Mayweather: More trouble with the law?

[Hornfinger]

Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent.

And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers

'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'

What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.

Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity. No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.

True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.

And that's fair enough. But floyd isn't the only one to have avoided potentially difficult fights. Saying that though mosley was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. Oscar at 154 was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. And those are just two examples. Floyd is a long way from perfect and he only has himself to blame for his troubles with the law outside the ring. but how many other fighters can that be applied to? ALOT!

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent.

And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers

'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'

What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.

Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity. No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.

True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.

And that's fair enough. But floyd isn't the only one to have avoided potentially difficult fights. Saying that though mosley was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. Oscar at 154 was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. And those are just two examples. Floyd is a long way from perfect and he only has himself to blame for his troubles with the law outside the ring. but how many other fighters can that be applied to? ALOT!

You're acknowledging that Floyd did avoid potentially difficult fights
It could apply to other fighters as well but someone here will come up with a reason as to why certain boxer didn't fight so and so whereas you gave up on Floyd.

[Hornfinger]

Floyd should take a leaf out of the Pacquiao book and just not turn up to be tried. After all if he refuses to go to court, he can't be tried and therefore must be innocent.

And so it was written by the great god of floyd nuthuggers

'Anytime you can't defend Floyd and all the question marks surrounding his actions and opponents, go and attack Manny Pacquiao to try and take the heat off or steer the conversation away.'

What's good for the goose. If it's ok for the pac fans then it shouldn't be any different from me.

Plus I'm not trying to steer the critisism from Floyd. That boy's looking at time for doing very very stupid things. BUT it's out of the ring activity. No ones critisizing what floyd does in the squared circle.

True. He just gets criticized for what he DOESN'T DO in the squared triangle, that is fight certain boxers.

And that's fair enough. But floyd isn't the only one to have avoided potentially difficult fights. Saying that though mosley was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. Oscar at 154 was meant to be tough, floyd dominated. And those are just two examples. Floyd is a long way from perfect and he only has himself to blame for his troubles with the law outside the ring. but how many other fighters can that be applied to? ALOT!

You're acknowledging that Floyd did avoid potentially difficult fights
It could apply to other fighters as well but someone here will come up with a reason as to why certain boxer didn't fight so and so whereas you gave up on Floyd.

Why wouldn't I acknowledge that?

If it was between fighting a tough opponant that could beat you for not much money or fight an easier guy for a lot of money i know what the majority on this planet would do. As a business Mayweathers boxing career generated maximum money at little risk and has been successful. The question marks are weather he fought the best oppo. But he won't be the only fighter to ever have those question mark. There are SHIT loads of hall of famers with those question marks. Ane to be honest IMO beating pacquiao (which I'm very very confident he would) won't make all those question marks go away. It'd help but it wouldn't scrub them all.