-
Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Fight officially announced , M.E.N arena Manchester 16/04/2011
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
-
Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.
Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dropanuke
Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.
Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog
#1 Why would Warren pay Sky when Khan left him for Golden Boy?
#2 Not well ranked? McCloskey has a high WBC ranking and is the European Champion.
#3 Why would a "World title" be less than the IBO or European title, and if this is the case, then why is the European Champion risking vacating his belt for a shot at the WBA Champion.
#4 Froch does fight the best, but Khan just beat one of the division's best in Maidana and has a pretty decent record at 140lbs. His next fight after this will almost certainly against the divisions #1 so this will just be a tune up.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Nice, I bet this fight turns out being better than alot of you(who just watch big fights and dont know shit about up and commers) think. ;D
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Khan:
Quote:
This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
No it isn't.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
koppas
Khan:
Quote:
This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
No it isn't.
No one else at Light Welter in this country pal. So I say yes it is.....
Good fight IMO. McCloskey can be an awkward fukka. Better fight than the Peterson fight for me...
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheMacMagician
Quote:
Originally Posted by
koppas
Khan:
Quote:
This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
No it isn't.
No one else at Light Welter in this country pal. So I say yes it is.....
Good fight IMO. McCloskey can be an awkward fukka. Better fight than the Peterson fight for me...
I should've highlighted the 'This is a matchup the British public want to see...'
The public wanted to see him fight either Prescott or Murray.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
This should be free as a taster for his next fight which should be against Bradley, that would be worth ppv.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
I guess this is a stay busy fight for the champion.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
koppas
The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
Would be a good fight that. Word over twitter is that Murray has big news this week. Hope so. The guy deserves his shot. Come on Mick, pull yer finger out.
I'm gonna go to this fight for sure, I like the match-up.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?
id like to have seen him fight witter
much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheMacMagician
Quote:
Originally Posted by
koppas
The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
Would be a good fight that. Word over twitter is that Murray has big news this week. Hope so. The guy deserves his shot. Come on Mick, pull yer finger out.
I'm gonna go to this fight for sure, I like the match-up.
He aint with Mick anymore, Mac. Word is Murray has signed for Golden Boy, hence why he is being considered for the undercard.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheMacMagician
Quote:
Originally Posted by
koppas
The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
Would be a good fight that. Word over twitter is that Murray has big news this week. Hope so. The guy deserves his shot. Come on Mick, pull yer finger out.
I'm gonna go to this fight for sure, I like the match-up.
He aint with Mick anymore, Mac. Word is Murray has signed for Golden Boy, hence why he is being considered for the undercard.
Right, I see. Wasn't sure what was happenin with that. I'd love to see Murray on the undercard, great stuff. All will become clear this week anyway i'm sure.....
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
I am not interested in this fight. Peterson was a much better opponent IMO. No, just not into it at all. A big anti climax after Maidana. He better fight Bradley after this, October would be ideal. Maybe Bradley could get another warm up in between too to polish up his tools and see if he can have a clean fight with someone.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Not going to bother paying for this i don't think. Not a bad match up, but it's not worth £15.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I am not interested in this fight. Peterson was a much better opponent IMO. No, just not into it at all. A big anti climax after Maidana. He better fight Bradley after this, October would be ideal. Maybe Bradley could get another warm up in between too to polish up his tools and see if he can have a clean fight with someone.
how is peterson a better opponent?
if khan fought peterson it would be one way traffic until he stopped him mid to late rounds at the latest, no chance of a peterson win
at least mccousky brings awkwardness a bit of power and a lot of fans
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
It's a decent match up and a better draw imo then Peterson would have been. I've not actually seen Khan fight live plus it's my mate's birthday that weekend so thinking we may head up to Manchester and watch this.
No doubt a load of the Irish will come across the Irish Sea for this so should be a good atmosphere.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I am not interested in this fight. Peterson was a much better opponent IMO. No, just not into it at all. A big anti climax after Maidana. He better fight Bradley after this, October would be ideal. Maybe Bradley could get another warm up in between too to polish up his tools and see if he can have a clean fight with someone.
how is peterson a better opponent?
if khan fought peterson it would be one way traffic until he stopped him mid to late rounds at the latest, no chance of a peterson win
at least mccousky brings awkwardness a bit of power and a lot of fans
Don't bother, if Khan signed to fight Peterson Miles would have posted exactly the same. Unfortunately for poor miles he will never get the image of Khan smashing Barrera all over the shop out of his deluded mind.
(He will now start posting about headbuts, cheating refs and fixed British promotions. Fact.)
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
mccloskey Ko 3 against the glass chinned khan
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
Come on miles don't be boring. You are clearly sober/not grumpy. Do an anti-Khan rant just for the sake of it.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
i could draw with ortiz
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
Come on miles don't be boring. You are clearly sober/not grumpy. Do an anti-Khan rant just for the sake of it.
