Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
meh. it's just getting sad.
POLICE REPORT: Mayweather troubles go on
Shooting victim says boxer tried to force him off road
POLICE REPORT: Mayweather troubles go on - News - ReviewJournal.com
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Welp, for sure he is gonna go away for a long time with that kind of offense. What a piece of work Floyd is.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
It's official. PBF is having trouble coping with Manny Pacquaio's claim to the thrown of the P4P rankings.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
The amount of charges piling up, man, he will do at least one year, I guarantee it.
Good!!!
f*<kin' fraud duckin' everyone with a pulse for 9 years....
http://i52.tinypic.com/xgbkp1.jpg
He's done, and good riddance!
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n...Justice_01.jpg
lil floid's beaten up at least 6 women over the years.
In 2002 floid pled guilty to 2 charges of beating 2 women.
In 2003 a domestic violence charge on yet another woman (Josie Harris) but she recanted over their kids.
In 2004 another battery charge against 2 more women in a club (floid received a suspended sentence and fine), and floid did community service for assaulting a doorman.
In 2009 a drive-by shooting from his car at the rink and his house was searched.
In 2010, a racist homophobic vid and a charge for beating a woman (Josie Harris again) in front of the kids, theft, threatening the kids when the mother screamed to call 911, recent assault on a security guard, and a recent attempt to run someone off the road. Guy thought he was suddenly in the Dukes of Hazzard, for $#!t's sake!!!
About a decade ago in Grand Rapids, there was one other woman-beating assault perpetrated by maywetaher too.
He's beaten up on lots of women, and a woman with black eyes and a bleeding nose is a heartbreaking scene to witness, but that cherry-picker never had the guts to step in with top prime dangerous men like Cotto, Margarito, Pacquiao, Paul Williams, the late Vernon Forrest, Tszyu, Joel Casamayor, Stevie Johnston, Erik Morales, Barrera, Hamed, etc...
He's goin' down this time, and it's a travesty that it's taken this long as he's basically gotten away with physically beating up at least 6 women over the years.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
I just don't understand people like Floyd Mayweather. With all that money, influence and the freedom to be whatever he wants, it just astonishes me why he would want to keep getting himself in trouble. It's like the little voice in the head telling you to stop just doesn't function when it comes to Mayweather.
If he wants to beat up a woman or rob a bank, he should play a computer game like the rest of us. He's going to end up like his father the way he's going.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
I hope this isn't true and it's just someone trying to get a few $$$ out of Mayweather. It does all sound a bit suspicious to me, there were no witnesses that saw the "white Bentley make a U turn and try running the Mazda off the road whilst trying to intimidate the other driver with a gun in Las Vegas"? Come on!
I hope I'm right anyway, otherwise we may never see him again and we all want to see him vs Pac!
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
He's just amazing. He's really a genius.
With all these cases lined up for him, he will get a long vacation from boxing and no one's ever going to push him to fight anyone anymore. this is even better that retiring. Getting jailed while being the greatest skilled boxer, now he can make a argument that he aint ducking anybody.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I just don't understand people like Floyd Mayweather. With all that money, influence and the freedom to be whatever he wants, it just astonishes me why he would want to keep getting himself in trouble. It's like the little voice in the head telling you to stop just doesn't function when it comes to Mayweather.
If he wants to beat up a woman or rob a bank, he should play a computer game like the rest of us. He's going to end up like his father the way he's going.
I think you've just got think for a second about how he got all that money, influence and freedom. Strictly by being better at beating people up than the next uneducated spawn of criminals and drug addicts. In this case there is every difference between having money and growing up with any sense or morality, just because it tends not to happen that way doesn't say a thing about Mayweather or his sport, really. Boxing, of all things, is very specific that way I think. The man has literally never experienced anything but profit from being violent, egotistical and deranged. In practically any other walk of life he's the kind of person who winds up dead or at least a complete failure.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
p4pking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I just don't understand people like Floyd Mayweather. With all that money, influence and the freedom to be whatever he wants, it just astonishes me why he would want to keep getting himself in trouble. It's like the little voice in the head telling you to stop just doesn't function when it comes to Mayweather.
If he wants to beat up a woman or rob a bank, he should play a computer game like the rest of us. He's going to end up like his father the way he's going.
I think you've just got think for a second about how he got all that money, influence and freedom. Strictly by being better at beating people up than the next uneducated spawn of criminals and drug addicts. In this case there is every difference between having money and growing up with any sense or morality, just because it tends not to happen that way doesn't say a thing about Mayweather or his sport, really. Boxing, of all things, is very specific that way I think. The man has literally never experienced anything but profit from being violent, egotistical and deranged. In practically any other walk of life he's the kind of person who winds up dead or at least a complete failure.
