserweight in the world at that time.
Mike McCallum = A very good win for James Toney, Mike McCallum is considered a legend amongst boxing fans. And plus he was still very capable in there 3rd fight, because he had just recently gone 12 rounds with a prime Roy Jones Jr.
Tim Littles = Was undefeated and was quite highly rated, because of his Amateur backgroud.
Evander Holyfield = Yes obviously not in his prime, but he is only the 2nd man to stop Evander Holyfield, other than 6'5 240+ Riddick Bowe. Plus it was an dominant win, and considering James Toney started off at Middleweight, that is very impressive.
Montel Griffin = Watch these fights James Toney was robbed in both fights, especially the 2nd. I had it 8-4 for James Toney.
The others i don't need to go into, because you seem to agree with most of the other names. But when James Toney was in his peak, dominating at Super Middleweight.
He was more impressive than B-Hop IMO, and considering he went through the weightclasses especially at Heavyweight. Where he was competitive against big guys, just shows he is greater IMO.
But to each to his own, im not trying to discredit B-Hop, he has had some good wins and he was exciting when he was younger. But he turned really boring when he won the title, and the fact he never really beat a very good fighter at his own weightclass. Just takes away from some of his greatness.
I laugh when people call Trinidad and De la Hoya blown up Welterweights. They were at their best at 147 but at that point weren't natural there. Trinidad just went through 154 knocking guys out and destroyed a top middleweight in Joppy in 5 rounds, not even Hopkins was able to do that. Hopkins was supposed to lose and by KO, i can't see how anyone can discredit that win.
Dlh came unprepared against Sturm and paid the price. Against Hopkins, it was at a catchweight of 156, only two pounds shy of the 154 division where De la Hoya was natural at, at that point. Hopkins did what he had to do and unified the division.
Tarver was supposed to beat Hopkins, those weight drained excuses are only there because Hopkins toyed with him for 12. The reality is that Hopkins was stylistically all wrong for him.
Same applies for Pavlik except Pavlik had to come up in weight, he was supposed to KO Hopkins and end his career. Hopkins dominates, Pavlik excuses come along.
Regarding Toney's win over Littles, if he deserves credit for that, Hopkins deserves credit for beating the undefeated Joe Lipsey and knocking him out.
I can't give Toney credit for beating that version of Holyfield. He was done. Toney stopping him means nothing either.
Does Pacquiao get credit for stopping a weight drained DLH and being the only guy besides a middleweight Hopkins ? Hell no.
Toneys resume at heavyweight is piss poor imo. His best win is a shot Holyfield.
His best performance was Ruiz but he cheated. no excuses.
Being realistic here, Hopkins would have no trouble beating that version of Holyfield. He would beat Ruiz also.
Imo, Hopkins has had the better career. Not by loads but his career has been better and will be viewed as better all time.
Goat bit had me laughing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Same here ;D
James Toney has still got world class shit talking skills but his boxing skills are no longer world class.
And Hopkins did put on a terrible fight with Jones the other night, but that does not mean his whole career should be called into question.
He is a legend and he deserves his respect, 20 MW title defenses, plus over 40 years old and he didn't just win against Tarver and Pavlik, he DOMINATED them.
And he was in a fight with Calzaghe where you could make the case he deserved the decision. Tho he did give away the last two rounds due to being so tired.
tarver was weight drained...as much as i dont like the guy. He had bitch tits, and looked extremely weak in that fight. I think that fight would have been different had he not done the rocky film..Quote:
Originally Posted by HulkQuote:
Originally Posted by Kel
Same here ;D
James Toney has still got world class shit talking skills but his boxing skills are no longer world class.
And Hopkins did put on a terrible fight with Jones the other night, but that does not mean his whole career should be called into question.
He is a legend and he deserves his respect, 20 MW title defenses, plus over 40 years old and he didn't just win against Tarver and Pavlik, he DOMINATED them.
And he was in a fight with Calzaghe where you could make the case he deserved the decision. Tho he did give away the last two rounds due to being so tired.