You called me boring. You do realise what happened when Bilbo called me boring the other day. I started an angry thread just to try and prove that I wasn't boring and it was all very mean. But not today, just not feeling mean.
I would much rather just remain civil and just say that I am not excited about the fight. It's the gods honest truth. No reason to even mention Barrera really. I don't know much about McCloskey and know a bit about Peterson, I'd prefer to see that instead. It's not me being particularly hateful because I really am just indifferent to this particular fight.
I want to see Bradley go at Khan. You might get more fire from me over that one.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
i could draw with ortiz
In an IQ test? ;D
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
i could draw with ortiz
In an IQ test? ;D
victor is a bright boy, i meant in a fight tho, i do a bit of swimming
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
i could draw with ortiz
In an IQ test? ;D
victor is a bright boy, i meant in a fight tho, i do a bit of swimming
Haha, you make me laugh! ;D
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
No, not at all Fenster.
I prefer Peterson because he has more name recognition in the States, just drew with Ortiz and has fought Bradley before. If Bradley and Khan are to meet, it would be nice to see how they compare against a common opponent.
It's a fair enough fight IMO.
I prefer Peterson too. Khan will finish McCloskey in 3, but I think It'd take longer with Peterson and I think Lamont could land a bit on Khan too. McCloskey will keep his hands low as always, and that will be a grave mistake against someone the speed of Khan.
Still, the more I think about it, he's an undefeated European Champion, and it's time for him to step up a level, so I'm not going to say he doesn't deserve a crack at it. Much better fight than Junior Witter for sure.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?
id like to have seen him fight witter
much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Who is convinced that McCloskey will not last 4 rounds? I will take sig bets first come first served on that nonsense. Jeez he only keeps his hands low to trick em into throwing a shot, he's a poor mans RJJ, who says he is not fast?
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dropanuke
Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.
Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog
#1 Why would Warren pay Sky when Khan left him for Golden Boy?
#2 Not well ranked? McCloskey has a high WBC ranking and is the European Champion.
#3 Why would a "World title" be less than the IBO or European title, and if this is the case, then why is the European Champion risking vacating his belt for a shot at the WBA Champion.
#4 Froch does fight the best, but Khan just beat one of the division's best in Maidana and has a pretty decent record at 140lbs. His next fight after this will almost certainly against the divisions #1 so this will just be a tune up.
Great post mate!
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
Who is convinced that McCloskey will not last 4 rounds? I will take sig bets first come first served on that nonsense. Jeez he only keeps his hands low to trick em into throwing a shot, he's a poor mans RJJ, who says he is not fast?
I'll take that. I'm not saying McCloskey is a crap fighter, but Khan is all wrong for him. McCloskey's style is to keep his hands low to trick the opponent, but Khan is so fast I can see it getting McCloskey in trouble early. I say Khan in 3.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Ok, I accept bzkfn. If I win your sig will be: Khan-tucky fried chicken, its finger licking good.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
Ok, I accept bzkfn. If I win your sig will be: Khan-tucky fried chicken, its finger licking good.
Hahaha. Funny.
Bzkfn, you get plenty of rep from me man, but I can't agree that McCloskey is 3 rounds work for Khan. I just can't have that. McCloskey will take a beating for a while before he caves in for sure.
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheMacMagician
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
Ok, I accept bzkfn. If I win your sig will be: Khan-tucky fried chicken, its finger licking good.
Hahaha. Funny.
Bzkfn, you get plenty of rep from me man, but I can't agree that McCloskey is 3 rounds work for Khan. I just can't have that. McCloskey will take a beating for a while before he caves in for sure.
He hasn't faced anyone even close to Khan's level. Khan is too fast and too good at the weight. If Khan had another 10 seconds against Maidana in that first round, he'd have got him out of there. Maidana was on the ropes and not answering back. Bad fight for Paul, he'll get murdered and quick!
And when I'm right No Contest's sig will be "McClost my senses!" ;D
-
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheMacMagician
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
Ok, I accept bzkfn. If I win your sig will be: Khan-tucky fried chicken, its finger licking good.
Hahaha. Funny.
Bzkfn, you get plenty of rep from me man, but I can't agree that McCloskey is 3 rounds work for Khan. I just can't have that. McCloskey will take a beating for a while before he caves in for sure.
He hasn't faced anyone even close to Khan's level. Khan is too fast and too good at the weight. If Khan had another 10 seconds against Maidana in that first round, he'd have got him out of there. Maidana was on the ropes and not answering back. Bad fight for Paul, he'll get murdered and quick!
And when I'm right No Contest's sig will be "McClost my senses!" ;D
HAHAHA. Good work. We'll see. I'd have a Sig bet with you, but I always have Sigs turned off these days as I'm always online on my phone and it kills load time.