Very good points. I guess how you grow up becomes an inescapable part of who you are. In Floyds particular case, he has got away with being a dick a fair bit and the boxing lifestyle and warped family situation would have only added to his character defects. I would have to assume that part of him felt untouchable too. It all seems to be accumulating now though and I am beginning to doubt that we will ever see a Pacquiao fight. :-\
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
arcanum26
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.
Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity. No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Very good post there, p4pking.
Listen, just a short bit here that says so much about family background.
Everyone has heard the convicted drug trafficker Floyd Sr talking about getting shot in the leg by a family member while he was holding 1 year old Floyd Jr in his arms, right?
I'm a father, I have a 5 year old daughter. Most decent fathers such as myself would do whatever it takes to protect one's young child, right?
If someone was pointing a gun at me, I would put my body between the gunman and my kid. Maybe try to convince the gunman to let the child at least leave the premises, something to protect the child, keep the child safe.
Instead of that, Floyd Sr picked up little Floyd and put little Floyd between the gunman and his own mangy carcass. He used 1 year old Floyd as a human shield to save his own worthless neck.
That action says worlds about the maywetahers.
Even as a coach, other than lil Floyd, who did Sr ever develop? What did he ever do?
He's an ex-con, unprofessional, tardy, bull$#!t artist who convinced some people that he was a good coach (which he isn't.)
Look how quick he abandoned Ricky Hatton and left the ring without even checking on unconscious Hatton's condition.
Guy wasn't on time for training sessions, making a world-class man like Hatton cool his heels waiting in the gym, and Hatton was paying this tardy unprofessional ar$ehole 10%?!
Hatton should have went with the other choice that his people were looking at, Ron Lipton, a real fight-coach with class and standards.
It might have allowed him to go at least a few more rds with Pacquiao before getting knocked out at least!:D
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Excellent point Bradlee.
Floyd Sr is a homosection.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
arcanum26
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.
Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity.
No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.
True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
arcanum26
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.
Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity.
No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.
True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.
And that's fair enough. But floyd isn't the only one to have avoided potentially difficult fights. Saying that though mosley was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. Oscar at 154 was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. And those are just two examples. Floyd is a long way from perfect and he only has himself to blame for his troubles with the law outside the ring. but how many other fighters can that be applied to? ALOT!
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
arcanum26
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.
Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity.
No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.
True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.
And that's fair enough.
But floyd isn't the only one to have avoided potentially difficult fights. Saying that though mosley was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. Oscar at 154 was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. And those are just two examples. Floyd is a long way from perfect and he only has himself to blame for his troubles with the law outside the ring. but how many other fighters can that be applied to? ALOT!
You're acknowledging that Floyd did avoid potentially difficult fights???
It could apply to other fighters as well but someone here will come up with a reason as to why certain boxer didn't fight so and so whereas you gave up on Floyd.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
arcanum26
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.
Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity.
No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.
True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.
And that's fair enough.
But floyd isn't the only one to have avoided potentially difficult fights. Saying that though mosley was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. Oscar at 154 was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. And those are just two examples. Floyd is a long way from perfect and he only has himself to blame for his troubles with the law outside the ring. but how many other fighters can that be applied to? ALOT!
You're acknowledging that Floyd did avoid potentially difficult fights???
It could apply to other fighters as well but someone here will come up with a reason as to why certain boxer didn't fight so and so whereas you gave up on Floyd.
Why wouldn't I acknowledge that?
If it was between fighting a tough opponant that could beat you for not much money or fight an easier guy for a lot of money i know what the majority on this planet would do. As a business Mayweathers boxing career generated maximum money at little risk and has been successful. The question marks are weather he fought the best oppo. But he won't be the only fighter to ever have those question mark. There are SHIT loads of hall of famers with those question marks. Ane to be honest IMO beating pacquiao (which I'm very very confident he would) won't make all those question marks go away. It'd help but it wouldn't scrub them all.
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by
arcanum26
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hornfinger
Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent. :p
And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers
'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'
;)
What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.
Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity.
No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.
True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.
Ouch! THAT one must've hurt.
;D
Re: Mayweather: More trouble with the law?
Another court date set for Feb, 3.
Apparently the Security Guard wants in on some of "Money's" Money.
Mayweather Accuser -- The Face-Poked Damage | TMZ.com